The "whistleblower" was heard discussing how to remove Trump from office long before the Ukraine call

While the Democrats and the #FakeNews media refuse to disclose who the "whistleblower" is it's actually common knowledge; it's a CIA analyst named Eric Ciaramella.

Is identity is relevant for the simple Constitutional reason that in American justice accusers are required to confront the people they accuse.

While Democrats say that would put Ciaramella at risk they seem to forget that that they support people who give testimony against gangs and organized crime members having to appear in court to do so.

Essentially Democrats are using their Big Lie that Republicans are more dangerous than criminals to pretend that by admitting to his actions Ciaramella would be in danger. But the real reason they don't want Ciaramella's identity to be known is that it would expose the Democrats conspiracy to veto the American people's selection of Donald Trump as their President.

It's important to know who the "whistleblower" is in order to understand whether he was in fact an apolitical civil servant just trying to see justice done or if he was a Democrat political operative who lied in order to help Democrats get more power and nullify the 2016 election.

We've known for a long time that not only is Ciaramella a hyper partisan Democrat-- an Obama holdover in the White House--, a personal friend of Joe Biden, and that he was thrown out of the White House for illegally leaking to the press to hurt Trump.

But now thanks to the hard work of Paul Sperry at RealClearInvestigations we now know that in the opening days of the Trump administration Ciaramella was overheard talking with another Obama hold over, Sean Misko, about how to remove Trump from office.

“Just days after he was sworn in they were already talking about trying to get rid of him[Trump],” said a White House colleague who overheard their conversation.

“They weren’t just bent on subverting his agenda,” the former official added. “They were plotting to actually have him removed from office.”
Why did they want to do that?  Because Trump's foreign policy was based on what's best for America not on what they thought was best for the world. They objected to Trump's belief that Americans should only die for the good of America not for the good of whatever globalist paradise they believe in.

Misko left the White House and went to work with Adam Schiff.

Hence the reality appears to be that Misko and Schiff conspired with Ciaramella to make up a story about Trump believing that Trump would never release the actual transcript of the now infamous Ukraine telephone call that would show that Ciaramella was lying.

When Trump did Schiff was too proud, or too deeply invested in the public eye, to back off and try another lie so he continued to back Ciaramella's lies.

The fact that the Democrats voted to impeach Trump while admitting that they didn't actually have any first hand evidence of Trump doing anything wrong, they're now saying he thought bad thoughts, shows that the entire exercise is nothing more than providing cover for a blatantly political impeachment that violates the Constitution.