Thursday, May 23, 2019

Rich white woman says Black brain surgeon is mentally crazy


Joy Behar said the following about Ben Carson:

"He's under the influence of Donald Svengali [Trump] who has already created this cult of mentally crazy people," she said. "I mean everybody who believes Donald Trump -- I believe has to look a little closer."

Can you imagine if a rich white guy said something similar about a Black man?  Yet there is no attack from the left about Behar's vicious, false, and politically motivated attack on a Black man who isn't afraid to reject what rich white leftists like Behar demand he believe in.

This is one more sign of the deep seated racism in the left.  Conservatives never use that sort of personal attack against Blacks who endorse the white left's policies. When conservatives made substantive critiques of Obama's policies people like Behar called them racists.

The reality is that Democrats believe that the role of Blacks is following the policies laid out by rich white leftists while conservatives believe that Blacks are capable of deciding what they want to support.

Democrats hatred for the Constitution is showing again


Banks are turning over Trump's private financial data to the Democrats in the House even though there is no probable cause to do so.

Under the 4th Amendment the government can't just demand people's private information without showing a judge that there is probable cause of a crime.  Democrats have shown no such evidence and Mueller has already declared that the crimes that Democrats said Trump was guilty of didn't occur.

What this means is that any enemy of the Democrats is now living in a fascist state where they have no Constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure.  Even worse by turning over the documents before Trump had a chance to appeal the banks have colluded with the Democrats to destroy the same legal system that Democrats so assiduously support when rapists and murderers are being investigated.

To the Democrats the law is just a tool to persecute their foes.

Pelosi is a lying bully.

Pelosi and the Democrats continue to lie incessantly about Trump after Mueller cleared him.


Yet they are shocked and offended when as they lie about Trump and threaten to impeach him because they won't accept the results of the 2016 election that he doesn't sit down and negotiate with them.

Their hypocrisy is truly amazing.  Other than pass a law that destroys women's sports and allows men who molest kids access to women's bathrooms all the Democrats have done is try and overturn the 2016 election.

They don't care about the American people they only care about power.  To them fixing America's infrastructure problems is of no interest; all that matters to them is nullifying the 2016 election.

Should politicians serve for life?


When Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath back in the 1990s many of the same politicians were in office as are in office today. People like Nancy Pelosi and Nadler were defending Clinton back then even as they attack Trump who hasn't committed any crimes today.

Given that so many politicians are in office for life it's not surprising that their loyalty is to each other not to their constituents.  Those politicians spend the vast majority of their time in DC reading DC newspapers and listening to what the ruling class of bureaucrats say.  Their constituents live in a different universe.

That's why we need term limits. The intent of the Founders was for people to suffer through a term or two and then go back to real life. That way they'd avoid passing laws that make life for people who aren't politicians worse.  But as it stands there is no reason for politicians to avoid passing bills that help them but hurt we the people.

We've seen this in the past.  Until Republicans took over Congress under Clinton Congress had exempted itself from the onerous laws that they had imposed on we the people.  The Republicans changed that.  When Obamacare was passed it exempted politicians.

We need politicians who care about we the people not just about themselves but so long as we allow such a large fraction of politicians to be elected for life that's not going to happen.

Jim Acosta; Democrat propagandist pretending to be a reporter

Acosta has a new book coming out which will be a highly biased truth free hit piece. While the books contents are being protected the description of the book tells us all we need to know:

"From CNN’s veteran Chief White House Correspondent Jim Acosta, an explosive, first-hand account of the dangers he faces reporting on the current White House while fighting on the front lines in President Trump’s war on truth."

Dangers?  To pretend that Acosta was in danger is an insult to real reporters in war zones who risk their lives to inform the American people.  Acosta hasn't even been spied on by Trump. Acosta hasn't had his computer bugged the way Obama bugged Sharyl Attkinson's computer.  Unlike a large number of AP reporters who Obama's government spied on Trump hasn't gotten hold of Acosta's phone records.

The idea that by pointing out the lies of the #FakeNews media, Russian collusion anyone?, Trump is waging a war on truth is absurd.  The reality is that people like Acosta are the ones waging the war on truth in order to advance the left's agenda.

What's interesting is that Acosta is apparently unaware that his attacks on Trump are no different than Trump's attacks on him. The difference of course is that Trump is a politician and Acosta is supposed to be an unbiased observer.

Propagandists like Acosta are fighting a war against Trump because Trump is pointing out their bias and dishonesty to we the people and that's something that could destroy the power of the #FakeNews media.

What this book will show is that Acosta is in no way an unbiased objective reporter who feels his job is to inform we the people so that we can decide. Rather it will show that he believes his job is to guide us to the "correct" conclusions that he supports.

According to the New York Times "Pregnancy Kills. Abortion Saves Lives.

If you needed any proof it's now official; we're living in a perpetual 1984 where hate is love, war is peace, and pregnancy is killing while abortion saves lives.

The author of the New York Times article is Dr. Warren Hern who makes his living by butchering unborn babies.  

Here's an illustration of a 20 week old unborn baby; this what the women to be that Hern kills for a living look like:

His victims aren't "blobs of cells" or part of their mother's bodies. They are people just like you and me but younger.  Every one of us was just like the children that Dr. Hern earns money by killing at some point in our lives.

The bad Dr. starts his article off by saying:

"Pregnancy is a life-threatening condition. Women die from being pregnant."

Women die from plastic surgery too yet the bad Dr. isn't condemning that.

The bad Dr's argument, to the extent that he has one, is that even though the new Alabama law allows an abortion when the mother's life is at risk is that pregnancy itself is a dangerous thing even if the mother's life isn't obviously at risk.

What he's saying is that since any pregnancy can result in death, just as any car trip can, a Dr. should be able to declare that every woman who wants an abortion should get it because there's always a chance that she could die from her pregnancy.

His own numbers show that what he's calling for is the mass execution of babies who wouldn't threaten their mother's health because a tiny fraction of them might.

He says that in Alabama 11.9 women died out of every 100,000 who became pregnant.  That's 0.01%.

Another way to look at that is that if Hern had his way and abortion at any point in time and for any reason were legal in Alabama then for every woman who lived 8402 babies would have to be killed. Which means roughly 4201 unborn women to be would die for every one born woman who didn't die.  


Currently one of the hot arguments against the death penalty pushed by leftists like Dr. Hern is that innocent people are being executed.  That's actually a valid concern.  However what Dr. Hern is saying is that 99.99% of the babies he wants to see executed are innocent.  Can you imagine even the staunchest proponent of the death penalty continuing to support it if they knew for sure that 99.99% of the people being executed were in fact innocent?

Yet Dr. Hern is all in for killing hundreds of thousands of unborn babies who don't threaten their mother's lives. Of course since he makes money by killing the unborn it's not unfair to wonder if money is his real motivation.  Essentially he's a hitman who's arguing against laws prohibiting murder.

But his argument also fails because it presumes that women die from pregnancies with no warning.  If the women who do die could be saved if they were treated promptly then his argument falls apart.  Like Thanos who choose to kill half of all life in the universe rather than double the size of the universe Hern is saying we should kill babies rather than improve the health care for pregnant women.

The Dr's bias for death is a constant in this article.  He sarcastically writes:


"Surely the Alabama legislature has carefully considered all of the above in drafting this law, which affects more than 2.5 million women in that state, some of them more than others."

He apparently is unaware that in every abortion a human being is killed and in 50%, or more if sex selection abortions occur, the victim is a woman. Apparently he doesn't think that those women are impacted more than their mothers who simply don't want to accept the consequences of their actions-- only 1% of abortions are 
dueto rape.

Hern tries to drum up support for his position by pointing out that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy than white women.  That's either a racist argument that Black women are less capable of being mothers than white women or it's a call for better health care for pregnant Black women. But Hern uses it to argue that as a result we should kill more Black babies.

Hern says that in Alabama 0.03% of Black pregnancies result in the death of the mother while only 0.006% of white women's pregnancies result in death.  He makes no attempt to explain that ratio for the simple reason that if he did the answer to the problem would not be more abortions but voluntary lifestyle changes by pregnant mothers and improved pre-natal health care not killing hundreds of thousands of Black babies of whom 99.97% wouldn't hurt their mothers.

What's interesting is that Hern doesn't mention that Black women are three times more likely to abort than white women. A key part of that disparity is that Planned Parenthood 
targets Blacks in what Jesse Jackson called genocide against Blacks.

The real racial component of the abortion question in America is why people like Hern aren't concerned by the huge racial disparity in abortions.  In any other aspect of life if Blacks were three times more likely to have an issue than whites leftists would automatically declare that it to be prima facia evidence of racism.  But somehow the fact that abortion kills far more Blacks than whites percentage wise and the fact that abortion is the leading cause of death for Black Americans are of no interest to people like Dr. Hern.

If Dr. Hern really cared about Blacks he'd be all in for banning abortion because that would mean America would have, over time, millions of Black citizens who are currently being killed before they can help make America great again.

It's not surprising that a monster like Hern who casually chops apart babies who look like the image above for a living calls for keeping his lucrative killing for cash business alive. What is truly shocking is that the editors at the NYT are so completely unaware of reality that they had no problem with the headline. They felt completely comfortable with declaring that the process that gives us all life is killing and the process that would have killed us before we could have learned to love arugula saves lives.

The NYT's demonstrates by this that they are in Thano's camp--death is the solution life is the problem.

As Reagan pointed out everyone who supports abortion is already safely born so supporting abortion for any reason at any time, including shortly after birth, is truly selfish.

No one at the NYT would be happy if they'd been aborted but they're eager to do to others what they would not want done to themselves.


UPDATE: The original version of this article said that 99,989 babies had to die to save one woman from dying.  That assumed that the mortality rate was 1/100,000.  Since the mortality rate is actually 11.9/100,000 8402 babies, of whom 4201 are women to be, have to die to save the life of one woman.

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Women don't usually abort due to a crisis but for convenience

Data from 2018 show that the vast majority of women don't kill their unborn daughters to save their own lives or because they've been raped but because they just don't want the baby they voluntarily conceived.

Fewer than 1.5% of abortions were due to non-life threatening physical health issues and only 0.3% were when the mothers life was at risk.  2% were due to psychological problems, which includes things like being depressed.

Only 0.14% of women who killed their unborn babies did so because they were raped and 0.01% occurred because of incest.

The reality is that the vast majority of abortions occur because women had consensual sex and didn't want to deal with the consequences of their actions.  The reality is that no form of contraception, other than abstinence, is perfect--a typical woman has a 40% chance of an unplanned pregnancy when using the Pill for example--so women know that every sex act risks pregnancy.

But women continue to have sex with men who won't be there for them because that's what society is telling them they have to do. Women are lied to about contraception and then they're told that it's ok if the father just walks away.  That puts many women into a tough spot where it's easy for them to give in and just kill their daughter rather than accept their responsibility.

We need to be sympathetic to those women but it doesn't change the fact that they're killing their unborn child just to avoid the consequences of their own freely chosen action.