Liberals on the economy

According to liberals when the government takes money from people who earn it the Government is growing the economy.

According to liberals no matter how little people get for their efforts they will work just as hard and create just as much wealth unless they are minimum skill people who must be paid more in order to work.

According to liberals it's greedy to want to keep the money you earn but it's not greedy to want to take other peoples hard earned money so you can spend it the way want--Thomas Sowell

According to liberals it doesn't matter how many people are on welfare.

According to liberals spending money to prop up an industry that couldn't survive on it's own is a good use of money.

According to liberals people who give up looking for work but who could work are not unemployed.

According to liberals under a Republican President temporary 5% unemployment is a disgrace but under a Democrat President years long 7% unemployment is a sign of compassion.

According to liberals when the number of poor decrease it just means we're not doing enough but when the number of poor increase under a Democrat President it means nothing.

According to liberals government regulations have no impact on productivity.

According to liberals government can "manage" the economy better than the people doing all the work.

According to liberals crony capitalism is great for Democrats but evil for Republicans--well at least they're half right on this one.

According to liberals it's bad if the rich get richer even if the poor get richer too but not as much.

According to liberals it's ok for government to get more and more of everything but bad for people who actually generate wealth to get more and more.

Liberals on the family:

According to liberals the family exists for the happiness of the adults; if the parents aren't happy they can split no matter what the consequences to the children.

According to liberals divorce can be traumatic for children--libs endorse putting those traumatized kids in counseling--but that's an acceptable price to pay for the parents happiness.

According to liberals even though the nuclear family--father mother and kids--has been around since the dawn of mankind it really serves no purpose; society is fine without it.

According to liberals one parent is fine for raising kids even though every study that has ever been conducted shows that children raised in single parent families are much more likely to be poor and unhappy.

According to liberals it's ok to abort their children because they would be inconvenient; that won't have any impact on the children they choose not to abort.

According to liberals it's society that raises kids not parents; that's why the inner city kids with one parent turn out so well after attending public schools.

It's clear that when liberals think of families they think of the adults not the children.

Memorial Day

We should all take a moment today for pray for all those who have served our country and made sacrifices to keep us free.

The Word made flesh from St. Francis Xavier Catholic church Lagrange Il

Liberals and science

It's important to realize that liberals have little or no understanding of science. This makes sense given that modern liberals are really a resurgence of the hedonistic self centered pagans of the pre-Christian world.

As an example of liberal scientific knowledge a friend of mine--whose wife is a friend of Michelle Obama's-- castigated me for invoking Feynman to critique the process used by some climate alarmists.

My friend thought it was absurd to use a physicist to question a climate scientist.

My friend did so because he actually has no comprehension of how the laws of physics underly how the climate behaves.

This was additionally informative in that what I quoted Feynman on was that if a theory does not model reality--the model produces results different from what we measure-- no matter who came up with the theory, no matter how beautiful the theory was, we have to conclude that the theory is wrong.

Essentially all Feynman was doing was explaining how science works; you guess what might explain something and then you compare your guess's predictions with measured data.  If they match great; if not then the guess is wrong.

But given that every single climate model has failed to match measured data for 15 years it's pretty clear that using science we can, according to Feynman, conclude that climate scientists current guess's are wrong.

Once they admit that then, if they are scientists and not political shills, they need to make new guesses and see if they accurately predict what nature does.

But liberals don't understand that so they use bogus statistics to say that since most climate scientists believe man is warming the planet it doesn't matter what the data says.

Just like primitive people listened to their witch doctors.

The sad reality is that while liberals envision themselves as progressives they are really the most radical of conservatives in that they wish to return to a primitivism; a primitivism that includes child sacrifice--abortion.