A trial run for mail in voter fraud: Paterson New Jersey municipal elections

On May 12 Paterson held a mail in election and the results make Trump's warnings about voter fraud look tame.

Of the 16,747 mail in ballots received only 13,557 were counted.  That's 19% of the ballots that were disqualified.

800 of those were disqualified because they were found in mailboxes bundled together.  One mailbox had hundreds of ballots in a single packet. Clearly there might be more than one ballot coming from one household but unless NJ has houses with hundreds of adults in them there's no reason other than voter fraud for hundreds of bundled ballots.

Another 2300 ballots were disqualified because the signatures on the ballot didn't match those on record.

There are a number of troubling things about that.  First in this modern day and age signatures aren't that important so people who have signatures that vary because it's not something they care about could have their legitimate ballots disqualified.

But the real problem is that Democrats across America are suing states to force those states to not verify the identity of the person who submitted the ballot.  That's a critical component of the Democrats massive voter fraud scheme.

First Democrats mail out ballots to millions of people who don't exist; they've either died or moved--it's no accident Democrat states don't bother to keep their voter rolls up to date.

Then they steal the ballots and vote them themselves.  Doubt they'd do that?  In the NJ election NBC found multiple people who "voted" who said they never submitted a ballot because they never got one.  Also there's clear evidence of mailmen leaving bundles of ballots in apartment building lobbies, where anyone could grab them, rather than put them in peoples mailboxes.

For Democrats to use those stolen ballots they either have to hire an army of forgers or they have to get states to not check the ballots; hence the lawsuits to do precisely that mentioned above.

As of this moment the NJ AG has charged four men with voter fraud including the vise president of the city council and a candidate for the city council.

The situation is so bad that the NAACP's local chapter is calling for the election to be invalidated.

Yet that's what Democrat governors and politicians like Nancy Pelosi are pushing for the elections in November.

They're lying about wanting to do that to avoid deaths due to China virus. The same Democrats approved of mass demonstrations and riots where no social distancing was practiced.

Polling places can easily be designed to conform to health standards.  A person wearing gloves hands you a ballot.  You take the ballot and go into a booth mark the ballot with your own pen and drop it in a slot.

If machines are used then you wear gloves, or a glove, when you enter your vote.  If necessary there is no reason that the state can't provide gloves for people to use at the polling place.

Lines will be longer, but not slower, to allow 6 ft between people.

Voila perfectly safe voting without the potential for massive voter fraud.

What about at risk people who don't feel safe going to the polls?  Well as far as I know no one from Trump on down has a problem with individuals requesting mail in ballots.  The issue is with sending mail in ballots to everyone registered to vote when millions of people on those lists have moved or died.