Now the Democrats are invoking secrecy to ensure that a similar analysis can't be done about the "whistleblowers" who are claiming, based on rumors, that Trump did something wrong in asking the Ukraine to investigate foreign interference in the 2016 election.
We do know that the first "whistleblower" is a highly partisan individual who supports one of the Democrat presidential candidates. Can you imagine if say Rudy Giuliani reported that Obama had done something nefarious how the #FakeNews media would excoriate him due to his bias? Yet by concealing the identity of this "whistleblower" the Democrats can keep his or her biases hidden.
Similarly the dishonest Adam Schiff has released only parts of secret testimony about the Ukraine and deliberately held back the parts that showed that the people testifying did not have any information that showed that Trump has done anything wrong.
Clearly the Democrats are going to try and conduct this latest attempt to overturn the 2016 election in secret so that they lying allies in the #FakeNews media can have a better chance of fooling we the people.
From a legal perspective the "whistleblower" isn't a whistleblower. They have no first hand knowledge of anything. Being a witness to unverified comments made by someone else doesn't entitle one to anonymity if one then weaponizes those rumors to attack the President for purely political reasons.
What's important to remember is that the first thing that Trump asked the Ukraine to look into wasn't Biden but the alleged hacking of the DNC computers by Russia. While the US Intelligence Community(IC) said that the hack was by the Russians they did so not based on their own examination of the hacked computers, because the DNC wouldn't let the IC near them, but on the word of a security firm hired by the DNC.
A security firm owned by a Ukrainian which just happened to move the DNCs computers to Ukraine.
If in fact it turns out that the DNC email hack wasn't done by the Russians then a huge portion of the Democrats lies about collusion would be discredited. That would be bad for their ongoing Big Lie about Trump and hence it's not surprising that they're up in arms about Trump trying to find the truth.
Democrats are desperately working to hide from we the people the truth about the sham collusion charges, all of which were based on foreign and mostly Russian sources, in order to fool us into voting for whatever Democrat wins their nomination.
Given that a senior Ukrainian official has been convicted of interfering in the 2016 election for Hillary it makes sense that the Democrats are desperate to hide the fact that there was foreign interference in the 2016 election but it was all for Hillary.
The #FakeNews media has done a great job hiding the fact that in March 2016 a Ukrainian American who happens to be a Democrat party activist approached the Ukraine embassy in the US for dirt on Trump. Alexandra Chalupa asked the Ukrainian government for "“evidence that Trump, his organization and [campaign manager Paul] Manafort were Russian assets, working to hurt the U.S. and working with Putin against the U.S. interests.”
Given that Democrats are now saying that Trump's asking the Ukraine to investigate if in fact the Ukraine interfered in the US election via the Ukrainian owned security firm the Democrats used is an impeachable offense Chalupa must be guilty of high crimes.
The whole Ukraine "scandal" is a squirrel that the Democrats are putting up in order to hide from we the people the fact that Democrats enlisted foreign aid in their campaign against Trump. Not only did Chalupa ask for Ukrainian help Hillary paid a British citizen to collect unverified "dirt" about Trump from anonymous sources in Russia.
To keep the Big Lie going however the Democrats need to hide the fact that Chalupa, Steele, and the "whistleblower" all hate Trump and are desperate to ensure that Democrats run America.
Posts
1 comment:
Democrats are not the only people in government using anonymity. The IRS uses it regularly when they decide to harass a taxpayer for more tax. Almost all notices sent out by the IRS are unsigned and almost all cite no law either. And when you look on government websites for the names of the senior IRS employee at a particular IRS office so you can write them about what is going on, you will not find it, and you have to respond "Dear Anonymous:"
Post a Comment