- Adam Schiff colluded with the "whistleblower" to create the complaint and lied about it.
- The "whistleblower" had no first hand knowledge of anything and the sources of his rumors deny his claims
- The "whistleblower" is a registered Democrat, a friend of Joe Biden, and he has worked with Joe Biden
- The transcript shows that nothing illegal happened.
- Col. Vindman testified that the transcript was accurate
- Hunter Biden got his high paying Ukraine job after Joe Biden was made point man for US Ukraine policy.
- The corrupt company that Hunter worked for, Burisma, used Hunter's name, really his dad's name, to try and getting meetings with US officials to declare that Burisma wasn't corrupt.
- Hunter Biden has publicly admitted that he wouldn't have gotten the high paying job in Ukraine if he wasn't Joe Biden's son.
- Hunter Biden can't speak Ukrainian, never went to Ukraine, and knows nothing about the energy sector but corrupt Ukraine company Burisma paid him as much as $83k a month.
- The one and only foreign prosecutor that Joe Biden personally assured got fired was the one and only foreign prosecutor who was investigating the company Hunter Biden worked for.
- Joe Biden is on video saying that he demanded a quid pro quo for US aid to Ukraine; that the prosecutor who just happened to be investigating Joe's son be fired. Democrats say that's fine.
- Because of Joe's actions the Ukraine stopped investigating Burisma which everyone agreed was corrupt.
- A State Department official raised a flag with Biden because even if his son's deal with Burisma wasn't corrupt it sure looked like it was and even the appearance of corruption by the US VP made it hard for the State Department to get Ukrainian politicians to stop being corrupt. Biden's office said there was no issue.
- Ambassador Sondland testified under oath that President Trump had personally told him there was no quid pro quo for military aid to Ukraine
- Sondland said he assumed there was a quid pro quo
- Col. Vindman made a big deal about being the White House's expert on Ukraine. But he thought that Obama had supplied lethal aid to Ukraine when Obama had in fact refused to do so.
- Col. Vindman was reprimanded by a commanding officer during a joint exercise in Europe that involved Russians for disparaging America and Americans to the Russians.
- Col. Vindman was born in the Ukraine.
- Col. Vindman admitted in his testimony that his problem with the phone call was that it would go against what he personally wanted the US to do.
- Col. Vindman said that "he was deeply troubled by what reinterpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy...". This is really really really bad because it shows that Vindman thinks that unelected bureaucrats like himself get to define US foreign policy not the President that we the people elect.
- The Biden's have a pattern of corruption. Back in 2007 Joe intervened with the government on two obscure issues that benefited Hunter's law firm.
- The Biden's have a pattern of corruption. Two weeks after flying to China on Air Force 2 with his dad Hunter Biden, and the stepson of then State Department head John Kerry, got a deal to manage $1.5 billion in cash that belongs to the Chinese government. Contrary to Hunter's claims he stood to make $20 million from the deal.
- Adam Schiff has selectively leaked testimony to make it appear that witnesses said something that they didn't say
- Adams Schiff has prevented Republicans from asking witnesses certain questions
- Adam Schiff is saying that the President can be impeached without the person who accused him of a crime having to testify or be cross examined
- Unlike all previous impeachments Trump won't be able to have his lawyers cross examine the witnesses at the hearings that aren't being held by the Judicial committee
- Unlike all previous impeachments Trump's lawyers won't be able to call witnesses at all the impeachment hearings
- What witnesses can be called at the Judiciary hearing will be controlled by Democrats
- The aid to Ukraine was held up because Trump wanted the Ukraine to make a positive public statement on ending corruption in the Ukraine not because Trump wanted Biden's obvious corruption investigated.
- 3 Democrat Senators wrote a letter to the Ukraine in 2018 demanding the Ukraine reopen investigations into people associated with Trump and clearly indicated that if the Ukraine didn't do so the Ukraine would suffer. Needless to say Democrats have no problem with that.
- In the transcript the mention of military aid occurs 500 words before any mention of the Bidens and is totally unrelated. Right after the mention of military aid Trump asked Zelensky, the new Ukrainian president, to investigate corruption and Ukraine interference in the 2016 election.
- Ukraine has convicted at least one Ukrainian for interfering in the 2016 election for Hillary Clinton.
- Acting Ambassador Taylor, testified that the Ukrainians never knew that military aid was temporarily held up because of Trump's concerns about the Europeans not doing enough and about corruption in the Ukraine siphoning off US aid money.
- There could not have been a quid pro quo if the Ukrainians never knew that anyone was even thinking about delaying aid much less conditioning that aid on specific actions by Ukraine
- President Zelensky of Ukraine said he felt no pressure and that there was no quid pro quo
- The "whistleblower" is a registered Democrat
- The "whistleblower" was kicked out of the White House for leaking information designed to damage Trump
- The "whistleblower" is a personal friend of Joe Biden and worked with him
- The "whistleblower's" attorney has called for a coup against Trump and said that one is starting
- Nancy Pelosi said that the impeachment inquiry vote wasn't about impeachment
- The new impeachment rules allow Democrats to continue to hold secret hearings as long as they want
- Democrats want to impeach Trump without having witnesses like the "whistleblower" and Hunter Biden testify
There is a lot more. Basically whenever we get to read the actual testimony what Democrat say is witnesses declaring that there was a quid pro quo turns out to be witnesses who have no first hand knowledge saying that they felt there was a quid pro quo.
This "impeachment" is a coup by another name. Democrats want to throw Trump out because they believe that democracy is only acceptable when they win.
No comments:
Post a Comment