Trouble is that it doesn't.
Referring to the aid that the Democrats are claiming constitutes the quid pro quo when asked:
“To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”
He added:
Sonderland called Trump on 9/9/2019 to find out what Trump wanted. According to Sonderland:
What did Zelensky run on; ending corruption in Ukraine.
So Trump wanted not for Zelensky to investigate Biden but for Zelensky to clean up corruption in the Ukraine so that US taxpayer dollars wouldn't just go into the pockets of corrupt politicians.
That's hardly a crime.
What the Democrats are seizing on is that Sondland did testy that he "assumed" that there was a tie between aid and ending corruption in Ukraine. But even then Sondland said that the requirement wasn't about Biden but about Zelensky issuing a statement condemning corruption.
Folks, if someone tells you Gordon Sondland affirmed quid pro quo, you’re being lied to. He didn’t say this.— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 7, 2019
He said he *did not know* what happened, but he began to *assume* aid was tied to an anti-corruption statement
President Trump corrected Sondland on this, shortly after
It might be argued that the Democrats apparent position that any cracking down by Zelensky on corruption is targeting the Bidens is a sign that the Democrats know that the Bidens are corrupt.
No comments:
Post a Comment