Thursday, September 17, 2020

Democrat politicians appear to endorse sex with 14 year olds

 California Democrats just passed a law that says if a 24 year old man rapes a 14 year old boy but the boy was "willing" then the man doesn't necessarily have to register as a sex offender.

By definition adults having sex with kids is rape because sane people understand that children aren't mature enough to make informed decisions about sex, a kid for example wouldn't know that California Democrats have said that not telling your sex partner you have AIDS is on par with jaywalking, and that a 24 year old adult cousin has huge power over a 14 year old child who is eager to please adults.

It's like a boss suggesting to his secretary that he's like to sleep with her.  His position of power and authority over her makes it hard for her to say no; not to mention her natural fear of losing her job.  That's a core aspect of the whole #MeToo movement.

But for some reasons Democrat politicians in California think that a 14 year old boy can somehow be "willing" in a sexual relationship with an adult.

The reality is that Democrat politicians are effectively endorsing the predilection of many gays to have sex with teenage boys.

This is nothing new. Decades ago an Apple engineer was on trial for having sadomasochistic sex with a 16 year old boy.  Many people came to his defense saying the kid was willing.

In light of the silence of Democrat politicians about the Netflix child porn file "Cuties" that shows 11 year old girls twerking and grabbing their crotches like strippers it's probably reasonable to wonder if they don't in fact want to legalize sex with "willing" minors.

Now not all Democrat politicians have been silent. Tulsi Gabbard has come out and condemned Cuties and Nancy Pelosi's daughter has too but so far Democrats in the Senate haven't joined with Republicans like Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz who are calling for Netflix to be investigated.

But even if Democrat politicians aren't for casual sex with kids you shouldn't vote for them because they're not protecting our children from sexual exploitation by adults.  Telling would be child molesters that if they groom their target enough so that the poor child will say he was willing will keep them off the sex offenders register is sending entirely the wrong message.

No comments: