The racism double standard; Democrat racism is ok

The #FakeNews media has been working hard to ignore it but the Democrat governor of Virginia admitted, then retracted his admission, to either appearing in a KKK uniform or blackface in his college yearbook; a crime that would have cost any Republican his job.

But because the governor is a Democrat he was able to hang on.

You may also remember that the New York Times hired a racist for its editorial board.  Here are a few of Sarah Jeong's tweets:

Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) December 24, 2014

i have graphs

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) December 24, 2014

the science is indisputable pic.twitter.com/th39vKR40g

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) December 24, 2014

oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) July 24, 2014

What's really amazing is that these tweets are still up; Sarah and the NYT think they're fine.  Imagine if you will if a white person said this about Blacks; would CNN cover anything else for at least a year?

But since Sarah hates white people and is a leftist her racism is just fine according to the NYT.

Now yet another NYT editor is in trouble; this time for racism and antisemitism.  Tom Wright-Piersanti tweeted racist and antisemitic statements.  Unlike Jeong he had the common sense and delete his tweets but here are two curtesy of Breitbart:

I was going to say "Crappy Jew Year," but one of my resolutions is to be less anti-Semitic. So… HAPPY Jew Year. You Jews.

— Tom Wright-Piersanti (@tomwp) January 1, 2010

I don't hate Mohawk Indians, though. I love those guys. I just hate Indians with mohawks. Different indians, different mohawks.

— Tom Wright-Piersanti (@tomwp) December 8, 2009

While the NYT is making noises odds are this guy will keep his job. Of course he is white and male while Jeong is a female and Asian so the NYT may be willing to offer him up.

What's really sad is that the NYT knows that it's full of antisemites.  In response to an uproar after the NYT published a blatantly antisemitic cartoon in its international edition it has dropped editorial cartoons from its international edition.  Which means that the NYT knows it can't judge if a cartoon is antisemitic or not.  That can only happen if there are so many antisemites in the organization that they can't be sure that they can find someone who would recognize hatred of Jews--as opposed to criticism of Israeli policy.

This is why the next time it turns out that Trump or any other conservative said something bad 10 years ago we just laugh it off and point out that being a racist qualifies one for an editorial job at the NYT.

Of course what's really amazing is that the NYT has just decided to spend the next 2 years lying about Trump by saying he's a racist.  Trump has many failings but there is simply no evidence he's a racist.  Instead the NYT and other leftists lie about what Trump said and then declare that that proves he's a racist.  For example Trump wants to limit illegal immigration, irrespective of the race of the illegal, and leftists say that proves he a racist.