Justice Roberts say's he's a god who can never be wrong

Justice Robert's reason for putting abortion access ahead of women's right to life is that he was following orders...I mean precedent.

Essentially what he's saying is that once the court has ruled on something, even if that ruling is clearly wrong and unconstitutional, it can never be changed.

By that reasoning slavery should still be legal because the Supreme Court ruled that it was in the Dredd Scott decision.

Only God is infallible, and the Pope in limited circumstances because Jesus is protecting him, but Roberts is saying that he can't make a mistake so essentially he's claiming infallibility and godhood for himself and his leftist cronies.

We see this in the Court saying that Trump's pen can't undo what Obama's pen has writ.

In Robert's mind leftists positions are irreversible but conservative ones are easily overturned.

After all abortion and gay sex where both viewed as criminal for over a century but Roberts has no problem with the Court overturning those positions.

It's clear that Roberts is just another leftists who views himself as our dictator who can impose on we the people any rule he and his 4 even more dishonest colleagues like.

That Democrats cheer this shows that they too are tyrants at heart. They don't care how their will is imposed on the people they only care that we the people are forced to live how Democrats want us to live.

What makes this even more appalling is that Roberts says he is a Catholic. The Church unambiguously teaches what science teaches; that abortion is the killing of an innocent human being.

Science is clear; human life begins at conception and every abortion kills a human being:

“[The zygote], formed by the union of an oocyte and a sperm, is the beginning of a new human being.”

Keith L. Moore, Before We Are Born: Essentials of Embryology, 7th edition 2008 p 2

“Although life is a continuous process, fertilization… is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new genetically distinct human organism is formed when the chromosomes of the male and female pronuclei blend in the oocyte.”

Ronan O’Rahilly and Fabiola Miller, Human Embryology and Teratology, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2001. p. 8.

“[All] organisms, however large and complex they might be as full grown, begin life as a single cell. This is true for the human being, for instance, who begins life as a fertilized ovum.”

Dr. Morris Krieger “The Human Reproductive System” p 88 (1969) Sterling Pub. Co

Roberts rejecting rules that save women's lives in order to protect abortion is like a Jew defending the Holocaust.

Safety for Democrat elites but not for we the people:Minneapolis edition

Three of the members of the Minneapolis City Council which is on record supporting the abolition of the police are using taxpayer dollars to pay for private security for themselves.

Over the past 3 weeks Minneapolis taxpayers have spent $63,000 to provide private security for those three.

This is what to expect from Democrats.  They are fascists at heart who don't believe that they should represent us but that they should rule us.

They, like all fascists, believe that they are better than us and that they deserve special privileges that we serfs aren't entitled to.

Interestingly while those 3 claim to have received death threats the Minneapolis Police Department has no record of threats, though they may have been filed confidentially.

This is what voting Democrat means. No cops to keep you safe but presumably armed security to protect the Democrats who make sure you're not safe.

Black Washington Post Editor blames white women for everything

So basically Karen is a racist who hates white people and thinks she's being magnanimous by not killing white folk.

Will the WaPo fire her for this?  We know they'd fire her if she was a white man who said something similar to this about Blacks.

This is what will in fact cause racism to rise again in America; Blacks not only getting special privileges--innocent whites killed by cops get no attention but any Black killed by cops, even the ones who were violent, are treated as a national problem--but Blacks calling for violence against whites being allowed to get away with it.

The vast majority of whites in America are far more afraid of being called racist than they are full of hatred for Blacks.

I'm starting to use Parler; you can find me at @Trinko

Unlike Twitter Parler isn't taking sides and censoring stuff that they don't like.

Justice Roberts hates women and wants them to die

Justice Roberts, and the four other dishonest Supreme Court justices, just ruled that a woman's health takes second place to her right to kill her unborn daughter.

They ruled that the State of Louisiana can't require the same health and safety requirements of abortion mills as it does for all other outpatient surgery centers.

Note the law that they said was unconstitutional didn't ban abortion it only said that in order to protect a woman's health the rules for abortion mills should be the same as for all other outpatient surgery centers.

While outpatient surgeries are generally safe sometimes things go wrong and the patient has to be rushed to a hospital for emergency care.  Around 7% of all abortions result in complications which need further treatment.

If that happens it's important that the doctor from the outpatient surgery center have admitting privileges at the hospital. If they don't then the woman will be treated by a doctor who has no information about the patient or her medical history.

By saying that Louisiana can't say that abortionists need admitting privileges Roberts said that it's ok for women's lives to be put at risk; that it's ok that more women will die.

Further one should ask the question why if all other outpatient surgery centers have no problem conforming to a rule that requires admitting privileges at a hospital is why is it a burden for abortionists?

The answer is that it's generally the dregs of the medical profession who make a living killing rather than saving lives.  Abortionists make their living killing unborn babies. As doctors they know that human life begins at conception but the fact that they're killing innocent human beings for no good reason--less than 2% of abortions are due to threat to the mothers life, threat to the mothers health, incest, and rape combined-- doesn't bother them.

We're not talking about an OB/GYNs who also perform abortions; they have to have admitting privileges in order to deliver babies.  The latest ruling is about "doctors" whose only job is killing unborn babies.

What sort of person can kill multiple babies day in and day out? Certainly not a good person; certainly not someone who cares about their patients.

If abortionists did care about their patients they'd gladly follow the same rules as all other outpatient surgery centers follow.

That they demand special privileges which hurt women shows that their only concern is with profit not their patients health.

But of course the idea that Robert's hates women is consistent with the Courts position on abortion.

The supporters of abortion are all for sex selection abortions that target unborn girls when the mother wants a son.  Can't get more misogynistic than that.

And more importantly abortion exists so that men can use women as sexual objects not love them as people.  Few women are interested in casual meaningless sex and prior to the legalization of abortion that meant that it was much harder for men to get women to have casual sex.

With abortion legal men know that if they use a woman they won't have to face 18 years of child support. Given that no form of contraception is 100% effective the patriarchal call for women to allow themselves to be used meant that men would have to face fiscal consequences.

Abortion was made legal to ensure that men could continue to exploit women rather than love them.

Only 0.3% of abortions occur because of a risk to the life of the mother, and even the Catholic Church allows steps to be taken to save the mother's life in most of those cases, and only 1.4% of abortions are due to lesser health issues like the mother being depressed.

Rape accounts for 0.14% and incest for 0.01%.

Abortion however is legal for any reason at any point in a pregnancy including while the mother is giving birth and a short time after the baby is born according to Democrats.

Abortion doesn't liberate women it imprisons them.

Justice Roberts has made it clear he's willing to let more women die if that helps ensure that more women will kill their unborn daughters.

Facebook Senior HR manager Leslie Brown says it's easier to fire white guys

Here's Leslie Brown on hidden camera:

“They were able to fire him without having to worry about discrimination…” says an undercover reporter.

“Right, right. Because he’s a white man. Yeah, white man. So no problem.” – Leslie Brown, Senior HR manager, Facebook.

“Oh, it’s easier when they’re..” continues the reporter.

“..White men,” says Brown, completing the reporter’s sentence. “No one has the white man’s back anymore [laughs].”

This is a stunning admission of racism.  It should never be harder to fire anyone just because of their race. Well if a company has a history of racial based firings there might be a justification but Facebook certainly has no such record.

Most people have encountered this I suspect.  While the percentage of incompetent Blacks is no higher than the percentage of incompetent whites white people are far more reluctant to fire Blacks than they are to fire whites because they know the consequences.

Not only that but with companies being forced to be "diverse" every fired Black is a huge problem for upper management.

What the left refuses to recognize is that discriminating against some because they're white or asian is just as racist as discriminating against them because they're Black.

Feminists praise Betsy DeVos's new campus sex assault rules

Proving that pigs do fly the New York Times has published an article that admits that Trump isn't actually Satan.

Trump's education secretary, Betsy DeVois, recently created new rules for how colleges have to handle sexual assault claims.

Colleges can no longer simply declare that a man is guilty based on the uncorroborated testimony of a woman.

Previously many colleges simply didn't "waste" time on hearing or allow the defendant to defend themselves they just declared if a woman said she was assaulted she was assaulted.

Oddly Democrats don't support that policy when it comes to women say that Democrats, like Bill Clinton and Joe Biden, have assaulted them.

In any case the usual Democrat politicians and left wing loons have all condemned DeVos for daring to say that before throwing a man out of college and ruining his life based on the uncorroborated claims of a woman they actually have to hold a public hearing and let the man defend himself.

But the NYT found that a large number of feminist legal scholars agree that the right solution to the Democrats rape culture--ever notice that it's almost always Democrats who are credibly accused of sexual assault?--isn't to declare all men guilty.

It's clear from the quote that the NYT used that the feminists who are supporting DeVos's new rules hate Trump:

“The new system is vastly better and fairer,” said Prof. Janet Halley, who specializes in gender and sexuality at Harvard Law School. “The fact that we’re getting good things from the Trump administration is confusing, but isn’t it better than an unbroken avalanche of bad things?”
The rules that DeVos has created aren't draconian and they don't require schools to assume that the woman is lying in every he said she said situation.  But they do require that if, for example, there are people who saw the women go willingly with the guy to his room or that if there are women who the "victim" told she in fact wasn't assaulted their testimony should be heard.

Obviously no sane person would object to that. After all look at what the Democrats are doing with respect to the credible accusation against Biden.

Are they saying that he must resign?  No they're impugning the honest of the Tara Reade, his accuser, and openly declaring that if she doesn't prove her claim it should be ignored.  DeVos's new rules wouldn't allow that.

Yet the same people saying that we should assume Tara Reade is lying are furious that DeVos is saying that Colleges can't simply assume that men are lying.

What's sad is that those feminists are now under attack because they don't understand how the left works.

Truth is irrelevant all that matters is power.  Any lie that supports Democrats getting more power is good any truth that keeps Democrats from getting power is bad.

Don't be shocked if those feminist legal scholars are soon facing censor and firing for their commitment to truth.

Why mailing everyone a ballot will cause voter fraud

Here's a video of a postman throwing campaign literature for a Republican candidate into the garbage.

WATCH: US Postal Worker Caught on Video Throwing Stack of GOP Congressional Candidate Campaign Mailers in Dumpster https://t.co/ApQTG0KH0B

— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) June 27, 2020

If postal workers who are members of a government union and hence almost all Democrats are willing to do this is there any doubt that some of them will take some of the millions of ballots Democrats want to mail to people who have moved or have died and either use them themselves or give them to others who will illegally vote with them ?

Democrat's welfare programs are destroying the Black family and Democrats don't care

In 1960 before racist Democrat LBJ instituted the "Great Society" welfare programs 78% of Black children were raised in a two parent family.

By 1985 only 33% of Black children were raised in a family with two parent.

In 2016 only 27% of Black children were raised in a family with two parents

Study after study has shown that kids raised without a father are more likely to commit crimes, use drugs, and get pregnant when they're young.

An honest Democrat, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who wasn't a racist warned Democrats about passing a system which pays single mothers more than married mothers.

But instead of spending the same amount of money on welfare but structuring the program so it didn't destroy Black families the Democrats stood by and watched as Black families collapsed and far too many Blacks fell into a cycle of dependency and crime.

The Democrat party has always stood for racism and the welfare system, which they refuse to reform so as to stop the destruction of Black families, is just one more example:

• The Democrat party was founded by a Southern slave owner who treated native Americans horribly
• The Democrat party fought the Civil War to keep slavery legal
• The Democrat party founded the KKK
• The Democrat party passed all the Jim Crow laws that kept Blacks in the back of the bus
• The Democrat party instituted segregated schools
• The Democrat party kept the military segregated
• The Democrat party supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964 much less than the Republican party did
• The Democrat party created a welfare system that they had every reason to believe would hurt Blacks
• The Democrat party did nothing to fix the problems their welfare system was creating for Blacks
• The Democrat party ignores the thousands of Blacks shot in Democrat run cities each year
• The Democrat party says that letting Black kids go to good schools is "racist"
• The Democrat party has no problem with Black women being 3 times as likely to abort as white women
• The Democrat party treats any Black who disagrees with them--Kanye, Ben Carson, Candice Owens, Justice Thomas for example--horribly calling them names
• The Democrat party's Presidential candidate, Joe Biden, has said that Blacks who don't vote for him aren't really Black

Why mailing out ballots to everyone will result in massive voter fraud

Here's a picture from New Jersey showing ballots left in the open for anyone to grab at a senior citizen building.

In the red circle you can see political mail and the ballots left in piles.  Anyone walking through the lobby could get all the ballots and fill them out anyway they wanted to.

Democrat politicians are losing control of their mobs: Wisconsin edition

I took this pic- it got me assaulted & beat up. Punched/kicked in the head, neck, ribs. Maybe concussion, socked in left eye is little blurry, sore neck & ribs. 8-10 people attacked me. Innocent people are going to get killed. Capitol locked- stuck in office.Stop violence nowPlz! pic.twitter.com/Zw2hdfYG66

— Tim Carpenter (@TimCarpenterMKE) June 24, 2020

Carpenter told the Washington Post that he's a gay progressive who supports peaceful protests.

But so long as the mobs advance the Democrat agenda Democrat leaders will gladly allow people like Carpenter to be beaten up.

It's all for the "greater good" after all.

A trial run for mail in voter fraud: Paterson New Jersey municipal elections

On May 12 Paterson held a mail in election and the results make Trump's warnings about voter fraud look tame.

Of the 16,747 mail in ballots received only 13,557 were counted.  That's 19% of the ballots that were disqualified.

800 of those were disqualified because they were found in mailboxes bundled together.  One mailbox had hundreds of ballots in a single packet. Clearly there might be more than one ballot coming from one household but unless NJ has houses with hundreds of adults in them there's no reason other than voter fraud for hundreds of bundled ballots.

Another 2300 ballots were disqualified because the signatures on the ballot didn't match those on record.

There are a number of troubling things about that.  First in this modern day and age signatures aren't that important so people who have signatures that vary because it's not something they care about could have their legitimate ballots disqualified.

But the real problem is that Democrats across America are suing states to force those states to not verify the identity of the person who submitted the ballot.  That's a critical component of the Democrats massive voter fraud scheme.

First Democrats mail out ballots to millions of people who don't exist; they've either died or moved--it's no accident Democrat states don't bother to keep their voter rolls up to date.

Then they steal the ballots and vote them themselves.  Doubt they'd do that?  In the NJ election NBC found multiple people who "voted" who said they never submitted a ballot because they never got one.  Also there's clear evidence of mailmen leaving bundles of ballots in apartment building lobbies, where anyone could grab them, rather than put them in peoples mailboxes.

For Democrats to use those stolen ballots they either have to hire an army of forgers or they have to get states to not check the ballots; hence the lawsuits to do precisely that mentioned above.

As of this moment the NJ AG has charged four men with voter fraud including the vise president of the city council and a candidate for the city council.

The situation is so bad that the NAACP's local chapter is calling for the election to be invalidated.

Yet that's what Democrat governors and politicians like Nancy Pelosi are pushing for the elections in November.

They're lying about wanting to do that to avoid deaths due to China virus. The same Democrats approved of mass demonstrations and riots where no social distancing was practiced.

Polling places can easily be designed to conform to health standards.  A person wearing gloves hands you a ballot.  You take the ballot and go into a booth mark the ballot with your own pen and drop it in a slot.

If machines are used then you wear gloves, or a glove, when you enter your vote.  If necessary there is no reason that the state can't provide gloves for people to use at the polling place.

Lines will be longer, but not slower, to allow 6 ft between people.

Voila perfectly safe voting without the potential for massive voter fraud.

What about at risk people who don't feel safe going to the polls?  Well as far as I know no one from Trump on down has a problem with individuals requesting mail in ballots.  The issue is with sending mail in ballots to everyone registered to vote when millions of people on those lists have moved or died.

How many people have really died from the China virus/COVID19?

According to the CDC about 122,000, not the 122 million Joe Biden claimed, Americans have died from coronavirus.

The problem is that even the CDC admits that there may be serious over counting going on.

Not only are healthcare providers incentivized to list deaths as due to COVID19--they get more medicare money if that's the case--but any death where the virus is present counts as a China virus death.

For example in Colorado a man was found dead in a park with a blood alcohol level of 0.55% and his death was declared to be due to coronavirus.  That blood alcohol level is above the lethal dose and the coroner certified the case of death as due to alcohol poisoning. But then magically the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmental categorized the death as due to COVID19.

But that's not an isolated case. The problem is that most of the people who are dying are old and they have many other health issues.  To simplify things what's being done is that if someone has the virus when they die that's listed as their cause of death even though it may not have killed them.

For example in San Diego an investigation into 194 COVID19 "deaths" fond that only 6 could be clearly shown to be due to the virus.  So as of early may out of a population of about 3.3 million people we know of only 6 coronavirus deaths.

The CDC says that of the people listed as dying from COVID19, the 122,000 mentioned above, only 7% listed only COVID19 as a cause of death. On average in addition to COVID19 there were 2.5 other conditions or causes.

Now that doesn't mean that only 8,540 Americans have died from COVID19.  For example someone who was going to die in a few months from lung cancer could have died sooner due to COVID19.  But it's also true that many if not most of that 93% who had multiple conditions died from those the conditions but happened to have COVID19 at the time they died.

So does this mean we should go out rioting and protesting while ignoring social distancing and not wearing masks?  No.

But it does mean that we need some real science, not Democrats lying to keep the country shut down until the election, to guide public policy.

Here's the trend of deaths in America using the very liberal definitions we've been discussing:

It's very clear that deaths are going down with episodic hiccups along the way.

This chart is why Democrats have shifted from talking about deaths to talking about cases.

The number of cases is going up, in part due to more testing, but the deaths are going down.  That's good. We want about 1/3 to 1/2 of the country to have had the disease so that we develop herd immunity.  But of course we don't want lots of people dying.  That we're seeing more cases with decreasing deaths means the "right" people are catching the disease; namely young healthy folk who are unlikely to die as a result.

It's smart and considerate to wear a mask in public.

It's smart and considerate to practice social distancing.

It's smart and considerate to provide special provisions, such as designated shopping hours, for people at high risk.

But if you're young and healthy there's no reason to panic and there is no reason you should be forced by the government to stay locked up and out of work.

Democrats want you poor and afraid so you'll vote for Joe Biden.

But remember if Joe had had his way there would have been no early travel restrictions on China and more Americans would have died.

Similarly it's Democrat Governor Cuomo in New York who ordered nursing homes to take patients with China virus, which Cuomo calls the "European Virus", where as the Republican Governor of Florida kept those patients in hospitals until they were no longer contagious.

Contrary to the lies told by the #FakeNews media things would have been much worse if Democrats had been in charge.

Democrats hate God: Riots/Protests are fine but outdoor religious services aren't edition

The Democrats revealed their hypocrisy about the dangers of the China virus when they encouraged massive non-social distancing riots and protests.

Now a Federal Judge is telling Democrats in New York that the 1st Amendment prohibits persecution of people of faith.

Federal Judge Gary Sharpe ruled that it's unconstitutional for Cuomo and De Blasio ban socially distancing religious service while publicly supporting non-socially distancing protests.

He recognized that if Cuomo and DeBlasio were saying that mass public gatherings with no social distancing were not a public health hazard then outdoor religious services where social distancing occurred couldn't be a public health hazard.  That's logic which is to Democrats what garlic is too vampires.

The Judge quoted Cuomo who said:

Protest. Just be smart about it. With this virus, you can do many things now as long as you’re smart about it, right? You can reopen, you can go into a store and you can do a lot of things, just be smart.

But Cuomo said that going to church couldn't be done no matter how smart people were about it.

Judge Sharpe then concluded:

Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio could have just as easily discouraged protests, short of condemning their message, in the name of public health and exercised discretion to suspend enforcement for public safety reasons instead of encouraging what they knew was a flagrant disregard of the outdoor limits and social distancing rules.

They could have also been silent. But by acting as they did, Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio sent a clear message that mass protests are deserving of preferential treatment.

Essentially Cuomo and DeBlasio used the pandemic as an excuse to persecute people of faith.  Thankfully the 1st Amendment says that's unconstitutional.

Either large gatherings have to be illegal for all speech or they have to be legal for all speech, which includes religious worship.

Remember how Hillary said that religions would have to change their teachings to conform to what the Democrats say is right?  At the same time she and other Democrats started talking not about freedom of religion, which is what the Constitution guarantees, but freedom of worship--you can go to service on Sunday, Friday, or Saturday but you have to keep your religious views to yourself in public.

Now it's clear that just as the Democrat's position on abortion has "evolved" from it should be legal, safe and rare to the more abortions the better the Democrat's position on religion has "evolved" from freedom of worship to religious services are a public health hazard and must be banned.

If China doesn't have to pay bigly for the China virus they will do it again

First let me be clear I don't think that the China virus was a weaponized military agent.

Nor do I believe that the Chinese deliberately released the virus to hurt the world.

But it is undeniable that for weeks the Chinese Communist government covered up the virus and lied to the world about the nature of the virus.

Chinese doctors who were raising red flags, which one would think would be considered a good thing in Red China, were forced to "confess" to crimes and ordered to not discuss the disease.

The Chinese knew by late December that the virus was in fact being transmitted between people; a key indicator of a potential pandemic agent.

Yet they lied to the world and to WHO.  

The Chinese government allowed millions of people to leave Wuhan province after they knew that those people could be infected with a highly transmissible disease.

The used political pressure to limit travel restrictions to China even as they banned flights from Wuhan to Beijing.

A study showed that if the Chinese government had acted 3 weeks sooner, which they could have done, the number of cases of COVID19 in China would have been only 5% of what they were.  

With that few cases it's likely there wouldn't have been a pandemic.

There is no question that the Chinese communists engaged in a massive coverup which resulted in the  current pandemic.

However covering up things is that happens in socialist societies where the press is the lap dog of the government.  Hence this coverup was most likely the result of local Communist tyrants hiding facts that would make them look bad not some centrally controlled conspiracy to launch a global pandemic.

That's the good news. The bad news is that what the Chinese fascists are seeing is that since they don't care about deaths in China, unless it's the ruling elite who are dying, China is going to get out of this disaster pretty well.

In fact the Chinese are already using the pandemic their incompetence and dishonesty created to gain control overseas by selling products and pretending to act in a humanitarian way.

Their vicious oppression of freedom loving residents of Hong Kong and their invasion of India are all being ignored by the western press whose only concern is blaming Trump for the crimes of the Chinese government and the Democrat politicians who control the police department whose officer was involved in George Floyds death.

If the lesson China's tyrant learns from this is that unleashing a pandemic helps China and hurts China's enemies more than it hurts China we can expect this to be the first in a long series of "accidental" pandemics.

Remember most of the serious viral outbreaks have come from China:

• 1956: Bird Flu killed between 1 and 4 million people world wide
• 1968 Hong Kong Flu 1 to 4 million died

So it's easy to imagine China releasing a "natural" virus and using its people as a distribution mechanism to infect the world if the tyrant running China thinks that he will personally be safe and that he will benefit as China appears to be benefiting from the coronavirus.

Remember the people who rule China had no problem running thousands of unarmed democracy protesters over with tanks so they won't care about the human suffering their actions will cause.

All they care about is whether or not it will advance their own interests.

That's why the civilized countries of the world have to unite and punish China for deliberately concealing critical information about the virus.

If China gets away with this "accident" they will do it again in order to gain power.

The Big Lie: Democrats and Republicans didn't switch positions on race; Democrats have always been racist

Allegedly the vote for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 precipitated the two parties switching their positions on racism.

But only 1 Democrat Senator who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 became a Republican.

Similarly only one Democrat member of the House who voted against the Act became a Republican.

Larry Elder conservative radio talk show host

Larry Elder explains why the South started voting Republican:

“The reason the South became increasingly more conservative is because the the Democrats became increasingly more left-wing,” Elder explained. “They became increasingly anti-religious, increasingly pro-abortion, increasingly higher taxes [and] pro-union. They were anti-Vietnam War, and the South felt very differently about that.”

Elder remarked, “There was a gradual change [in the South] from pro-Democrat to pro-Republican, and that change wasn’t even completed until the 1990s. It took 30 years for the South to go from Democrat to Republican, but we’re turning this all on race and the 1964 Civil Rights Act?”

Elder maintained, “It is simply not true. This narrative that they have to use in order to airbrush over their skanky history. This is the party of slavery. This is the party that founded the Klan. It wasn’t Democrat Party that did it, but Democrats founded the Klan, and the [Ku Klux Klan members] were all belonging to the Democratic Party. In fact, the NAACP used to refer to the KKK as the terror wing of the Democratic Party.”

Elder added, “Never mind the first Republican president to win was a guy named Abraham Lincoln, and the reason for the start of the Republican Party was to stop and eventually to end the practice of slavery. The fact is that history is taught by the left. Government schools are dominated, of course, by the left. Hollywood is dominated by the left. The media as dominated by the left, too, so this message of ‘the switch’ has been unchallenged, has been perpetuated, and now a lot of young people believe it.”

The South didn't slowly vote switch to voting Republican because the Republicans were racists, remember it was Republicans who forced school integration in the South, but because Democrats moved to the hard left mocking Southerners religious beliefs and their patriotism.

Here's a few of the Democrat policies stretching from the founding of the party by a slave owner to today which are racist:

• The Democrat party was founded by a Southern slave owner who treated native Americans horribly
• The Democrat party fought the Civil War to keep slavery legal
• The Democrat party founded the KKK
• The Democrat party passed all the Jim Crow laws that kept Blacks in the back of the bus
• The Democrat party instituted segregated schools
• The Democrat party kept the military segregated
• The Democrat party supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964 much less than the Republican party did
• The Democrat party created a welfare system that they had every reason to believe would hurt Blacks
• The Democrat party did nothing to fix the problems their welfare system was creating for Blacks
• The Democrat party ignores the thousands of Blacks shot in Democrat run cities each year
• The Democrat party says that letting Black kids go to good schools is "racist"
• The Democrat party has no problem with Black women being 3 times as likely to abort as white women
• The Democrat party treats any Black who disagrees with them--Kanye, Ben Carson, Candice Owens, Justice Thomas for example--horribly calling them names
• The Democrat party's Presidential candidate, Joe Biden, has said that Blacks who don't vote for him aren't really Black

Republicans want to end abortion so that we don't lose so many Blacks.

Republicans want Blacks to have school choice so they can send their kids to decent schools.

Republicans want enterprise zones in Black areas to draw in good jobs.

Republicans want to enforce the law and stop the slaughter of Blacks in Democrat run cities like Chicago.

Don't forget that George Floyd was killed by cops in a city run by Democrats, in a state run by Democrats.

Twitter declares that threatening to enforce the law is abusive behavior

If this was 1862 Twitter would be censoring tweets by Lincoln saying that if the South seceded he would stop them with serious force.

Here's Twitter's insane comment on this Trump tweet:

We’ve placed a public interest notice on this Tweet for violating our policy against abusive behavior, specifically, the presence of a threat of harm against an identifiable group.https://t.co/AcmW6O6d4t

— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) June 23, 2020

The CHOP was a part of Seattle which insurrectionists declared was no longer part of America; just like the South did in order to protect slavery.

The violent insurrectionists who burned down a police station and refused to let the police into their new "country" didn't ask the people who live there if they wanted to leave the US. That's because the insurrectionists are fascists from BLM and Antifa.

That experiment has already failed with a murder that resulted from infighting in the police free zone forcing the Seattle Mayor who'd praised the insurrectionists' actions now shutting it down.

Last night insurrectionists who believe that they can skip the whole democratic process and do what they want said that they'd establish a similar autonomous zone in DC.

Trump's tweet was warning them that they can't break the law with impunity and that unlike the spineless mayor of Seattle he'd ensure that the law is enforced.

Trump didn't threaten abusive action toward peaceful protests only against insurrectionists.

Apparently in Twitterland insurrectionists are an identified group that is above the law.

One more example of how Twitter is dishonest.  It believes not in the rule of law but that whatever radical insurrectionists who are supported by people like Joe Biden want they should get.

Charles Barkley says that defunding the police would hurt Blacks

On ESPN Barkley said:

“We need to weed out the bad cops — you know I hear these guys getting on television these politicians talking about ‘defunding the police department.’ First of all, that would have a negative effect on the black communities — who the black people gonna call, Ghostbusters?” Barkley asked. “Because they’re not gonna defund the police in the good white neighborhoods, so we need police reform.”

Rich white pats of New York City and Chicago can hire private guards to keep them safe but without the police Blacks will be at the mercy of the gangs.

But we know that Democrats who are calling for defunding the police don't care about Blacks.

After all year in and year out thousands of Blacks are shot and hundreds of Blacks are murdered in Democrat run cities like Chicago and the Democrats never even mention it.

Conservatives agree that cops like the one involved in George Floyds death, who had a huge number of complaints filed against him for excessive use of force, should be weeded out.

But it's the Democrats who run Minneapolis and Minnesota who bow to police union pressure to protect those cops not Trump or conservatives.

The only thing standing against meaningful police reform are the Democrats who want to make Blacks victims of criminals.

Ken Blackwell shows there is no systemic racism in cops killing innocent people

Multiple studies have shown that cops are no more likely to kill innocent Black people than they are to kill innocent white people.

He points out that Blacks are being slaughtered in America but mostly if not entirely in Democrat run cities like Chicago:

“The real systemic and deadly reality is that black men and women are being slaughtered in cities and communities of color across the country in numbers that can only be compared to war zones in Iraq and Syria,” said Blackwell, reflecting on a column he wrote with former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik regarding crime in Democrat-run cities, “Every single one of those cities have been run by Democrats, and in some cases, [for] as long as 40 years. [Kerik and I] just took exception to the fact that these mayors were passing the buck. These local officials were passing a buck.”

Year after year thousands of Blacks are shot in Chicago and the Democrats who have been running the city for 89 years do nothing to fix the problem.

Does anyone think that if thousands of whites were being shot each year in Chicago the Democrat rulers would do nothing?  Of course not there'd be a cop on every street corner with a machine gun.

He went on to point out that Black suffered far more from the George Floyd riots than they do from the police.

“Fifteen innocent civilians and two police officers were shot and killed,” Blackwell stated. “Hundreds of civilians brutally beaten, and more than 700 police officers were injured nationwide. Hundreds of millions of dollars of property have been destroyed as businesses and places for people to make money and raise their families in 42 states.”

Democrats shout "systemic racism" to make Blacks think that the fact that George Floyd was killed by a cop in a city run by Democrats in a state run by Democrats is somehow Trump's fault.

The only "systemic racism" in America is in the Democrat party which has always worked hard to keep Blacks poor, uneducated, and scared.

Here's a short list of racist Democrat policies:

• The Democrat party was founded by a Southern slave owner who treated native Americans horribly
• The Democrat party fought the Civil War to keep slavery legal
• The Democrat party founded the KKK
• The Democrat party passed all the Jim Crow laws that kept Blacks in the back of the bus
• The Democrat party instituted segregated schools
• The Democrat party kept the military segregated
• The Democrat party supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964 much less than the Republican party did
• The Democrat party created a welfare system that they had every reason to believe would hurt Blacks
• The Democrat party did nothing to fix the problems their welfare system was creating for Blacks
• The Democrat party ignores the thousands of Blacks shot in Democrat run cities each year
• The Democrat party says that letting Black kids go to good schools is "racist"
• The Democrat party has no problem with Black women being 3 times as likely to abort as white women
• The Democrat party treats any Black who disagrees with them--Kanye, Ben Carson, Candice Owens, Justice Thomas for example--horribly calling them names
• The Democrat party's Presidential candidate, Joe Biden, has said that Blacks who don't vote for him aren't really Black

Nancy Pelosi is a fascist liar: Republicans are trying to get away with murdering George Floyd edition

We've always known that Pelosi is a liar; she claims to be Catholic but endorses abortion at any point during a pregnancy and a little bit after the baby is born.

Now we have more proof that like every fascist demagogue she will tell any lie to get more power to control your life.

She said:

“So far they [Republicans] were trying to get away with murder, actually, the murder of George Floyd.”

We're currently not sure that George Floyd was murdered; remember how the #FakeNews media always calls crooks whose crimes are caught on camera "alleged" criminals?

But if he was then we know one thing for sure Republicans didn't have anything to do with it.

It's Democrats who have run Minneapolis for decades.

It's Democrats who allowed the cop in question to continue to be on the streets after numerous accusations that he used excessive force.

It's Democrats who control the Minneapolis police Department.

So if anyone other than the cop in question is guilty of murder it's not the Republicans in the Senate but Democrats.

Pelosi wants to push a "crime" bill that will greatly increase crime and reduce the safety of all Americans, but especially Black Americans trapped in Democrat run cities, and because Republicans want to address police brutality without leaving poor inner city residents defenseless she's trying to blame them for the gross failure of the Democrats who run Minneapolis.

She's telling this lie because she thinks it will help her and her fellow fascists get more power over your life in November.

Democrat like Pelosi want to have control over every aspect of your life from how much soda you can drink to what your religious beliefs can be.

If she wasn't a fascist liar she'd be talking about why her crime bill is better than that of the Republicans not trying to avoid any discussion by blaming Republicans for the failures of Democrats.

Democrats are planning massive voter fraud with mail in ballots

First no one objects to people requesting and getting mail in ballots.

What honest Americans object to and what Democrat politicians want is for the government to send ballots to every registered voter.

Sounds good right?  But when one realizes that because governments, especially Democrat run ones, don't update the voter rolls there are millions of voters on the rolls who have either died or moved it becomes clear that the Democrats are planning on stealing the election.

If even of the fraction of more than 2,000,000 ballots that will be sent to non-existent individuals are "repurposed" to vote for Democrats, including Biden, it could they could easily steal the election.

But you say don't they check the identities of the people sending in those ballots?

Yes which is why Democrats and their allied groups, like the League of Women Voters, are now filing   lawsuits in swing states demanding that States don't need to verify the identity of people casting absentee ballots.

Now you may ask yourself why would any honest person not want the States to check to make sure that people aren't voting multiple times?  The answer is there is no reason.

The only reason to sue to keep States from verifying that mail in ballots are legally cast is to enable massive voter fraud.

We know that the Democrats are dishonest.

AOC praised people who allegedly interfered with Trump's campaign so clearly she's cool with cheating.

In California Democrats first gave illegal aliens drivers licenses and then they let them vote if they're willing to lie about their citizenship status. When anyone applies for a drivers license at the CA DMV they go to a computer and fill out some forms.

One of the questions is do you want to register to vote.

If you say yes you're asked if you're a citizen.  It's on the honor code; no one ever checks to see if you really are a citizen.

Clearly given that illegal aliens have broken our immigration laws to get a better life a significant fraction of them won't hesitate to violate our voting laws to vote for Democrats who promise them more money.

It's not an accident that as Democrat Governor Newsom is saying that teachers may need to take 10% payouts he's handing out $600 checks to help them deal with the China virus crisis.

Democrats in CA also have legalized ballot harvesting where people, often illegal aliens, go door to door collecting ballots.  Well at least ones which are for Democrats.  This practice has been illegal across America because it's so open to fraud.  "Volunteers" can offer to help people fill out ballots and even do the actual filling out themselves.

I grew up in the Chicago area and everyone knew how the Democrat machine worked.  But now Democrats are saying there is no voter fraud.

What they really mean is that voter fraud occurs in states where the people who would investigate the fraud are in on the scheme.

Shaun King says stained glass windows and statues of Jesus should be destroyed.

Shaun King is a racist.  He hates white people.

Yes, I think the statues of the white European they claim is Jesus should also come down.

They are a form of white supremacy.

Always have been.

In the Bible, when the family of Jesus wanted to hide, and blend in, guess where they went?

EGYPT!

Not Denmark.

Tear them down.

— Shaun King (@shaunking) June 22, 2020

The reality is that Christians tend to put up images and statues of Jesus that look the way they look.

A Black Jesus: https://www.amazon.com/HSE-Jenkins-African-American-Religious/dp/B005IDWLQK/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=black+Jesus+picture&qid=1592949372&sr=8-1

An Asian Jesus: https://www.8asians.com/2011/08/10/was-jesus-asian/

A Native American Jesus: http://indigenousjesus.blogspot.com/2012/11/father-john-giuliani-painter-of-native.html

People who aren't racist have no problems with everyone, including white people, using images of Jesus that look like they do.

But Shaun King wants images of White Jesus destroyed.

What's interesting is that Shaun probably wouldn't call for the destruction of images of Black Jesus even though Jesus wasn't Black but brown.

What makes this more amazing is that Shaun King is white but pretends to be Black.

Given King's Marxist tendencies perhaps his real reason for wanting images of Jesus destroyed is taht he hates God.

The #FakeNews media lies about everything: The "noose" in Bubba Wallace's NASCAR garage has been there since last year

If America is systemically racist why do people have to keep making up hate crimes?

The latest big lie was that someone had put a noose in NASCAR racer Bubba Wallace's garage.

Given that no Black man has been lynched since the Democrats lost control of the South decades ago it's unclear why any self respecting racist would remind the world of the complete inability of white nationalists to actually lynch the people they hate.

But more importantly after 15 FBI agents investigated they found the following:

• It wasn't a noose it was pull rope used to open the garage door
• It had been there long before Wallace was assigned to that garage
• It wasn't in any way shape or form a crime much less a hate crime

So you won't be hearing about it unless Democrats keep pretending that the FBI investigation never happened.

Girl who makes Teddy Bears for the children of slain police officers gets death threats

This is the left. They hate the police because they, leftists, are insurrectionists and criminals and the police stand between them and your money and freedom.

This girl started this effort when she was 14 to help the children of officers slain in the line of duty, including officers of color.

But now she's getting death threats and is being ostracized by her classmates.

Megan wrote this on her Facebook page:

Saying I am heartbroken is an understatement. 3 and a half years ago when I started Blue Line Bears tensions were high in the United States and police officers were under attack. I received hate comment after hate comment, most along the lines of “I hope your dad is the next Officer you make a bear for.” The hate comments never truly disappeared, but they became less frequent until these past couple of weeks. I posted something that was pro-police on my own personal social media and got attacked by my own classmates calling me all sorts of things.

People who I saw as friends blocked me and called me toxic. I watched the increase in police injuries in New York and wondered if those were officers I’ve given a patch to. I scrolled through social media posts to be met with nothing but anti-police rants. My heart broke more and more everyday. Yesterday my family made the decision to get rid of the wrap on my Jeep, because it’s not safe for me to drive anymore.

My heart shattered and I finally let myself cry over this (as seen in the deleted post from yesterday). The comments were positive in the beginning until we got hundreds of comments wanting my dad dead and saying they hope he gets shot in the face. I have stayed silent until now, but I’m not doing that anymore. These people can troll and hate on my dad and me, but all they’re doing is fueling the fire that will make Blue Line Bears more and more successful. I will not stand down.

This is the left in action. Sending death threats to teenage girls who try and comfort the children of police officers who died protect we the people from criminals.

Odds are you won't hear Joe Biden or any other Democrat condemn these violent threats or stand up for the police

Democrats endorse election cheating: Good reason to not mail millions of ballots to people who don't exist

Democrats keep saying there's no evidence of voter fraud as if the fact that Democrat's don't prosecute themselves for fraud is a compelling argument.

AOC just came out in support of the alleged attempt to keep people from attending Trump's Tulsa rally.

She claimed that people, many of whom might not have been old enough to vote, took reservations for the Trump rally that they never intended to use.

She thought that was great.

Actually you just got ROCKED by teens on TikTok who flooded the Trump campaign w/ fake ticket reservations & tricked you into believing a million people wanted your white supremacist open mic enough to pack an arena during COVID

Shout out to Zoomers. Y’all make me so proud. ☺️ https://t.co/jGrp5bSZ9T

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 21, 2020

AOC, in many ways the voice of the Democrat party, is saying that if cheating helps Democrats win then cheating is good.

With that mindset using some of those millions of ballots that Democrats want to mail to people who are dead or who have moved would be fine too.

Hence AOC just proved that Trump's concern about voter fraud if everyone, including millions of people who have moved or died, is mailed a ballot.

The good news is that according to the Trump campaign AOC is wrong since the identities and cell phone numbers of everyone getting a reservation was verified.

The bad news is that constant media lying that it would be dangerous to go to the rally did tend to suppress attendance but not enthusiasm for Trump.

Blacks supported the 1994 crime bill because they wanted safe neighborhoods

The majority of the Congressional Black Caucus voted for the same crime bill they're now saying is racist.

Let that sink in. Apparently the Congressional Black Caucus in 1994 was racist and hated Blacks.

The reason white leftists and the Blacks who dance to their tune are ok with letting criminals out sooner is that the primary victims of crime are Black.

While we constantly hear that Blacks are overrepresented in prisons, which isn't true, what we never hear is that Blacks are grossly over victimized by crime.

For example in Chicago 75% of the people murdered are Blacks and 71% of their murders are Black but Blacks only make up 32% of Chicagoans.

A higher proportion of Blacks are in prison than whites because a higher proportion of criminals are Black.  The race of a criminal is defined by what the victim says it is so given that Blacks are the primary victims of crime it's Blacks saying that their assailants are Black not whites saying their assailants were Black.

In the recent George Floyd riots in Chicago the vast majority of Chicago's 864,024 Blacks did not riot  and did not steal.  But they suffered from the destruction caused by the small fraction of Blacks who did.

The same applies to day to day crime.  Blacks are like everybody else; they don't want to have their children sleep in bathtubs to protect them from stray bullets.

Blacks want safe neighborhoods but white Democrats don't care.  In fact white Democrats like Blacks being afraid since that tends to keep Blacks from noticing that their real enemy are the Democrats who run the cities, like Chicago, where it's open season on shooting Blacks.

So when you see Blacks who follow what the white Democrats want pushing to return murderers, drug dealers, and thieves back to Black neighborhoods where they will prey on Blacks you have to wonder just what they're thinking.

It's official; Democrats hate women

Democrats are cheering a Supreme Court ruling that if taken to it's logical conclusion says that biological men can compete against women in sports.

The court reasoned that if a man is attracted to a man and a woman is attracted to a man saying that men attracted to men are treated differently is solely because of their sex.

But then using that reasoning of a man wants to compete in women's sports and a woman wants to compete in women's sports banning a man would be solely because of his sex and hence illegal.

It's clear that men are generally more athletic than women. Anyone who doubts that should take note of the fact that men who weren't in the top 100 suddenly set records when they compete as women.

Allowing biological men to compete with women is incredibly misogynistic.  It essentially means that women can't win in athletic competitions.

Not only does it destroy women's self esteem it shuts them out from valuable sources of college scholarship funding.

But Democrats and the Supreme Court don't care about that.  Clearly the concerns and the lives of real women don't matter as much to Democrats as the delusions or dishonesty of a tiny fraction of the population.

A man who thinks he's a woman is no less insane than a man who thinks he's Napoleon.

In neither case is the man bad but in both cases he's ill.  The correct way to help a man who thinks he's a woman is to get him to understand that he's wonderful just as he is; no pretending is required.  That's the same approach one would take with a man who thinks he's Napoleon.

But Democrats say that the right way to treat a man who thinks he's Napoleon is to bow to him.

Further there will be some men who, wanting a free ride in college, will just say they're women in order to get scholarships.  After all no surgery is required.

Just as abortion is a tool men use to ensure that they can objectify and use women rather than love them shows that Democrats don't really care about women declaring that a man can become a woman with a few drugs and some plastic surgery is an example of how low Democrats opinions are of women.

One more way to see that Democrat politicians don't like women; they support sex selection abortions.

When a mother, or her partner, want a boy rather than a girl it's perfectly legal for her to kill her perfectly healthy unborn daughter. There's nothing more misogynistic than that and Democrat politicians say it should be legal.

Everyone is a racist except Antifa: General Grant edition

The new Democrat Brown Shirts, the KKK having been retired by Democrats, are storming our streets and tearing down statues they don't like.

They, like most of the Democrat base and most Democrat politicians, think they're above the law.  That is they're fascists.

If we the people want a statue taken down there's a process we follow to do so.  Simply declaring that the mob can do so on their own just because they're leftists is a direct rejection of democracy.

While supposedly only statues of racists are being toppled the left wing fascists in San Francisco have taken down a statue of Ulysses S. Grant.  The man next to Lincoln most responsible for freeing the slaves.

Grant also prosecuted the KKK, the Democrats organization that was only recently replaced by ANTIFA, and appointed Blacks to prominent roles in government.

He also worked hard to pass the 15th Amendment and he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1875.

But apparently all that is irrelevant since he was given a slave by his father in law.  Of course he emancipated that slave in less than a year and he was given the slave long before the Civil War occurred.

Cleary the Democrat fascist mob isn't interested in racial justice but in the destruction of America so they can replace it with a fascist state.

Oh and by the way San Francisco is open to some serious charges of racism itself.  Blacks are overrepresented by a factor of 6 in the homeless population in SF based on the % of Blacks in California.

Time to teardown all the statues of FDR; he put Japanese Americans in prison camps

While historically the Democrat party has tended to concentrate their racist hate on Blacks they have occasionally taken time to horribly abuse other races too.

A great example of that is FDR, Democrat, putting Japanese Americans in prison camps during WWII for the "crime" of being of Japanese descent.

While there was reason to distrust some Japanese Americans it should be noted that there was also some reason to distrust German Americans but they weren't put in prison camps probably because they were white.

In both cases the reality was that there were small numbers of people with misplaced loyalties in both Germans and Japanese American populations but that's hardly justification for throwing all Japanese Americans into prison camps.

So if we're going to take down Saint Junipero Serra, who worked hard to help native Americans, we definitely have to tear down every statue to FDR.

And while we're at it we should tear down every statue of Harry Truman who ordered nuclear weapons dropped on Japan.

What the idiots on the left don't get people can honor General Lee not for defending slavery but for fighting for states rights just as people can honor FDR for his leadership in WWII without approving of his putting innocent people in prison camps because of their ethnic origin.www

China killed 20 Indian soldiers in an invasion of India and you probably didn't hear about it

One rogue cop kills George Floyd and the media is non stop condemning all white people, except the Democrat politicians who run Minneapolis and all of Minnesota.

But China invades India and kills 20 Indian soldiers and the media is nearly silent.

Just as China is using force to declare that it owns the South China Sea it's using force to steal parts of India.

But you'll have to look long and hard for any Democrat politician who cares.

Given Biden's continual pandering to China, possibly due to China giving Biden's son Hunter $1.5 billion to invest, means that a President Biden will let the Chinese get away with pretty much anything.

Time to change Yale's name: The Twitter Mob is woke

It turns out that Yale college is named after Elihu Yale a man who was not only a slave owner but an actual slave trader; he made money by buying slaves cheap and selling them for lots of money.

Now of course sane people know that no one prior to now knew who Yale was, or cared.  But to the twitter mob and the Democrats new Brown Shirts, Antifa, everything should be torn down that isn't what they like. Which is why the statue of mass murdering Lenin in Seattle is safe.

What's great is that this bit of trolling, started by Ann Coulter, has gotten support from the lunatics on the left.

The Supreme Court hates you and views you as serfs

One of the reasons invoked by the Supreme Court to declare that Obama's unconstitutional DACA--which is nothing less than the executive branch unilaterally deciding to not enforce the law of the land--is that it might be unfair to illegal aliens who have broken our immigration laws.

What the Court is saying is that we, citizens, have no more rights than anyone who wanders into the country illegally seeking welfare for life.

Since when is it the Supreme Courts remit to decide that law breakers can't suffer for their crimes?

Of course the same man who made this travesty possible also unconstitutionally declared that the fees in Obamacare were really taxes.

That despite the fact that all the Democrats who passed Obamacare swore up and down it contained no new taxes.  It wouldn't have passed even the completely Democrat controlled government if people had thought it was a massive new tax bill.

So Roberts let the Democrats have their cake and eat it too. They were able to say that Obamacare contained no new taxes when they campaigned and they were able to keep Obamacare as the law of the land even though they couldn't have passed a revised version where the fees were relabeled as taxes.

In both of these cases, DACA and Obamacare, Roberts allowed Democrats to effectively change their laws without having to actually have Congress vote on the issue.

The same applies to the redefinition of "sex" to included "gender" and "sexual identity".  Democrats had tried multiple times to pass laws with that redefinition and had failed. Roberts then imposed what the Democrats wanted but couldn't get enough popular support for it to pass Congress.

In every case Roberts has twisted the law to make Democrats rulers and not representatives.

Want to reopen your business? Live in a Democrat run state? Declare your business to be an on-going George Floyd protest

The same Democrat governors who are destroying small businesses in their states are welcoming massive protests, some peaceful some not, where all social distancing is completely ignored.

According to those Democrats the China virus is smart enough to not spread when hundreds of protesters bump into each other.

Anyone who as been in a protest knows that people are a lot closer together than they are even in a moderately crowded bar or restaurant. In addition even a bar the people near to you tend to be the same ones for an extended period unlike a protest where different people are constantly moving here you thereby increasing exposure.

Sure a dance club might be worse than a protest in terms of spreading COVID19 but your regular bar or restaurant doesn't come close.

One way to get around the tyrannical Democrats who want your business to fail and to put you on welfare so they can control you would be to declare that your business is in fact an on-going George Floyd protest where people's primary purpose is to condemn excessive police violence and whatever else they're doing is just a minor side part of their effort.

After all Democrats believe that the virus will recognize your efforts and eschew infecting anyone.

The Supreme Court rules that Obama was wrong but that he still is a King

The Supreme Court just said that Trump can't overturn an executive order issued by Obama with an executive order of his own.

That means that Obama is king since his edicts must stand irrespective of how the people vote.

This essentially destroys American democracy.

We the people elected Trump who said he'd get rid of DACA.

But the Supreme Court says that Trump isn't a king like Obama was so that what Obama did with his pen Trump can't undo with his pen.

In doing so the Supreme Court declared that Obama was wrong when he said:

Responding in October 2010 to demands that he implement immigration reforms unilaterally, Obama declared, "I am not king. I can't do these things just by myself." In March 2011, he said that with "respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that's just not the case." In May 2011, he acknowledged that he couldn't "just bypass Congress and change the (immigration) law myself. ... That's not how a democracy works."

If we the people wanted DACA we could have voted in a Congress that would pass it. But we didn't.

Instead Obama, in 2012, did what he had previously said was an unconstitutional usurpation of Congressional power and decided that he would simply not enforce a law he didn't like.

That makes him a king not a president.  Presidents report to the people and follow the constraints of the Constitution. Kings do what they please.

Because the Supreme Court didn't address the intrinsic unconstitutionality of DACA they said that Obama was wrong; it wasn't unconstitutional.

Because the Supreme Court said that what Obama created with a pen couldn't be undone with his successors pen says that elections are meaningless.  We the people rejected DACA but the President we voted for can't undo what Obama did thereby effectively neutering the whole concept of democracy.

NBC engages in unethical and possibly criminal acts to destroy its competition

NBC teamed with a UK based organization in an attempt to silence two conservative web sites.

The radical left wing UK organization said that people had posted racist comments on those sites.

NBC took those claims to Google and suggested that Google demonetize the sites which would effectively drive them out of business.

Given that the NBC web site is in direct competition with those sites that's sorta like NBC swatting CBS.

That can't be legal or ethical.

Can you imagine how NBC and the rest of the #FakeNews media would react if FoxNews tried to get Google to demonetize NBC because people posted pro-terrorist or anti-white comments on the unmoderated site comment sections?

The reality is that leftists will do anything to keep you from hearing the truth.

If all you know is the lies that NBC spews in defense of Democrats you can't possibly vote intelligently.

Google demands that it be censored

Well not exactly.

Under Section 230 content neutral platforms on the Internet can't be sued if someone posts something libelous much less racist.

The idea is that these platforms are providing away for people to communicate and so long as the platforms are content neutral, they don't exclude say only left wing comments, they need to be immune to lawsuits.

In fact Google owns YouTube and invokes Section 230 protection as justification for why it doesn't police the comments posted on YouTube and why it can't be sued if someone say posted that you are a Nazi.

Now there's a big debate going on about Section 230 because Twitter and Facebook have begun controlling their content so they are no longer content neutral.  Yet they still demand Section 230 protection.

In the case of YouTube their parent company is worth nearly $1 trillion but they can't afford to monitor the comments on their site.

But when a foreign organization said that the conservative site, the Federalist, had comments on it that were racist Google apparently demanded that the Federalist remove those comments or be demonitized--Google wouldn't run ads on the site anymore.

So on one hand Google's YouTube doesn't moderate comments and says that they can't be held responsible for H8rs while on the other Google is threatening the Federalist because of unmoderated comments on the Federalist site.

Either Google is amazingly hypocritical here or it's a secret cry for help; "Censor us because we're too weak to remove racist comments".

Further it's hard to believe that lots of left wing sites don't have racists comments, white people are all evil, yet we never hear about those sites being threatened by Google.

If this is allowed to continue then the left will have an amazing tool to silence all conservative sites that use ad revenue.

Some dishonest leftist posts a racist comment on the conservative site and either the site has to moderate all comments, which is very expensive, block all comments--thereby silencing conservative voices--, or go without ad revenue.

This is normal for the left. They can't win arguments because the positions they support--eliminate the police and men can become women with some drugs and plastic surgery--are horrible so they try and shut down all dissenting voices.

Democrat politicians really don't like Jews: de Blasio edition

Within a day or two of participating in a massive no social distancing pro-LGBTQ protest, which was peaceful, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio had the gates to a park in a Jewish neighborhood welded shut.

Apparently social distancing only applies to Jewish kids in de Blasio's mind not to LGBTQ folk.

He also sent the police to shutdown a large Orthodox Jewish Funeral.

In April de Blasio said:

"My message to the Jewish community, and all communities, is this simple: the time for warnings has passed. I have instructed the NYPD to proceed immediately to summons or even arrest those who gather in large groups," de Blasio said in a tweet Tuesday night. "This is about stopping this disease and saving lives. Period."
de Blasio later said that going to synagogue is not as important as protesting the death of George Floyd at the hands of a Democrat run police department in ultra left wing Minneapolis.

“When you see a nation, an entire nation simultaneously grappling with an extraordinary crisis seeded in 400 years of American racism, I’m sorry, that is not the same question as the understandably aggrieved store owner or the devout religious person who wants to go back to services,”

But then that's what we expect from a Democrat. They hate religion because if people believe in God then the power of government, ie the power of Democrat politicians, is limited.

de Blasio is carrying on a long standing Democrat dislike for Jews as shown by Obama spying on American Jews and doing everything he could to hurt Israel while helping Iran get nuclear weapons.

Left wing riots are peaceful no matter how many people are hurt

When riots broke out across America and at least 2 Black police officers were killed the #FakeNews media declared that the riots were mostly peaceful.

One CNN reporter said that protests in Minneapolis were mostly peaceful as a multimillion dollar affordable housing project burned to the ground behind him. Have to wonder what he thinks is violent.

When rioters threw bricks and tried to grab police officer's guns and the police used pepper balls and smoke to disperse then Democrats and the #FakeNews media characterized the rioters as "peaceful
protesters".

Apparently any level of violence is "peaceful" if it's advancing the Democrat cause.

NBC News helps foreigners influence the 2020 election

NBC news teamed up with a foreign "research" company--actually a left wing activist organization-- in an attempt to silence conservative voices prior to the 2020 election.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate(CCDH) is based in the UK and has direct links to the UK government and the senior members of the UK Labor Party.

It worked with NBC to get Google to "demonetize" the Federalist a conservative site.

The crime?  Someone posted what the CCDH said was a racist comment on the site.

The CCDH didn't cite any racist comments by the Federalist itself though they did say that "conspiracy theories" about the riots resulting from George Floyds death are apparently impermissible speech in their opinion. They don't appear to be bothered that all the "conspiracy theories" about Trump colluding with Russia have been shown to be wrong.

I'm so old that I remember when NBC was decrying foreign interference in the 2016 election; interference that turns out to have been minimal and ineffectual.

But now NBC is teaming with foreigners to silence voices on one side of the 2020 election.

That's real and dangerous interference since we the people can't vote intelligently if all we hear is left wing propaganda.

J.K. Rowlings speaks the truth and the left tries to "cancel" her

The famous author the Harry Potter series dared to speak the truth that one's sex is a real thing.

‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?

Opinion: Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate https://t.co/cVpZxG7gaA

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 6, 2020

That tweet caused the left to rise up as one and scream at Rowlings. They didn't really have any logical objections to her point but they knew that she must be silenced.

But that's the way of the left these days; don't debate just deplatform and cancel anyone who doesn't agree with you.

It's a direct and explicit rejection of the basic concept of America where we discuss our differences and where the 1st Amendment means that people whose opinions we disagree with have as much right to speak as we do.

How far the left has come from when the ACLU sued not just to allow Nazi's to march in Illinois but to march in a specific neighborhood full of Holocaust survivors.  Now merely stating the scientific fact that women menstruate is considered to be something that must be silenced.

And don't be mistaken. Rowlings isn't some conservative and she believes in the left's lie that a man who thinks he's a woman isn't mentally ill.

If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth.

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 6, 2020

The reality is simple there is nothing more misogynistic than to say that with a little plastic surgery and some drugs a man can become a woman.

Well maybe giving a man, Bruce Jenner, the award for "Woman of the Year" is worse but it's a close thing.

A man who thinks he's a woman is no different than a man who thinks he's Napoleon or a man who thinks that his arm isn't really part of him; they are all afflicted with mental illness.

People suffering from gender confusion are not bad people and we have to love them but just as the way to truly love the guy who thinks he's Napoleon isn't to go along with his delusion the way to love  people who are confused about their sex is to get them to see that they're wonderful as they are; no pretending to be something they're not is necessary.

This is one more example of how the left itself is literally insane; it is disjoint from reality.