Elizabeth Warren says she's not sure if she's against corruption

Some media person didn't get the memo and asked Democrat Elizabeth Warren a hard question about whether or not it would be ethical for her vice president's son served on the board of a foreign company:

FLAG: Senator Elizabeth Warren appears uncharacteristically flustered when asked if her ethics plan would allow her Vice President's son to serve on the board of a foreign company: "No," she said. "I don't know. I mean I’d have to go back and look at the details." #nhpolitics pic.twitter.com/EksLlMEsew

— Nicole Sganga (@NicoleSganga) September 25, 2019

Clearly Warren was unwilling to agree that Joe Biden's son, Hunter, did anything wrong by receiving as much as $83K a month from a corrupt Ukrainian company on a subject area he knew nothing about starting shortly after Obama had appointed Biden as his point man on Ukraine.

Given that this question was asked because Warren has pledged to end corruption it shows once again how to Democrats there are two sets of laws and moral standards; one for them and one for everyone else.

Obviously when Warren says she's going to clean up corruption she means she's going to declare that things she doesn't like are corruption not that she actually wants to end corruption.

If you read her plan it's all about basically eliminating the 1st Amendment rights of anyone who has worked in government.

She also wants to prevent the government having to listen to input from Americans who are impacted by bureaucratic rules. How that's corruption is unclear but it would sure make it easier for extremist policies to be enforced on we the people.

While she's unsure if Biden's son raking in huge piles of cash due to his dad's position is corruption she does know that force arbitration is corrupt.

Clearly her latest tacit admission shows that she doesn't really know what the word corruption means as well as the fact that if corruption favors Democrats she's all for it.