The Left hates America; Moon Landing edition

There's a new movie out about Neil Armstrong; the first man to stand on the moon.

The movie leaves out the part about Neil putting up an American flag on the moon because to the leftists who made the movie the landing on the moon was an achievement for mankind not the USA.

Despite the fact that it was an American president, JFK, who called for the landing, the fact that it was paid for entirely by US taxpayers, the fact that it was executed by American engineers and scientists, the fact that the astronauts were all American, and the fact that the Soviet Union was trying to get to the moon at the same time but failed to the left putting a man on the moon wasn't an American triumph.

It's clear that the left hates America and what better way to turn Americans against America than to constantly blame America for things it didn't do, mass killings of civilians in the war on terror, and to refuse to credit America for the great things it's done, end slavery and land on the moon.

There are many Americans who get their history from entertainment and their public school education but both sources are biased against America.  In school kids learn about how horrible the US was to allow slavery but the fact that thousands of Americans died to end slavery is not discussed.  Kids are taught that the US oppressed native Americans but they're not taught how blood thirsty and savage the native Americans were.  The list is endless.

The left hates America because America didn't follow 21st century rules in the 18th century.  Never mind that America was much better in the 18th century than the rest of the world; all that matters to the left is that we weren't perfect.

If you know history try and educate your friends. Tell them about how the native Americans attacked and committed atrocities against Americans; it was not just Americans slaughtering the natives for the fun of it.  Tell them about how the US sacrificed so much to end Nazism and to rebuild Japan and Europe after WWII.  Tell them that the First Gulf War wasn't about oil but about liberating a small country--Kuwait--which had been overrun by a large country--Iraq.

We need to counteract the #FakeHistory that the public schools and the entertainment industry is pushing.

The truth shall set us free but lies will enslave us.

The Left is beyond caring about Truth.

The Left is very very very upset about the fact that Trump Jr. met with a Russian who supposedly had dirt on Hillary.

They declare that that meeting is proof of collusion.

But there are a few problems with that.

First the Russian had no dirt on Hillary and as a result Trump Jr. left the meeting; no money changed hands no dirt was produced.

The only way the meeting could be wrong or illegal is if it's illegal to ask Russians for dirt on American candidates.

But if that's illegal then Hillary belongs in jail since she paid for Russian dirt on Trump, real unsubstantiated gossip from anonymous sources which was actually used to attack Trump.

Of course Leftists won't say that what Hillary did was wrong.

Hence Leftists don't care about the truth.

The Left is racist; they blame Blacks for White violence

Jeffrey Toobin said on CNN that "Antifa is widely perceived as an African American organization."

Huh?

Now some people have accused Black Lives Matter as advocating violence but the image of Antifa has always been rich white folk using violence to silence speech they don't like.

Apparently Toobin accidentally exposed the racism in the Left.  After all it's the Left that keeps Blacks in crime and drug ridden neighborhoods with poor schools in every city they run.

Conservatives don't condemn or commend organizations because of the race of the organizations members but because of the organizations ideology.

That's apparently a bridge too far for a CNN "expert".

Hillary Clinton; Chinese James Bond

It's possible that China hacked into Hillary's private email server and got sent copies of every email she sent.

That would have been espionage gold in that we know that Obama sent emails to Hillary as well as that highly classified information was on that server.

Of course the #FakeNews media doesn't care since their only concern is ensuring that only leftists get elected and that the 2016 election be overthrown.

But even if the new story isn't true it shows that Hillary cares more for herself than her country.

She knew that by taking her email off of the government servers the odds of it being secure were dramatically reduced; after all huge corporations with much more extensive security than her server are hacked on a regular basis.

But she didn't care.  She was more concerned about hiding any emails that would show that she was operating a pay for play scheme than she was about protecting American secrets from our adversaries.

It was all about what was best for her not what was best for the country.

That tells us a lot about modern Democrat politicians.

CNN lies again

Lanny Davis is one of Cohen's attorneys.  You know Cohen the former lawyer of Donald Trump.  The one whose office was raided and all his records seized.

But what's odd is that Lanny has always been a big supporter of the Clintons.

The oddness goes away when we discover that Davis has been using Cohen as a battering ram to attack Trump; it's clear Lanny is still serving the Clintons not Cohen.

It has now been uncovered that Lanny told CNN that Cohen had evidence that Trump knew in advance of Trump Jr's meeting with a Russian who was peddling dirt on Hillary.

Ignoring for the moment that Lanny and CNN have no problem with Hillary paying Russians for dirt on Trump there is another problem with CNN's coverage.

In the article CNN said that Lanny Davis didn't provide a comment but we now know that Lanny was the anonymous source that the same CNN article cited.  So CNN lied; Lanny had commented but just not for attribution.

Even worse Lanny is now saying that in fact Cohen didn't have any knowledge that Trump knew in advance of his son's meeting with a Russian who turned out to have nothing to say.

So apparently Lanny lied to CNN and CNN lied to it's readers.

And people like Chuck Todd say that media bias isn't real.

Trump wins again

Remember how the #FakeNews media lied about Trump starting a trade war when what he was doing was trying to get fair deals for the US?

We were told this was horrible and it would destroy civilization etc.

Yet now Trump is closing a deal with Mexico which will be a great step towards leveling the playing field in terms of trade with Mexico and will help bring desperately needed jobs back to America.

I wonder how the media would cover it if the NYT or the Washington post started exporting jobs to other countries?  Would they say that it's an inevitable result of globalization and happily get jobs at Starbucks or McDonalds as so many hard working American's in the heartland have had to do?  Or would they protest that it's unfair to let the 1% increase their wealth by exploiting cheap foreign labor?

Remember there are two reasons leftists support massive immigration--legal and illegal.

1) To let the mega rich get richer by exploiting immigrants who can be paid less
2) To get more voters for the Democrats.

A problem with Bishop Vigano's statement about the Pope

I don't doubt that there is a problem in the Church with homosexual priests and Bishops.  After all 80% of the priests who were accused of molestation in America were gay or bisexual and preyed on teenage boys. Similarly McCarrick is accused of having sexually harassed adult males

I don't doubt that much of what Vigano says is true.

However a quote that isn't getting much play is this one which Vigano attributes to Pope Francis:

“Yes, the Bishops in the United States must not be ideologized, they must not be right-wing like the Archbishop of Philadelphia, (the Pope did not give me the name of the Archbishop) they must be shepherds; and they must not be left-wing — and he added, raising both arms — and when I say left-wing I mean homosexual.”

Which is a very clear statement by the Pope which goes against Vigano's claims, many of which are based on speculation or Vigano's ability to know what people are thinking based on their facial expressions.

A further thing to keep in mind is that the accusations against McCarrick for molesting boys, as opposed to sexually harassing adults, are more recent than Vigano's interactions with the Pope; if Francis was defending  McCarrick it wasn't for molesting children.

It's quite possible that the Pope just has poor judgement and thought that McCarrick wasn't as guilty as some claimed or that the Pope thought that old age had cured McCarrick.  The only answer is not that the Pope knew about what McCarrick did and endorsed it.

The Pope's unwillingness to comment on Vigano's claims is very troubling however. The faithful deserve the truth.

In any case the Church needs to find out who kept advancing McCarrick even though it was known he'd sexually harassed seminarians.

Leftists endorse fascism again.

It's becoming a daily occurrence.

Trump exercises his Presidential authority, often to revert the rules to what they were before Obama was enthroned, and some Democrat appointed judge declares that every Federal judge has to approve of everything Trump does otherwise Trump can't do it.

The somewhat useful Hot Air site--they're good conservatives in general but have a strong anti-Trump bias-- has the latest story.

You may recall that Trump enacted some reasonable reforms to the government by speeding up the process to fire government employees--though the new process is far more protective than what anyone has in the private sector--, by reducing the amount of taxpayer paid for time that union members can use for union business--that's right before Trump's order union officials who were government employee's were paid by taxpayers to work on union business; after the order they couldn't work more than 25% of their paid time on union business--, and by requiring the unions to pay for the use of government used offices.

But since leftists don't like those reforms--because government union works vote Democrat-- they are quite happy for the Judicial Branch to ignore separation of powers and become the de facto tyrants who run this country.

Government workers get paid more and have much better benefits than the average American worker.  The average yearly government salary is $71,650--the average State government salary is $51,340--while the average salary in America is $44,568.  Yet leftists tell us that those folks are oppressed and should be paid to do union business.

That's not right.

But whether you agree with that or not Trump has the right to make those changes.  The dishonest judge says that the changes prevent the union from negotiating fairly with the government but that's simply untrue; all they do is say that the union has to use the money they get from their members to do union business rather than have the taxpayer pay so the that the union can use their dues money to help Democrat politicians.

If you let the Democrats win the House in November, much less the Senate, you can be sure that government workers will continue to make more money than you do, have better perks than you do--have you ever seen how many days government workers get off each year?--and better benefits than you do.

Which makes it look like they're the rulers and we're the ruled.

Which is exactly how leftists view the world; they are better than us and hence they shouldn't be constrained by the law or the Constitution.

That's right leftists are fascists at heart.

Leftists are fascists because they reject the rule of law

Despite there not being a shred of evidence that Trump or anyone on his campaign colluded with Russia the media and the left have supported Mueller's witch hunt.

Yet at the same time we know for a fact that Hillary and the DNC paid a British ex spy to get dirt from anonymous Russian sources, who may be agents of the Russian government, about Trump.

Now that's collusion.

If the left believed in the rule of law they'd support investigating Hillary but they don't because they don't believe that the law applies to leftists; i.e. they're fascists.

Similarly we now know that Steele, the British ex spy lobbied the FBI for a Russian oligarch but didn't register as a foreign agent but the Left has no interest in investigating that.

This is why every election is going to be a Flight 93 election.  So long as the Democrats are fascists every election will be like the one which vaulted Hitler to power in Germany; a competition between people who believe in freedom and people who believe in tyranny.

The Big Lie; Pennsylvania Priest molesting edition

As a Catholic I’m sickened by the fact that some priests have molested children.  I fully support every effort to identify and stop such crimes in the Church.  I believe the Church has a responsibility to reach out to each and every victim and do everything it can to help them recover from the horror they have endured.

But I also object to the media’s Big Lie that the Catholic Church is supportive of child molestation and is the nexus of child molestation in America today.

The recent report by the highly biased Pennsylvania Attorney General is an example of how the Left is lying about the Catholic Church.

The PA AG says that the report is about 300 priests who “raped” 1,000 children.  It’s true that 300 Catholics have been accused, not convicted, of having molested—ranging from talking inappropriately to kids to raping kids—1000 kids in Pennsylvania.

What you haven’t heard is that those actions occurred over the span of 70 years—with most cases dating back more than 33 years--, one case dates back to the 1930s, that the 300 number includes men other than priests, and that other groups in America are guilty of far more massive assaults on children.

Since even one case of a priest molesting a kid is too much 300 seems huge.  Until you realize that in 2014 in PA alone hundreds of sexual misconduct complaints against public school teachers were filed. Extrapolating that out to the same 70 years covered by the PA report makes the 300 number look small.  Further the rate of complaints about teachers has grown dramatically while the rate for priests has decreased rapidly.  The accusations against priests peaked in the 1970's and were back to 1950's level, i.e. very low, by the 1990's.

That doesn’t mean that what those priests did isn’t horrible but it does mean that the Church is not the leader in assaulting children. It's dishonest for people to care only for children molested by priests and not those children who were molested by teachers.  We need to love and support all the victims no matter who molested them.

Also the 300 includes not just priests but deacons—who can be married--, brothers—monks--, and seminarians.  The left is trying to inflate the number of priests to make the Church look worse. 

Historically about 50-60% of accusations turn out to be substantiated.  There’s an entire book about cases where innocent priests were accused of molesting kids.  The most famous case was when Cardinal Bernadine of Chicago was accused by a man of having molested that man when the man was 17.  The accuser later recanted and apologized.  The fact that the Church has paid out a fortune to victims incentivizes fraud as well.

The Big Lie is saying that all priests are to be assumed to be guilty until proven innocent.  We know that the Left has no problem defending or casting doubt about charges of molestation against people who they like, Roman Polanski and Woody Allen for example. Woody Allen has been credibly accused, just like the priests in the PA report, of “inappropriately touching” a 7 year old girl.  I don’t know if he’s guilty or not but the media has not had a problem repeating Woody’s claims of innocence while simultaneously assuming that every accused Catholic priest is guilty.

If we assume that half of the accusations are true that means that just a few percent of the thousands of priests who served in PA over 70 years were guilty of molesting children.  Far too many but that still means that the vast majority of priests are completely innocent. But the media works hard to make you think that most priests are predators.

Another aspect of the Big Lie is that the PA report has revealed an ongoing problem.  To someone who just listens to the news it appears that priests are molesting children right and left today.  But that’s not true.

While the media isn’t making a point of it the PA AG admits that few of the accusations he discovered can be prosecuted because the statute of limitations has run out.  In PA the state can prosecute a molester so long as the victim comes forward before the victim is 50 years old. That means that if a 17 year old is molested he has 33 years to report the crime.

Hence most of the accusations that the PA AG found occurred more than 33 years ago.  That refutes the media’s Big Lie that this is a current problem in the Church. In the last two years only 0.05% of Catholic priests in the US have been credibly accused of molesting a child.  Clearly the Left doesn’t want you to know that the Church has done a lot to fix the problem it had decades ago.

Many Americans think that the Church is the only place in America where children are molested because that’s all the media reports on.  But that’s part of the Big Lie too. The Pennsylvania Professional Standards and Practices Commission states that 10% of children in Pennsylvania public schools will be subject to sexual misconduct between kindergarten and graduating from high school.  That works out to about 17,500 victims in a 13 year period in PA alone.  Extrapolating that out to the same 70 years covered in the PA report gives us nearly 100,000 children who were victims of sexual misconduct in PA public schools.

Does that mean that what molesting priests did was ok?  Of course not but it does mean that the silence by the media on other sources of child molesters, and the lack of interest on the part of the PA AG, is part of the Big Lie that child molestation is a uniquely Catholic problem.

Many good Protestants think that Protestant ministers don’t molest children. But according to Protestant sources, and the insurance companies that cover both Catholic and Protestant churches, ministers are accused at the same or slightly higher rate than Catholic priests.  Does that mean that the Protestant churches are evil supporters of child molesters? Of course not; it simply means that Catholic priests and Protestant ministers are humans who can succumb to sin.  It’s wrong to tar the vast majority of innocent priests and ministers because of the sins of a few. Yet that’s precisely what the media is trying to do to Catholic priests; convince the world that the Church supports child molestation and that many priests are molesters.

Another aspect of the problem that the media doesn’t cover is that only about 5% of the cases involve pedophilia— where the victim hasn’t yet passed through puberty.  The vast majority of the victims are teenage boys who have been preyed on by gay priests.  While most priests who suffer from same sex attraction don’t molest children most priests, around 80%, who do molest kids are gay. 

We shouldn’t blame all gays for the sins of those gay priests and the media shouldn’t blame all Catholic priests for the crimes of those priests.  The fact that the victims of those gay priests are older doesn’t make their crimes ok but part of the Big Lie is trying to make it appear that every accusation is about a priest raping a 5 year old.  It’s horribly evil to seduce a teenager but it’s much worse to rape a 5 year old.

