Sunday, August 2, 2015

Saving America vs managing the decline

The Republican leadership these days seem to have bought into Obama's vision of America; bigger government, less freedom, less economic growth.

Those "leaders" seem more interested in managing the decline of America, for the benefit of their big money donors, than they do in saving America from the abyss of socialism and European malaise.

That's why we have to work hard to make sure that the Republican presidential nominee is not some Democrat lite who thinks government is the solution and thinks that Republicans should work with Democrats even though Democrats refuse to budge an inch on their agenda ever.

The big benefit of Trump, who is really a Democrat, is that he's showing the other Republicans that in order to win you have to act like a winner; shout out the massive failures of the Democrats, explain why you care more about the average Joe than the rich liberals, stand for values--like reducing immigration--that voters like not values that the DC thought bubble endorses.

It doesn't matter if we win elections if the people we elect don't do anything to further the positions on issues that we support.

Saturday, August 1, 2015

Some photos

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Why "pro-choice" isn't

see my post at American Thinker.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Planned Parenthood "profits"

Because PP is a non-profit it cannot, by definition, make profits.

But that doesn't mean that PP employees don't get wealthy by selling baby hearts.

We all condemn those Protestant televangelists who make a fortune and live in mansions yet their ministries are non-profit just like Planned Parenthood.

What we need to understand is that when a non-profit takes in money it goes to either operating expenses, free services, or the employee's.  I'm not aware of PP doing much of anything for free--as opposed to billing the government for services to the poor--so that means money goes to pay for facilities and salaries.

But what PP charges for an abortion is designed to at least cover the facilities and salaries needed to perform that abortion--including overhead like the receptionist's pay etc. Therefore any money they get for the babies organs is extra.

Now since PP is a non-profit that extra money isn't a "profit" but it is money that can help a PP abortionist buy a new Lamborghini or increase the president of PP's salary.

That's why it doesn't matter if PP makes a "profit" off of selling baby hearts.  PP employees take home more money because they callously sell the parts of babies that they deny are human.  PP employees profit off trafficking in human organs even if the organization technically doesn't.

So if someone says that PP is just recovering their costs point out that those costs include the abortionists time so that the abortionist walks away with that extra cash she needs to buy that Lamborghini she's been wanting.

To most people that's making a profit. That's why sane people condemn PP for exploiting women in crisis by selling their daughters hearts for cold hard cash.

A liberal is

See my post at American Thinker here

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Blue and Gold

The Lying Curtain; Female Warriors

Clearly women are very brave; few men would repeatedly volunteer for pregnancy.

However the simple reality is that woman in general lack the killer instinct, the competitiveness, and the muscle mass needed to be a combatant.

Yet if you watch TV or movies you see tiny women constantly out fighting men who are as well trained as they are and much larger than they are.

Sure any random female MMA fighter could beat me up without working up a sweat but in general women simply aren't designed for combat; which is why female MMA fighters are very unenthused about "transgendered" MMA fighters.

It's also why female MMA fighters would be slaughtered by male MMA fighters.

But by repeatedly lying about reality the media make it easy for people to simply accept women in combat or women as fire fighters even if that requires lowering standards. By hiding the lowering standards parts from the people the media makes the issue about discrimination based on sex not discrimination based on capabilities.

In the real world outside the lying curtain liberals use to confuse people men and women are of equal value but significantly different in their strengths.  If some tiny portion of women want to be fire fighters great; just make them pass the same tests because fires aren't gentlemen who treat ladies differently.

Similarly by not reporting on the problems with women on ships the media makes the whole issue of women in combat not about the problems of mixed gender units but about discriminating based only on gender.

In the end the main victims of this particular lie are women who get killed fighting fires because they don't have the strength they need and women who are mistreated by men who are being told to think of women as guys when it comes to fighting.