Hillary explains how the Democrats are planning to steal the election

Hillary kindly told America just how Democrats are planning on stealing the 2020 election.

She said:

“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances,” Clinton said. “Because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually, I do believe he will win, if we don’t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is.”

What she's saying is even if Biden loses don't concede so that Democrats can manufacture votes to steal the election.

This is a frequently used Democrat strategy.

In 1960 JFK beat Nixon because he won Illinois and Texas--which at the time was a Democrat stronghold due to the strong racism of the Democrat party.

In both cases there was strong evidence of massive voter fraud.  In Texas boxes of ballots were found on the roadside and in Illinois the voting was, to say the least, odd.

At the time Chicago was a Democrat bastion while the rest of the state was solidly Republican. The population in the two zones was about the same.

As precincts reported an interesting pattern was noted but ignored.  Non-Chicago precincts were reporting but Chicago precincts weren't.  Finally after all or almost all of the non-Chicago precincts had reported the Chicago precincts reported and magically produced just enough votes to ensure that JFK won the state.

Given the long history, even then, of voter fraud in Chicago it's clear that the Democrats waited until they knew how many votes they had to produce and then produced them.

That highlights a key problem facing Democrats; if they manufacture too many votes the fact that they're cheating will be obvious.

Which is why Hillary is saying to not concede.  Once the Democrats know how many votes they need they can produce just enough to ensure Biden wins but without blatant evidence of their criminal acts.

We know for a fact that Democrats are shipping millions of ballots to people who don't exist.  The voting rolls are rarely kept up to date, especially in Democrat run areas, so there are millions of people registered to vote who have either died or moved out of state who shouldn't be voting despite their names being in the voting rolls.

If you doubt that it turns out there are over 100 counties in America where the number of registered voters exceeds the number of people of voting age in those counties.  The combined excess in those counties is over 2 million.

But since 100% of voters don't register there are problems in a much larger number of counties.

The first step then in the Democrat's voter fraud scheme is making sure there are literally millions of ballots floating around. Given that Trump won some states by a few thousand votes in 2016 millions of ballots are more than enough to let dishonest Democrats flip the election for Biden.

But what about signatures? Won't the ballots be rejected because the signatures don't match?

They would if in fact signatures are checked. It's no accident that Democrats are suing in 12 swing states to prevent checking signatures since that's supposedly "voter suppression".  In Nevada the Democrats didn't even try to hide their intended ploy. A new law passed in the middle of the night allows ballot harvesting and says that if a bunch of ballots are turned in they only need one signature; so 50 ballots might only have one signature among them.

Another example of Democrat dishonesty is the 2000 election.  Al Gore lost Florida.  But by not conceding he put America through months of turmoil as Democrats tried to recount the ballots over and over until they came out ahead--at which point they would have stopped recounting.  Only Democrat strongholds were recounted and the ballots of soldiers that had arrived late weren't counted since soldiers tend to vote Republican.

Back in 1960 Nixon chose to not protest because of the turmoil it would put the country through.

It says a lot that Al Gore, Hillary, and possibly Joe Biden are less concerned about we the people and less ethical than Richard Nixon.