But now the NYT has been forced to correct the story. The data wasn't sent by Manafort to a Russian but to two Ukrainians.
Unsurprisingly the NYT is telling us that even though the data didn't go to Russia it's still evidence of Trump colluding with Russia.
What this tells us is that the NYT views anything anyone remotely related to Trump does even if it's not with Russia is "evidence" of collusion. Clearly the staff of the NYT are either insane or dishonest.
Whichever is the case they're clearly not trustworthy on any story related to Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment