1) Schiff keeps telling us, even after Mueller, that the Steele dossier is truth. Even though we now know thanks to the IG report that the Hillary paid for lies from Russia wasn't trusted by the FBI once they interviewed the primary sub source who basically said it was all made up.
Even worse the FISA court has stated that at least the last two warrants used to spy on the Trump campaign, and based solely on the Steele dossier, are invalid, ie illegal.
But during his endless prattling presenting his "case" against Trump Schiff talked on and on about Russia even though without the Steele dossier there is absolutely 0 evidence of any Russian collusion.
2) Which leads us to the next of Schiff's big lies. He keeps saying that he has "ample evidence" of collusion between Russia and Trump. When he told those lies everything was classified so we couldn't know for sure that he's lying.
Now with the IG report out we know that he was lying, there was no evidence.
3)Back in 2017 Nunes released a memo showing how the FISA court had been abused to spy on Trump because the Steele dossier was a big lie. Schiff relentlessly denied that and said that the FISA warrants were based on much more than the Steele lies. With Mueller, the fact that the FISA court is now saying that at least the last 2 warrants were illegal, and the IG report we now know for sure that Nunes was right and that Steel was lying.
4)The reason that Schiff is demanding that the "whistleblower's" identity be kept secret has nothing to do with worrying about the "whistleblower's" safety. Schiff needs to keep the guys identity secret because Schiff colluded with him to set Trump up for impeachment.
We now know that Schiff hired the "whistleblower's" friend, with whom the "whistleblower" was overheard to discuss how to remove Trump from office shortly after the election, and that Schiff's office had contact with the "whistleblower" despite Schiff's claims to the contrary.
It would be very damaging to Schiff's fake impeachment if we the people found out that the "whistleblower" was working hand in hand with Schiff to set Trump up by lying about the Ukraine phone call.
5) Schiff keeps citing Ambassador Sondland as saying that there was a quid pro quo. That's true. What makes it a lie is that when questioned Sondland admitted two key things:
- No one every told him there was a quid pro quo; he simply "presumed" there was one
- When Sondland asked Trump about it Trump emphatically stated that he did not want a quid pro quo
Hence while Sondland said the words "there was a quid pro quo" when questioned it was clear that he was lying since he admitted that the only first hand knowledge he had from the horse's mouth, Trump, was that not only wasn't there a quid pro quo but Trump didn't want there to be one.
6) Schiff got up and pretended to read the transcript of the Ukraine telephone conversation to the House but in fact made up a dialog that had nothing to do with what was actually said and which painted Trump as some gangster demanding protection money.
7) Schiff even lies to other Democrats. He sent a highly redacted text message to Jerry Nadler which implied that Lev Parnas had been trying to set up a meeting with Ukraine President Zelensky. But when an unredacted version showed up, and Schiff had to have access to the unredacted version, it turned out that Lev Parnas's Mr Z wasn't Zelensky but Mykola Zlochevsky the founder of Burisma the company that bribed Joe Biden.
8) In his closing remarks he cited a CBS report that alleged that Republican Senators were told that their heads would be on pikes if they voted against Trump; a claim that even very liberal Republican Senators rejected.
9) Schiff said that Mick Mulvaney had said that the president's critics should "just get over it" about his conduct in Ukraine. But that's not what Mulvaney said:
Karl: Let’s be clear, what you just described is a quid pro quo. It is funding will not flow unless the investigation into the Democratic server happened as well.
Mulvaney: We do that all the time with foreign policy. If you read the news reports and you believe them, what did McKinney say yesterday? Well, McKinney said yesterday that he was really upset with the political influence in foreign policy. That was one of the reasons he was so upset about this, and I have news for everybody: get over it. There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy.”
What Mulvaney was saying is that Democrats have to get over the idea that Trump is the first president in history to allow politics to impact foreign policy not that people should just ignore what Trump did. So Schiff lied about that.
Also note something interesting. The reporter correctly noted that the discussion of the US supplying weapons to Ukraine wasn't followed by a discussion about investigating the corrupt Bidens but about investigating who really hacked into the DNC server. That made sense in a conversation with the Ukraine president because the company that the DNC hired to "investigate" the hack is owned by an Ukrainian American and the actual DNC servers are currently believed to be in Ukraine.
In fact the first mention of the Bidens occurs long after this point and the Ukraine's desire for weapons is never discussed in association with the Biden investigation. So that shows that when Schiff says otherwise he's lying.
The list could go on; deceptively edited videos, Schiff's constantly talking about things that aren't in the articles of impeachment etc.
Adam Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi et al are abusing the Constitution for the sake of improving their chances of winning in 2020.
Adam Schiff is on record as being willing to tell any lie abuse any law in order to get more power for the Democrats.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment