The Left's view of freedom: throwing people out of restaurants edition

The Washington Post published an editorial by the infamous owner, Stephanie Wilkinson, of the Red Hen restaurant, the restaurant which threw Sarah Sanders out, saying that woke people have an obligation to throw people out who they disagree with at least until a Democrat is elected President.

Odds are she also feels that a Christian baker should be forced to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

That's the Left today; freedom for me but not for thee.

They feel perfectly comfortable throwing conservatives out of their restaurant because they know that conservatives are better people than they are and hence conservatives won't start throwing leftists out.

We all know that the people that run Chick Fil A are conservative but they hire and serve anyone irrespective of their ideology.  That's what America is about; tolerance and diversity.

But the left today rejects both.  Oh they use the terms but they don't really know what the words mean.

To the left everyone must tolerate the left and to be diverse leftists must be included but leftists feel no obligation to tolerate others or include anyone they don't like.

The problem is that this sort of fascist brinkmanship could lead the US to a very sad place.  With blue check "journalists" on Twitter saying beating up journalists is ok so long as they're conservative and with the WaPo endorsing the harassment of their political opponents in public places we're getting very close to a place where the vast majority of Americans who do in fact value tolerance are going to start  responding in kind.

Washington Post approves of throwing conservatives out of resteraunts

The WaPo gave the owner of the Red Hen restaurant a chance to justify why restaurant owners should deny service to people whose politics they don't like.

She of course is famous for kicking Sarah Sanders out of the Red Hen.

What's interesting is that if a conservative restaurant threw out say Kamala Harris because of her support for killing born alive babies the left, and the Red Hen owner, would undoubtedly be screaming bloody murder.

The owners rationalization of her fascist tactics is

"if you’re an unsavory individual — of whatever persuasion or affiliation — we have no legal or moral obligation to do business with you. And that, too, is right. (snip)

…at bottom this isn’t about politics. It’s about values, and accountability to values, in business."

But of course when she talks about "unsavory" folk she's basing that value judgement on her radical leftist politics and her statement about whatever persuasion is a lie for the simple reason that she wouldn't see someone like Harris who advocates the mass murder of the unborn as "unsavory".

It's interesting when #FakeNews media outlets like the WaPo are complaining about Trump's supposed war on the free press, which is nothing more than Trump pointing out the lies of the #FakeNews media, the WaPo feels free to endorse driving conservative Americans out of public places.

The big reveal however comes when the Red Hen's owner writes:

"When  the world returns to its normal axis, these encounters will disappear."

That is when the Democrats are in power she'll stop discriminating against people whose views she doesn't like.

As with most modern Democrats she's all about threats and intimidation since she can't convince anyone of the value of her political views.

First Rule of #FakeNews: Everything Trump does is wrong North Korea edition

When Trump was tough on North Korea the #FakeNews media said he was a warmonger and was going to get us into a nuclear war.

When Trump started negotiating with North Korea the #FakeNews media said he was giving too much away and that it would never work.

When Trump walked away from the Vietnam Summit because North Korea made harsh demands the #FakeNews media said Trump had failed.

Now that Trump has gotten talks restarted without making any concessions to North Korea the #FakeNews media is saying it's all for show.

No matter what Trump does--act tough, negotiate, refuse to accept bad terms, or act friendly-- the #FakeNews media condemns him.

We see that at the border.  When Trump said there was a crisis at the border the #FakeNews media mocked him. Now that the Democrats are agreeing there is a crisis the #FakeNews media is blaming it on Trump.

Antifa thugs attacked reporter Andy Ngo and sent him to the ER.

Democrats either commend Antifa or ignore it.  After all what fascists, and modern Democrat politicians are mostly fascists who want to rule us not represent us, doesn't like their own personal brown shirts who will beat up anyone that dares express truths the fascists don't want spoken?

It will be interesting to see how the #FakeNews media will handle the vicious assault on reporter Andy Ngo.

Because he's Asian he is considered to be white so the left has no particular reason to care about him. He's not on welfare and won't vote Democrat so really about the best we can expect is silence.

But wait you say he's a reporter?  Aren't people like Acosta always saying that Trump is making it physically dangerous for reporters? Won't they come to Andy's defense?

Of course not. If Trump was actually making it physically dangerous Acosta would have run a long time ago.  They know they're lying about Trump and they could care less what happens to a reporter who doesn't toe the Democrat party line.

California Democrats create a new tax on Americans to buy the votes of illegals.

California Democrats are planning to provide free medical coverage to illegals between the ages of 19 and 25 by enrolling them in Medi-Cal.  The Democrats are claiming that will only cost $98,000,000 a year.  This is part of then latest California budget.

Of course given that California is between $285 billion and $1 trillion in debt due to underfunded pension plans for California government employees even the Democrats agree that they have to raise taxes to come up with that $98 million.

They plan to tax American citizens who are too poor, or too healthy, to buy their own insurance to pay for the health care for illegals. That's right they're going to raise the Obamacare mandate from the dead, the Republicans having gotten rid of it, and impose it on Californians; of course since illegals don't pay state taxes, unless they've stolen someone's identity, they won't be contributing.

But that's the least of the problems with this Democrat proposal.

It turns out the definition of poor in the bill would mean that a family of four that made $150,000 a year could still get some level of benefits from this new plan.  Given that the poverty level in California, adjusted for local conditions like the high cost of housing is $30,00 a year that means that a lot of illegals who aren't poor will be getting benefits.

But the biggest problem with this new plan is that either its cost is dramatically underestimated or it's proof that illegals are stealing good high paying jobs from Americans.

Since there are around 2.4 million illegals in California and roughly 14% of illegals are in the 19 to 25 year age range there are roughly 332,190 illegals who are potentially eligible for this new program.

If we assume that the 90,000 figure is right then that means that 72.9% of illegals ages 19 to 25 earn enough to be above the poverty line;$30 thousand a year. That means that only 27% of illegals are living in poverty. If that's true then the majority of illegals aren't taking low paying jobs that Americans won't take but instead are stealing high paying jobs from Americans.

When we look at how earnings change by age the problem is even worse.  The average salary for Americans age 20-24 is $29 thousand a year. That rises to $42 thousand a year for American workers aged 25-34 and $51 thousand a year for workers ages 35 to 44.  Hence the average salary of illegals, if the Democrats estimates are right, are very close to the pay for citizens given that the poverty level in CA is $30 thousand a year.   

If the Democrat estimates are correct that means that a significant fraction of illegals aren't taking low paying, back breaking jobs. Instead those illegals are taking the same types of jobs, in terms of pay, as American citizens.

However given that the average poverty rate of illegals in California is more like 80% the problem probably isn't that illegals are stealing high paying jobs from Americans, they're just driving down wages and keeping poor Americans from getting jobs, but that the cost of this program will be much higher than the Democrats are predicting.

Using the Democrats numbers it will cost around $1100 a year for each illegal who benefits from the program.  If we assume that 80% of young illegals are poor, rather than the 27% that the Democrats assume, the total number of illegals who will benefit from this program will be 265,752 instead of 90,000.

If that figure is true the program will cost California citizens $290 million a year not the $98 million dollars a year that the Democrats are projecting.

Given that Democrats have a very long history of underestimating the cost of welfare programs and the fact that it's highly unlikely that illegals who lack English skills and a decent education are stealing high paying jobs odds are that if passed this new plan will cost Californians a lot more money than the Democrats are claiming it will.

What's interesting is that by supporting this plan Democrats are saying that they're willing to tax American citizens to pay for the expenses of illegals.

Of course by offering in state tuition and free public schooling to illegals California Democrats have clearly said that they believe that illegals should benefit from the hard work of Americans. What's unique about this case is that Democrats are saying that they will create a new tax that only applies to American citizens to pay for this new benefit for illegals.

Historically Democrats have just funded their welfare for illegals programs out of the general revenue so actually creating a new tax the only purpose of which is to benefit illegals is a new achievement by Democrats.

Inquiring minds might be asking why are Democrats so eager to help illegals? After all Democrats have historically only used taxpayer money to buy votes.

The answer is that in California it's highly likely that Democrats believe that illegals are voting Democrat.  Why else would the Democrats have made it easy for illegals to register to vote?

Currently illegals in California can get a drivers license and when they do so they're asked if they want to register to vote. The process is based entirely on the honor system; if an illegal says that they are a citizen they will be registered to vote; they are not required to provide any proof of citizenship.

Democrats want us to believe that people who had no problem breaking our immigration laws to improve their financial situation would never ever contemplate breaking our election laws to vote for politicians who say they will improve the economic situation of illegals.

As with most current Democrat efforts in California this new plan will hurt working Californians, not hurt the rich who won't have to pay the new tax,  and help illegals which tells us who the Democrats really care about.
Feel free to follow tom on Twitter

It's official; California will provide free medical care for some illegals paid for by a new tax on citizens

Well the California budget passed and has been signed.

Illegals between 19 and 25 will get Medi-Cal.

Californians who don't buy health insurance will be taxed to pay for those illegals coverage.

It's likely a first; the first time a new tax on citizens has been created for the sole purpose of benefiting illegals.

While Democrat governor Newsom says it'll cost $98 million a year that's crazy talk. Based on the number of people in that group the cost will probably be more than $200 million a year.

Democrats hate children: busing edition

School bussing to achieve racial integration was a total disaster opposed by everyone.  We don't have bussing today because America's racist but because America, other than Democrat politicians, love children.

What Black mother wants her kid spending hours a day on a school bus and unable to make friends at the school she goes to because most of the kids live too far away?

Bussing ended because no one, Black or white, thought it solved anything and everyone agreed it made things much worse for kids.

The whole idea of bussing is nothing more than a way for the Democrats to continue to support high salaries for incompetent inner city public school teachers.

The obvious solution isn't to punish the kids but to make the inner city schools better. But that would require firing incompetent and uncaring teachers which is anathema to Democrats since teachers unions give a huge amount of money to Democrats.

Democrats didn't care when illegals were dying on the border when Biden was VP.

During the Obama years Breitbart reported 20 times on illegals dying trying to sneak into the US and the #FakeNews media and the Democrats said nothing; they just didn't care.

Here's a plot of deaths on the border by year:

During Obama's first two years in office, 2009 and 2010, 785 illegals died trying to enter the US.  During Trump's first two years in office, 2017 and 2018, 581 illegals died trying to enter the US.

That's a 25% reduction.

Yet Democrats are condemning Trump for causing illegals to die.  

That argument is absurd since it's the Democrats who are enticing illegals to sneak into the country by offering work permits, free healthcare, and a path to citizenship to anyone who can survive the desert.

The reality is as it always is; Democrat politicians only care about themselves but they're willing to use the suffering of anyone to advance their own agenda.

Democrats want illegals to suffer

For months conservatives and even #NeverTrumpers have been begging the Democrats to provide extra funding to ensure that the tens of thousands of illegals who are swarming the border can be treated in a reasonable way.

And for months the Democrats have said no; apparently more eager to exploit the suffering of those illegals than actually help them.

Now that the situation has grown so bad that even Nancy Pelosi's heart of stone felt that something had to be done leftist Democrats in the House are furious that the House went along with the bipartisan Senate bill that provides $4.5 billion to feed and shelter all those illegals swarming the border.

As an aside it's interesting to remember how often the left says things like "instead of buying that $1 billion nuclear submarine we should be using the money to help poor kids".  Apparently spending $4.5 billion on illegals doesn't take any money away from helping poor Black kids.

When talking about suffering at the border it's important to remember that any illegal who feels that they are being treated inhumanely can simply leave and return to Mexico no questions asked.  So the question is how much are the majority of illegals suffering if few of them return to Mexico?

We're all for treating illegals fairly but the sad thing is that Democrats are quite willing to use the illegals as pawns even if that means that illegals suffer more in the process.

Democrats want you to pay for "free" healthcare for illegals

Democrats are all behind taking away the healthcare you like and forcing you to go to a civilian version of the Veterans Administration where you'll die waiting for care.

Of course since nothing is free Democrats expect you to pay more taxes for the privilege of getting lower quality healthcare.

You won't be able to get your kid the tutor she needs and you'll have to fix your car yourself because of the money the Democrats will take from you but that doesn't hurt Democrats one bit.

But Democrats love illegals so illegals will get, in fact, free healthcare since they won't be paying the high taxes that we the people will that pays for their healthcare.

As far as can be seen there is absolutely no area in which Democrats think that illegals should be treated worse than hard working tax paying Black Americans.

That makes sense since all that matters about each of us to Democrats is whether or not we'll vote for them.

Anyone who votes for Democrats is automatically granted all the rights that Democrats believe in.

Anyone who doesn't is begrudgingly allowed their Constitutional rights until a dishonest judge can be found who will remove those rights.

Democrats forget nothing material is free

When Democrats talk about forgiving student debt, providing medicare for all, etc they act as though they're giving us a gift.

The reality is our taxes will go up and we'll end up paying more because of the gross inefficiency of the government ensures that a large fraction of every tax dollar is spent feeding the swamp not actually helping citizens.

Now given that the Democrats are pandering to their base which is mostly rich people who have accountants that will ensure that they don't end up having to pay more taxes or people who don't pay taxes, like illegals, but who will get these new "freebies" it's true that the people who benefit from the Democrats plans will pay nothing.

But for we the people who work hard to support our families and be good people it'll mean we get to keep much less of what we earn and get poorer quality services so that people who could work but who don't want to will have a nice life at our expense.

We are slaves to the Supreme Court: Census edition

A 5 to 4 majority of the Supreme Court ruled that it is entirely legal to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. Given that the question has been on the census in the past that was a no brainer but given the decisions the Court has made in the past we can't count on it to get even no brainers right.

However then Justice Roberts, the same Justice who turned fees into taxes to save Obamacare, said that it's unclear if the reasoning used to decide to add the citizenship question in was valid.  He used that insanity to effectively bar the question from the census by throwing the case back to the lower court by siding with the 4 always dishonest judges.

As the honest judges pointed out declaring that a legal action can become illegal because of the thought process used to arrive at it is outside of traditional American law.  It's the reasoning that led a lower court to declare that one of Trump's executive orders was illegal while admitting that if Hillary had been elected and issued the same executive order it would have been legal.

That clearly is fascist reasoning that denies the authority of we the people to elect representatives to decide our laws. That sort of reasoning is ideal for setting up a two track legal system where any action by people who dishonest judges don't like is declared illegal because of those "bad" people's incorrect thoughts while any action by people dishonest judges go like only has to be legal.

It will be interesting to see what Trump does.  The problem is that supposedly the census forms have to be printed starting on July 1.  While the government is slow perhaps some way can be found to delay that.

Or perhaps Trump can pull an Obama and simply delay the census due to Supreme Court meddling.  While he wouldn't officially say he's doing so he could just create a schedule showing the census being completed at midnight on December 31 2020 and if the government fails to meet it he can let the Democrats sue him; which they will do anyway.

Some people say that if we begin doing things like that we're as bad as the leftists but the problem is that we don't have the majority of judges like the leftists do.  We're in a war and if we decide to use knives while leftists use shotguns we're going to end up as serfs.

Democrats show their hand; if you are responsible they will hurt you to help their voters

What sort of things did the Democrat candidates for President talk about last night?

1) Full citizenship and welfare for life for anyone who can make it across the border.  So if you're a hard working tax paying American you'll be subsidizing illegals so that they'll vote Democrat

2) 70% tax rate on the rich.  Note that when the "rich" pay taxes their money goes to the government which takes a big cut to pay the massive federal bureaucracy and then gives what's left to people who are likely to vote Democrat.  Remember that the money the "rich" no longer have can't be used to create new jobs or buy stuff that the company you work for makes.  Taxing the "rich" hurts hard working Americans but helps illegals and Americans who don't work.

3) Take away your medical insurance and replace it with a government controlled program.  Aside from the fact that everywhere you look government controlled medical care has been bad for responsible people but good for irresponsible ones is it really right that someone who has worked hard for decades should have the same medical care as someone who dropped out of high school to do drugs and how has lived on welfare ever since?  It's fine if people want to voluntarily contribute their money to help people like that but is it fair to demand that lower middle class families pay more taxes to subsidize indolence and irresponsibility?

4) Abortion for any reason at any point in time including immediately after birth.  Odd that these same people condemn Trump because illegals irresponsibly drag their children through a desert and some of them die as a result.

5) Abortion rights for trans women.  Yes Democrats demand that men who are pretending to be women have abortion rights. Given that it's physically impossible for a trans "woman" to get pregnant this shows how insane these candidates are.

6) They want to take your gun.  While they won't admit it, doing all they can to avoid answering directly, Democrats want to make it nearly impossible for anyone, but them, to have a gun.

7) Despite the great economy helping the vast majority of responsible Americans Democrats don't like it at all.  While Biden wasn't on last night he's called for increasing your taxes by repealing the Trump tax cuts. If you think about it that makes sense.  People with a good job who are responsible are hurt by every single Democrat policy.

That's actually the key take away from last night.  If you're not a pandered to minority, if you're not irresponsible, if you're not likely to vote Democrat every single Democrat policy will make your life worse.

Democrats hands red with the blood of dead child migrants

Children whose parents are trying to sneak into the US sometimes die in the attempt.  It happened under Obama and the Democrats didn't care but now that it's happening under Trump they're suddenly energized to blame him.

The problem is that it's their fault not his.  If the Wall had been built far fewer people would be selfish and drag their children on a trek across a desert where their chances of dying aren't miniscule.  The parents want more money and the kids suffer as a result.

Trump does everything he can to convince would be illegals that they will be caught and deported but Democrats and the #FakeNews media tell illegal wanna be's that odds are good that they can collect welfare for life if they can just sneak across the border.

Effectively Democrats are holding up a big pile of cash and tempting Hispanics to risk their lives to get it.  For the Democrats it's a win win; if the illegals make it into the country they're more potential Democrat voters and if they die trying Democrats, with the complicity of the #FakeNews media, will blame Trump.

These illegals know that they're not refugees because if they thought they were they'd simply apply for asylum at one of 11 locations in Mexico or any border crossing. They can do that without risking their kids lives, or being separated from their kids.  If they put their kids lives at risk by instead trying to sneak in they really hate their kids, they're amazingly stupid, or they realize that they won't qualify for asylum.

If the Democrats stood up for legal immigration only then we'd see a lot fewer deaths because people would know that odds weren't good for them getting a pot of gold once they managed to sneak into the US.

It's Democrats desire for more illegals to vote for them that moves them to induce the poor of central America to risk their kids lives to sneak into the US.

The blood of those children is, to a large extent, on the hands of the Democrats and the #FakeNews media.

The tyrannical greed of Democrat Ilhan Omar: Student Loan edition

Ilhan Omar voluntarily took on debt to go to college and now she wants you to pay off her debt.

Even though only 40% of Americans go to college and even though she didn't need to go to college she expects you to pay for her college.

What's really amazing is that as a member of Congress she makes $174,000 a year while the average American who she wants to pay off her freely assumed debt makes $56,000 a year.

This is the epitome of the tyrannical greed and personal irresponsibility of modern Democrat politicians; you are to work hard to ensure that they, and the people who vote for them, get the lifestyle they want.  Omar wants free college and Ocasio-Cortez wants you to work hard to ensure that Democrat voters who could work but who don't want to can still have a comfortable lifestyle.

Notice that no one is calling for free trade school or for subsidizing the tools that non-college graduates like plumbers, carpenters, or electricians need to buy in order to do their jobs.  Only the "elite" mostly white mostly financially well off college graduates are going to benefit from this massive, $1.6 trillion, bribe by the Democrats.

As with almost every Democrat policy this one rewards the lazy and irresponsible while punishing people who take responsibility for their own lives.  People have paid off or who are paying off their student loans will benefit far less, if at all, while students who haven't been paying off their debts will benefit the most.

This policy also is a great bribe for Democrat voters, another prerequisite for modern Democrat policies.  People who have hundreds of thousands of dollars of voluntarily acquired college debt paid off by someone else will have a tendency to vote for the politicians who erased their debts.  Academics will benefit because this will allow colleges to charge obscene amounts of money since the students, or their parents, won't have to pay.

When you hear the Democrat presidential candidates proposing all sorts of "free" things ranging from paying off college debts to free medical care remember that nothing is free.  All the Democrats are doing is saying that you have to pay for everyone else's "free" stuff.

If you don't owe massive college debts because you were responsible you won't benefit from the government paying off the student loans of others but you will pay more taxes to ensure that those people don't have to take responsibility for their actions.

If you have worked hard and have health insurance you won't benefit from medicare for all but you will pay for it.

The Democrat positions are all aimed at helping people who are greedy and irresponsible.  We all agree on the need to help those who through no fault of their own need help but the Democrats want us to deny our own children the ability to attend an affordable college because of the higher taxes we will have to pay to ensure that irresponsible people are rewarded.

I'm sick; stupid stomach bug. Won't be posting much for a few days. Sorry

It turns out that Google is changing search results in order to advance a leftist agenda.  Look at these two search results:

Almost all of the responses for men are either derogatory or talk about things that only women can do, like have babies now.  On the other hand the entries for women are either very positive or at worst neutral.

Why?

Because Google is on record now as saying that they don't care if the search results are true; what matters is that they advance Googles leftist agenda:

Google is saying that it will not report fact that contradict the leftist narrative.  That's why the search for "men can" says that men can have babies even though only biologically female human beings can have babies.  To express the truth would hurt the left's lies about transgenderism and gender fluidity and hence had to be suppressed.

It's rather amazing but not surprising that the leftists at Google think that they are capable of objectively determining what is a more fair and equitable state.  Odds are that they are rigging their AI so that it returns results that support the government paying off students college debt.  But given that that policy causes the 60% of Americans who didn't go to college to pay for the tuition of people who chose to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to get a useless degree in race or gender studies it's hardly clear that it's either equitable or fair.

Even worse a key Google executive has said on video that Google is working to make sure that 2016 doesn't happen again; ie that a candidate they don't like is elected.

This should be enough to allow people to sue Google for all sorts of reasons.  Google enjoyed a protection from being held responsible for its actions when it was a content neutral platform.  But now that Google itself is admitting it's a publisher that controls its content that protection no longer applies.

For example conservative websites which are deliberately down rated should be able to sue Google for essentially racketeering; using their platform to drive sites they don't like out of business.

Trump shows he has a cool head

Unlike Obama who issued a red line and then ignored it Trump had made no advanced statement about what actions Iran would have to do do earn a retaliatory strike.

Hence Trump cancelling an air strike over concerned about the number of Iranians that would die is nothing like Obama's having declared that if Assad in Syria used chemical weapons against civilians there would be consequences and then Obama doing nothing when Syria did just that.

Instead Trump has defined a red line, don't kill even one American, and taken non-lethal actions against Iranian leadership.  New financial regulations will cut the mad mullah's who run Iran off from billions of dollars in resources.  A cyber attack against the Iranian military has reduced their ability to deal with an American strike in the future.

All in all the Iranians are going to feel real pain for their attack on our drone.  Additionally Trump not running off to war shows we the people and the leaders of foreign governments that all the lies peddled by the #FakeNews media about Trump being a mentally unstable warmonger are in fact lies.

Americans are tired of our warriors dying in the Middle East because the radical Muslims there think they have the god given right to kill any and all non-Muslims.  If Trump succeeds with a non-violent retaliation then we'll avoid losing more Americans.

If his non-violent responses don't work and Iran kills Americans then most Americans will realize that force, and the death of Americans and Iranians, will be necessary.

Democrats kept Trump from retaliating against Iran

Since before he was elected Democrats and the #FakeNews media have been saying he's literally insane and will drag America into war, perhaps even a nuclear war.

Even though the left is attacking Trump for not retaliating against Iran if he had struck they'd have attacked him for that citing it as evidence of why he can't be trusted to be President.

By telling the world day after day that Trump is untrustworthy the #FakeNews media are making it hard for Trump to establish a coalition to take on Iran's increasing belligerency.

The good news is that Trump's decision to support a proportionate response was the right one; at least until Tehran kills an American.

The Europeans whose lust for money always overcomes their interest in peace are feverishly working to short circuit Trump's new sanctions on Iran. The fact that Trump eschewed a lethal response will make it harder for the Europeans to peddle the lie that Iran is the good guy and Trump is the bad guy.

I wanted an armed but limited response.  But after thinking about it for awhile I realized this is similar to why we shouldn't shoot robbers who are fleeing our house.  It took me a long time to appreciate that a non-violent thief doesn't deserve to die just for stealing my stuff.  But that's the right position in light of what Jesus taught.

Now if the thief was armed and had tried to kill me it might be possible to make a case that shooting him was ok to keep him from coming back and trying to kill me again.  But if he ran when he saw me and did nothing aggressive to me it would be wrong to risk killing him.

We can replace that drone.  We don't need to kill Iranians to hurt Iran.

But now if Iran does escalate Trump has established that it's Iran that's at fault so that he'll be able to get more international support for action against Iran.

Problems with Islam: Superiority complex edition

Many Muslims are good people and patriotic Americans but that's in spite of Islam not because of it.

Aside from the fact that Islam, unlike Catholicism, teaches that we should all be ruled by religious dictators Islam teaches that Muslims are superior to everyone else in the world.

Islam calls on Muslims to slay or subjugate non-Muslims.

Islam says that non-Muslims who are subjugated have to pay a special tax and are to be treated as second class citizens.

Islam says that Muslims can lie to non-Muslims if it advances the cause of Islam.

Islam says that Muslims are better people than non-Muslims.

This is why the Muslim world has so many people who are violent and bigoted.  They're poor, their culture is backwards, and their militaries always lose.  They react to that by hating non-Muslims since they "know" that Muslims are better so the only reason that they're suffering must be due to the evil non-Muslims.

Many Muslims rise above the hate in the Quran but the reality is that Islam is a 7th century version of Scientology.

Both were founded and made up by men who wanted to get wealthy, and in Muhammads case have sex with a 9 year old.  Neither performed any miracles or provided any proof for their claims.  Both were conmen at heart who were perfectly willing to use others to improve their own lifestyle.

Christianity teaches that we are to love our enemies and Islam teaches that Muslims are to conquer their enemies.

Christianity teaches that we are to turn the other cheek while Islam teaches that Muslims should do anything to win.

Until Muslims realize that they are not inherently better than the rest of us they will continue to be the main source of the worlds terrorism.

Antifa fascist thugs physically attack conservatives and Democrats are silent

Last year Antifa attacked Tucker Carlson's home and pounded on the door as his wife hid in the pantry.

Democrats said nothing.

Now Antifa has once again posted Tucker's home address, along with the home addresses of Neil Patel, Ann Coulter, and Sean Hannity.  Online the hate group said in a post called "Fascists are vulnerable. Confront them at their homes": "

“protecting ourselves and our communities means interfering with those who make a platform for hate.”

Can you imagine if some white nationalists did the same thing to Bill Maher or Colbert how the #FakeNews media would react?  Conservatives would be shouting the loudest condemning the violent tactics that were being called for. Yet the left is essentially being silent.

While most Democrat voters are good patriotic Americans the Democrat leadership is embracing the use of violence to silence their opponents just as Hitler sent out his Brown Shirts to silence those who stood against him.

New evidence the Deep State was trying to deep six Trump

Trey Gowdy said the following on Fox News:

"Here’s one, Maria, have you seen the disparate defensive briefings they gave candidate Clinton versus Candidate Trump? And has anyone asked the FBI to explain why they took entirely different tracks to those two debriefings? There’s a lot left to be seen by you and your viewers."

The FBI briefs all campaigns about threats from foreign sources hackers etc.

There would be no reason for different briefings since the intent is to ensure that all candidates can protect themselves from all threats.

If Trump was denied information that could have helped him protect himself from threats that was given to Hillary that would be pretty scandalous.

We already know that instead of informing Trump of the FBI's supposed concerns about Carter Page the FBI said nothing. That contrasts with a how the FBI treated Senator McCain when he was running for President. There were concerns about one of the people on his campaign. McCain was told and he took care of the problem.

But the FBI didn't warn Trump so that Trump could fix the problem even though the FBI has said that they weren't investigating Trump at the time and hence had no reason to not share the information.

It's clear that Obama weaponized the FBI to help Hillary win the presidency.

Pro-choice isn't

A judge in England has ruled that a mentally retarded girl must have an abortion against her own wishes, her mother's wishes, and the recommendations of social workers.

The woman has no choice; the judge is commanding that her child be killed.

Of course for decades China had a forced abortion policy and people who called themselves "pro-choice" supported it.

While many Americans who think that abortion should be legal at least some of the time are in fact deeply saddened by it the reality is that allowing abortion to be legal isn't pro-choice it's pro-abortion.

Imagine for a moment if someone said that they weren't for slavery but that they were pro-choice and wanted it to be legal. Would anyone for even the slightest fraction of a second say that their position made sense?

Or if someone said that they didn't support the death penalty but they were pro-choice and wanted the death penalty to be legal and used.  Would anyone consider that person to be making sense?

Anyone who supports abortion being legal supports abortion; at least in the circumstances where they want it to be legal.  The pro-choice term is just a bit of Orwellian speak to cover up what supporting legal abortion means.

Biden promises to take more of your money to buy votes

Democrat Joe Biden has declared that his first order of business is to increase the amount of your money he can spend.

Trump's tax cuts resulted in 80% of Americans paying less taxes. Biden says that's horrible and he want's your money back.

Despite the incessant lies of the #FakeNews media the vast majority of Americans benefited from the tax cuts both directly and indirectly.  We got to keep more of our hard earned money and because companies were taxed less, and remember you pay corporation taxes because they're included in the price you pay for products, they could expand and hire more people.

But Democrats don't care about you they only care about getting more power for themselves.  The fewer poor and unemployed people there are the fewer votes Democrats get so they want you to be poor and unemployed.

The less of your money they have the fewer votes they can buy by promising free college, free medical care, or "reparations" for people who have never been slaves.

The one unifying theme of almost all Democrat politicians today is what can the country do for us?

Democrat politicians just use children to further the Democrat agenda

Have you ever noticed that the same people who are screaming about the horror of the children of illegals being temporarily separated from their parents are eager to kill the unborn children of Americans by having we the people pay for elective abortions?

No child would ever be separated from their parents if their parents didn't try to enter the country illegally. Further once arrested if the parents agreed to return home they wouldn't be separated from their children.  Any separation is due to the greed of the parents.

But ignoring that what is worse separating a child from her parents for a short time or killing that child before she's born?

Clearly killing a child is worse than separating her from her parents but Democrats support the killing option even after birth while saying that separating kids is an abomination.

If Democrat politicians really cared about children they'd be discouraging divorce-- since divorce hurts kids--, stopping the shootings in Democrat run cities, --children are often collateral damage-- and condemning abortion--since every abortion kills a child.

Recently Democrats have become even more extreme in their persecution of children.  They have come out again and again against bills that say that a born alive baby who survived an abortion attempt should be given appropriate medical care. That's right the Senate Democrats and now the Governor of Wisconsin are on record saying it's ok to leave born healthy babies to die if their mother doesn't want them.

Democrat politicians use babies the same way the use Blacks and illegals, as tools to get themselves more power over we the people.

It's the illegal parents who are tearing families apart not Trump

Democrats are resurrecting their old lies about illegal immigration.

Once illegals request for asylum is denied because they're just coming to America to make more money there is no reason for them to not go home with their kids.

But if any of their kids were born in the US, with the hospital costs probably paid for by US taxpayers, the kid, according to our leftists elites, is a citizen and can stay.  What's interesting about that is that the law doesn't say that and the Supreme Court hasn't ruled that is the case.  All that theft can point to is a comment in a decision on another case by one Supreme Court justice.

Even if however that kid is a US citizen there is no reason that the family can't take her back to whatever country she came from.

Hence if that family is broken up it's because the parents choose to break it up by not taking their kid home with them.

Essentially what Democrats are supporting is the idea that kids can be used as pawns to ensure that illegals can stay in the US and collect welfare for life.  If you doubt that note that illegals collect huge amounts of welfare for their kids who are supposedly US citizens.

The reality is that Democrats want as many illegals as possible because Democrats work hard to ensure that illegals vote because illegals, not surprisingly, vote for Democrats who want to tax Americans to provide freebies to illegals.

If you doubt that note that in California they're currently working to pass a bill that will create a new tax on Americans solely to come up with money to provide free medical care to illegals.

Democrats are pro-abortion not pro-woman or pro-choice

The last abortion mill in Missouri is a disaster with numerous health code violations and a record of sending more than 7 women a year to hospitals due to botched abortions.

5 of the 7 Doctors who kill babies at the clinic are refusing to talk to the health department.  That should cause anyone who cares about women to pause and wonder what those doctors are trying to hide.

Among the problems cited by the health department at this clinic are:

• Students performing abortions without proper supervision
• It took 3 attempts to successfully complete one abortion
• They don't follow required procedures to ensure that all of the babies body is removed from the mother, baby parts left in the mother can lead to serious infections
• The facility doesn't maintain adequate medical records

These sorts of problems aren't something new or a temporary lapse.  In the past some of the bad practices of the "clinic" include:

• Using expired medicines, IV fluids, and supplies. Some as much as 6 years old
• Using single dose injectable medications for multiple patients to "save money"
• Failing to record abortions done after 18 weeks as required by law
• Hiring employees without performing background checks
• Tears in the operating tables that prevented them from being sterilized between patients
• Failure to properly sterilize instruments between usages thereby exposing women to infection

Anyone who is pro-woman and pro-choice would want such a facility shut down if it refused to improve the quality of care it provides.  Yet pro-choice people are doing anything they can to ensure that the "clinic" can continue to exploit and harm women.

Clearly the pro-choices are really pro-abortion not pro-woman

California Democrats wage war on Christians

Assembly Concurrent Resolution 99 asks pastors and religious workers to endorse the LGBTQ lifestyle and condemn any attempt to cure gays.

This is just one more example of how Democrats believe that religion should bow to whatever the morality Democrats subscribe to today.  Remember that just a few years ago Obama repeatedly said that marriage shouldn't be redefined yet now Democrats are demanding that people of faith ignore God and listen to them.

At the same time the Democrats in California are demanding that Catholic priests violate the seal of the confessional. There is no evidence that in doing so any good would be achieved so the clear motivation is an animus to the Catholic Church that dares condemn the hedonism that Democrats are trying to impose on America.

To Democrats we the people have no rights other than what Democrats deign to give us.  The First Amendment makes it clear that we have the right to live our religious beliefs yet Democrats say that we can only live their religious beliefs.

The modern Democrat party is clearly establishing itself as the enemy of anyone who believes that God gives us our rights and that we are first responsible to God in terms of how we live our lives.

The Democrat party's hatred of religion isn't based on science because science tells us that men who think they're women are wrong and that if our purpose is sending our genes to the future being gay is a defect just like Downs syndrome and hence trying to fix it, and not by killing either Downs babies or gays, is a good thing.

Democrat politicians reject that because they don't care about gays or the transgendered. They just use those groups to justify the oppression of religion because Christianity stands between Democrat politicians and complete control over every aspect of people's lives.

So long as God is the source of our rights, as the Founder said, Democrat politicians are limited in what they can do. But if they manage to oppress religion enough then they will be able to do what they really want to do; control every aspect of the lives of we the people.

Democrat Ilhan Omar lies about people seeking asylum

Omar said the following:

"We have to look at our immigration process through a humane lens and what this administration is doing really truly is inhumane and extremely unAmerican and it goes against our values," Omar said. "We're talking about people who are coming to our border, seeking asylum, and there's nothing illegal about seeking an asylum. We have an opportunity to use the resources that we have to properly process people and we have an administration that is hell-bent on making people seem as if they are breaking laws when they are just within the borders of what is allowed by international law."

First under international law asylum seekers are supposed to seek asylum in the first safe country they get to which would be, for many of those illegally entering the US, Mexico.

Second people who are caught illegally entering the country and who then claim asylum status are in fact breaking the law.  People who apply for asylum at one of the many locations in Mexico or at any border crossing aren't in fact breaking the law but if they refuse to await their adjudication in Mexico then the US has no choice other than to somehow house them until their cases are heard.

By pretending that the illegals in question weren't caught breaking our laws by trying to sneak into the US and not go through the asylum process Omar is demonstrating her hatred for the rule of law.  Apparently to her anyone in the world who wants to is owed entry into the US.

Remember anyone who is being treated "inhumanely" by the US can end that treatment by simply asking to be returned to Mexico.  It seems rather racist, to use the Democrat mantra, to say that illegals are too stupid to understand that they can get out of what Ocasio-Cortez says are concentration camps by simply saying that they want to be returned to Mexico.  Clearly the millions of Jews who the Nazi's murdered would have loved to have that sort of get out of jail free card.

The reality is that Omar hates America as it is and wants to remake it into a society where American citizens are obligated to work hard to provide the taxes to provide illegals a decent standard of living.

She and her fellow Democrats want to effectively convert Americans into slaves who must produce the money Democrats need to buy the votes of illegals.

Condoleezza Rice reveals the #FakeNews media's racist lies

The Democrats and the #FakeNews media are trying to portray Trump as a racist and convince us that racism is a huge problem in America today.

Both of those claims are blatant lies disprove by the facts but truth has never been a concern of the #FakeNews media or Democrats.

NBC host Sheinelle Jones disingenuously said that "some" people say that it feels worse now in terms of racism.

Rice responded with:

“It sure doesn’t feel worse than when I grew up in Jim Crow Alabama. So let’s drop this notion that we’re worse race relations today than we were in the past.”

“I think the hyperbole about how much worse it is isn’t doing us any good,” 

When Rice was growing up her church was bombed by some racists and children, some of them her friends, were killed.  Democrats  in the South didn't prosecute or even pursue the bombers because then as now Democrats stand for the oppression of Blacks.

Back then they tried to keep Blacks in their place through violence and they do the same today.  In Democrat run cities like Chicago Black neighborhoods are unsafe and parents have to put their children in bathtubs when they sleep to avoid them being collateral damage in the massive shooting spree that goes on non-stop.

By keeping Blacks afraid, poorly educated, and in poverty Democrats get them to vote Democrat which is the only reason that Democrats tolerate Blacks.  After all we repeatedly hear this or that Democrat talking about why we need abortion to prevent crime and poverty and they're always talking about aborting Blacks when they do so.  

The leading cause of death for Black Americans is abortion and Blacks are 3 times more likely to abort their children than whites yet Democrats praise Planned Parenthood even though 80% of PP "clinics" are in minority neighborhoods.

The reality is that Republicans, including Trump, stand against racism while Democrats say they oppose it but then work hard to treat Blacks as second class citizens.

Just say no to Roy Moore

While Roy Moore's interactions with young women weren't criminal or abusive they guarantee that there is no way he can be elected.

Further the fact that he doesn't understand that and is willing to risk the GOP losing a Senate seat to satisfy his own ego shows that he's not the best candidate that we can find to run for that Senate seat he lost.

No matter how true it might be that at the time Roy did those things they were considered normal the reality is that they are viewed as unacceptable now.  If Moore was a Democrat he could count on the #FakeNews media squashing the story and that's blatantly unfair but it's also the reality we face.

If nothing else Moore's decision to try again shows that he doesn't have the sort of judgement we want for GOP Senators.

The Left's war on we the people

A leftists group at the University of Texas Austin campus has threatened to dox any freshman who dare to join conservative clubs.

This is no idle threat given that the leftists released personal information about students who dared to protest for Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court including, in some cases, the phone numbers of where those students worked.

In America today the left, supported by Democrat politicians, are waging a no holds barred war on anyone who dares disagree with their fascist totalitarian agenda.  The left want's Democrats to rule us not represent us and they're willing to use any level of violence and intimidation to achieve that objective.

Iran: Should we turn it into a parking lot?

The answer is no.  Most Iranians hate the mad mullahs who run the country more than we do. But because the government has all the guns there's not much the Iranian people can do.

They hate that money that could be used to improve life for Iranians is being funneled into terrorism and attacks on Israel.  But once again because they're disarmed, like Democrats want Americans to be, they can't do anything.

So any sort of large attack on Iran that resulted in lots of Iranian casualties would actually work to the benefit of the Iranian theocrats.

But limited strikes against military targets, like the Iranian fleet or Iranian nuclear weapons sites, would result in few casualties but really hurt the Iranian regime.

Similarly non-lethal attacks, say disrupting the power grid, would make Iranian lives miserable but not kill anyone and if we use smart psychological warfare the Iranian people would blame their government for inciting the US.

Given that even Germany is now admitting that the Iranians attacked the tankers Trump should be able to get some countries to agree to at least publicly support limited strikes.  Even though the Europeans might know that Iran is behind the attacks they may be more interested in making money trading with Iran than in stopping Iranian aggression.  After all since WWI European countries have been much more in favor of ignoring evil than addressing it.

Even the radical neo-cons aren't calling for "liberating" Iran.  But odds are Democrats will condemn whatever Trump does so from a political perspective limited proportionate counter strikes won't hurt Trump.

Trump's saying that it may have been an act by a rogue Iranian is a brilliant move. It buys time for him to get Germany et al lined up in support of the US while making America look responsible and not weak.  Irrespective of what the Europeans eventually do the US can execute a limited attack in a week or two and not appear weak.

More high level FBI corruption?

 A key document that was used to indict Paul Manafort, who was Trump's campaign manager for a while, may be bogus and the FBI may have used it despite knowing it was bogus.

The document, called the "black cash ledger" was discovered in the Ukraine by Ukraine authorities. It purportedly shows Manafort taking large amounts of cash across various national borders.

The problem is that the head anticorruption prosecutor in the Ukraine told the FBI that not only can't they link the ledger to Manafort but that the ledger is likely a fraud.

The most compelling evidence that the FBI knew the document was a fraud but used it anyway is that  the FBI didn't introduce the document into court proceedings. Rather they cited news sources that reported on it.

If they'd have introduced the document they would have had to shown it was legitimate and that it was linked to Manafort.  If they could have done so they would have.

Instead they cited media reports based on leaks from the FBI based on the document.  That way the effectively introduced the document without having to show that it wasn't a fraud.  Even better if they'd tried to introduce the actual document they'd have had to address the fact that the officials who found the document in the Ukraine believed it was fake so by using a leak they planted in the media they didn't have to inform the judge about the Ukrainian government's belief that the document was a fake.

This is just one more example of how Obama weaponized the FBI. The more we learn the more we find out that the top level officials at the FBI, not the rank and file, were willing to do pretty much anything in an attempt to nullify the 2016 election.

Planned Parenthood says we owe it our tax money

President Trump exercised his lawful power to say change how Title IX is enforced so that organizations like Planned Parenthood, but not limited to Planned Parenthood, can't use Title IX money to subsidize abortions by using it to pay for buildings in which abortions are performed for example.

Interestingly when ever the government passes some new rule that restricts how defense contractors can spend government money the left is always enthused.

But apparently Planned Parenthood is above the rest of us and is entitled to our hard earned money.

That's the Democrats mind set in action. They aren't our representatives they are our rulers because they're smarter and kinder and better than us.

All Trump's change requires is for Planned Parenthood to not use taxpayer dollars to subsidize abortions. This makes sense because most Americans don't want that, even those who support abortion being legal, and because the vast majority of abortions are elective.

About 0.3% of abortions are done to protect the life of the mother with another roughly 1.5% being done for health related reasons and roughly 2% for psychological reasons that include the mother being depressed if she can't kill her unborn daughter.  That means that 96%+ of abortions are because the woman, or often the father, just doesn't want the kid she helped make.

Why should we pay for that?  We don't see leftists wanting to pay for our next vacation.  If a woman absolutely positively doesn't want to get pregnant she should just not have sex.  If she voluntarily chooses to have sex, and only about 0.14% of abortions are due to rape, then she and her partner should take responsibility for their actions.

The Left and Democrats hate women: sports edition

Men are stronger and more athletic than women.  Contrary to what Hollywood tries to tell us with stories about 100 lb women beating up multiple combat trained 220 lb men science tells us that the average man has stronger muscles, a bigger heart, etc and hence lb for lb is more athletic than the average woman.

Despite that the left and Democrats support the "equality" bill which would mandate that any man who says that he thinks he's a woman could compete in women's athletics.

A man who is in the top 1000 male athletes and who wants to be number 1  can probably achieve their goal by switching to women's sports.

Of course with men being able to compete in woman's sports means real biological women will never get athletic scholarships or win trophies again.

But Democrats and the left are more concerned about enabling the insanity of those poor people who think they're something they're not than about real women.

The transgendered are the definition of insanity.  That's obvious unless someone thinks that if their best friend says he's really Napoleon then he is Napoleon because he says so.

Hence if we love those people we should do everything we can to convince them of the truth; that they're wonderful just as they are and that they don't have to pretend to be something they're not.

The left doesn't care about the truth or about people suffering from transgenderism.  Rather they use those poor souls as a tool to destroy our moral society and replace it with hedonism and selfishness.

They tell us that a man who stands by his wife through thick and thin is evil but the man who simply uses women for sex and then abandons them is good.

We know that the left doesn't care about women because if they did they wouldn't demand that men both use woman's bathrooms and compete in women's sports.

Fortunately people are wising up to the lefts misogyny and are fighting back. Female student athletes in Connecticut are suing because allowing men to compete in their sports is a violation of Title IX.

Biden destroying the Big Democrat Lie on Racism

In order to get Black votes the Democrats and the #FakeNews media have been lying about who was behind American racism.

They're telling us that even though the Democrats fought a war to keep slavery legal and the Republicans fought a war to end it it's Republicans who are racists.

They're telling us that despite the fact that the Democrats founded the KKK and passed all the Jim Crow laws that kept Blacks segregated and despite the fact that it was Republicans who fought the KK and who integrated Southern schools it's Republicans who are the racists.

Their argument is that the two parties switched their positions at some point in the 1960s.

But now that we're learning that uber Democrat Joe Biden was praising racist Democrat Senators in 1988 it's clear that there was no switch of beliefs in the 1960s.  Rather there was a shift in rhetoric.

Democrats continued to be racists but they lied about their beliefs.

We can tell that Democrat politicians are currently racist for a number of reasons including:

1) Thousands of Blacks are shot each year in Democrat run cities like Chicago and Democrat politicians never say a word of complaint.

2) Democrats are encouraging massive illegal immigration even though it drives down Black's salaries.

3) Abortion is the leading cause of death and Planned Parenthood has 80% of its abortion mills in minority neighborhoods and Democrats applaud PP

4) Blacks are getting horrible educations due to failing public schools but Democrats say that giving poor Blacks school choice is racist.

Essentially Democrats created the welfare state and that supposedly was their great gift to Blacks. The only problem was that Democrats knew the welfare state would destroy Black families and leave Blacks trapped in a cycle of violence and dependency and they passed it anyway.  After 10 years it was clear that welfare as the Democrats had structured it was seriously hurting Blacks but Democrats did nothing.

Democrats want Blacks poorly educated so that they can't see that the source of their problems is, as Burgess Owens said, the Democrat party.

If an icon of the Democrat party could say what great people segregationists, currently we'd call them white supremacists, were in 1988 long after Democrats say that the two parties changed their positions on matters of race then it's clear that that switch never occurred.

Democrat politicians today like Democrats of the past are racists. If thousands of white people were being killed in Democrat cites like Chicago we'd never hear the end of it but since it's Blacks who are suffering Democrat politicians are silent.

While it's true that a large section of the Democrat base is racist, think of Harvard discriminating against Asians, most Democrat voters aren't aware, because of the constant lies by the #FakeNews media, just how strong the hold of white supremacists is on the Democrat party.

If you have friends who are good people but who vote Democrat because they believe the lies the #FakeNews media peddles about Republicans ask them what they think about the points listed above; it's likely they've never really thought about what the Democrat's silence on the mass shooting of Blacks in Democrat run cities means.

#FakeNews media lies; says Democrat segregationists were Republican

Joe Biden is facing a controversy since he held up his ability to work with racist segregationists as a plus.

When announcing an upcoming story about the issue MSNBC's Kasie Hunt said:

"Still to come, Joe Biden references his relationships with two former Republican colleagues at an event in New York City. The only problem? They were both segregationists."

The reality is that both of those former colleagues were Democrats.

This is part of the Big Lie that the #FakeNews media has been peddling for decades. The reality is that the racists in America have almost always been Democrats not Republicans.

Yet modern leftists work hard to convince we the people that in fact all the crimes against Blacks done in the past were in fact done by Republicans.

The reality is that the Democrat party has been the party that has hated Blacks since it was founded:

1) The founder of the Democrat party, Andrew Jackson, was a slave owner.
2) The Democrats worked hard to keep a balance in the Senate between slave and free states so as to ensure that slavery stayed legal.
3) When Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected the Democrats fought a war to keep slavery legal.
4) Democrats founded the KKK
5) Democrats passed all the Jim Crow laws that segregated Blacks
6) Democrats opposed school integration
7) The Civil Rights act of 1964 was rejected by a major portion of the Democrat party
8) Democrats passed the Great Society even though they were warned that it would destroy Black families
9) At it became clear that the Great Society was hurting Blacks instead of revising it Democrats did nothing
10) Every year thousands of Blacks are shot in Democrat run cities like Chicago. We all know that if thousands of white people were shot in Chicago each year there would be a cop on every corner. But apparently Black lives don't matter to Democrats
11) Inner city public schools consistently fail to educate Blacks while private inner city schools succeed.  Yet Democrats say giving Blacks school choice is racist.
12) Illegals are driving down Black wages and stealing jobs from Blacks and Democrats are happy
13) The only racial disparity that Democrats aren't bothered by is the fact that Blacks are 3 times more likely to kill their unborn child than whites.
14) Planned Parenthood was founded by an avowed racist who viewed Blacks as weeds.  Today PP targets Blacks for abortions and Democrats praise PP.

Obama's buddies in Iran shoot down a US drone in international waters

Obama told us that while Iran would be able to produce nuclear weapons within a few years under his  deal it was ok because Iran wasn't that bad of a country.

Now that Iran is attacking US and other countries ships and drones it's becoming clear that Iran's support for international terrorism and attacks on Americans isn't some sort of aberration but rather the clear expression of the mad mullahs who run Iran's desire to impose Islam on all of us.

The last time Iran did something like this the US sank their whole fleet. That bought decades of less openly aggressive behavior by Iran.

Given that even Germany is now admitting that it was Iran who attacked those oil tankers it's time for them to join with the US, and all other major international players, in retaliating against Iran.

We don't need to "liberate" Iran. Sinking its fleet, destroying a few of its nuclear sites, and taking out a large part of their air defense system would send a strong message with a very low risk of American or civilian casualties.

Of course without the economic relief that Obama gave Iran in return for them saying that they might not develop nuclear weapons in the near term Iran couldn't be waging this attack on the rest of the world.

But don't worry the #FakeNews media will cover up Obama's responsibility for the mess we're in now.

Supreme Court strikes a huge blow for religious liberty

In a 7-2 decision the Court has ruled that a cross that has stood on public land for nearly a century can continue to stand because taking it down would be an act of hostility towards religion which isn't part of the Constitution.

“It has become a prominent community landmark, and its removal or radical alteration at this date would be seen by many not as a neutral act but as the manifestation of ‘a hostility toward religion that has no place in our Establishment Clause traditions,’”

This is a far bigger decision than many people realize because it declares that a hostility to religion is unConstitutional.

The clear intent of the Framers was that the government should encourage religious liberty but not allow any one religion to have the special endorsement of the government. Essentially the Framers didn't want a repeat of the Church of England fiasco in England where all other Christians faced oppression.

The Framers never envisioned a "wall of separation" as the modern court has created.  In fact Jefferson, who created that phrase which isn't in the Constitution, felt that it was perfectly legal for the government to fund Catholic priests to minister to Native Americans so it's clear that his concept of a "wall" isn't the one that modern leftists are so eager to invoke.

Given that the entire modern atheist push to silence religious speech in public is based on an unquestionable hostility towards religion this decision might signal a new blooming of freedom in America.

Atheism is a faith based belief system similar to Christianity because it is based on beliefs that can't be proven to be true.

For example according to Professor Hawking if there is no god then we are purely material beings. That in turn means that all our thoughts are nothing more than chemical reactions in our brains.  Hawking points out that if that's the case then we have no control over our thoughts; they are determined by the laws of physics. But if we have absolutely no control over our thoughts we clearly can't have free will.  

Yet we all know based on what goes on in our heads that we do in fact have free will. That could be an illusion but until atheists can prove that to be the case they have to accept, based on faith, that it is an illusion. 

Similarly if atheists are right then everything in the universe, including the existence of the universe, must be explicable by purely materialistic processes.  Given that science is a process that says nothin about what it will or won't be able to explain atheists must accept on faith that everything we see is in fact based on purely materialistic processes.

Further to be an atheist one must reject the historical accuracy of the Bible even though one can't prove that to be the case.

Atheism is just like all other religions because it depend on beliefs based on faith not facts.

Note that religions don't have to believe in god. Buddhists for example don't believe in god but everyone considers Buddhism to be a religion. 

While no one questions the rights of atheists to express their faith in the public square to many dishonest judges and leftists have demanded that people of other faiths be silenced.

Those people disingenuously claim that a teacher speaking about Jesus will be viewed as the State endorsing Christianity while a teacher speaking about an atheist champion like Nietzsche won't be viewed as the State endorsing atheism.

The reason the 3% of Americans who are atheists have been so successful at persecuting religion in America is that a much larger number of Democrats want to eliminate religion because religion puts a limit on the power of the government.  At our founding we the people declared that we have inalienable rights given to us by God.  That limits how much power Democrats can have and they hate that limitation so they gladly join with atheists to push religion into a closet.

Burgess Owens says that Democrats should pay reparations

Burgess Owens, a former Oakland Raiders player, told Congress that due to the horrible damage caused to Blacks by the Democrat party Democrats, not taxpayers, should pay Blacks reparations.

He's right of course.  I proposed that as an alternative to figuring out who owed and who was owed reparations in this article.

Let's look at what Democrats have done to Blacks.

1) The founder of the Democrat party, Andrew Jackson, was a slave owner.
2) The Democrats worked hard to keep a balance in the Senate between slave and free states so as to ensure that slavery stayed legal.
3) When Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected the Democrats fought a war to keep slavery legal.
4) Democrats founded the KKK
5) Democrats passed all the Jim Crow laws that segregated Blacks
6) Democrats opposed school integration
7) The Civil Rights act of 1964 was rejected by a major portion of the Democrat party
8) Democrats passed the Great Society even though they were warned that it would destroy Black families
9) At it became clear that the Great Society was hurting Blacks instead of revising it Democrats did nothing
10) Every year thousands of Blacks are shot in Democrat run cities like Chicago. We all know that if thousands of white people were shot in Chicago each year there would be a cop on every corner. But apparently Black lives don't matter to Democrats
11) Inner city public schools consistently fail to educate Blacks while private inner city schools succeed.  Yet Democrats say giving Blacks school choice is racist.
12) Illegals are driving down Black wages and stealing jobs from Blacks and Democrats are happy
13) The only racial disparity that Democrats aren't bothered by is the fact that Blacks are 3 times more likely to kill their unborn child than whites.
14) Planned Parenthood was founded by an avowed racist who viewed Blacks as weeds.  Today PP targets Blacks for abortions and Democrats praise PP.

Blacks have been giving Democrats their votes for decades and all that has happened is the their situation has gotten worse.

The whole reparations agenda is nothing more than Democrats trying to buy Black votes using taxpayer's hard earned money.

Democrats continue to work to ensure that illegals vote

For years Democrats have made sure that it's easy for illegals to vote in California. They gave illegals drivers licenses and when an illegal registers for their drivers license they are asked if they want to register to vote; to put it more correctly they are encouraged to register to vote.

They are asked if they're US citizens but it's an honor code system; their claims are never checked.

According to Democrats the same people who have no problem breaking our immigration laws in order to get more money would never ever think of breaking our voting laws in order to elect politicians who promise illegals more money.

Having seen how well that worked in making California a one party state New York Democrats are working hard to ensure that illegals get drivers licenses.  In New York State all illegals need to register to vote is a drivers license and a willingness to lie about their citizenship status. Essentially the Democrats are ensuring that in all future elections illegals will have the same rights as US citizens without having to pay the onerous taxes that Democrats keep imposing on US citizens.

Democrats are doing this because they know that Americans reject their ultra leftists plans to eliminate the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Amendments so they're importing voters who don't care since they come from countries without freedom.  Illegals are better off being on welfare here with no freedom than back in their home countries without both welfare and freedom.

Teddy Kennedy started the effort with an immigration law that ensured that low education low skill immigrants were prioritized.  Precisely the sort of folks who would tend to latch on to the Democrats welfare for votes scheme.

When that didn't work the Democrats upped the ante by demanding that we have open borders and any unskilled, uneducated, non-English speaking person who could stumble over the border should be allowed to stay.  Once again precisely the sort of people who will, in general, trade their vote for free stuff.

Democrat politicians hate Americans. They hate people who believe in personal responsibility and limited government. They hate the Constitution because it puts limits on their power over us.

But that platform won't win elections which is why Democrats have to pretend to be moderates while campaigning.

Democrats have grown tired of that. They want to have power over we the people without having to lie about their agenda.  That can only happen if they import enough voters who they can bribe with our money.

White supremacists has become a meaningless term

In LA a Democrat politician said that the NRA was a "white supremacist" organization.

Given that the NRA stands for ensuring that all Americans, including Blacks, have the right to own guns it's hard to see how they could be a group that hates Blacks.

After all when's the last time you heard slave owners advocating that slaves be armed?

We all despise anyone who says that white people should have more rights than people of color or that whites are intrinsically better than people of color.

That's why leftists have started labelling anyone they disagree with as a "white supremacists". In doing so they don't care that they're lying nor do they care that by misusing the term it will lose it's potency when used to describe real racists.

This is another example of how leftists have been forced to use even stronger lies.  Like junkies who need more and more of a drug to get high because their bodies build up a tolerance leftists have essentially destroyed the power of the words they've been misusing.

If George Bush is literally Hitler and every Republican is literally Hitler then no one is Hitler.  People , even those who disagreed with Bush, know he wasn't for the mass murder of Jews so when the left kept saying he was people simply ignored what they said.

Similarly if everyone who isn't a leftist is a racist, if saying all lives matter is racist, then nothing is racist.  Essentially the left has discredited the term since they apply it so freely to things that aren't racist.

Hence now the left has latched on to white supremacists as the ultimate insult. But given that few if any of the people the left labels as white supremacists are racist in any way that term too is now meaningless.

This is the inevitable result of the left refusing to engage based on anything other than their rage.  Facts, logic, and reason are anathema to the left because their positions all fail when examined using those historically normative techniques.

To  support the left's agenda one must abandon facts and reason and invest entirely in feelings; feelings usually based on lies told by the #FakeNews media.

The sad thing is that there are real Hitlers in our world; people who advocate for abortion for any reason at any time, even after birth, and monsters like the man who currently rules Venezuela.  But we can't compare them to Hitler because the name has lost it's power through the misuse of it by the left.

Similarly there are a few hundred or thousand white supremacists in America but by declaring that anyone they don't like is one the left has made it harder to condemn the really vile people.

Another reason Democrats like Venezuela; the socialist rulers are antisemites

Chavez the former tyrant ruler of Venezuela had a Jewish synagogue attacked in 2009 and stole a list of Jews from the synagogue to identify Jews for persecution.

In 2006 the Anti-Defamation League reported that attacks on Jews in Venezuela were wide spread and increasing over time.

By 2007 the Jewish population in Venezuela had dropped by 60% due to the socialist government's antisemitic policies.

Yet the socialists government's antisemitism and the fact that Venezuelans have been reduced to poverty despite having huge oil reserves Democrats still blame the US for Venezuela's problems.

Antisemite Ilhan Omar declares all the people in the world to be American

Radical leftists and antisemite Democrat Ilhan Omar tweeted the following:

No one is an "alien."

This is family separation on a massive scale.

Dehumanizing immigrants and tearing apart families will not make us any stronger. It will only destroy lives, traumatize children, and make our country less safe. https://t.co/a8q9YV3AGX

— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) June 18, 2019

She is saying that anyone from around the world who tries to illegally enter the US is one of us; an American.

That's treason and a betrayal of the American people. We can have honest disagreements about how many immigrants we as a country allow in and about how we treat those who break our laws in order to get welfare for life but to declare that everyone around the world is one of us and is entitled to all the benefits of citizenship--without paying any of the cost like serving in the military or paying taxes--is vile.

Clearly Omar, who complains that the country that took her out of abject poverty and terror isn't that good, is rooting for the people she left behind rather than for what should be her new country.  We welcomed her in, paid for her, educated her and her response is to spit on us and doing all she can to help the people who didn't help her prey on the American taxpayer.

Remember that anyone caught trying to illegally enter the US, as opposed to legally applying for asylum, can avoid having their family separated by simply agreeing to leave the US.  It's the parents who demand an asylum hearing when they know they're not refugees and a Court ruling that forces Trump, and Obama before him, to separate children.

But Omar doesn't care.  She hates the US and Trump almost as much as she hates Jews.

She's the poster girl for why the US should be more careful who we allow in. Not because she's a woman or because she is Muslim but because she rejects the idea that America is good and the idea that we the people don't have an obligation to support everyone around the world who wants to come to the US.

It's interesting how so many of the illegals vote for people who want to remake America into what they are supposedly fleeing from.

Trump speaks truth to power

At his reelection kickoff in Orlando last night Trump spoke truth to the Democrats and the #FakeNews media:

“Our radical Democrat opponents are driven by hatred, prejudice and rage. They want to destroy you and they want to destroy our country as we know it. Not acceptable. It’s not going to happen.”

He's right Democrats today oppose the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Amendments.

The California Democrat convention declared that "hate" speech--ie anything Democrats don't agree with--isn't protected by the First Amendment.

California is also suing to force Catholic nuns to have to participate in providing abortions even after the Supreme Court ruled in the nuns favor.  Clearly Democrats despise freedom of religion.

All the Democrats are pushing for more laws to make it harder for honest people to have guns.  None of those laws would have prevented past shootings and given that only 10% of criminals who use guns get them legally those restrictions won't reduce crime.

By demanding Trump's private information even though there is no evidence of a crime the Democrats in Congress are endorsing the government's right to search your private information without a warrant thereby nullifying the 4th Amendment. If they can see Trump's information without convincing a judge they can see your information without convincing a judge.

Trump also said this:

“They went after my family, my business, my finances, my employees, almost everyone that I have ever known or worked with, but they are really going after you. That’s what it is all about. It’s not about us. It’s about you. They tried to erase your vote, erase your legacy of the greatest campaign and the greatest election probably in the history of our country.”

It's important for us to remember that the attacks on Trump have all been lies and the objective of those attacks has been to nullify your vote.  The Democrats refuse to abide by the law because you chose to not vote for Hillary.

If they're eager to take away your right to vote it's unlikely they'll respect any of your rights if those rights stand between Democrats and what they want.