The one Democrat Senator who ended up voting for Kavanaugh did so only when Schumer said it was ok because it wouldn't make a difference and the Democrat had to pretend to be moderate to get reelected.
Essentially due to the radical nature of what Democrats want to do to America--repeal the 1st and 2nd Amendments for example--they always lie when they run for office. Well that's not quite true; there are some areas, like San Francisco and New York City, where Democrats can campaign on what they believe but Democrats running in the rest of the country have to lie.
In Arizona for example the Democrat candidate for the Senate, Kirsten Sinema, doesn't mention she's a Democrat and doesn't mention that she's for citizenship for all illegals. In Missouri the Democrat Senate candidate is saying she's not one of those "crazy Democrats".
But undercover video by Project Veritas has revealed that Democrats will vote differently than one would think based on what they say when they're running for office.
One of the biggest lies that Democrats tell is that they plan to represent their constituents when in fact they will push for the Democrat party agenda no matter what.
That's why Democrats voted in lock step on Kavanaugh and Obamacare; the Democrat party is like an organized crime family not a political party.
Historically there was dissent in both parties; conservative Democrats siding with Republicans and liberal Republicans siding with Democrats.
But while the Republicans have stayed an honest political party-- witness the fact that there were three Republican Senators who weren't sure how they'd vote on Kavanaugh and John McCain voting against the repeal of Obamacare-- the Democrats have become a gang.
The logjam in Congress isn't due to a change in the American people but instead is due to the fact that the Democrats vote as a block which means that a super majority is needed to overcome the objection of Schumer or Pelosi to a bill. Historically there was some bipartisanship but now the only bipartisan are Republicans.
This is a natural evolution of the Chicagoification of the Democrat party by Obama. After all the Democrat machine in Chicago is famous for its ability to manufacture votes and ensure that everyone works together to maximize their power and profits.
A key element of the plan to revise the Democrat party has been the setting of strict standards about who can run for office as a Democrat. For example the Democrat party has effectively said that no one who is pro-life can run for office while there are several pro-abort Republicans, including Susan Collins.
But since Pelosi's agenda is repugnant to most Americans the Democrats know that they have to lie about what they believe and how they will vote in order to get elected.
When you consider who to vote for remember that no matter what the Democrat candidate says they will vote with Schumer and Pelosi. Which is not surprising given that almost all Democrat candidates are hard core leftists. But even the few "moderates" will go along with the party because if they don't they'll be jettisoned for more compliant individuals.
If you doubt that note that in California the Democrat party rejected Diane Feinstein for Senate because she isn't as left wing as Democrat De Leon.
Any political tent too small to include Diane Feinstein is just a smidge to the right of Antia.
No comments:
Post a Comment