Another misdirection by the media is the idea that Bishops are constantly covering for offending priests.  Decades ago psychiatrists told the Bishops that the offending priests had been cured.  That the Bishops believed them was stupid but that is far from the Bishops malevolently reassigning priests they knew were dangerous. Having learned its lesson the Church no longer moves offenders around.

However today public schools cover up accusations of molestation and commonly let teachers accused of molestation simply go to another school. By ignoring the details, not mentioning that cover ups are generally a thing of the past in the Church, and never mentioning how cover ups occur in other institutions the media is working hard to create the false image of the Church as a unique predator.

The fact that the left-wing media/Democrat complex is lying about the nature, timing, and extent of the sexual molestation problem in the Church doesn’t excuse any of the crimes that have been committed by priests or Bishops. Nor does it mean that the Church doesn’t have to continue to improve in this area. But it does show that the common perception of Americans that the Catholic Church is the heart of the child molestation problem in America is simply false.

As a Catholic I will work to drive down the incidence of child molestation in the Church to zero but I will not stand by and support the Big Lie that the entire Church is either responsible for the sins of a few or that the Church is the biggest source of molestation in America.

UPDATE: Changed the number of charges filed against PA teachers in 2014 from more than 500 to hundreds. The source says that the number was on track to hit 700 by the end of the year and that about half would be for sexual misconduct.

The rules of freedom in the Left's Amerika

Rocker Steven Tyler of Aerosmith has just demanded that Trump not use his songs at Trump rallies.

I doubt anyone on the left will disagree with his right to do so though I don't know what the law has to say about it.

But it's interesting that the same Leftists who say that Catholic nuns have to cooperate in procuring abortions and that the baker in Colorado has to bake a cake for a "transgendered" person will undoubtedly say that Tyler has the right for his creative works to not be used in a manner that opposes his beliefs even though they aren't religious.

To the Left the First Amendment exists not to protect free speech--because they support Antifa's suppression of free speech and they support banning protests outside abortion mills-- or freedom of religion--because they insist that worshipping at the altar of gay wonderfulness is the only acceptable religion-- but to ensure that #FakeNews reporters can lie to their hearts content without facing any consequences.

Have no doubts the modern Left is fascist to the core and it firmly believes in "free" speech for the Left and the Left alone.  They believe in freedom of religion so long as that religion supports whatever the Left is supporting; if not then the Left only believes, for now, that people can meet in private to worship.

In November if we let them Democrats will take over the House and work diligently to overturn the last election because as fascists they only accept elections that they win.

John Brennan, Security Clearances, and the office stapler

see my article here

New evidence of the left's dishonesty

Cohen has pleaded guilty to something that isn't illegal.

He probably did so to avoid being charged with more serious things he was guilty of.

Paying off Trump's old lovers isn't illegal for several reasons including:

1) Trump paid the money and there is no limit on what a candidate can spend on their own campaign
2) Dual use items, one's that help the campaign but also are useful for other reasons--like a candidate having his teeth whitened--, are not considered campaign contributions and clearly paying off Stormy saved the Trump family a lot of embarrassment.

Why would the Leftist prosecutors offer him that sort of deal? Because their real target all along has been Trump. The Left, including Deep State prosecutors, have one objective in mind, overturning an election which they didn't win.

Make no doubt about it the Left, whose candidate Obama paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for violating campaign financing laws, doesn't care a bit about the law or Russian collusion.

They are a bunch of fascists who think that elections are only valid if they win.

We know that Trump has had a problem with being unfaithful to his spouses something that we were told was no problem when it came to Bill Clinton but more importantly we know that since he's been elected Trump hasn't been unfaithful to the American people.

Hence don't panic over this latest bit of #FakeNews designed to justify the Left's illegal overthrow of our democratic process.

Oh and don't forget that this whole prosecution is the result of the government seizing all the records of an attorney who worked for the President. Can you imagine the uproar if say Obama's personal attorney's office and residences had been raided at the order of a special prosecutor?

But apparently in the new Left's Amerika attorney client privilege is only something that Leftists get.

Think about it; the FBI/DOJ allowed Hillary's lawyers to decide which of the emails on her illegal server were government related but they seized every document Cohen had.

We're all guilty now

The problem with the fact that the Mueller investigation is unlimited in scope is that there are so many laws that everyone is probably guilty of something.

The complexity of the laws in areas like campaign financing and taxes are so arcane that it's easy for people to make honest mistakes.

This gives politically biased prosecutors like Mueller all they need to attack anyone they don't like.

Effectively everyone breaks some of these complex laws either intentionally or because they, and their lawyers, honestly think that what they're doing is legal.

That in itself wouldn't be a problem if everyone who broke the law was prosecuted.  But if biased prosecutors only indict people whose politics they don't like it effectively means that we no longer have a nation based on laws but a nation based on people, the "right" people are treated better than the "wrong" people.

Think of it this way; pretty much everyone breaks the speed limit while driving.  The vast majority of people only do so in a safe way; going 70 on the freeway when traffic is light and it's not raining.

But suppose instead of only ticketing the drivers who were driving unsafely the police based their policy on who to ticket on the politics of the driver?  Democrats could speed all the time and be untouched but any Republican who was speeding would get a ticket.

That's what we're seeing with the Deep State attack on Trump.  When investigating Hillary she was allowed to vet her own emails while Trump's lawyers office was raided and all his emails were seized and a third party decided which ones were relevant to Mueller.  Hillary's people were offered immunity right and left in turn for saying nothing while Mueller is using every trick in the book to indict Trump associates for process crimes which are usually nothing more than people having bad memories.

The explosion of government laws and regulations means that the biased prosecutors of the Deep State can prosecute everyone.  But since they are biased they only use this power against people on their enemies list not the people they like.

Clearly this perversion of the law has to end if we're to remain a free country.

Latest Democrat attack on Kavanaugh; he had to be explicit to keep Bill Clinton from lying.

Kavanaugh, Trump's recent pick for the Supreme Court, worked on Ken Starr's investigation into Bill Clinton's crimes.

Being a serial liar and a legalist of the first order, it depends on what you say "is" means, Bill was hard to pin down.

Being a good lawyer Kavanaugh constructed explicit questions that would force the serial harasser Bill Clinton to either explicitly lie or tell the truth. There would be no room for him to say that he'd answered truthfully because he interpreted the question differently than how the investigators interpreted it.

Since Bill's lies and crimes all involved sexual harassment it turns out that Kavanaugh's questions had to be well explicit.

But now Democrats are going to attack Kavanaugh because of that.

That's right the same Democrats who told us that Bill Clinton was perfectly fit to be president even though he was a serial harasser of women are now going to tell us that Kavanaugh is not fit to be on the Supreme Court because he was forced to use explicit language to keep a serial harasser of women from being able to lie.

Just one more example of how Democrat politicians believe that rules only apply to us little people.

Bruce Ohr is now a non-person

Back in during the Left's glory days in the mass murdering Soviet Union thugs in the government who fell from grace became non-persons, they were airbrushed out of pictures and history was rewritten to obliterate them.

Today the New York Times is doing the same to Bruce Ohr because he's becoming a major liability to the Left's war on Trump.

Even though Ohr was formerly the Associate Deputy Attorney General with an office just a few doors down from the head of the DOJ the NYT is now telling us that he was a nobody.

Apparently his being head Director of the DOJ's Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force in the age of the opioid crisis was also no big deal.

The NYT is peddling this lie because we now know that not only did Ohr funnel information from Steele into the FBI after the FBI told the FISA court they were no longer using Steele as a source--because he'd lied to the FBI about talking to the press--but Ohr's wife worked at Fusion GPS--the source of the Steele dossier.

The conflicts of interest are massive and President Trump has pointed that out.  Hence the NYT must make Ohr a non-person so as to ridicule the idea that his actions could have been important. Though to be honest that's an invalid argument since the guy who stole all the NSA's secret files and leaked them was a very low level employee.

Unfortunately for the NYT they can't actually banish Ohr to the Gulag so they have to resort to lying about his importance.

On the plus side this means that the NYT, and their leftist friends, must be running scared if they have to resort to blatant and easily debunked lies.

For a more detailed analysis of the NYT perfidy check out this article.

The #FakeNews media moves into jury tampering

A lot is riding on the Manafort trial. While it has absolutely nothing to do with collusion by Trump with Russia a loss would further stain what little credibility Mueller has.

After all it wasn't that long ago that Mueller indicted a bunch of Russians with no evidence as a ploy to make it appear he was actually interested in something other than overturning the 2016 election.  We know he lacked the evidence because when one of the Russian companies that Mueller indicted showed up asking for a speedy trial Mueller said he wasn't ready.

But if he really had the evidence necessary to indict the Russians he should have been ready to take them to trial.  At least that's how the legal process normally works.

By effectively admitting that he'd only indicted the Russians because he assumed they'd never show up Mueller made it clear that actually stopping Russian election interference isn't his real objective.

Now Manafort is on trial for some supposedly illegal complex financial dealings that occurred long before he had any relationship with the Trump campaign.  If Mueller loses that trial it will start to look like he isn't really doing anything.

Given that the jury hasn't reached a verdict yet and that one juror has asked for guidance leftists are starting to worry that Manafort might not be found guilty.

Perhaps that's why the #FakeNews media(FNM) are demanding that the judge in the case provide them with the names and home addresses of all the jurors.

Given the way the media has attacked anyone who isn't rabidly anti-Trump the obvious concern is that the FNM are planning some jury tampering.  Imagine if the media suddenly showed up at the juror's home asking them leading questions and implying that if the juror's don't convict Manafort they might be investigated by the media for taking bribes.

We know that the left can't win based on truth so they've routinely been using violence and intimidation to get their way; witness Antifa.  This latest demand for the identity of jurors before a trial is over combined with the FNM's history of attacking anyone who doesn't support their left wing agenda makes it far from unreasonable for the American people to conclude that the FNM is trying to be even more proactive in its "resistance" to the Democratic process.

The leftist social media giants want to censor us; time for Congress to fix the problem.

Under the law the social media platforms are platforms not publishers. That's necessary because if they were publishers, who control the content they present, they could be sued if content was posted that was libelous.

That's fine but the problem now is that the social media platforms are censoring speech they don't like.  Which makes them publishers because they control what is showing up on their platforms.

Some libertarians or old school conservatives correctly say that since the social media platforms aren private businesses they can censor to their hearts content. They say that involving the government would be bad.

Which is true if by involving the government we give the government control of what can and can't be posted.

However if the government simply informs FB, Twitter, etc that if they have decided to become publishers who control the content on their platforms then they are liable for everything that they allow to appear.

To preserve public order we'll let them censor anything that is directly criminal; someone could say that they hate Catholics but they could be censored if they posted that Catholics should be murdered.

To date censoring voices they don't like hasn't cost the left wing folk who own and run social media platforms anything.  But if they have to choose between opening them up for lawsuits over every lie some left wing wacko posts and being able to silence voices they don't like it's likely they'll choose to avoid bankruptcy and stop censoring conservatives.

Google loves China more than it loves the US?

Recently unpatriotic Google employees got Google to stop helping the military process surveillance video.

Now the US military has a long tradition of being willing to die to bring freedom to people in other countries ranging from Germany to Kuwait.

On the other hand the Chinese government has a history of mass murder of civilians, around 60,000,000 in the last century, and running over student protesters with tanks.

That’s why it will be interesting to see how Google responds to the recent concerns of some of its employees about the ethical basis for bringing a censored Google to China.

If Google decides that helping China oppress the Chinese people by denying them the truth is ok while helping the US military defend freedom is bad we’ll know who Google loves the most.

Democrats politicians being honest; they really do hate America

For a long time Democrat politicians have lied about liking America even as they work hard to reshape America into something completely different.

Governor Cuomo's recent admission that in his mind America was never really great--tell that to the Jews who weren't killed in the Holocaust, or the South Koreans who, unlike North Koreans, have food to eat-- isn't a sign of a new perspective on the part of Democrat politicians.

It was just a slip of the tongue, like Obama's comment about how people cling to guns and religion when they're afraid, that reveals what he really thinks.

Every leftist policy that modern Democrat politicians like Cuomo support is designed to fundamentally change America from a free country with a strong moral compass into a hedonistic tyranny.

America was founded on the idea that every human being had the right to life yet Democrats have pushed hard to ensure that the unborn, the handicapped, and the elderly can be executed if they are not "wanted".  To Democrats the idea that all human life is of value is an abomination.  Now it is true that they care intensely for animals since they advocate jailing people for hurting dogs while demanding that killing the unborn in the most gruesome manner is a Constitutional right.

American law is based on the Ten Commandments.  Yet Democrats constantly condemn anyone who takes God seriously and demand that the law only reflect the relative situational morality of leftists.  To Democrat politicians any restriction on pure hedonism, whether it be casual sex or drug use, makes America less than it could be.

Democrats are starting to admit what we've known all along; they don't support free speech. The ACLU has admitted that some speech shouldn't be protected and the left in general is saying that any speech they don't like, which they arbitrarily label hate speech, shouldn't be allowed.  Democrat politicians were slow to condemn Antifa violence which shut down free speech for example.

Because the modern Democrat politician is all about hedonism, casual sex, and general irresponsibility they demand that everyone bow down to their "gods".  If anyone dare say what all civilized countries have believed in the history of the world, that marriage is between a man and a woman, Democrat politicians demand that they be punished for their "heresy".  The Puritans and the Inquisition have nothing on the modern witch hunts run by the left wing propaganda machine, i.e. the #FakeNews media, in terms of using violence to oppress any faith other than their own.

Under Obama we saw how Democrat politicians view the US as a source of evil in the world. That's why Democrats are constantly trying to weaken the military. It's not just so they can get more money to buy votes with; they honestly think that America--not Iran, or North Korea, or China--is the problem. This isn't new. During the Cold War when the mass murdering Soviet Union was trying to conquer the world Democrats said that Ronald Reagan, not the dictators that ran the Soviet Union, was the problem.

After the late 1960's it's hard to find a Democrat politician who believed in America.

So when it comes time to vote in the fall remember that Democrat politicians hate America as it is and want to dramatically change it.

Democrats declare that Nazi's and the KKK aren't racist

For awhile now the left has been saying that minorities can't be racist because racism requires the power to oppress the people you hate.

This was most recently invoked to say that Sarah Jeong isn't racist even though she clearly hates white people because Asian American's don't have any power.  Which when you think about it is kinda insulting to the Asian American members of Congress, various state legislatures, and local Asian American politicians.

The Leftists "reason" that even though some Blacks hate white people because they are white those Blacks are not racist because they don't have power over whites.  Of course given that we had a Black president for 8 years and there are plenty of Black politicians at all levels of government, as well as a Supreme Court justice, it would seem that the left is saying that those Black politicians are so incompetent that they have no ability to influence what the government does.

Given that the definition of racism is hating or believing a given race is inferior saying that one has to have power to be racist is crazy talk.

We can see this if we note that today in America White nationalists and the KKK, as well as Nazis, have no power. There are no KKK politicians or police chiefs and the pitiful handful of racist white nationalists couldn't swing the election for a dog catcher.

But if racism requires power then the KKK, White nationalists, and the Nazis can't be racist since they have no power.

Leftists try and work around this by saying that whites in general have power.  But that's saying that white racists can be racists even though they have no power just because other non-racist whites have power.  Since the whole point of the left's argument is that racism requires the power to discriminate the fact that whites who are racist don't have the power to discriminate means that if we use the left's definition they, the KKK et al, can't be racist.

If you run into any nutter who is trying to peddle this nonsense get them to explain to you how the powerless KKK can be racist if racism requires power.

Chelsea Clinton monetizes murder

According to Chelsea abortion is good because it boosts the economy by letting more women get jobs.

Given that science tells us that human life begins at conception she’s essentially telling us that human life is a commodity; that we all don’t have intrinsic value just because we’re human.

That’s amazingly evil.

She’s also probably wrong in her basic argument given that while Black women are 3 times as likely as white women to have an abortion under Obama the unemployment rate for Black women was twice that of white women.

But if abortion is the main, or even a significant, factor in liberating  women to take paying jobs the unemployment rate for Black women should be lower than the unemployment rate for white women.

The dishonesty of John Brennan and the NYT

News sources around the internet proclaimed that John Brennan, former head of the CIA, had an editorial in the NYT entitled “President Trumos claims of no collusion are hogwash”.

Given Brennan’s acces to US intelligence data this must be a new revelation, he must be finally producing the heretofore hidden evidence behind the Democrats collusion mania.

Clearly the NYT and Brennan wanted to fool people who only saw the headline in passing because the core of the now security clearance less disgraced former head of the CIA’s claim is that Trump made a joke in a speech about how maybe the Russians could find the 33,000 emails Hillery had illegally erased from here illegal private email server.

Everyone knew Trump was joking. And in fact no one claims that the Russians found those emails, though given Hillary’s lax security practices, which were the basis in part of Trumps joke, they could have them; along with all the classified data Hillary illegally put on her server.

Yet here is a an ex-communist voting former CIA head pretending that Trump was seriously asking the Russians to spy on Hillary.  Either gross stupidity or true malice can explain this but while the specific motive doesn’t matter the conclusion we can draw does; nothing Brennan has said or will say  can be trusted.

Given the deceptive headline that the NYT used its clear that they can’t be trusted either.

This is all the more amazing given that today the #FakeNews media have united to condemn Trump for saying that they are united in their biased against him.

But then cluelessness is one of the key identifying factors for the #FakeNews media.

Who Democrat politicians protect tell us who they care about

One of the best kept secrets in America today is who is protected by the sanctuary city/state “laws” passed by Democrats.  Illegals who work hard, steal someone’s identity so they can pay taxes, and are better than flyover country rednecks in every way—according to Democrats— are not helped at all.  Only if an illegal commits new crimes in the USA and are arrested do sanctuary “laws” help them. In that case if ICE is looking for this criminal to deport them the Democrats ensure that ICE won’t be able to deport them.

Hence Democrats must like illegals who commit more crimes in the USA; perhaps that’s why Democrats were upset when Trump called MS-13 gang members animals.

Democrats also try and protect home grown felons too.  They are all for legal technicalities and reduced sentencing.  They’re also eager to put more Black criminals back on the streets; perhaps because Black criminals prey primarily on Blacks not white liberals.

This too isn’t surprising given the thousands of Blacks shot in Democrat run cities each year. We all know if thousands of whites were being shot in Chicago, Baltimore,etc something would be done.  But apparently Democrat politicians, like their KKK founding predecessors, don’t care about honest Black people.

Then of course drug dealers hold a special place in the hearts of Democrat politicians; Obama extended clemency to a bunch of them for example.

The one group you won’t find Democrat politicians protecting are honest hard working Americans.

If the Democrats win back the Congress here’s what they say they will do:

Raise taxes
Impeach Trump
Force Catholic nuns to assist in abortions
Cut defense spending
Increase welfare spending
Have open borders
Reduce criminals time in prison
Let men use the women’s bathrooms
Stifle the economy with regulations
Support FaceBook, YouTube , etc censorship of conservative views
Shut down all investigations into Deep State corruption

A win for Democrat politicians would be a win for criminals, illegals and a loss for honest Americans.

The lefts game plan is to make sure we’re ignorant

Unless you’re very rich, someone else is supporting you voluntarily—think college students—or someone else is forced to support you—think people who view welfare not as a temporary helping hand but as a lifestyle— none of the policies advanced by the left will be good for you.

Leftists know this which is why they use their control of academia and the media to try and keep Americans ignorant of the truth.

College students are indoctrinate about how whites are evil, which according to leftists is not racist, and that speech they don’t agree with isn’t protected by the First Amendment. They aren’t taught how to think of that feelings and facts are not the same things.

A Democrat senator was on trial for corruption for 7 weeks and the #FakeNews media hardly covered it; two of the networks never mentioned it.

Few Americans know that abortion is legal for any reason at any point in a pregnancy or that science says the unborn are human beings from the moment of conception not “blobs of cells”.

The fact that all the models used to “prove” that man kind is causing catastrophic global warming haven’t accurately predicted the actual temperature of the Earth for the last 19 years is something the media simply hides.

Americans aren’t told that the leading cause of death for Black Americans is abortion or that Black women are 3 times as likely to abort as white women.

While condemning Trump for starting a trade war with China the media fails to mention that China’s tariffs on American products are more than 3 times higher than our tariffs on their products. Essentially The media is hiding the fact that China started this trade war long ago.

The media has concealed the fact that the author of the infamous Trump collusion dossier has stated in court that nothing in that dossier has been verified; essentially the whole Steele dossier, paid for by Hillary, is just second, third or more hand gossip from unidentified Russian sources who may or may not have been working for Russian intelligence agencies.

When antifa attacks reporters the media downplays it.

These are just a few examples of how the left is working to deny Americans the truth.

Most Americans have little time for politics because they’re too busy working and raising their families. They’re also honest people who would never tell a big lie.  Hence when they do hear the news they assume, often incorrectly, that it’s not a lie and that no one is conspiring to hide the truth from them.

Truth is to the left what a Crucifix is to a vampire which means that we’ll informed people like you need spread the truth to your family, friends, and coworkers.

We need to crowdsource the news to counteract the lefts massive propaganda machine.

Sure die hard leftists won’t be moved if you share the truth with them in most cases but lots of low information voters may reconsider when they hear the truth.

Look at the #WalkAway movement where leftist who learned the truth have rejected the radical unAmerican leftist agenda.

If good people like you do nothing the left can win and steal away our freedom. But if we all work to spread the truth we can keep America free.

Yes the #FakeNews media is that clueless

Starting on August 16 128, and counting, “news” outlets will run coordinated editorials claiming that Trump saying the #FakeNews media coordinates against him is evil.

That’s right these left wing outlets are coordinating an attack on Trump Saying thatTrump is wrong to say that they coordinate attacks on him.

They’re also advancing the idea that any criticism of the #FakeNews media is unconstitutional.  Of course criticizing Fox is still kosher.

More amazingly the #FakeNews media has no problem with conservative news sources being thrown off Twitter, Facebook, et al.

To the Democrat party propagandists who pretend to be reporters Trump pointing out their bias is unfathonable evil but censoring news outlets that aren’t in lock step with the left is great.

These people don’t want a free press they want a propaganda monopoly so that they can deny us the truth.

It’s time for us to demand that if the media wants respect they need to stop lying to us.

Obama the super president and the death of democracy

Historically what one president has done with his pen and phone can be undone by his successors with their pen and phone.

That’s necessary if we’re going to have a democracy in America. If a new president can’t undo what his predecessor did then the people have no power because no matter who they elect the policies of the president they’re rejecting will stay in place.

But traitorous leftist judges have decided that Obama is a super president whose actions can’t be undone by Trump.  For example Obama changed Bush’s policy on the criteria necessary to seek asylum. But when Trump tried to change them back a dishonest judge said he can’t.

Note that the standard that Trump wants to return to was considered Constitutional and never found to be problematic.

The judge’s action is nothing less than treason. That judge is misusing his authority to nullify the 2016 election by preventing Trump from lawfully executing his authority as President.

