Pelosi wants to impose dishonesty on the Senate

The way impeachments work is that the House makes the case that the President has done something criminal and then the Senate reviews the case and votes on it.

Essentially the House is the prosecutor and the Senate is the jury.

Yet now Democrats are saying that unless they can call witnesses that weren't called during the trial during what is essentially the prosecutions closing arguments, something that never happens, the Senate isn't being "fair".

What makes this really absurd is that the House's hearings, overseen by Pelosi, are a textbook example of a kangaroo court and were completely unfair:

• Adam Schiff held secret hearings from which he barred Representatives who he didn't like in a direct violation of House rules
• Adam Schiff selectively leaked portions of the secret testimony taken out of context to directly invert what the witnesses actually said
• Adam Schiff withheld transcripts from we the people until after he'd concluded his hearings
• Adam Schiff used the secret hearings to audition witnesses. Those who said things Schiff liked were called in the public hearings while those who spoke the truth were not.
• Adam Schiff prevented Republicans from calling witnesses he didn't like.
• Adam Schiff denied Trump the right to confront his accuser, a core principle in American law, by insisting that the infamous "whistleblower"not be called to testify
• Adam Schiff denied Trump the right to be represented at the hearings and the right to call witnesses in his defense; things that Bill Clinton was allowed to do
• Adam Schiff talked about quid pro quo until focus groups showed that bribery resonated better with voters but ended up not producing a single witness who could testify to first hand knowledge of Trump having done anything wrong
• Al Green said that Democrats had to impeach Trump otherwise Trump would be reelected; that's of course something that the Framers condemned in their discussion of grounds for impeachment
• Jerry Nadler called 4 legal scholars three of whom are radicals who have openly expressed their hatred of Trump and one liberal who didn't like Trump to justify the Democrats impeachment hoax
• Jerry Nadler gave Trump 2 days to get ready to defend himself where as Clinton had two and a half weeks
• Jerry Nadler refused to call any fact witnesses so that the Democrats denied Trump the right to confront his accusers or defend himself at any point in the impeachment process
• Jerry Nadler's final acts of impeachment mention no crime
• Jerry Nadler admitted that Trump was being impeached not for what he'd done but for what he would do. That's the same as putting a Black man in prison because he would sell dope in the future. It's a fascist tactic that goes against everything America stands for.
• The Constitution says that impeachment can only be for crimes yet neither article of impeachment mentions any crimes. The Framers when discussing impeachment specifically condemned the idea that impeachment was a tool that the party that controlled Congress could use to veto who we the people choose to be President.
• Not a single Republican voted for impeachment and 3 Democrats voted against it. Yet back when Bill Clinton was being impeached, and impeached bipartisanly, Democrats said that a purely partisan impeachment was wrong; that's Jerry Nadler talking by the way.\

Effectively the Democrats have run a one sided lynching where the defendant, Trump, wasn't allowed to defend himself and unreliable witnesses could only talk about rumors and hearsay not facts.  Given that historically Democrats are the ones who lynched Blacks Pelosi's behavior is consistent with Democrat tradition; the law be damned we need to hang anyone who we don't like.

It's not cheapening the horror of what Pelosi's predecessors did to Blacks to point out that she used the same dishonest tactics to try and nullify your vote in 2016 because effectively trying to dishonestly overthrow an election is a crime with less personal punishment, Trump isn't being killed like the poor Blacks that Democrats slaughtered, but with much more significant punishments for we the people, essentially Pelosi is saying we can only vote for people she approves of.

For Pelosi to say she won't send her sham results to the Senate because the Senate won't be fair is an amazing display of dishonesty and hypocrisy.

Imagine for a moment if a prosecutor who has totally failed to make a case against a Black man for murder declaring that the jury shouldn't be allowed to vote because he knows that they will find the Black man to be innocent.  Everyone would condemn that prosecutor. But that's precisely what Pelosi is doing.

She tried to get rid of Trump dishonestly but all she showed is that Democrats will support anything, will tell any lie if it gives them more power over we the people.

Republicans have proven that they will vote against a Republican President if he does something wrong; that's why Nixon resigned, he was told that the Republicans in the Senate would vote against him.

Democrats have proven that they will never vote against a Democrat President no matter what he does.  Democrats agreed that Bill Clinton had committed perjury, lied under oath, in order to cover up his sexual harassment of government employees yet they refused to vote to convict him.

The biggest takeaway from the Democrats attempted coup is that modern Democrat politicians are all dishonest fascists who will do anything to get power over we the people and as such that they can't be trusted to have any power over us.