British Judge rules that the Steele dossier contains inaccurate data

Worrying about how the Deep State tried to undo the 2016 election by pretending that Trump colluded with Russia is something the Democrats and the #FakeNews media want you to forget about.

Apparently there is no level of treason is high enough for Democrats to be held accountable for it.

But since most Americans don't share the Democrat's view here's an interesting update on the notorious Steele Dossier.

That document was compiled by a former British spy, Steele, and consisted of unverified rumors which Steele used Hillary Clinton's money to buy from anonymous Russian sources.

That's right the entire collusion attack on Trump was based on a dossier compiled by a foreign national, paid for by Hillary, and containing nothing more than unverified rumors from Russians.

Well it turns out that two people who Steele accused of making payments to Putin sued Steele in England.

The judge has no ruled in their favor saying that the dossier contains several items which are "inaccurate or misleading as a matter of fact".

That's the judges way of saying that Steele either lied or made things up.

The judge pointed out that before smearing the two men who sued Steele, and Trump, Steele hadn't done even tried to verify the contents of his dossier.

We now know that that dossier was the only "evidence" the Deep State had to justify its attack on Trump.