But if the Post Office can't deliver those fake ballots the Democrat's scheme might be at risk.
The first thing to realize is that Trump has no direct control over the Post Office. He nominates members of the Post Office board who have to be approved of by the Senate. Further there is a requirement that a certain percentage of member of the board have to be of each party.
The supposed crisis is due to the Post Office retiring some machines that might be used to process mail in ballots.
Here are the facts:
- The Post Office put that plan in place long before COVID19 or Democrats call for mail in voting fraud because the amount of mail that those machines work on has been dropping
- The Post Office is losing billions of dollars each year and Trump's appointees want to fix that
- Trump is opposing a $25 billion bail out of the Post Office which has no impact on the sorting machines in question
- The Post Office processes 471 million items each day; if everyone--even babies--there would only be 330 million ballots. Hence there's no reason to believe that the Post Office can't process the mail in ballots in time
The bottom line is clear Democrats are lying.
Even the Washington Post says:
“Purchased when letters not packages made up a greater share of postal work, the bulky and aging machines can be expensive to maintain and take up floor space postal leaders say would be better devoted to boxes. Removing underused machines would make the overall system more efficient, postal leaders say. The Postal Service has cut back on mail-sorting equipment for years since mail volume began to decline in the 2000s.”
So basically Democrats are trying to blame Trump for something that started long ago and which was motivated by a need to quit wasting taxpayer dollars.
Of course they're doing this to set up their plan to push for allowing votes mailed long after election day to be counted.
That's important because one of the issues that Democrats face in their election fraud attempt is how many fake votes to file. If they file too many then it will be obvious that fraud occurred. If they file too few Trump might win.
But if they can file more fake votes for days or weeks after the election they can file just enough to ensure that Joe wins.
We've seen a version of this in California where Republicans who lead by several % on election day ended up losing due to ballots cast via unusual channels.
We saw it in 1960 in Illinois. At the time Chicago was a Democrat strong hold while the rest of the state voted Republican. On election night precinct after precinct across the state, but not in Chicago, reported their results.
After the rest of the state had reported Chicago precincts suddenly started reporting and they produced just enough votes to win the state for JFK.
No comments:
Post a Comment