Monday, August 31, 2020

Nancy Pelosi says that Joe Biden can't deal with Putin

Nancy Pelosi is desperately trying to avoid Joe Biden going toe to toe with Trump in a debate.

That can only be because she knows that Joe is unable to deal with Trump.

But if Joe can't handle Trump how's he going to handle Putin or Xi Jinping?

Nancy doesn't care about that because her only concern is amassing more power over we the people here in the US.  Modern Democrats are friends with our enemies.

Obama ridiculed Romney for saying that Russia was a threat.  Only when acting as if Russia was a threat helped Democrats try and undo the 2016 election did they change their position.

Joe Biden is bought and paid for by China, China gave his son $1.5 billion to invest, and constantly defends China.  So he won't need to stand up to Xi Jinping since he's already Jinping's servant.

Similarly Joe's a big fan of terrorist sponsoring Iran and he condemned the killing of an Iranian terrorist mastermind who had the blood of hundreds of Americans on his hands.

Joe doesn't need to stand up to foreign dictators because he's more aligned with them than with the interests of the American people.

UPDATE: Apparently Pelosi has changed her mind but we can be fairly certain that's not because her opinion of Biden has improved but because of the bad optics of her position.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

> That can only be because she knows that Joe is unable to deal with Trump.

That's the only reason you can think of? I mean she offered her own explanation and I can think of others but apparently you can only think of one. The question is whether you are intentionally obtuse or just being manipulative as usual.

trinko said...

Her "explanation" was that the voters are better off not hearing Trump which is itself an amazing demonstration of fascism

Anonymous said...

Amazing. You didn't even paraphrase her explanation correctly. Also it's hilarious to think the voters don't already hear from Trump.

trinko said...

She said that the people shouldn't hear Trump; her bogus "reasons" are irrelevant

Anonymous said...

wow you failed to paraphrase her again. she said there shouldn't be a debate. she didn't call for the media to stop covering what Trump says or anything that would result in people not hearing trump.

and the reasons are the entire point of your post! your entire argument is built on your guess as to what her "true" reasons are! amazing how you missed that.