We’ve seen this before in the lower court rulings on Trumps temporary travel restrictions on people coming from countries where their identity can’t be confirmed.

It’s time to impeach these judges so that the left can’t deny the people their president.

The Washington Post’s Mission Statement

The new motto for the WaPo is “Democracy dies in darkness” but what is the WaPo’s Mission statement?

We know that a major objective of the WaPo is working to distract its readers from things like:

The fact that human life begins at conception

The fact that the Obama regime spied on Trump based on a dossier paid for by Hillary which is nothing more than a bunch of unverified rumors from unidentified Russians.

The fact that the economy is doing great because of Trump and the Republicans

The significance of the fact that the leading cause of death for Black Americans is abortion

It would seem then that the WaPo’s mission statement should be “We turn out the lights”

What happens when Democrats run things

In CA where it’s all Democrats all the time the wise and caring Democrat masters have decided to issue drivers licenses to illegals.

This has massively increased wait times at the DMV for everyone because the Democratic despots who rule CA don’t care enough about illegals to fix it. We know they don’t care about actual CA citizens.

They may not care because it turns out there is a special DMV office just for the state government elite hidden in the Legislative Office Building which exclusively serves  California’s rulers and their flunkies.

Yes that’s right oppressed and massively taxed workers of CA just like in the old Soviet Union the masters in CA have a special store open only to them so that they can avoid the consequences of the edicts they impose on the rest of us.

If we let Democrats take over the House and/or the Senate we can expect to see major growth in ruler only percs at the national level too because that’s how Democrats roll.

So in the words of the patron saint of Democrat corruption the late great Mayor Daily of Chicago “vote early and vote often especially if you’re dead because if you’re dead you don’t have anything better to do”—notice for Jim Acosta and other #FakeNews propagandists this is satire; that isn’t a literal quote from Mayor Daily not am I calling on people to commit voter fraud.

The FBI caught telling lies again

We now know that despite the FBI's claim that they stopped using Steele as a source after he was caught lying to them about his contacts with the media the FBI continued to receive, through Bruce Ohr a senior Justice Department employee, information from Steele.

This is a clear indication of the FBI's lack of concern about Steele's clear dishonesty.

Further we know from what Ohr has said that the FBI knew that Steele had a very strong bias against Trump prior to the FBI using Steele's dossier, which has admitted in court is not verified in any way, to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page.  Yet in that FISA warrant application the FBI vouched for Steele but did not mention that they knew that Steele was not an unbiased source when it came to Trump and his campaign.

Another thing we know is that when the FBI found out that someone on Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein's staff was a Chinese spy they notified her. But when the FBI suspected a staffer on Trump's campaign was a Russian spy they didn't warn Trump.

It's clear from revelation after revelation that the way the FBI and DOJ spied on Trump's campaign in the absence of any actual evidence--remember the Steele dossier was unverified and based solely no second, third and worse hand rumors from Russian sources--is very different than the way they handle other investigations.

The reality is that this whole thing is much much worse than Watergate because in Watergate a few people in the Nixon campaign committed crimes spying on the Democrat Presidential campaign which is no where near as bad as Obama subverting the FBI and the DOJ to spy on the Republican Presidential campaign.

Stupid "conservatives"; stopping censorship is not violating free speech

There are "conservatives" arguing today that trying to force the big social media monopolies-- FaceBook, Twitter etc--to follow the First Amendment is censorship. That is they're saying that forcing a platform to not censor legal speech is censorship.  That's nuts.

They point out that private companies have the right to discriminate to their hearts content and in that they're right.

However the situation today is similar to that if AT&T had prevented people whose messages they didn't like from using a phone back when AT&T had a monopoly on phone service.

While it might change at the moment FB and Twitter are effectively public services and enjoy are de facto monopolies.

Therefore it's clearly wrong to say that they can censor any voices that they don't like using any criteria they happen to come up with.

Further these sites say that they are not publishers but neutral platforms. They have to say that because if they do in fact control content then they are open to lawsuits if content they control, either by omission or commission, is libelous or incites people to commit crimes.

They can't have it both ways; they can't be neutral platforms while they reject certain content.  If they choose to be all left wing all the time then they are clearly controlling content and hence are publishers not neutral platforms.

Conservatives have two options; we can remove the protection the platforms enjoy from lawsuits and/or we can declare the platforms to be monopolies and demand that they only censor speech which is criminal; calls for violence, child pornography that sort of thing.

To say that we must just sit back and take the politicization of a what are communications monopolies is the sort of "I'd rather lose than tarnish my principles" view of the old conservatives who talked a great game but who never managed to get any of their policies enacted and who watched as the left's plan to destroy America inexorably moved forward.

It's time to stand up for what's right rather than feel good about being "pure" while watching our country be stolen away by the new fascists.

The Democrat platform for 2018

Based on what Democrats are saying and doing this is what they will do if they win control of the House:

1) Impeach Trump for not being Hillary
2) Impeach Trump for not doing what Hillary would have done
3) Impeach Trump because an unverified dossier containing rumors from unidentified Russian sources says that Trump is a bad person.
4) Raise taxes.
5) Allow anyone who can walk to enter the US and get welfare for life.
6) Keep Black wages down by allowing illegals to compete with Americans for jobs
7) Ensure that Christians have to serve gay weddings and that Catholic nuns have to help women kill their babies
8) Destroy the US economy to prevent climate change while ignoring the fact that India and China are massively increasing their CO2 emissions.
9) Keep exporting manufacturing jobs to continue destroying the middle class
10) Ensure that Iran gets plenty of money to spread terrorism and protect the Iranian nuclear weapons program.
11) Run US foreign policy so that it pleases Europeans
12) Establish Medicare for all which will cost about twice the current federal budget per year
13) Stop all investigations into political bias by civil servants
14) Cover up the fact that Obama used the intelligence community to spy on Trump based on a dossier paid for by Hillary which contains, according to its author, unverified information from unnamed Russian sources.
15) Continue to ignore the mass murder of Blacks in Chicago
16) Censor the internet by taking down conservative voices
17) Use taxpayer dollars to bail out Illinois and California when they go bankrupt
18) Reduce taxes on rich people by letting them deduct their state taxes above the current $10K cap.
19) Reduce defense spending even as they tell us what a threat Russia is
20) Declare that minorities can't be racist and that declaring that all whites are evil is just common sense.

When leftists say you're stupid they really mean you're smart

The left are saying that because you are too stupid to differentiate between fake news and real news that anything the left deems to be untrue must be banished from the Internet.

Given that the left has always been rather patronizing and certain that they are smarter than the rest of us this is not surprising.

However the reality is somewhat different.  The left knows that its policies are not good for most Americans, especially hard working families.

Their real reason for trying to censor anything that they don't like is that they're deathly afraid that because you aren't stupid if you see the truth you'll see through their lies.

If people find out that thousands of Blacks are shot in Chicago each year but the Democrats who've run the city for more than 60 years are doing nothing they'll start to wonder if maybe the Democrats of today are as racist as the Democrats who fought the Civil War for slavery.

If people find out that the only "evidence" of Trump colluding with Russia is a bunch of unverified rumors from unidentified Russian sources compiled by a Brit they might start to wonder what else the media is lying to them about.

If people find out that science says life begins at conception and only 1% of abortions are due to rape they might start wondering why we need to make abortion legal for any reason at any time up till the moment of birth.

The left does think we're stupid. But they're also afraid that we're not stupid enough to buy into their plans to build a fascist dictatorship with them as the ruling elite if we know the truth.

That's why Democrats are waging a war on the truth.

Frankly if vampires existed they'd like Crucifixes and garlic more than Democrats like the truth.

Judge orders Trump to not enforce the law

A judge recently ordered Trump to continue Obama's DACA program.

The DACA program is basically not enforcing US immigration laws on millions of illegal aliens.  Obama himself admitted on numerous occasions that the President didn't have the power to do that. Right up till when he did it.

Congress has been unwilling to pass a bill that would change immigration laws so as to make DACA legal.

So what that judge did was to order the President to not enforce a law which has been found to be Constitutional.

By doing so the judge is saying that he can overrule the Congress and the Constitution and demand that a co-equal branch of government to do what the judge wants.

If this stands it means that unelected judges have complete power over the people. No longer will they be limited to declaring that a law was unConstitutional but under the new standard they can eliminate laws they don't like and impose laws that they do like no matter what the people's representatives say.

Democrats return to their roots; hound a black woman out of a resteraunt

In my lifetime Democrats fought to keep Black people out of "white" restaurants in the South.

While staying racist the Democrats have more recently tried to pretend that they don't hate Blacks.

Though the truth came out in how Democrat politicians viciously attacked Blacks who refused to toe the white leftists line. Or how Democrat politicians don't care about the thousands of Blacks shot in Chicago each year--partially because the gangs doing most of the killings help bring out the vote for Democrat politicians each election year.

Apparently the Democrats are tired of pretending to not hate Blacks who are so "uppity" as to not do what their white Democrat masters say they should do.

That's why a bunch of white's harassed a Black woman, Candice Owens, at a restaurant.  They want to make sure that Blacks know that if Blacks don't do what their white masters want they, Blacks, will pay a price.

After all if conservatives get their way and Blacks are free to think whatever they want the Democrats will lose lots of elections.

Democrats won't let that happen because the one thing they prize above all others is their ability to control the lives of others including how much soda they drink and whether or not they can use straws.

Proof the FBI lied about the Trump investigation

Remember when it came out that the FBI used paid informants, i.e. spies, against the Trump campaign?

Remember how the media and the FBI said that that was perfectly normal--try hard to suppress your laughter at that?

Remember how when sane people pointed out that if the FBI thought that the problem was just some peripheral players in the campaign they should have told Trump so that he could get rid of those "bad" actors?

Remember how we were told that wasn't the case?

Well know we know the FBI was lying.

Five years ago the FBI discovered that Diane Feinstein's California driver was a spy for the Chinese Communists.

What did the FBI do?  They notified Feinstein who then fired the spy.

So we know that when an FBI investigation into a spy in a politicians organization doesn't involve Trump the FBI does the sane thing and notifies the politician.

Hence when we were told that it was ok that Trump wasn't notified that was incorrect.

Now there is an option where the FBI isn't lying.  If the FBI didn't think that Carter Page or anyone else in the Trump campaign was actually a Russian agent then there would have been nothing to notify Trump about.

But if the FBI knew that none of Mueller's intermediary targets were Russian agents why did they tell the FISA court that at least one of them was?

Either way it's clear the FBI was lying one way or the other.

Gov. Cuomo is a tyrant at heart

Cuomo has said that he's trying to drive the NRA out of business using the power of government.

What's more tyrannical than that?

Can you imagine if say Gov. Walker in Wisconsin said he was going to use the power of government to drive Black Lives Matter or even Antifa out of business?

Clearly Cuomo believes he's a ruler not a public servant and that power derives not from the people but from the elites who run our government.

He also can't stand the First Amendment. He apparently feels that he has the right to squash all speech he doesn't like.

Every election is becoming a Flight 93 election because the choice isn't between two sets of people who believe in the Constitution but between one group that does and the Democrats who are fascists and who only believe that elections count when they win.

With their enthusiasm about unelected judges making up new laws and their belief that the First Amendment only applies to them many Democrat politicians are an existential threat to American freedom.

The lies of the left are starting to fail; Blacks, union workers warming to Trump

The left is getting desperate.

The economy is soaring, Blacks aren't being shot by cops in record numbers--only by other Blacks in Democrat run cities, Trump's tariffs have brought the EU to the negotiating table and not trashed the economy, and women aren't dying because religious institutions don't have to provide them with free birth control.

But the worst news is that Blacks are starting to see that it's the Democrats who are racists not Trump.

Under Obama Black unemployment rates were double that of whites and they had been high for a very long time.  When white unemployment numbers finally, after far too long, returned to semi normal levels in the Obama economy the left was ecstatic; apparently the fact that Black unemployment was still very high didn't matter to the left.

But now under Trump Black unemployment is at historic lows.  That coupled with Black people realizing that the Democrats who run big cities don't give a darn about Black people being shot by the thousands has led to many Black people being woke to the racism of the Democrats.  The fact that Democrats are supporting illegals who drive down wages and steal jobs from Black Americans has helped too.

It's taken time because the left wing media and folks like Jesse Jackson have been telling Blacks for decades that it's Republicans who are racist. Blacks are like everyone else since they will rarely tell a Big Lie they tend to assume that others won't either and hence it's taken time for them to catch on; something that a lot of white voters who think that the Democrats are moderates have yet to do.

But now a poll shows that Trump's approval rating with Blacks is 29%.  That doesn't seem like much but historically a Republican having more than single digit approval in the Black community is amazing.  Without a solid near 100% Black turnout for Democrats their chances of winning elections goes way down.

As icing on the cake union people are suddenly realizing that they lost their jobs due to unfair trade practices during the 8 years of Obama. Since Trump is bringing those manufacturing jobs back, over the protests of the establishment and the rich, union members, and even the highly political union leaders, are taking a new look at Trump.

It's critical that we ensure that Republicans continue to control the House and Senate so that we can deny the Democrats an impeachment circus that will distract everyone from the huge failures of all the Democrats plans.

Democrat politicians hate the Constitution and the rule of law

The Democrat governor of New York, Cuomo, is using the power of the state to try and prevent financial institutions, including insurance companies, from doing business with the "extremist" National Rifle Association.

Given that all the NRA does is support our Second Amendment rights to own guns it's clear that not only does Cuomo hate the First Amendment, because he wants to squash non-criminal speech, but he hates the Second Amendment too.

But this is just one of many cases where Democrat politicians have rejected the Constitution.

Almost all of the modern judicial activism is based on rejecting the clear wording of the Constitution and replacing what the Constitution says with what leftists judges and Democrat politicians want the Constitution to say.

For example:

There is no "right to privacy" in the Constitution but there is a right to life.  Hence the legalizing of abortion for any reason at any point in the pregnancy by the Supreme Court is not based on the Constitution.

The Constitution explicitly says that the President is responsible for foreign affairs but Federal Courts keep ruling that they can tell the President what he can and can't do.

There is no right to redefine marriage in the Constitution and the people who ratified the Constitution condemned active homosexuality so there is no way that the intent of the Constitution is to require the redefinition of marriage.

The phrase "wall of separation between church and state" is nowhere in the Constitution.  In fact when the Constitution was ratified several states had state sponsored religions which no one found to be in conflict with the Constitution. Hence the war on religion waged by the Democrats and supported by leftist judges is not based on the Constitution and in fact goes directly against the clear wording of the First Amendment.

Democrat politicians are perfectly comfortable with rejecting the First Amendment where it pertains to political speech they don't like and to people's right to actually live their faiths.

Without rejecting the Constitution as it is actually written the entire Democrat agenda for America would be impossible.

Democrat politicians also reject the rule of law; they want a nation of men where the importance of the person determines which laws apply to them not a nation of laws where all men are subject to the same rules.

For example:

Obama said he didn't have the authority to implement DACA on his own and then he did so anyway.

Obama refused to enforce laws that he didn't like; such as the Defense of Marriage Act.

Democrat politicians in California refused to defend Prop 8 which was passed by a large majority of Californians.

Democrats told Trump to stop enforcing immigration laws that they didn't like but they refused to work with Trump to change the laws via the Democratic process.

Democrats are perfectly comfortable with ignoring immigration laws.

