Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Democrats planned to undermine election from the start

The entire bogus Russian collusion narrative that the Democrats have been pushing for two years now is based on a "dossier" of unverified rumors from Russian sources compiled by an admittedly Trump hating former British spy.

That disreputable individual, Christopher Steele, has admitted in court--where he's being sued for libel-- that the "dossier" is unverified.  He has now declared, also in court, that he was hired by the Democrats to find--translation manufacture-- a basis for overturning the results of the 2016 election if Hillary were to lose.

It's important to remember that the "dossier" is based on anonymous unverified Russian sources some or all of whom may have been working for Russian intelligence agencies; though we can't know since the sources aren't identified.  Which in turn means Steele could have fabricated the entire "dossier" and we would have no way of finding that out.

Steele would have been quite happy to make up the whole "dossier" because he was "desperate" to keep Trump from winning the election.

This new revelation is truly amazing.  Even as Hillary was condemning Trump for saying that he might not accept the election results if there were evidence of massive voter fraud she was paying a foreigner to generate unverified rumors from solely Russian sources with the intent of using that to overturn the results of the 2016 election.

And she could count on the FBI and DOJ to support her efforts because they both had been weaponized, along with the IRS, by Obama to serve the purposes of the Democrat party.  That's why even though Hillary was caught red handed breaking the law with respect to highly classified data she was never prosecuted.

The amazing bias of the FBI is demonstrated by the fact that without bothering to verify the contents of the "dossier" they used it to get a FISA warrant which enabled the Obama administration to use the entire power of the US Intelligence Community(IC) to spy on the Trump campaign.

When spying on US citizens the identities of those citizens is normally masked in the IC reports.  However we know that political appointees in the Obama administration routinely asked for the real identity of the people in the Trump campaign who were being spied on.  Essentially the FBI provided the Democrat party with real time intelligence on what the Trump campaign was up to.

Keep in mind that the entire Watergate scandal was about the fact that some Republican operatives had broken into a Democrat campaign office to find out what the Democrats were up to so what Obama, Comey, etc did during the 2016 campaign is Watergate supersized and on steroids.

Yet the #FakeNews media defend this massive violation of the intent of the laws which allow the use of the IC against Americans in limited circumstances.  This is especially odious given that the #FakeNews media has railed against the IC spying on Americans who have been directly linked to terrorists; going so far as to reveal highly secret programs which had been providing critical information in the war on terror thereby aiding the cause of terror because the #FakeNews media supposedly opposed government spying.

It's easy to tell that the whole collusion narrative is a lie by looking at what Trump has done since being elected.  If the Russians "own" Trump, as the #FakeNews media is constantly saying, we'd expect that his policies would favor Russia. Yet we see the opposite:

1) Trump has gotten NATO to significantly increase defense spending something that Obama didn't do.
2) Trump got Germany to drop a huge deal for more natural gas from Russia which would have made billions for Russia something that Obama didn't do.
3) Trump retaliated against the Syrian regime, a client of Russia, when that regime used chemical weapons against civilians.  Obama turned the policing of Syria over to the Russians which is what the Russians wanted when Syria used chemical weapons against civilians.
4) Trump has increased sanctions against Russia.
5) Trump has supplied weapons to Ukraine to defend against the Russian invasion; something Obama wouldn't do.

What's really interesting is that we know that millions of dollars flowed from Russian related sources to Bill and Hillary Clinton and that when she was Secretary of State she "reset" our relations with Russia essentially forgiving Russia for invading and annexing parts of the country of Georgia.

Hence if anyone is likely to be "owned" by the Russians it's Hillary not Trump.

It's becoming clear that modern Democrats are fascists who reject the idea of democracy if they don't win.  We saw that when they tried to get members of the electoral college to change their votes and we're seeing it now in the unending lies about Trump colluding with Russia.

No comments: