Sondland's shifting memory and Democrat corruption

During the Kavanaugh hearing one of the biggest factors was that the only even remotely credible accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, story was denied by a good friend of hers.  After all if one of Ford's lifelong friends said that what Ford was saying wasn't true then why should anyone believe Ford?

We now know that that friend of hers was pressured by Democrats to change her testimony to support  Ford.  They even threatened to make public embarrassing details of the friends private life.  But thanks be to God the woman was strong enough to not give in; instead she continued to tell the truth.

It's possible we're seeing that scenario run again but with a person of less integrity.

Originally US Ambassador to the EU, Gordon Sondland, said there was no quid pro quo, no bribery.  Then he changed his testimony saying that the other lying Democrat witnesses statements had apparently jogged his memory and that there was in fact a conversation with a Ukrainian official linking aid to Ukraine investigating corruption--not Biden.  He then admitted that he "presumed" there was a link since he didn't personally know if there was one.

He then went on to admit that when he'd talked to Trump Trump had directly told him that there was no linkage.

Now in his latest testimony Sondland has gone 180 degrees and is declaring that despite the fact that Trump told him there was no link there was a quid pro quo.

What is the more likely explanation; Sondland has the world's worst memory or the Democrats have gotten to him?

Maybe they're bribing him with a promise of a better job or perhaps they've pointed out to him all the money, fame, and prestige that Christine Blasey Ford has gotten for lying in support of Democrat objectives.

Whatever the mechanism despite what the #FakeNews media tells you there's something fishy about a witness who goes from saying there was no crime to saying that of course there was a crime in a few weeks.

If that happened in a real trial the defense would be raising the obvious concern about prosecutorial misconduct but that won't happen here since the #FakeNews media's only purpose in life is to get Democrats elected so that they can control every aspect of your life from how much soda you drink to what your religious beliefs are.

Given that either Sondland was wrong when he said that there was no quid pro quo or he's wrong now it's clear that his testimony is worthless especially when he admits that when he asked Trump Trump emphatically said there was no linkage.