People want to know; is Smollett lying?

In case you haven't heard a black actor claims that two people--he can't identify their race or sex--attacked him, broke his rib, poured bleach over him, and put a rope around his neck in Chicago at 0200 hours while telling him that he was in "MAGA country".

If he was attacked then the police should do everything they can to find and arrest the scum who attacked Smollett.

The problem is that since the media has lied so often about hate crimes it's hard to know if this one is real or fake.

From  2007 to early 2016 Breitbart compiled a list of 100 fake hate crimes--with links for everyone of them so you can check them yourself.

Further we've seen that the media will lie through it's teeth if by lying they can attack Trump.

Which means that a lot of people are going to question Smollett's honesty.  That's really bad if Smollett was in fact attacked but it's the natural result of the #FakeNews media constantly lying to us and acting as though fake hate crimes were real.

As of now there are some things that seem to call into question whether or not Smollett's account is true:

1) When first interviewed by the police he didn't mention the "MAGA country" comment but then revised his story later
2) His description is of a random encounter so why would his attackers be carrying around bleach at 0200 at night?
3) His manager now says he was on the phone with Smollett but Smollett refuses to let the cops have access to his phone to confirm that
4) There are reports that he didn't look beaten up when others saw him right after the supposed assault.

Now all of those could be explained but the fact that we know that the #FakeNews media lies all the time means that if Smollett was attacked he's not getting the support and sympathy he deserves because we can't trust the media when it comes to stories that hurt Trump or his supporters.

That's why a lying press is not the free press that the Constitution calls for.  We can't ban lies by the media but we need to call out the media when it says those of us who point out lies by the media are going against the First Amendment; you know the one that doesn't protect what the #FakeNews media calls "hate" speech.

Democrats give government employees disciplined for sexual harassment a raise.

Republicans proposed a measure that the new raise for Federal workers not be given to government workers who had been disciplined for #MeToo offenses.

All but 17 Democrats voted against it.

Given that nearly all of the #MeToo poster boys have been hard core Democrats and leftists I guess this shouldn't come as a surprise.

Democrats talk good about #MeToo but the govern as hard core members of the patriarchy as they'd put it.

It pays well to be a Democrat enforcer

Democrat politicians are making it clear that they are better than us and that they are rulers not representatives.

Case in point the imposition of bans on plastic straws in left wing fiefdoms across America.

The Democrats who run D.C. are so serious about preventing we the people using plastic straws in restaurants that they pay an a "civil servant" $60,472 a year to police the ban.

That's right.  Taxpayers are paying $60K a year, not counting any fines levied on restaurants, so that they can be prohibited from using plastic straws.

Paying for health and safety inspections is one thing but now we have Democrat enforcers paid for by taxpayers whose job is to ensure that we the people follow the non-safety related edicts of our ruling class.

Since when has the government had the right to tell us what type of straw we can use?  This goes totally against the basic freedom that America has always been known for.

Hating babies

In a conversation on Facebook some atheists declared that letting a dog out in the Chicago cold made the people who did that a**holes but a woman who killed her baby is not an a**hole.

It's not a large sampling but it's a sad sign of the times; too many care more about animals than about people.

The same people who condemn clubbing baby harp seals, who demand jail time for people who run dog fights, who condemn the idea of eating meat are perfectly comfortable with an unborn, but viable, baby girl being literally seared with chemicals or chopped apart without anesthetic.

If the exact same things as are done to an unborn baby in an abortion were done to a puppy the left would be incensed.

As Reagan said everyone who supports abortion is already born.

The Hill.com lets us know what Satanists think

We're told that the Hill.com is a source of reliable information but one has to wonder given that they thought the opinion of the head of a Satanic Temple was relevant.

Atheists don't believe in God. Satanists worship the father of lies, the great deceiver, the fallen angel who wants everyone of us to end up in Hell suffering for eternity.

It would seem that someone who is rooting for all of us to go to Hell, literally, isn't someone that we should provide publicity to.

But even though the guy is unknown the Hill.com thought that giving him a bully pulpit to attack VP Pence was a good idea.

The guy who wants us all in Hell said VP Pence's "theocratic" vision for the US "really scares" him.  Of course Pence has never suggested that ministers or priests run the government, like the Imans do in Iran.  In fact given that Satanists wants us all in Hell I'd say that sane people, whether or not they believe in Satan and/or God, would say that anything that scares Satanists is probably a good thing for the rest of us.

I haven't studied what Satanists believe but if they're really worshiping the same Satan that the vast majority of Americans believe in then they're truly evil and if they're worshiping something else that they call Satan in order to get publicity they're dishonest.

Why Democrats love ballot harvesting

The Democrats in California legalized ballot harvesting and it won them several seats in Congress.

In order to avoid coercive voting and ballot box stuffing most states require that ballots be submitted by the person who cast the ballot.  If there are reasons they can't do that, such as health limitations, then they can have some other person deliver their ballot for them.

When ballot harvesting is legal one person can roam around asking people if they'd like to vote and then deliver their ballots for them to the polling station. Essentially ballot harvesting gets people who are too lazy, uncaring, or uniformed to bother to fill out their ballot and drop it into a mailbox prior to the election to vote.

That's why the Democrats love it; it increases the vote from their target demographic, lazy and uninformed people.  Of course given that the ballot harvesters are all Democrats, at least in the last election, they will only bring in ballots from people who are going to vote Democrat and they are quite likely to "help" the uninformed voters figure out how to fill in their ballots.

This is especially scary in California given the massive problems with maintaining accurate voter lists. For example LA has just consented, as part of a legal action, to strike 1.6 million voters from the roles who haven't voted for 2 election cycles.  With ballot harvesting one person could bring in hundreds of ballots from those voters without those voters even knowing about it.  For example a lot of those people have moved or died.  If someone were to request a ballot in their name instead of having to find one person for every dead person's vote to be counted one ballot harvester could turn in hundreds or thousands of dead people's votes.

But even if there is no corruption, even if there is no picking only Democrat ballots the problem is that people who are unwilling to mail in a ballot are not the sort of people we want voting.  Democracy requires an informed people, which is why #FakeNews is so bad, because uninformed people voting will tend to make bad decisions and be primarily motivated by what the government can do for them--at the expense of their fellow citizens in general.

For example many left wing ballot propositions in California are accompanied by highly deceptive advertising.  My favorite was the term limits for politicians proposition, which passed thanks be to God.  The Democrats ran ads against it that said if it passed the ocean would become polluted.  At no point in the ad was anything actually related to the proposition mentioned.

Uninformed voters who don't care enough to mail in their ballots are more likely to fall for the #FakeNews and vote for propositions that really hurt them.

But that's bread and butter for Democrats because anyone who actually reasons based on facts will always reject the vast majority of the solutions Democrats propose; without the ignorant and the lied to--by the #FakeNews media--the Democrat party would disappear.

Democrat Cuomo says all Catholics should leave New York; Catholic Bishops won't excommunicate him

Good Catholics are wondering why Democrat Cuomo, governor of New York, isn't being excommunicated for making it legal to kill the unborn up to the moment of birth.  After all the Church has taught for 2000 years that abortion is murder.

We shouldn't however be surprised since Cuomo has already said that all Catholics are unwelcome in New York and that they should leave and the Bishops took no substantial action about that.

In 2014 Cuomo said:

"Right-to-life, pro-assault weapons, anti-gay — if that's who they are, they have no place in the state of New York because that's not who New Yorkers are," 

But all Catholics, if they actually believe what the Church teaches, must be pro-life hence Cuomo said that true Catholics should leave New York.

Contrary to the lies told by Nancy Pelosi, another "catholic" who is a big fan of the mass murder of the unborn, the Church has condemned abortion since the time of Christ.

In the Didache, the teaching of the twelve Apostles, written in the 1st century it says:

""Thou shalt do no murder; thou shalt not commit adultery"; thou shalt not commit sodomy; thou shalt not commit fornication; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not use magic; thou shalt not use philtres; thou shalt not procure abortion, nor commit infanticide; "thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's goods"; "

If Governor Cuomo had passed, and celebrated, a law that legalized the killing of Jews would the Catholic Bishops of New York only issue sternly worded statements?  It's unlikely.

Cardinal Dolan of NYC has given reasons why he feels that Cuomo shouldn't be excommunicated:

1) Excommunication should not be used as a weapon:  What does that mean?  The purpose of excommunication is to tell the sinner that he is going to hell unless he repents so that he will repent; i.e. the intent of excommunication isn't to punish but to bring the person to repentance.  So given that Cuomo is pushing what his Church has taught is mass murder how can reminding him that he's on a path to Hell, just as surely as any concentration camp guard, be a bad thing?

2)Notable Canon Lawyers have said that excommunication is not an appropriate response to legislators who support laws advancing abortion:  This is really strange.  The Church teaches that the intentional murder of innocents is objectively wrong; that's why the Holocaust was wrong, that's why killing gays for being gay is wrong.  So what these Canon lawyers are saying is that if Cuomo had supported a bill legalizing the killing of gays for being gay or Jews for being Jews it would be "inappropriate" to excommunicate him for his support of mass murder?  Really?  That makes no sense.  It's not like Cuomo was supporting some position where people of good faith could disagree, like how to deal with poverty or what to do about illegal immigration. Cuomo is using all of his political power to ensure that innocent people are murdered.

What makes this claim even more interesting is that Canon lawyers agree that anyone who successfully procures an abortion is automatically excommunicated.  Further any Catholic who helps procure an abortion--by performing it, by paying for it, by encouraging it,etc--is automatically excommunicated.

But since Cuomo is using his power to get the state to pay for abortions it would seem he's already excommunicated.  Further isn't making abortion legal encouraging it?  After all if a woman wanted an abortion but it was illegal she'd be discouraged to have it hence making it legal is encouraging abortion by having the state, and society, say that abortion is a ok.  We know that Jesse Jackson's mother almost aborted him and that he's said that if abortion had been legal the odds of her choosing to abort him would have increased.

As one woman who had an abortion commented on Catholic radio she was excommunicated but Cuomo who encourages, pays for, and legalizes hundreds of thousands of abortions isn't seems a bit odd.

3) The Bishop's duty is to address grave issues individually with the person:  Well Cuomo has been for abortion for a very long time and we can assume that his Bishop has been talking to him in a pastoral manner. Yet nothing has happened. Further note that the Bishops have been willing to publicly condemn Cuomo for his actions so it's not like they refuse to make public comments on Cuomo's public sin.  But so long as they refuse to excommunicate Cuomo it's quite possible that Cuomo thinks they don't believe that his offense is that serious which of course would be a major road block in their attempt to pastorally help Cuomo.

4)Excommunication would be worn as a badge of courage by Cuomo: So?  That doing the right think might help an evil man is no reason not to do what is right.  Would anyone suggest that Jews shouldn't have condemned Hitler for the Holocaust because Hitler would have used that as a plus when talking to his Nazi supporters? But while Cuomo would boast of his standing up to the Church how many low information Catholic voters who reflexively vote Democrat--Cardinal Dolan has said his father told him to never vote Republican--would suddenly stop and reconsider how they vote if the Church were to officially and publicly declare that Cuomo was on the road to Hell?  Dolan can't know the answer to that.

Further a key objective of excommunication in this context is to end scandal. As it stands many Americans, and many Catholics, are unclear as to how seriously the Church opposes abortion. No amount of talk or appearances at the March for Life can counteract the fact that many Catholic politicians, including Cuomo, push for abortion for any reason at any point in the pregnancy and are allowed to act as though they are good Catholics.  Is it any surprise that Catholics keep voting for Cuomo given the message the Church is sending?

It's clear that these Bishops need to find a way to publicly counteract the public sins of people like Cuomo.  Allowing Cuomo to attend Mass and act as though he's a good Catholic is hurting the Church and the faithful and pretending that it's not only helps Satan advance his abortion project.

Democrats support identity politics sort of

Democrats tell Hispanics, Blacks, gays, transgendered, and Asians that their true identity isn't as Americans but as members of their identity group, a fancy name for a tribe.

But for some strange reason if whites start talking the same way that other identity groups do the Democrats scream racism.

The problem is that if whites identified as whites first and wanted laws that benefited whites only they would be racists. Luckily for the various minorities no significant portion of white Americans have thought that way since the 1960s.

But that could change.  Anti-white racism by minorities who are being egged on by Democrats could invoke a counter reaction.  When Blacks knew that they could be denied a job because of their race they were rightly resentful of white people.  But people are people irrespective of their skin color so it would be reasonable to assume that consistent discrimination against white people solely because of their skin color will engender resent among whites.  How many parents have to see that their kid doesn't get into a good college while a less qualified Black kids does before white people start saying "enough"?

The vast majority of white people fully support stamping out racial discrimination.  To be called a racist is a horrible thing in America precisely because white Americans find racism to be odious.

But racism is intrinsically evil no matter which race it targets so the Democrats are running a real risk of creating the sort of racial divisions in the US which could lead to real violence.

It's time to demand that the Democrats redefine racism to cases where someone actually discriminates based on the persons race not when a person opposed the political agenda of the Democrat party.

House Democrats ditching God

Democrats, in addition to funding the murder of brown babies overseas with taxpayer dollars, are moving to strike "so help me God" from the oath taken by witnesses who testify before the House Committee on Natural Resources.

While they pose as Christians when wooing voters Democrat politicians, as opposed to Democrat voters, put their own power first and God a distant 431st after climate change and restricting how much soda we can drink when they exercise their power.

The GOP cut your taxes and the Democrats are lying about it

You've probably heard the lie that the Republican tax cuts only benefited the very rich.

The reality is that 80% of all Americans and 91% of the middle class received tax cuts.

Those few whose taxes increased can generally blame Democrats for that.  One of the much needed reforms in the Trump tax bill was to cap the amount of State income tax payments that can be deducted to $10k.  Only rich people have to pay that much state income tax so you'd think that the Democrats would like it.

They don't because in Democrat states like California and Illinois with insanely high state tax rates even the very upper middle class people, and all the wealthy, are going to have to pay more taxes as a result.

For years the Democrats have been running a scam; they divert massive amounts of income that should go to the Federal government to their own local coffers.  People paying their huge state tax bills in those progressive havens didn't feel the pain because they got to deduct those massive payments from their Federal taxes. Which meant that the people of Texas and other low/no state tax states were paying more than their fair share of running the country while the folks in California and Illinois were supporting their local Democrat's schemes like reduce college tuition for illegals.

By capping the deduction at $10k Trump fixed that problem.  Naturally the Democrats can't actually say that most of the people who are now going to have to pay more Federal taxes are going to have to do so because of the monstrously high tax rates Democrats have imposed to fund their socialist fantasies so they, and many of their propagandists in the #FakeNews media, continue to lie about the Trump tax cut.

They also ignore that the 2018 tax revenues are a record high.  Basically the argument for cutting tax rates is that reducing the rates will increase the GDP because people will be more willing to invest and because consumers will have more money to spend. So if the GDP increases enough the tax revenues can increase even if the tax rates are lower because a lower rate on a larger amount can result in a larger return.

For example a tax rate of 70% on $100 will net the government $70. But a tax rate of 50% on $140 will also net the government $70.  Historically tax revenues have risen after tax cuts. The problem has been that our ruling class in DC has responded to increased revenue by increasing spending.

Now the Democrats are hell bent on drastically increasing your taxes.  For example the "medicare for all" that many Democrats are proposing will increase government spending by close to 100% and they can only be paid for with massive tax increases on all Americans; taxing the wealthy alone will not generate the necessary cash even if we assume that massively increasing the tax rates of the investor class doesn't drive down the GDP even though historically that has always been the case.

The Democrats are fascists who want to be able to spend the money you earn the way they want; mostly to pay off cronies and buy votes.  Remember that whenever you hear about a Democrat talking about increasing taxes; they think that they know better than you do how to spend the money you work so hard for.

Democrats legalize the murder of children

If a mugger attacks a pregnant woman on her way to the hospital to give birth and his violent assault kills her baby he is no longer guilty of homicide under the new "pro-choice" law in the state of New York.

We only become people once we're born according to this new law so that the killing of what science declares to be a human being is not homicide unless they've been born.

One might ask why the obvious correction wasn't made; namely that a woman has the right to choose to kill her unborn child but no one else does.  The problem is that if the law said that it would be saying that the unborn are people and that's something the pro-abortion fanatics can't allow.

This is the central lie at the heart of the abortion movement; that somehow at birth a human being is magically turned into a person.

The science is settled; human life begins at conception, see the quotes at the end of this post.  Anyone who has taken sex ed or high school biology knows that this is true.  Each individual organism, human or animal, is defined by its DNA.  At conception a new unique being with human DNA is formed.  From that instant the sex, hair color, and a multitude of other factors are fixed.  One can go to any biology text and discover that at every stage of human development, including those before birth, people are human. There is no magical transition where a woman's unborn daughter turns from a frog to a human being. That's as fake as Scientology.

Yet in order to allow abortions pro-aborts have to pretend that science is wrong.

The key way they do that is to say that the unborn are human--though they only admit that when forced to by scientific facts--but they're not persons who are protected by the law.  Interestingly that was the same technique used by Nazi's to justify killing Jews and by slave owners to justify slavery.

The problem is that if leftists say that the government has the power to define which biologically human beings are persons then they're saying that if Trump managed to get the government to declare that illegals weren't persons, even though they're obviously human beings, and hence that we could hunt down and kill illegals it would be ok in that while leftists wouldn't agree with it they would have to agree that the government has the power to do that.

In reality just like the Nazi's and the slave owners modern pro-abortion folk only think the government has the power to declare those human beings who pro-abortion folks don't like to be non-persons.  But that's just hypocrisy. If the left declares that the government has the power to declare any scientifically human being a non-person with no rights then that power is clearly applicable against anyone from Jews to the handicapped.  Thats why our Declaration of Independence says that all people have intrinsic rights that come from God and which can't be taken away by the government including the right to life.

The reality is clear Cuomo and his Democrat allies aren't interested in a woman's right to choose; they're interested in killing babies.  When a woman's baby is killed in an assault she's not choosing it yet the law Cuomo forced through says its not homicide.  Similarly allowing non-Doctors to perform abortions is putting killing babies in front of safe medical care for women.

Historically Democrats have worked hard to not hold abortion mills to the same medical safety standards as other medical sites that actually heal people.  For example the Gosnell abortion "clinic" had blood and cat feces on the floor but nothing had been done because the "clinic" hadn't been inspected by the government for 20 years. The lack of any government oversight also explained how the "anesthesiologist" had a 6th grade eduction.  The health of the women who went to that clinic was of no concern to the pro-abortion forces; all they cared about was that lots of unborn Black children were being killed.

The "clinic" wasn't inspected because politicians said that requiring abortion mills to pass medical inspections would hinder a woman's access to abortion.  Once again what matters is that unborn babies are killed not that women get quality health care.  Apparently preforming more abortions is more important than insuring that women who have abortions do so in clinics that actually conform to good medical practices. Perhaps because rich white women don't go to "clinics" like Gosnells Democrats aren't concerned about the quality of service offered to minorities.

In America today around 80% of Planned Parenthood clinics are in minority neighborhoods and Black women are 3 times as likely to abort their unborn child as white women.  Abortion is in fact the leading cause of death for Black Americans.

In every other case where there is a disparate outcome, if only 5% of CEOs are Black while 12% of Americans are Black, the left tells us that it is proof of racism.  But in spite of clear evidence of PP targeting minorities, and PP having been founded by a racist who endorsed Hitlers eugenics policies, we're told that Black women aborting at 3 times the rate of white women does not show any racism.

The reality is that the left doesn't like Blacks because if it did they'd be saying that while they support a woman's right to choose we need to take steps to end the disparate impact of abortion on Blacks.  It's not by accident that the party which fought the Civil War to keep slavery legal, which founded the KKK, and which passed all the Jim Crow laws is now unconcerned about what Jesse Jackson called genocide against Black people.

The fact that Cuomo and Democrats in general celebrated a law that makes killing a fully viable pain capable child to be literally butchered in her mothers womb minutes before her birth shows that they are monsters not people who care about women.

========================================================================

"By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception." Dr. Hymie Gordon, Chairman, Department of Genetics at the Mayo Clinic

"To accept the fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or opinion ... it is plain experimental evidence." The "Father of Modern Genetics" Dr. Jerome Lejeune, Univ. of Descarte, Paris

"Embryo: the developing organism from the time of fertilization until significant differentiation has occurred, when the organism becomes known as a fetus."

[Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2.]

"Embryo: An organism in the earliest stage of development; in a man, from the time of conception to the end of the second month in the uterus."

[Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146]

"The development of a human begins with fertilization, a process by which the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote."

[Sadler, T.W. Langman's Medical Embryology. 7th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1995, p. 3]

"Although life is a continuous process, fertilization is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new, genetically distinct human organism is thereby formed.... The combination of 23 chromosomes present in each pronucleus results in 46 chromosomes in the zygote. Thus the diploid number is restored and the embryonic genome is formed. The embryo now exists as a genetic unity."

[O'Rahilly, Ronan and Mller, Fabiola. Human Embryology & Teratology. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1996, pp. 8, 29. ]

Swalwell lies about Russian collusion

Extreme leftists Democrat Eric Swalwell, from California of course, said on Sunday:

"He[Trump] betrayed our country and I don't say that lightly,"

When pressed the only evidence he could supply was:

1) Trump had a private meeting with Putin and every word spoken has not been made public
2) Trump is taking us out of Syria
3) Trump wants to take the US out of NATO
4) Trump wants Russia to keep hacking US elections

These are all either lies or insane distortions of reality.

1) Historically the details of US Presidents meetings with heads of other countries are not made public.  Swalwell doesn't claim to know that anything "traitorous" was discussed. To him the mere fact that Trump hasn't made public the transcript of the meeting is a sign of treason.  

If you want to see an example however of presidential malfeasance with Putin one needs look no further than Obama.  Back in 2012 Obama told the President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, that he should tell Putin that Obama would have more "flexibility" to deal with Russia after the election.  The only reason we know this is that Obama was unaware that his microphone was on.  Obama's intent was to conceal from the American people that he was lying to us about how he would deal with Russia.  In fact Obama intended to be more supportive of what Putin wanted than he was telling us.

Strangely Swalwell doesn't consider lying to the people about going easy on Putin by Obama is traitorous but not publishing the meeting notes by Trump is.

2) Since the start of the war in Afghanistan in 2001 Democrats have been telling us that we shouldn't be involved in wars in the Middle East.  Yet now that ISIS has been defeated, due to Trump, those same Democrats are saying it's treason to withdraw our troops from Syria.

Remember under Obama when the Syrian government, which is a client of Putin's, used chemical weapons against their own people Obama turned Syria over to Putin and allowed Putin to oversee the destruction of Syrian chemical weapons.  Given that we know that Putin didn't do that, if he had the subsequent use of chemical weapons that occurred when Trump was president couldn't have happened, it's clear that Obama was doing what was best for Putin.

Further when Assad, Putin's buddy, used chemical weapons against his people again unlike Obama Trump bombed the Russian client's airfield.

What Swalwell is saying is that allowing Assad to use chemical weapons against civilians with no retaliation by Obama and giving Putin more power in Syria was ok but Trump saying we shouldn't have boots on the ground forever in Syria is treason.  Note that Trump has said that US withdrawals will be conditioned on ensuring the security of our allies the Kurds so unlike Obama's strategy in Iraq and Libya--mess the country up and then leave so as to facilitate the growth of terrorism-- Trump is just saying that we shouldn't have American men and women dying forever in Syria.

3) Trump doesn't want to take the US out of NATO. What he's said is that if NATO won't work to defend itself he doesn't see why the US should continue to pay for the defense of Europe.  Since WWII Europe has funded massive welfare programs using the money it should have spent on defense and counted on US taxpayers to pay for the defense of Europe.

So Trump's "treason" is that he's said the American people are tired of subsidizing the defense of Europe.  Obama on the other hand stopped the deployment of an anti-missile defense system in Europe that Putin didn't like.  Even better Obama's move alienated our allies because it not only did it appease Putin it was announced on the anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland. Yet in the extremist mind of Swalwell that's just fine.

Interestingly Trump's tough talk has caused NATO nations other than the US to increase defense spending by $100B thereby reducing the burden that the US carried under Obama to defend Europe. That makes sense since the GDP of the NATO countries is on par with the US GDP so they should be paying their fair share.

4)Trump's comment about the Russian hacking was a joke.  We can tell because when he made it he and his audience laughed.  At the time Hillary had admitted to illegally deleting 33,000 emails without allowing the government to verify that they weren't government related.  Trump joked that maybe the Russians could find those emails that Hillary had deleted.  Trump has never made any comment that said that he was in favor of Russians hacking our election.

On the other hand Obama has admitted knowing about Russia's attempt to influence the 2016 election and he did nothing serious to stop it.  Yet Swalwell doesn't seem bothered by that.

In contrast to the baseless issues Swalwell is raising we have a number of reasons to believe that Trump is not Putin's puppet:

1) Trump is demanding that Putin's client in Venezuela, the dictator Maduro, step down
2) Trump got Germany to stop a multi billion dollar natural gas deal with Russia which would have given Putin hundreds of billions of dollars
3) Trump attacked Putin's client in Syria which Obama refused to do
4) Trump has gotten NATO countries to dramatically increase their defense spending
5) Trump has increased US defense spending

All of these are things that Putin would not want to happen, things that directly hurt Putin. Unlike Swalwell's claims these are things that we know happened and which we know that Putin didn't like.

Swalwell is the one who is "betraying" our country by lying about our President in an attempt to ensure that Democrats get more power over the American people.

Democrats want your kids to get a bad education

Why would Democrats oppose our kids getting a good education? The answer is simple any intelligent person who looks at Democrat policies rationally can see that they are bad policies.  No one who reasons, as opposed to emoting, and who knows history can seriously believe that socialism is great or that big government actually does what the people want. Similarly science unequivocally says that the unborn are human beings and hence every abortion kills a human being; something that the left is desperate to hide from we the people.

Hence ensuring that our children are taught what to believe rather than how to reason and the facts they need to decide on their own is anathema to Democrats.  It's not surprising fascists historically have wanted to propagandize the people not educate them.

That's why Democrats, which include the teacher's unions, work hard to shut down any competition to the public schools.  Every kid who escapes the main stream public schools and the union teachers is a kid who might actually get a real education and pose a threat to the unions and the Democrats.  To be fair not all teachers embrace this philosophy and do their best to truly educate their kids but mandated curriculums and policies make it hard for even good teachers to go against the Democrats objectives.

A little noticed aspect of the agreement that ended the LA teachers strike was that the Board would ask for a statewide examination of charter schools and that the Board should consider asking for a state wide moratorium on them.

Charter schools are schools that are privately run but publicly funded.  They are required to conform to many of the same rules as public schools but they generally provide a far better education for the same per student cost. Parents love them because they aren't one size fits all machines which exist solely to meet graduation statistics.

Why would the teachers union care about that?  The answer is simple; in general charter schools succeed and the teachers at charter schools aren't unionized.  Also charter schools are competition to the failing public schools.  Which means that to compete the public schools would actually have to start improving what they do. That is an unimaginable evil to teachers unions and so instead of competing and driving charter schools out of business by providing great educations to their students they, like all Democrats, want to shut down their competition via political maneuvering.

It's clear that Democrats want our kids to be indoctrinated not educated from the sort of left wing insanity they require to be "taught" in school such as having kindergarteners learn that being gay is great and a man can be a woman.  We've all seen stories about teachers advocating left wing political causes like the California teacher who declared that the members of the military were "the friction' lowest of our low".

And the teachers unions are glad to go along because they're radical left wing organizations which have no shame; they're eager to ask for pay raises in places where the teachers are completely failing to educate the kids and where teachers are already earning quite generous salaries.

The unions spend a fortune to support the Democrats who in turn give teachers raises no matter how poorly they're doing.

That's why Democrats are quite willing to go along with making kids education worse; it helps get them huge amounts of money from teachers unions and it dumbs down America so that people will vote for Democrats like Ilhan Omar and Ocasio-Cortez--who says that facts don't matter.

Voter Fraud; a Democrat ideal

I grew up in Democrat run Chicago and the standard jokes was that Mayor Daley was such a great mayor that people came back from the dead to vote for him.

Voter fraud is a key part of Democrat DNA but the #FakeNews media tells us that it's not a problem.

While Democrat states like California make it easy for illegals to vote we're told it's not a problem even though California doesn't do much to keep illegals from voting.  Supposedly the same people who ignore our immigration laws to enter the US to make more money would never think of breaking our election laws to vote for politicians who will give them more money.

In very Red Texas they actually care about restricting voting to US citizens.  But a recent investigation by Texas revealed that 95,000 non-citizens are registered to vote in Texas and 58,000 of them have actually voted.

Interestingly the response of the left and the #FakeNews media has been to point out that there are actually millions of registered voters so this is no big deal.  The problem is that elections aren't generally won by millions of votes.  For example Al Franken won his set in the Senate, and thereby allowed Obamacare to become law, by a margin of 312 votes.  Since the election 1099 felons have been identified as having voted illegally in that race.  Given that felons lean very strongly towards Democrats, giving new meaning to the phrase "thick as thieves", that means that without voter fraud Franken would have lost and Obamacare would not have passed.

Of course if Texas found 95,000 non-citizen voters we can only imagine how many California would find if they looked. But of course they refuse to do so for the simple reason that non-citizens tend to vote Democrat and Democrats run California.

That's why it took a lawsuit by Judicial Watch to force California to remove 1.5 million in active voters from the voting lists.

The simple reality is that Democrats are fascists who want to rule over the people and as such they are perfectly comfortable with anything that advances their cause.  They rationalize it to themselves by declaring that they're fighting for what's right--things like making sure we the people don't drink too much soda--and hence that good end justifies any means.

Democrats; the new Gestapo

Several years ago in Wisconsin Democrat politicians arranged for the homes of Republican activists to be raided in the dark by armed agents.  The crimes that these Republicans were being investigated for were not in fact crimes and the courts told said that the investigation itself, much less the armed raids, were totally baseless.

When Roger Stone was arrested during an early morning raid on his home by a slew of armed agents the Democrats were repeating their Gestapo tactics.  Stone is accused of lying just like Comey and a variety of other Democrats yet while those the Democrats like aren't even prosecuted people like Stone are treated like terrorists.

Given that Stone wasn't violent there was no reason that the normal procedure, negotiate a time for the person to surrender themselves at a police station, wasn't used.  The only possible motivation is that the new Gestapo made up of Deep State actors want to intimidate Stone and coerce him to lie about his relationship with Trump.

The reality is that modern Democrats are fascists who will use force whenever it suits their purpose.  Antifa uses violence to shut down anyone who dares question leftist orthodoxy and Democrats will use the police whenever they can to intimidate their political opponents.

Democrats think animals not the unborn are the most vulnerable among us

Rabidly pro-abortion New York Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul said:

"The test of whether a society is civilized and just is how it cares for its most vulnerable," "This funding will help animal shelters across the state care for dogs and cats while they embark on new beginnings."

She was referring to the $5 million that the state of New York was providing to improve animal shelters.

Hochul is saying that the nearly 1 million unborn babies who are killed each year are less vulnerable than stray cats.  One has to be truly evil to say something like that.

But even if we ignore the pro-life aspect why is New York spending millions on stray animals when there are plenty of poor and even homeless people in New York?   Every time the left dislikes a weapon system it says that this or that military system is evil because the money for it could be used to help the poor.

So the reality is that not only is Hochul saying that the unborn are less vulnerable than stray animals she's saying that the poor are less vulnerable than stray animals.

Finally who in their right mind includes animals as members of society?  Society is made up of people who can think not animals that can't.

Surprise; Anti-semitic Muslim politician calls for leniency for Americans who tried to join ISIS

In Minnesota a group of men were convicted of trying to join ISIS and become terrorists.  Ilhan Omar , Democrat Representative, said the following:

“Incarcerating 20-year-old men for 30 or 40 years is essentially a life sentence. Society will have no expectations of the to-be 50- or 60-year-old released prisoners; it will view them with distrust and revulsion,” “Such punitive measures not only lack efficacy, they inevitably create an environment in which extremism can flourish, aligning with the presupposition of terrorist recruitment,"

Apparently we're not supposed to view people who want to join ISIS, you know the group that rapes women and throws gays off of roofs not to mention their eagerness to kill all non-Muslims, with revulsion.  Which would seem to say that Omar doesn't view ISIS with revulsion.

But of course this isn't surprising given that Omar has said recently that the democratically elected opposition to the socialist dictator running Venezuela is "far right".

Anyone who considers a socialist who believes in democracy as "far right" and who says that Jews "hypnotize" the world as Omar does is clearly a banner carrier for the modern Democrat party.

Abortion hurts everyone

Science unequivocally tells us that in every abortion an innocent human being is intentionally killed.

"Although life is a continuous process, fertilization is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new, genetically distinct human organism is thereby formed.... The combination of 23 chromosomes present in each pronucleus results in 46 chromosomes in the zygote. Thus the diploid number is restored and the embryonic genome is formed. The embryo now exists as a genetic unity."

[O'Rahilly, Ronan and Mller, Fabiola. Human Embryology & Teratology. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1996, pp. 8, 29. ]

Yet our society tells us that abortion is a wonderful good and Democrats have gone from saying that they want abortion to be legal, safe, and rare to calling on women to boast about their abortions.  How can the killing of an innocent human being ever be good?

Abortion is all about selfishness. Women kill their daughters either because they feel that their daughters would be a burden or because they feel that the pressure from others--the father or their friends/parents/family-- is too hard to endure.

But what about rape or threat to the mothers health? The reality is that less than 0.5% of women who have an abortion say that they've been raped and that less than 1% of women who have an abortion do so because a medical doctor told them it was necessary. Note that 4% of women say they're having an abortion because of their health but in a previous study only 3% of the women who said that they were aborting because of their health were told that they needed to abort by a doctor(3% of 4% is 0.12%.  Also note that if a woman feels that she would be depressed if she doesn't abort that is defined by the Supreme Court as a health based abortion; the woman doesn't need to be at risk of dying.  Hence the vast majority of abortions are about convenience and selfishness not rape or avoiding death. For example 25% of women who abort say that they say that they're doing so because they're not ready for a child.  Interestingly 23% say that they can't afford a child now but given that putting one's child up for adoption doesn't cost anything that's just another example of selfishness.

The pro-life movement rightly recognizes that women who are under tremendous pressure to kill their child deserve our care and sympathy but we shouldn't forget that, except in places like socialist China or for prostitutes who are forced to abort by their pimps, women aren't actually forced to have an abortion. That doesn't mean we shouldn't be sympathetic towards them but it does mean that they are being selfish; declaring that their daughter's life is worth less than the inconvenience she causes them.

By teaching women to be selfish abortion advocates hurt women since we are at our best when we're charitable not when we're selfish.

Abortion hurts women because it let's men exploit women.  Without abortion every time a man has sex with a women he risks, at the very least, 18 years of child support.  With abortion men can use women as objects with no fear of any significant consequences.  Abortion enables men to objectify women rather than requiring them to love a woman enough to commit to her.

Interestingly just as women are complaining more and more about men being unwilling to commit women are also pushing to keep abortion legal.  Historically men committed because they knew that if they wanted sex they had to.  Today however the left's Big Lie machine tells men and women that casual sex is wonderful. But if that's true then why should men commit to women?

Abortion hurts everyone because it tells us that our lives only have value to the extent that our mothers wanted us; that we have no intrinsic value.  Is it surprising that parents will beat the child who just a few months before society told them they could kill?  Is it surprising that in marriages what the parents want has become more important than what's best for the children?  After all if children can be killed at will prior to birth why should anyone think that parents should sacrifice themselves for their children?  

Abortion hurts minorities.  Blacks are 3 times as likely to abort their baby than whites.  Interestingly the leftist media which bemoans any difference in outcome between Blacks and whites has no problem with this disparity.

In the end the only people who benefit from abortion are the men who want women to be available to use but who aren't interested in actually loving women and racists who want to commit what Jesse Jackson called genocide against Blacks.

Point out to your friends that it's a Big Lie that abortion helps women because it only helps women to be objectified and used. A woman in a loving relationship never needs abortion.

The Left's Trump paradox; if Trump is Putin's puppet why does Trump constantly act against Putin's interests?

We're told that Trump is under Putin's thumb by the #FakeNews media and the Left all the time.  But when you ask them for examples they simply cite the fact that Trump says positive things about dictators who he's trying to get to agree to do things that help the US.

If we look at Trump's actions we see the following:

1) Trump has significantly increased US defense spending which is something Putin doesn't want

2) Trump has gotten NATO to increase their defense spending which is not what Putin wants

3) When Putin's ally in Syria used poison gas on civilians Obama did nothing but Trump bombed Putin's ally which is clearly not what Putin wanted

4) Trump got Germany to cancel a natural gas deal with Russia which would have made hundreds of billions of dollars for Putin's friends

5) Trump intervened in Syria against the wishes of Putin

To that list we can now add another key example:

6) The socialist dictator in Venezuela is a client of Putin's and Putin has done a lot to support him so Trump recognizing Juan Guaido as the legitimate President of Venezuela is clearly not what Putin wants.

What we have here is an example of the willingness of the left to tell any lie to gain power.  The whole approach that the left is using to nullify the 2016 election is based on Trump doing things that help Russia but hurt the US. But the reality is that Trump has spoken softly about Russia and Putin but carried a big stick; while he acts civil towards Putin and even compliments him Trump's actions are always in favor of the US and in opposition to what Putin wants.

But if the left reported the truth then their whole attempt to overthrow American democracy and void the 2016 election would go down the tubes.  Because all that matters to the left is complete power over we the people they will tell any lie and ignore any story that goes against their narrative.

Hence the left is pitching a paradox to we the people; Trump is Putin's stooge even though all of Trump's actions are going against what Putin wants.  With stooges like that Putin certainly doesn't need enemies.

The New York Times extolls the virtues of SPLC defined racists

If you live on the east coast in the NY or DC areas you are apparently familiar with the Hebrew Israelites.  They stand on street corners and shout racist and homophobic slurs.

Even the SPLC, the far left former civil rights group, says that they are racists for, among other reasons, the fact that the Hebrew Israelites declare that all white people are going to hell.

The NYT published a piece defending the group since it's critical to the #FakeNews spin on the Covington boys story.  The reality is that a group of Black adults called a bunch of kids "faggots" and "n*gger".  Interestingly they also called the fake Vietnam veteran, Phillips, names including "Uncle Tomahawk".  But the NYT does its best to portray these haters as all around nice guys who are just passionate:

"They shout, use blunt and sometimes offensive language, and gamely engage in arguments aimed at drawing listeners near."

Can you imagine for one instant if a White group that said all Blacks are going to Hell and used verboten words like "faggot" and the n-word would be described that way?

But in order to maintain the left's lies the NYT has to make it appear that a bunch of teenagers who said nothing racist are the villains and adult men who hurled vile insults at the kids for an extended period are the victims.

That's why the NYT goes on to say:

"More alarming to many African Americans, he[Todd

Boyd a professor of race and pop culture at USC] said, is “seeing a white guy in a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat.”"
Now that's a racist statement; it's saying that Black people are more comfortable with adults who say all white people are going to Hell than they are with people who want to make America great again.  I refuse to believe that Blacks in general are that racist.  Certainly none of the Blacks I've known and worked with hate white people that much.

What the NYT is doing is being far more sympathetic to an openly racist and homophobic group of adults who verbally attacked and tried to intimidate a bunch of kids than they are to the kids who were the victims of what is clearly child abuse.

Real men don't harangue kids and we all know that if a bunch of white men had done to a group of Black kids what the Hebrew Israelites did to the Covington kids the NYT would be screaming bloody murder.

But the truth is that the truth doesn't matter to the left or the NYT. All that matters is power and they will tell any lie and hurt anyone who stands between them and power.

In the past week Democrats have voted twice against paying government workers

Steve Scalise--you know the guy who was almost murdered by a Democrat and whose story the media forgot about after 2 days--reminds us that in the last week the Democrats have voted twice against paying government employees.

“This is not the first, but the second time in the last week that Democrats have voted against paying our federal workers while we continue negotiating to secure our border and reopen the government.

“For weeks, Democrats have falsely attempted to pass blame to Republicans for federal workers missing their paychecks, but now Speaker Pelosi and her caucus are nowhere to be found when it comes to actually voting to pay these same workers. Just days ago, Speaker Pelosi outright rejected the President’s offer to reopen the government before she even had the chance to hear it.

“Democrats are all talk. They won’t vote to secure our border. They won’t vote to pay displaced federal workers. They're so committed to their open-border agenda that they have repeatedly voted to deprive federal workers of their paychecks just to send a message to the President. The government has been shut down for 33 days yet Speaker Pelosi offers no solutions or paths forward. The American people deserve better.”

#FakeNews media is trying to discourage you because we're winning

I don't know about you but I get discouraged when all the major news media continually lies about pretty much everything from Trump to the Covington kids and when I see that Democrats can say and do anything and be commended while anything Conservatives say is distorted and condemned.

But the reality is that if the left were winning they wouldn't have to lie.  If Americans really bought into the whole massive government, high taxes, less free America that leftists are trying to enact leftists would run on what they believe rather than what they think the people want, for example rather than pretending to be for controlling the border leftists would proclaim that anyone who can walk across the border should immediately become a US citizen able to collect welfare.

If America were really as pro-abortion as the #FakeNews keep saying the media wouldn't have to gin up a bogus account of high school kids being racists to distract the people from the 200,000 strong March for Life.

If the average American really liked what Ocasio-Cortez was selling the media wouldn't have to lie about what she says and refuse to cover the cringe worthy things she says--like facts aren't important.

Similarly if American bought into the hatred of Israel that Democrats like Ilhan Omar spew the media would cover it rather than covering it up.

The reality is that the only reason Democrats win anything is about 30% of the population is too trusting and/or are dependent on government for their next meal.  It's certainly not unlikely that someone who is on welfare will vote for the Democrats who promise they will take more money from the folks who earn it and give it to them.

But lots of people vote Democrat because they've been lied to; it's just the same thing in North Korea, the people have been lied to so much they think they're government is great even as the people starve.  In America those folks are the ones who believe that the Russians tampered with the vote counts, that Trump is on Putin's side, that abortion doesn't kill a human being, that science says we're all going to die in 12 years unless we drastically increase taxes and give Democrats more power, that condemning casual sex is evil, that Jesus taught that we shouldn't judge anyone's actions, etc.  In their world Trump conspired with Russia but Hillary didn't.

  About 20% of the population is the Democrat base who want to abolish capitalism and Democracy and enthrone the elites as our rulers who will ensure that we live our lives the way they know is best for us.

So our job is to get to that 30% and give them the truth. Let people know about your conservatism, that you belong to the Knights of Columbus, that you attend services every Sunday, and that you don't believe the lies told to you by the media.

I remember when Rush Limbaugh went on the air.  Suddenly tens of millions of people were listening to this guy who supported the same sort of things I did.  Prior to that the monolithic left wing media and created the illusion that no one in America was conservative.  Reagan's election was an accident due not to people supporting his vision but to the American people believing his "lies".

The Internet brought about a similar revolution. Like all tyrants Democrats want to keep the people from knowing the truth which is why they're so supportive of any type of censorship.  So the Democrats in Silicon Valley are working hard to censor any voices they don't like.  We must respond by speaking even more on any and all venues we have access to.  The only way to bring the 30% back to reality is to expose them to the truth.

It's easy for Twitter and FB to censor a few voices. But if we all speak the truth to power--the uber rich Democrats-- Twitter can't censor all of us.

Ilhan Omar Democrat strikes again

On Tuesday, long after the truth about the Covington kids came out, Ilhan Omar--the Democrat Congresswoman who was married to her brother as part of some sort of scam for 8 years--, viciously attacked those kids on Twitter.

Now she's saying that the fact that others are sharing the tweet she deleted, but did not apologize for, is hypocritical.

Yes to Ilhan sharing the truth that she wants to hide is hypocritical.

One way to see if someone is a Democrat is to see if they object to the truth when the truth doesn't make them look good.  So we can now conclude that the virulently anti-Semitic Omar is a Democrat in good standing.

Cuomo and New York state say that killing a pregnant woman's baby isn't murder

By declaring, in direct opposition to all science, that human beings aren't human until they're born Cuomo and the state of New York have made it so that if a man beats his pregnant girlfriend in order to kill their unborn child he is no longer guilty of murder even if the child was wanted by the woman.  After all murder is the killing of a person and since Cuomo et al have declared that the unborn aren't persons under the law then killing them isn't murder.

Keep in mind leftists who support the mass murder of the unborn get all upset when a baby seal is clubbed, when an eagle's egg is stolen, and when dogs are killed in a dog fight ring.  To them animals are of more concern than human beings.

That tells us just how hateful and barbaric people like Cuomo are.

It's not surprising then that Cuomo also supports the killing of fully viable late term babies as well as sex selection abortions where unborn women are killed because their parents want a boy.

Cuomo doesn't care that in NYC 60% of Black babies are killed before they're born or that Black women are 3 times more likely to abort than white women; probably because he like the rest of the Democrat party is a racist who views Blacks as a problem.  After all he could say that abortion is great but that we should work to end the disparity in outcome where Blacks abort so much more than whites. But he's silent on that; and silence is consent.

In the future when the cult of death has been defeated Cuomo and people like him will be viewed the way we view Nazi's today; as murderous monsters.

Microsoft's NewsGuard supports #FakeNews

The term "fake news" was originally coined by the left wing media in an attempt to declare that pretty much every thing Trump said was a lie.

Trump being Trump however he turned that label into something truthful; namely that the major media has for a very long time consistently lied and distorted the news in order to advance the objectives of leftists in America.

Because the left can never win a fair intellectual fight since their ideology is both tyrannical and unAmerican they have to resort to concealing the truth from the people and silencing any voice that disagrees with their hateful agenda.

First came the "fact checking" sites which are nothing more than left wing propagandists.  How often have you looked up a "fact check" and found something along the lines of "well the facts in that statement by a conservative are correct but the statement is not because the conservatives is using the facts in a way we don't like because it hurts what we believe in"?  Essentially "fact checking" sites run by people with absolutely no relevant experience but who have significant and publicly admitted left wing bias exist solely to delegitimize the truth.

Now the uber leftists tech gurus are using algorithms to warn us of what sites they don't want us to see.

Microsoft has just launched a new add on to their Edge browser which supposedly tells the user what sites are trustworthy and which ones aren't.  Not surprisingly the tool conforms to establishment leftist beliefs.

For example even though Buzzfeed has been caught fabricating stories about Trump the most recent being that Cohen had testified that Trump had asked him to lie to Congress; a story that Buzzfeed kept up even after Mueller said it was #FakeNews.

Meanwhile Drudge report is listed as unreliable even though it's a news aggregator which means that Newsguard is saying that a Washington Post article linked to via Drudge is unreliable but the same article if gone to directly is reliable.

The news sites which are still spreading lies about the Covington boys are rated as reliable while those which are spreading the truth are labeled as unreliable.

Essentially whatever algorithm that NewsGuard is using is very biased.

Like Twitter allowing blue checked people to advocate or fantasize about violence against children while banning people who object to that Microsoft is working hard to impose its "truth" on America by doing its best to ensure that Americans are kept as far away from the truth as possible.

Democrats vote against paying Federal workers during the shutdown

Republican Congressman Dan Crenshaw tweeted:

“Big deal that never got reported:

“Last week, House GOP voted to pay federal employees their 1st paycheck of 2019, despite shutdown. Only 6 Dems voted with us. It failed.

“Dem priority is not paying workers or opening gov’t. It is opposing Trump,”

That's right. Even though government workers overwhelmingly support Democrats with their money, their time, and their votes the Democrats refused to vote for a plan to pay them.  Which is made even more horrible by the fact that the Democrats, and the #FakeNews media, has been constantly talking about the privations that those government workers are enduring.  Catholic Charities even gave tens of thousands of dollars to help those suffering government workers yet the Democrats refused to help them when they could.

One more example of how Democrats don't care about the people only about how much power they can have over the rest of us.  Federal government employee's suffering means nothing to Democrats compared to the wall limiting the number of illegals who will contribute to Democrats--remember it was illegals who did the ballot harvesting in California which won the Democrats several congressional seats-- and who will vote for them--the idea that illegals who gladly broke our immigration laws to get more money will refuse to violate our voting laws in order to vote for politicians who will give them more money is absurd.

In the end the Democrats are like the Mafia; they stick together no matter what and they only care about what gets them more power and money.

Radical leftist admits Covington kids were persecuted because leftists hate Trump

On the ultra leftists ABC show "The View" leftist doyen Joy Behar let the truth slip out:

"WHOOPI GOLDBERG, HOST: Many people admitted they made snap judgments before these other facts came in. But is it that we just instantly say that's what it is based on what we see in that moment and then have to walk stuff back when it turns out we're wrong? Why is that? Why do we keep making the same mistake?

JOY BEHAR: Because we're desperate to get Trump out of office. That's why."

First note that contrary to completely dishonest sources like the AP and the Atlantic which are still lying about the Covington kids Whoopi admits that the left got it wrong; that they viciously attacked a bunch of high schoolers, not all of whom were white by the way, based on a selectively edited bit of video and that now when more complete coverage of the event is available it has become clear that the boys did nothing wrong.

Then note that Behar points out what we all know to be true but which leftists rarely admit; they were perfectly comfortable publicly condemning some high school kids if it advanced their agenda of nullifying the 2016 election.

I commend Whoopi for admitting that the left got it wrong and if she realized what she was saying Behar for admitting to the reality of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

The racism or cluelessness of Democrat Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar, the Muslim woman who was married to her brother as part of some sort of scam for 8 years and who is virulently anti-Semitic, has revealed that's she's either racist or clueless.

Yesterday, long after the truth about what happened to the Covington kids was revealed, she tweeted the following(since deleted):

-The boys were protesting a woman's right to choose & yelled “it’s not rape if you enjoy it”
-They were taunting 5 Black men before they surrounded Phillips and led racist chants
-Sandmann’s family hired a right wing PR firm to write his non-apology https://t.co/fG8AUCuDTr https://t.co/bOA6yFsIjW

— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) January 23, 2019

First note that the link tells the true story; namely that a group of Black radicals, declared to be a hate group by the SPLC, were hurling racist and homophobic insults at the boys and that it was the adult native American "activist", whose campaigned for the release of a man who was convicted of murdering two FBI agents, who approached and harassed the boys.

There is no evidence what so ever that the boys ever chanted that it's not rape if you like it. One boy, not from Covington, apparently said it once but Omar imputes the offense to all the boys from Covington.The video clearly shows that it was the Black men, members of a cult which regularly harasses people in the street, who were taunting the boys.

Given that people were calling for physical assaulting and even killing a high school student, Sandmann, is it odd that his parents would hire a PR firm to help him tell his side of the story?

There is no excuse for any of Omar's charges any more than there has been for her vile anti-Semitic comments.

It will be interesting to see if Democrats and the #FakeNews media hold her accountable for her libelous attacks on a bunch of kids.

Democrats and the always delayed end of the world

Leftists often mock Christians who think that the end of the world is around the corner which is odd since it's leftists like Al Gore and Ocasio-Cortez who are the loudest proclaimers of impending doom.

Ocasio-Cortez has recently proclaimed that the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't do something about climate change.  What's interesting is that her claim was made 10 years after Al Gore said that the world would reach a point of no return in 10 years. It's also interesting that no credible scientist, even those who support the idea that man is causing the world to warm, supports Ocasio-Cortez's claim.

Despite's Gore's claim having been demonstrated to be false Ocasio-Cortez is issuing a new ultimatum.

We know that Ocasio-Cortez is either insincere or dishonest since under Trump the US has decreased our CO2 emissions. The real offenders, India and China, are massively increasing their CO2 emissions, as allowed by the Paris Accords, yet no one on the left is calling for us to force them to even hold their CO2 emissions constant.  Either Ocasio-Cortez doesn't know which countries are driving up the global CO2 or she does and doesn't care since she knows that the whole climate change story is #FakeNews.

Despite the fact that for 20 years the satellite data, the most accurate temperature data we have, has been effectively constant the left is calling for a massive increase in taxes-- giving them more of our money to spend--, drastically higher energy costs--which will hurt the poor and lower middle class the most--, and more government power over every aspect of our lives.

It's all about Democrats having more power and we the people having less freedom.  If the Democrats cared about Global Warming...err Climate Change they would never have supported the Paris accords which allow China and India to massively increase their CO2 emissions. If the Democrats cared about CO2 they'd be commending fracking which has lead to a significant reduction in the US's CO2 emissions.  But the democrats have done neither because doing so would reduce their power which is all that really matters to them.

Leftists advocate violence against children

We now know that the Covington high school kids didn't disrespect a native American.  Rather that native American activist adult harassed them.

Generally speaking in civilized society an adult harassing kids is viewed as wrong.  In fact we can be fairly certain that if a White Rush Limbaugh fan started pounding a drum inches away from the face of a Black teenager the exact same adults who are now viciously attacking children would be attacking the adult instead.

Yet Covington high school is closed today out of fear for the safety of the students.  Even though we all now know that the kids didn't approach the adult he approached them. That they didn't chant what the adult said they chanted but his followers did tell the kids to go back to Europe.  That the one kids "smirk" was his attempt to smile and be friendly in the face of an adult shoving a drum in his face and swinging drumstick within inches of his face.

The left hates Trump so much that they're willing and eager to literally punch or kill a kid because he "disrespected" a native American adult.  What sort of monsters think that violence is an acceptable response to speech, or a "smirk", they don't like?

Democrats and leftists that's who. Just as they are comfortable with Antifa brutally assaulting people who disagree with the leftists line we are now seeing that places like AP and the Atlantic are comfortable continuing to disseminate a lie even though it's resulting in death threats against children.

To the left people have no value other than their ability to increase the power of the left over Americans.  That these innocent children are facing physical violence and possible death doesn't matter to the left since by lying about them they can cover up the mass violence of abortion in America and strike a blow against Trump.

It's not surprising that the left advocates violence against children given that for decades the left has supported the mass murder of the unborn for any reason at any point in a pregnancy--even after the unborn can feel pain and even after the unborn child could live outside the womb.

Given that according to the Planned Parenthood think tank, the Guttmacher Institute, less than 1% of abortions are due to rape and a similarly tiny percentage are due to cases where a doctor has said an abortion is necessary to save the mothers life the vast majority of abortions, 90%+, are for convenience; two people had consensual sex and the made a child which they'd rather kill than raise.

It's one thing to be a young girl abandoned by her "lover" and pressured by her parents who chooses to have an abortion it's quite another to be a leftist activist who encourages abortion, who extols abortion, who demands that the taxpayers pay for abortion, who demands that Catholic nuns be forced to cooperate in procuring abortions.

We can feel sympathy and while disagreeing with her decision understand how that young girl might make the choice she did.  But no truly good person can sympathize with people who act as pitchmen for the mass murder of the unborn.

The left has always advocated violence against children.  It's just that now the left has increased the age of the children it is willing to sacrifice to advance its selfish cause.

The new Democrat Brown Shirts

Hitler used his Brown Shirt thugs to intimidate and silence his political enemies.

While we all know about Antifa, its use of violence, and Democrats general approval of it that is only one part of the army of violence that Democrats use to silence those they don't like.

For example in the last day or so leftist thugs have been calling for violence against some teenage boys who the left claimed had been disrespectful to an adult Native American activist.  Of course now that the whole video is out we know that the kids actually were saints but even if the original narrative had been true does anyone think that their actions would have merited death threats, expulsion from school, or being denied entry to college?

Yet leftist thugs ranging from the famous to the people in the trenches advocated all those things simply because they thought that those boys hadn't been nice enough to an adult who didn't share their political beliefs.

Gangs of thugs roam American cities attacking everyone in sight yet the left wing Brown Shirts only call out for understanding but let a few Trump supporting teens stray from the Democrats plantation and killing them become acceptable.

Twitter suspends the account of someone for calling out a leftist who said that a teenage boys face looked punchable but left the leftist who was advocating violence against a kid untouched.

The reality is that the left can't win the hearts and minds of Americans with the truth so they're spreading lies through the #FakeNews media and using violence and censorship to silence anyone who dares speak the truth in public.