NYT reporters try and blame their editors for big lie about Kavanaugh

The two New York Times reporters who declared that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted a woman who said she wasn't sexually assaulted are blaming the NYT editors for their #FakeNews story.

Supposedly the "reporters" put the fact that the alleged victim said the event never happened in their story and an evil editor took it out.

What the reporters are missing is the obvious fact that they're still guilty.

Imagine for a moment if a Republic operative, who had a grudge against Obama, had said that Obama had sexually harassed a women when he was in college but that woman said it never happened yet two Fox News reporters wrote about the allegation and then Fox News ran an article in which it neglected to mention that the woman said nothing had happened.

The media would be in an uproar; not just because Fox News didn't mention that there was no victim but because the two Fox News reporters thought a story whose only source was someone who had good reason to hate Obama was credible.

Given that despite his many other failings there has never been any indication that Obama was a sexual predator simply assuming that a story from a politically motivated enemy was true would be a massive breach of journalist ethics.

But we know from all the women who have worked for and with Kavanaugh and all the women who knew him in College that Kavanaugh has always been the antithesis of a sexual predator so the NYT "reporters" simply assuming the story about him must be true shows an amazing level of either stupidity or dishonesty.

The NYT reporters only source for their latest smear is a man called Max Stier.  It turns out that not only is he a hard core Democrat operative but that he squared off against Kavanaugh when Bill Clinton was being investigated by Ken Starr. That's right the Democrat source for the claim against Kavanaugh defended Bill Clinton who is a sexual predator.

In a world where the NYTs wasn't nothing more than a propaganda arm of the Democrat party it would have done what Democrat Senators, the Washington Post, and the FBI did when they heard Stier's story; ignored it.

It's absolutely critical to note that the woman who Stier says was harassed says that she has no recollection of any such incident; that is there is no victim in this story other than Kavanaugh whose reputation is being smeared.

That the NYT reporters would put such a monstrous lie in their book shows that they're guilty of being propaganda agents not reporters irrespective of whether or not they removed the critical fact that there was no victim from their story in the NYT.