The New York Times ran an article that declared that Jesus was a Palestinian.
Aside from the obvious historical evidence of Jesus being Jewish there's the problem that the Palestinians are Arabs who didn't reach the Holy Land until the 7th century.
The question of course why would anyone lie about Jesus not being Jewish?
In this context the motivation seems to be to raise support for Palestinians and Black people.
Omar is trying to get Americans to identify with Palestinian Muslims rather than Israeli Jews. Given the close links between Judaism and Christianity and the fact that Islam is a 7th century version of Scientology--a made up religion designed to enrich its creator-- it's hard for antisemites like Omar to generate support for Palestinian terrorists by telling the truth.
The Black man who wrote in the NYT is trying to tell us that only Blacks feel like outsiders in our society. Conservatives in California, Catholics in any number of places, Eastern Europeans etc are all discriminated against by other whites yet in the left's victimhood culture a first generation Ukraine Catholic immigrant has the same White privilege as a Rockefeller. He feels that having Jesus look white is evil. Of course it's easy to get pictures of Jesus as a Black which are equally incorrect--Jesus was likely on the brown side-- and if you're going to get hung up over Jesus not looking like you then it's women who are the most oppressed.
Of course we are made in God's image not in terms of our visual appearance but in terms of our souls so the fact we do or don't look like Jesus is irrelevant.
This is just one more example of how the left will lie about anything to advance their agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment