A question to ask yourself about impeachment

If a Democrat President in the future were to ask a foreign country to investigate if Trump had engaged in corrupt acts there would the Democrats or the #FakeNews media find that bothersome?

The answer is no.  We know the answer is no because in 2018 three Democrat Senators sent a threatening note to Ukraine demanding that Ukraine reopen investigations into individuals who were in some way connected to Trump or else.

There was no outcry about how horrible it was for elected officials to ask a foreign country to investigate a political opponent.  Democrats and the #FakeNews media had no problem with the quid pro quo that the Democrats were  effectively offering.

Even more importantly if there was substantial real evidence that Trump Jr had engaged in corrupt acts in Ukraine would you object to a future President asking Ukraine to investigate that?

I wouldn't.  But then I don't believe that corruption by Democrat politicians is ok as people like Adam Schiff and the members of the #FakeNews media clearly do.

Right now we have the transcript of the phone call and we know without any doubt that Trump didn't do anything wrong. Yet the Democrats are still running their kangaroo court and trying to get you to believe that when Col. Vindman says that Trump was wrong to conduct foreign policy in a way that Col. Vindman doesn't approve of that Trump is guilty of a crime.

Yet we know for a fact that the Bidens corrupt.

These following statements are agreed to by everyone:

1) Hunter Biden got his job with Burisma due to being Joe Biden's son; Hunter said that on a TV interview
2) The one and only foreign prosecutor that Joe Biden ever personally ensured was fired is also the one and only foreign prosecutor who was investigating the company that paid Joe's son Hunter around $3.1 million
3) Joe got the prosecutor fired by establishing a quid pro quo. If Ukraine fired the prosecutor Ukraine got $1 billion in US aid. If Ukraine didn't fire the prosecutor the Ukraine got nothing.  Oh and Joe gave them 4 hours to make up their minds. Joe said all this on TV.
4) The investigation into Burisma ended due to Joe's firing that prosector

Now if there was anything like this amount of evidence against Trump for anything I'd be on the impeachment bandwagon.  But we know there isn't because if there was Adam Schiff wouldn't be forced to misrepresent testimony the way he is.