Sunday, September 23, 2018

Should I say that Judge Ginsberg assaulted me?

As Christine Blasey Ford's story falls apart leftists are moving the goal posts again.

All four of the people, including a left wing long time female friend of Fords, who Ford says were at the party have said no such party ever occurred.  Unlike Ford all of them have provided sworn testimony under penalty of criminal sanctions.

That combined with Ford's changing story--four boys attacking her became four boys at the party which became 3 boys and a girl other than Ford at the party-- and lack of details--the alleged attack occurred somewhere in a very large geographic area at sometime over a span of more than a year-- pretty much destroys any credibility that Christine Blasey Ford had.

But the left is trying to salvage this mess by creating two new talking points.

The first, pushed by a female Democrat Senator Hirono from Hawaii, is that any man who opposes abortion should be assumed to be a sexual attacker until proven otherwise.  Essentially she's making the amazingly fascist and sexist claim that we should believe any woman accuses a man whose politics Hirono doesn't agree with.

Given that it took multiple credible accusations of sexual offenses before Democrats were willing to hold people who supported abortion to task, such as Weinstein, at fault it's clear that this is nothing more than the typical Democrat belief in one set of rules for Democrats and another for their political opponents.

The second point is that the mere existence of an accusation no matter how unsupported it is should disqualify someone from being on the Supreme Court.  This is even more amazing given that the same leftists who are pushing this still think that Bill Clinton is an ok guy even though he has been credibly accused of rape.  Given that at this very moment the same Democrats who are espousing this insanity are dutifully ignoring the credible claims against DNC vice chairman Keith Ellison it's clear this is a very dishonest attempt to defeat Kavanaugh.

However if we accept the second concept as the left wants us to it would mean that if I accused Judge Ginsburg of sexually assaulting me at some time and place that I can't remember she should immediately step down from the Court even if all the people I said were aware of the event said I was lying.

Unlike leftists I'm not going to lie to hurt my political opponents but this example shows how absurd the second concept is. The Left only supports it in the Kavanaugh case and will immediately jettison it when the accused is a Democrat. In fact they have already refused to do what they say should be done in the case of Keith Ellison.

2 comments:

PeterK said...

and now we have this
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez

trinko said...

Latest accusation already debunked
https://pjmedia.com/trending/four-reasons-the-new-accusations-against-kavanaugh-are-weaker-than-fords/