Joe and Democrats in general keep defending his firing of a Ukraine prosecutor either by pretending it didn't happen, or by saying that he fired the prosecutor because the prosecutor was corrupt.
The reason that the firing is such a political hot potato is that the prosecutor was investigating the Burisma company; a company which had paid Joe's son Hunter $3M for no discernible reason since Hunter knew nothing about what Burisma does to make money; Hunter knew nothing of the energy business.
Hunter himself told ABC News on camera that the only reason he got the money was because he is Joe Biden's son. He answered the question of whether he would have gotten the job with Burisma if he wasn't Joe's son by saying:
“I don’t know. I don’t know. Probably not, in retrospect,” Hunter Biden said, before admitting his family’s political prominence played a large role in all of his dealings. “But that’s—you know—I don’t think that there’s a lot of things that would have happened in my life if my last name wasn’t Biden.”
When the prosecutor was fired the investigation into Burisma went away.
We now have Hunter's emails which show that one of the things that Burisma expected for they cash was protection.
Essentially the fact that the one and only time that Joe Biden personally intervened to get a corrupt foreign prosecutor fired was the one and only time a foreign prosecutor was investigating a company that had paid the Biden family millions of dollars.
Democrats are desperate to avoid you connecting the dots. There first line of defense is to say that Biden didn't fire the prosecutor.
Well we have video of Joe boasting of how he gave Ukraine 6 hours to fire the prosecutor or he'd deny them $1B in US aid.
No comments:
Post a Comment