Why don't socialists give away their own money?

Democrat socialists like Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders are pushing for we the people to ensure economic security for bums who are able to work but who don't want to work.

Those Democrats tell us that they are better than us because they care so much for the poor and oppressed.

But doesn't it strike you as odd that despite their fervent and oft repeated claims to love their neighbor they all hang on to their own money?

Bernie Sanders has three houses; why hasn't he sold two and used the money to help the poor?

While Ocasio-Cortez isn't rich her chief of staff is yet he hasn't given all of the money he doesn't need to live to ensure that those unwilling to work have a good lifestyle.

Tom Steyer, George Soros, and other mega rich Democrat donors spend fortunes to make America into a socialist state while keeping far more money for themselves than they need.

Perhaps the fact that in socialist regimes people who are at the top politically tend to become very very rich has something to do with this.  Could it be that Democrat socialists aren't motivated by love of others but by a selfish desire to get even richer? 

To be charitable perhaps what motivates them is not greed but the desire to feel good about themselves without actually having to sacrifice anything that they've worked hard to get; which when you think about it is selfish.  

A good description of the left in America is that they are people who want to be philanthropic with other peoples money.  Instead of sacrificing what they have earned to help the poor they want to force we the people to sacrifice.

How often have you met a leftist who thinks they're being charitable when they vote for a Democrat whose platform is to raise taxes on other people?  Of course demanding that others be taxed isn't charity it's theft.

One thing we know is that in socialist countries like Venezuela the political elite steal vast amounts of money from the people. Hugo Chavez and his family stole billions from the people of Venezuela for example.

Just as Democrats declare that they love Blacks even as they ignore the mass shootings of Blacks in Democrat run cities Democrats are now declaring that they love the poor even as they refuse to give their own money to help those in need.

Studies have shown that the more conservative politically and the more religious a person is the more they give in money and time to real charities--among Obama's personal "charities" was  the Congressional Black Caucus for example.

That's because just as it's conservatives who really care about Blacks--that's why we demand better law enforcement in Chicago and object to the massive racial disparity in abortions where Black women are 3 times as likely to abort as white women-- while Democrats only pretend to care it's conservatives who work to improve the economy to pull people out of poverty.

After all even Pope Francis says that welfare isn't a good long term solution to poverty while Democrat socialists say it is.

The reality is that with wealth and income inequality Democrat Socialists are nothing more than posers; people who won't part with their own money to help the poor but who are quite eager to force we the people to pay for schemes that enrich the bloated and overpaid government bureaucracy--who will consistently vote for Democrats--but not actually help the poor in the long run.