Wednesday, February 19, 2020

The Washington Post advocates for tyranny





Clearly the elites in the DC area believe that we the people can't be allowed to, as Adam Schiff implied, "interfere" in the 2020 election.

The WaPo op-ed was written by a university professor, well duh, from Marquette university.

Julia Azari wrote:

"The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters."

Of course leftists elitists would ignore anything the voters said that they, the elites, didn't like so the whole "instructions from voters" would be just a big lie to cover up that Azari wants us to return to the past where candidates were selected in smoke filled rooms by the "elites"; of course now the smoke would be from weed not tobacco.

That the WaPo would publish this is more proof that their "Democracy Dies in Darkness" is a mission statement not a warning.

This is how Democrat leaders, politicians and the folk in the #FakeNews media, think of you.  You're a problem and you're not really smart enough to make your own decisions.

This nothing new. Back when Democrats were fighting the Civil War to keep slavery legal they said that slavery was actually a good thing for Blacks. Their "reasoning" was based the belief held by Democrats that Blacks were too stupid to run their own lives so that slavery actually resulted in a better quality of life for Blacks than being free would.

All that's changed is that modern Democrat elites view all of we the people as too stupid to run our own lives. That's why they believe that they should have complete control over how we live from deciding what our religious beliefs should be, remember Hillary said that religions would have to change what they teach to conform to Democrat policy?, to how much soda/pop we can drink and what sort of straws we can use.

All Democrat presidential candidates support fascist tyranny and believe that they should control your lives rather than represent you.

UPDATE: in response to criticism the WaPo changed the headline.  But the fact remains that they thought the original one, and there article itself, was ok.

No comments: