Who do you believe on the Ukraine; the "victim" or a Democrat hack?

The President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, has categorically stated that he didn't feel pressured by Trump to investigate the obvious case of Joe and Hunter Biden's corruption.

A Democrat aligned CIA analyst with no first hand knowledge says that Zelensky is wrong.

Now apparently another person in the intelligence community is claiming first hand knowledge of the events related to the infamous Ukraine call.

The problem of course is that if that person says something different than what the transcript says and even more importantly different than what Zelensky says then we have to ask the simple question; who do we trust more the supposed "victim" or a highly biased Deep State actor who is probably colluding with Democrats in Congress?

We know that the first "whistleblower" worked with House Democrats, one of whom--Adam Schiff--lied about it, in order to turn rumors--which the transcript and Zelensky showed to be false-- into an excuse for the Democrats to nullify the 2016 election.

It's inevitable that it will turn up that this new "whistleblower" who is being represented by the same Democrat party loyalist lawyer will be a part of the "resistance" who is eager to "correct" the voters "mistake" at any cost.

What we're seeing is the desperate Swamp creatures willing to tell any lie in order to ensure that no election that they lose will stand.