The Framers said that the Supreme Court would be the least powerful of the three branches of government because all it could do is apply the laws passed by the Congress and signed by the President.
How wrong they turned out to be.
Starting in the 1940s with FDR's threat of court packing and the creation of a "wall of separation" between Church and state and then accelerating in the 1960s with the Warren court and continuing into our own day were the Court unilaterally redefined marriage and declared that men can compete in women's sports the Court has become the primary source of laws in country.
Completely unhinged from the Constitution dishonest, traitorous, judges like RBG ruled what they sincerely thought was best for America irrespective of what the Constitution actually says.
There is no right to privacy in the Constitution for example and the Founders would have been appalled at the idea that anything they wrote required killing unborn babies to be legal.
But Democrat politicians have been ecstatic with the situation because conservative judges, like Scalia, never made rulings that advanced the conservative agenda while dishonest judges like RBG constantly made rulings that advanced the Democrat agenda.
Not a single one of the Democrat's social agenda objectives has actually passed Congress.
Coddling criminals was something Democrats wanted but didn't dare try to legislate so the Supreme Court did it for them.
The Court's ruling on abortion was so radical, abortion for any reason at any point in a pregnancy, that it overturned the laws of all 50 states including states that had allowed abortions in some cases like New York.
51,000,000 Americans voted against redefining marriage and there is no way it would have passed the Congress but the Supreme Court did the heavy lifting and told voters to pound sand.
Most recently after Democrats tried and failed many times to change the word "sex" in Title IX to "gender" the Court did it for them. Once again spitting in voters faces.
In fascist regimes a small group at the top makes the laws.
Hence the fact that Democrat politicians are happy about the Court essentially passing laws which Democrats could never get through Congress shows that Democrat politicians are fascists.
Democrat politicians believe that they should rule over us and control every aspect of our lives from how much soda we drink to what our religious beliefs are.
Like all fascists they think they're better than we the people and that they are entitled to run our poor benighted lives; for our own good of course.
That's why Democrats are actually threatening violence if Trump and the Senate appoint a Supreme Court judge that they, the Democrats, don't approve of.
If the Court had been neutral since FDR's day none of the Democrats hedonistic social agenda would have ever passed. Obamacare would have been found to be unconstitutional since the Constitution doesn't allow the government to levy fees on people who don't do something. That's why Roberts had to say that what Democrats called fees were really taxes.
Of course if the Democrats had said that they were raising taxes as part of Obamacare it would have never passed so effectively Roberts allowed the Democrats to declare that they weren't raising taxes while in fact raising taxes.
Democrats haven't been undermining our society via the democratic process. Their major efforts to turn America into a hedonistic European country have all been arbitrarily imposed on society by the Supreme Court.
If the Court should get, for the first time in living memory, a majority of honest judges who view their role as deciding what the people's representatives intended when they passed a law not making new laws because the people are too stupid to support what's "best" for them then Democrats would have to actually convince people to support their radical agenda.
That's an intolerable thought to Democrat politicians because they're fascists who don't think that they represent you; rather they think they should rule over you.
If the Court wasn't a super unelected legislature no one would care who was on it.
The fact that Democrats are saying they will do anything, include use violence, to ensure that the Court stays dishonest tells us all we need to know about who we should vote for in November.
3 comments:
If the Supreme Court does not make laws why are conservatives so desperate to replace Ginsburg?
Just asking.
Well that's obvious. We want the Court to stop making Democrat laws.
Conservative judges don't create new laws; they just do what they're supposed to do apply the laws as defined by Congress to specific cases.
>Conservative judges don't create new laws; they just do what they're supposed to do apply the laws as defined by Congress to specific cases.
everyone thinks their rulings are 'right' and the others are overreach and 'legislating from the bench'. look to citizens united or heller for clear cases of conservative justices legislating from the bench.
Post a Comment