In addition the story told by Ford was implausible and conflicted with what other witnesses said; for one thing none of the people Ford said were at the party remembers the party that the attack supposedly occurred at.
But at least the alleged victim, Ford, said that she recalled, albeit decades later, that she was assaulted.
The New York Times just ran an article, a bit of free publicity for a book being released by the same NYT reporters, that claims that there is a new charge of sexual impropriety against Justice Kavanaugh. A Democrat activist, Max Stier, is claiming that he saw someone else force Kavanaugh's penis into the face of another woman.
There are some obvious problems with this. If in fact a third party forced Kavanaugh's penis into a woman's face then both Kavanaugh and the woman are victims. Further Stier shopped this allegation around back during the Kavanaugh hearings and no Democrat Senator bothered to investigate.
To put the magnitude of that rejection into perspective remember that the Democrats did discuss the claims of a woman who said that she had attended multiple high school parties, which she said Kavanaugh also attended, when she was in college where women were repeatedly gang raped. She said she didn't see Kavanaugh participating.
Even worse it turns out that if she wasn't lying she went to multiple parties where she knew women, who she said were her friends, were being and would be raped and did nothing. She didn't warn the women in any way. Clearly one can only hope that she's a liar since if she's not then she enabled multiple gang rapes.
Her story fell apart quickly and lacked any sort of supporting testimony from anyone. But the Democrats treated it as being credible.
So Stier's story has to be even less credible than that.
And it turns out it is.
The fact that the New York Times deliberately left out of their story, but which is in the book, is the the woman that Max Stier, Democrat activist, said was the victim has said that no such event ever occurred.
Yes you've got that right. Democrats have moved from accusing Kavanaugh based on the testimony of one woman which was contradicted by all the people, including one close friend, who she said would back her story to accusing Kavanaugh of assaulting a woman who says he never assaulted her.
The fact that the New York Times knew that the story they published was a lie because they knew that there was no woman who said she'd been harassed by Kavanaugh shows that the NYT cares nothing for the truth. They are dishonest scum who will tell any lie in order to get more business and undo the 2016 election.
What's amazing is that the NYT also said that putting a penis in a woman face is "harmless fun". So the NYT is accusing Kavanaugh of being a monster for doing what it describes as "harmless fun". Clearly if we dig we'll find lot's of sexual harassment by people who have that sort of definition of "harmless fun".
New York Times Opinion— I can only assume accidentally— deleted this Pulitzer bound journalism. Between praising Mao and blaming airplanes, it’s the NYT family’s 3rd totally accidental deletion this month.— The Red-Headed Libertarian™️ (@TRHLofficial) September 15, 2019
Don’t worry. I’ve got a screen shot. pic.twitter.com/tG9RUSeYgF
It's time that the real press in America start going through the personal lives in college and high school of these NYT reporters and see if any problems show up. The thought that Republicans might put future Democrat president's Supreme Court picks through the wringer won't deter liars like these NYT reporters. Only if their own reputations are at stake will they eschew lying and stick to the facts.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment