Mueller corrects; the left ignores

Mueller is treading a very thin line; he's doing everything he can to imply that Trump is guilty of evil deeds while not actually lying and saying that Trump has done anything wrong.

It's a tough job given that his report admits that there was no collusion and refuses to say that there was any obstruction.

Mueller's line is that he didn't decide if there was obstruction.  Given that making that decision was his job he can get away with saying that only because the #FakeNews media cover for him.

In real life the way things are supposed to work is a prosecutor investigates a crime he has some evidence occurred; a body is found lying on a street.  After he gets all the evidence he then decides if there is evidence to show a crime has been committed; was the body stabbed or did they die of typhus?  If a crime was committed then the prosecutor indicts the perpetrator.  If the prosecutor can't find evidence of a crime he walks away saying nothing.

That's because in America you're innocent until proven guilty.  But Mueller has flipped that.  He's saying that since he couldn't prove a negative--Trump didn't do anything--then Trump must be guilty.

Given the complete lack of any form of honesty on the part of the #FakeNews media and Democrat politicians they're gladly going along with this inversion of the American judicial process. Their treachery is transparent given that they are also the ones who fight to ensure that rapists, drug dealers, and murderers are set free due to legal technicalities precisely because even those fiends are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

If one reads the Mueller report in light of traditional American justice then it's clear that Mueller did come to a conclusion on obstruction; he couldn't find any evidence of it.  Hence he should have said so rather than declare that Trump is guilty until proven innocent.

In his recent speech Mueller tried to toe the same thin line but as with his report he created the impression among leftists that if it were allowed under DOJ policy to indict a sitting President he, Mueller, would have indicted Trump for obstruction.

But we have to credit Mueller with having a tiny shred of honesty, or perhaps a fear of being indicted or sued by Trump, because after his recent speech he issued the following clarification--something that the left hasn't taken to heart:

"The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements."

But even as Mueller denied what the left got out of his speech he still was acting as though he didn't clear Trump by admitting that there wasn't any evidence he could cite that showed that Trump had in fact obstructed justice.

For anyone else in America a prosecutor saying that he couldn't find any evidence to indict would mean that that person was off the hook but not so for the left and Trump.  

In the minds of the left Trump has no right to be President because to the left elections are nothing more than shams to cover the ascension to power of our rightful rulers.