Gun control is about making we the people serfs

While Democrats keep pitching their desire to nullify the 2nd Amendment based on the claim that doing so will reduce violence their real motivation is to ensure that we the people can't protect ourselves.

Guns were far more common in America in the 1950s than they are now but mass shootings were far less common and the number of shootings in Democrat run cities like Chicago were no where near as high as they are now.

Clearly if it was access to guns that was the problem then states like Texas would be awash with blood and places like Chicago where it's nearly impossible to own a gun would be the safest places on earth. Yet the opposite is true.

The problem isn't guns because, contrary to Democrat claims, guns don't kill people. People kill people.  In London, which has a higher murder rate than NYC, you can't get a gun so people kill with knives.

What's changed since the 1950s is that we've become a less religious society and we've shown more sympathy to criminals than to victims.

With Democrats pushing for softer sentences for people who use guns in crimes it's clear that they're not really concerned with the safety of we the people when they push for keeping law abiding people from buying guns.

That's why they ignore the evidence that shows that the more honest law abiding people who have guns the less violence there is.

In fact we know that guns are our best defense against mass shootings. In the Christchurch shootings for example a man with a gun drove the assailant away from the first Mosque, thereby keeping the body count low there, but at the second Mosque where there was no man with a gun the shooter was able to kill many more Muslims.

The church shooting in Texas was stopped by a neighbor who had an AR-15--the gun Democrats despise the most.

The #FakeNews media doesn't talk about the many school shootings where the body count was kept low because someone on the campus had a gun and engaged the shooter.

Studies have also shown that the more honest people who have guns the less prevalent crime is.

Given that only 10% of criminals get their guns legally none of the gun control measures Democrats are demanding will do anything to limit crime and make we the people safer.

Even then nuts who go out and do mass shootings wouldn't be stopped by any of the laws that Democrats are proposing.

Given that it's clear that gun control doesn't impact criminals or mass shooters why are Democrats so eager to disarm we the people and render us defenseless?

The answer is simple; people who depend on the government are more likely to vote for people who want bigger government, ie Democrats.

That's one of the reasons why city dwellers who are far more dependent on government services than people in the country tend to vote Democrat.

Around the world we've seen the consequences of a disarmed population. People without weapons are far more likely to be ruled by tyrants.  Even Mao agreed that an armed population is good, from the perspective of the population, when he said that power grows from the barrel of a gun.g

It's time to just say no to Democrats desire to ignore the 2nd Amendment. If the American people support the Democrat position then Democrats should use the process defined in the Constitution to change the 2nd Amendment.

But since, as with all Democrat policies, few Americans really support them Democrats will never do that. Rather they'll pass law after law and hope that dishonest judges will support them.

That alone shows why we the people should have guns because clearly if they get power Democrat politicians will institute a fascist regime where they are the rulers and we're the serfs.