It's becoming clearer and clearer that the Democrat leadership, as opposed to Democrat voters, are fascists who don't object to using violence and the full power of the government to silence those who disagree with them.  They are completely comfortable with 5 unelected judges making law up out of thin air so long as the laws favor the Democrats.

Modern Democrat politicians are just as much of a threat to freedom in America as Hitler and his Brown Shirts, modern day name antifa, were in Germany.  Which isn't surprising in that Hitler was a socialist who believe in the government controlling the economy just like the latest bunch of Democrat politicians.

While it's true that Democrat politicians don't support genocide against Jews they have no problem supporting what Jesse Jackson called genocide against Blacks; abortion.

No longer do Democrat politicians say that abortion should be safe and rare now they're saying that it's a good thing even in cases where the mother kills her unborn daughter because she wants a son.

Modern Democrat politicians reject democracy and embrace totalitarianism where there is no aspect of our lives, from how much soda we drink to whether or not we can use straws, that they can control.

We need to stop them now otherwise our children won't live in a free America.

When racism is ok NYT edition.

The NYT has just hired a new editorial person who has a history of making vicious anti-white racist comments.

She says, and the NYT accepts this, that she was just imitating some racists who trolled her because she's Asian.

The sad commentary on our times is that if she'd written exactly the same things about gays, the transgendered, Muslims, or Blacks she'd have been fired by the NYT before she could blink.

But because she was making racist comments about whites it's ok since she said she's sorry.

I'm all for forgiving people who make mistakes. But I'm also all for the same set of rules for everyone no matter what their political positions are.

But the NYT appears to have a double standard because when Roseanne Barr made one racist joke and then apologized the NYT was all for her being fired. Interestingly in an editorial condemning those who objected to Barr being shown the door for one apologized for mistake the NYT said that Trump's policies are racist, a lie, and that he called some immigrants animals, which was really a lie since it was about illegals not legal immigrants and it was about MS-13 members neither of which the NYT felt obligated to mention.

So we now know that the NYT is comfortable with racism directed at white people.

Keep that in mind when you read anything that comes from the NYT in the future.

Acosta doesn't get it; misleading the people with #FakeNews makes the left wing press the enemy of the people

Jim Acosta boy reporter for CNN, the network that's allergic to the truth, is upset that people in the Administration don't like the press. He tweeted:

I walked out of the end of that briefing because I am totally saddened by what just happened. Sarah Sanders was repeatedly given a chance to say the press is not the enemy and she wouldn't do it. Shameful.

Given that Jim and his homies have been attacking Trump non-stop since he was nominated it seems odd that Acosta is so lacking in reasoning skills that he wouldn't realize that attacking someone constantly, especially when you're wrong most of the time, does not engender friendship.

To see how clueless Acosta is he went also said the following:

They believe in their heart of hearts that the journalists who cover this White House, the journalists who work in this city, who were just trying a few moments ago to hold some of these officials accountable about attacks on our democracy, that the people here who work at this White House, all the way up to the president, evidently believe that journalists are the enemy of the people. Literally, the enemy of the people.

So in the same breath where he asks how the Trump administration could be bothered by reporters he says that those same reporters are "...just trying a few moments ago to hold some of these officials accountable about attacks on our democracy...".  Is it possible to be this unaware?  If Acosta was talking about Russian hacking sans collusion what does he mean by saying that "journalists" want to hold White House officials accountable about attacks that Russia did on their own? How can he hold Trump administration officials accountable for actions done by Russia when Obama was President? "Journalists" who are saying that Trump's perfectly legal actions are "attacks on our democracy" or that Trump colluded when there is no evidence for that are the enemy of the people because they're telling the people things that aren't true. Remember the WaPo says that "Democracy dies in darkness" so even the WaPo agrees that when "journalists" give the people #FakeNews they're acting as the enemy of our democracy.

Trump has never said all the press is the enemy of the people, he clearly doesn't think Fox or Rush are, he's only said the media that lies to the people is the enemy of the people.

You'd think that would be self evidently true but apparently Acosta either doesn't realize that he's constantly misinforming the people or he thinks when he misinforms America it's for some greater good.

"Journalists" who never said a word when Obama did attack our democracy but who now declare that  any and everything Trump does is an attack on our democracy even though it never is are in fact the enemy of the people.

During the Obama administration Acosta class "journalists" lied either by omission or commission about every dirty action of the Obama administration.  They did everything they could to keep the American people in the dark about what was really going on.

Now during the Trump administration they're doing the same. Trump has turned around the economy and brought about growth that Obama said was impossible. If Obama had done this the Acosta corp would have been asking the Pope to declare Obama to be a saint. But since it's Trump they either ignore it or downplay it.

After over a year of no evidence of collusion other than a Democrat paid for dossier whose author has admitted in court contains not a single verified piece of intelligence the Acosta corp continues to attack Trump and breathlessly declare week in and week out that Trump will be frog marched out of the White House at any minute.

When one week's #FakeNews claim is shown to be bogus they just move on to a new one.  You know how desperate they are when they cite Mueller's looking into Trump's tweets for evidence of some vile deed.

It doesn't matter to us why Acosta and his ilk spread lies because our response is independent of his motivation.

We need to counter his lies to everyone we can by spreading the truth.

But it's also true that whatever Acosta's problem is he's a deeply wounded human being who needs our prayers.  

So the good news is that no matter what's wrong with Acosta our answer is the same; we pray for him and we refute the #FakeNews he is constantly spewing.

Atheism and the First Amendment

The First Amendment is:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Note that it doesn't describe a "wall of separation" between religion and the Federal government only that the Federal government can't establish a specific religion, like the Church of England.

But today militant atheists are trying to establish atheism as an official state religion. Not all atheists are militant and the rest of this post is only about militant atheists not the tolerant atheists who don't mind Christianity showing up in the public square.

Atheism is a religion?  Yes indeed it is.

Atheism is a faith based belief system.  Atheists say that they lack a belief in God.  Lacking a belief in God means that they must believe that God is not necessary to explain anything we see in the world which in turn means that everything we see in the world must be explicable by purely materialistic processes.  Yet we don't know that that is true and science, because it's a process, doesn't tell us what it will or won't be able to explain.

Atheists may be right that God is unnecessary but they can't prove it to be true so they must accept it based on faith.

Atheists must believe that the Bible is wrong but they can't prove that to be true so they accept it based on faith.

According to Prof Hawking we can't have free will if there is no God because if that's the case then all our thoughts are simply brain chemistry which is controlled not by us but by the laws of physics. But atheists can't prove that what we all know goes on in our heads is bogus so they must accept, based on faith not facts, that we don't have free will.

But what about the fact that atheism lacks a god?  Well Buddhism lacks a god but everyone considers it to be a religion.  Essentially a religion is a faith based belief system which makes atheism a religion.

The problem is that atheists have been working hard, and very successfully, to drive all other religions out of the public square while ensuring that their faith is advocated by the government.

According to atheists a valedictorian can't voluntarily mention Jesus but he can mention Nietzsche an atheist paragon.  Similarly a teacher can't talk about Christ but he can talk about Dawkins, an atheist advocate.

Hedonism can be taught in sex ed but Christian morality can't be taught.

The list goes on.

Most people realize that atheists war on religion distorts the First Amendment which was designed to protect religious belief. 

But few people have realized that the atheists are actually going directly against the intent of the First Amendment by creating an officially state sponsored faith based belief system, namely atheism.

It's time to put a stop to this.  Instead of banning the Ten Commandments in Courtrooms while allowing quotes from atheists to be posted let's let local groups decide what faith based symbols are allowed.  In our country where the vast majority of people are Christians the majority of those symbols will be Christian but in parts of the country where other faiths are strong we'll see their symbols which is as it should be. The First Amendment was never intended to be a weapon to drive the faith of the majority out of the public square.