Dishonest Adam Schiff tries to hide Mark Sandy testimony that clears Trump

Mark Sandy from OMB was questioned in secret as part of Adam Schiff's witch hunt.

Oddly he wasn't questioned in the public hearings and his "secret" testimony wasn't released until well after Schiff's impeachment coup ended.

Well perhaps it wasn't that odd given that Sandy clearly testified that the only reason he was given for the hold up in aid was that Trump was concerned about the fact that European countries weren't doing their fair share to help Ukraine.

This is one more example of Schiff and the #FakeNews media deliberately distorting witness testimony prior to releasing the actual testimony.

Clearly the Democrats in Congress have absolutely no scruples.

Why you can't trust the #FakeNews media: Newsweek Thanksgiving edition

I thought Newsweek was out of business? https://t.co/3ro4eSJloo

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 29, 2019

So we're told that Trump "attacking" the media, ie pointing out when the media lies to help Democrats, is an assault on the free press.  Yet which is the real assault when Trump points out how the #FakeNews media is lying or when the #FakeNews media lies?

Clearly the threat to our freedom is a "press" which is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the Democrats.  We the people need the truth to decide who we should vote for. By deliberately denying us the truth the #FakeNews media is working hard to ensure that we vote for candidates who don't have our interests in mind.

It turns out that the reporter that wrote this did so in advance and she was asked to write a new article about what really happened.  She got fired but it's unclear if that was right since it would seem that it was the fault of whomever posted the out of date article not her.

That doesn't alter the point; I think we all agree it would be hard to imagine that Newsweek would have done this for Obama.

Democrats double standard: Fake college of Farmington edition

The left is all upset about Trump's ICE using a fake university to trap foreigners who were trying to buy their way into the US by pretending to go to college here.

The scam is simple; set up a fake school that doesn't actually teach anything but that hands out I-20 forms that allow foreigners to be in the US for cash.

ICE setting up a fake university of its own in order to catch would be illegal immigrants is clearly a smart thing to do but the left is incensed because Trump did it.

Earlier this year, Congress rushed to approve BILLIONS more $ for ICE + CBP.

I saw members voting YES w/o even a summary of the bill. Nobody cared then how we’d pay for it.

Now ICE is setting up fake universities to trap students.

Yet we were called radical for opposing it.

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 27, 2019

Or did he?

It turns out that the fake University of Farmington was set up in 2015 when Obama was president. Further in 2013 ICE had used a similar scheme where the fake University of Northern New Jersey was set up.

One more example of how if Trump does the same thing as Obama it's a crime for Trump but not Obama.

Democrats will do anything to get power including lie to you.

Despite Schiff's Star Chamber Witch Hunt not producing any crime Democrats will continue with impeachment

Despite all their witness tampering Democrats couldn't get a single witness to say that they had first hand evidence of their being a quid pro quo, much less a bribe, in their made up Ukraine story.

Sondland said there was but then he admitted that he "presumed" there was and that Trump had told him directly that Trump didn't want any quid pro quo.

Vindman said he was troubled but couldn't point to a crime and then had to admit that he'd deliberately falsified the transcript of a conversation between Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky.

The Democrats first two witnesses testified that they had no first hand knowledge of anything an no even second hand knowledge of anything that would be a crime.

Yet the Democrats are going to continue their completely partisan attempt to nullify the 2016 election.

Meanwhile nothing is being done to actually address the issues facing the country.

Clearly all that matters to Democrat politicians is getting more power not making life better for Americans.

Contrary to leftists lies America wasn't based on slavery

What the left is trying to do is convince our youth that America is the only place that ever allowed slaves and that as a result America is evil.

The problem is that not only is the slave trade still going on today in the Arab world but the vast majority of Africans who were enslaved didn't go to the US.

Also it turns out that historically far more Blacks were enslaved by Muslim countries than by countries in the Americas. Muslims enslaved roughly 17 million Blacks vs the 12.5 million who were shipped across the Atlantic.

Leftists are saying that the Revolutionary war was waged to protect slavery in the US which is amazingly dishonest.  America revolted because of oppressive English imperialistic policies.  The vast majority of Americans who supported independence didn't own slaves so why would they risk poverty and death for a cause they had no stake in?

That's just another Democrat Big Lie to cover up the racist history of the Democrat party.  If America is all about slavery then why did America fight its bloodiest war to end slavery?

The reality is that Democrats fought for slavery and they fought to oppress Blacks after slavery was ended.  

America isn't all about slavery and oppressing Blacks but the Democrat party is.

Even today Blacks can't get a decent education in Democrat run cities and thousands of Blacks are shot in Democrat run cities and Democrats do nothing to stop it.  Clearly Democrats today don't car any more about Blacks than the Democrats who fought for slavery did.

None of this makes slavery in America an ok thing but to pretend that at the time slavery started in America it was some sort of oddity is clearly wrong.  At the time, and for thousands of years prior to then, slavery was part of life.  A huge portion of people in the Roman Empire were slaves for example.

What's interesting though is that the Democrats who are condemning the US for slavery belong to the same party that fought the Civil War to preserve slavery, that founded the KKK, that fought school integration, and that instituted all the Jim Crow laws.

But with the usual amazing hypocrisy of leftists Democrats are saying that it's Republicans, who freed the slaves, who are at fault.

Clearly if America is all about slavery, which is what the Democrats are saying, then we wouldn't have fought a war, the bloodiest war in American history, to end it. Republicans wouldn't have passed the 14th Amendment, and we wouldn't have elected a Black man as President twice.

But truth is no impediment to Democrats trying to diss America.

Evanston Illinois institutes race based taxes

All the marijuana users in the Chicago suburb of Evanston will be paying their drug taxes for the sole  purpose of funding "reparations" for Blacks in the suburb.

This is in line with California instituting a new tax on health care which is used solely to fund free health care for certain illegal immigrants.

Of course all it is is a way for Democrat politicians to tax everyone to provide cold hard cash to bribe people to vote Democrat.

The proximate motivation for the new plan could be that the percentage of Evanstonians who are Black is dropping which means fewer votes for Democrats.  Hence a plan to induce Blacks to come to Evanston would make sense to Democrats whose first concern is staying in power; or perhaps assuaging their guilt from being in the party of slavery, the KKK, and Jim Crow laws.

Twitter declares it's all in for Democrats even antisemitic ones

A Republican woman, Danielle Stella, is running against Democrat Ilhan Omar.

Stella tweeted the if Omar did in fact pass US secrets to Iran she should be convicted of treason and hanged.  Note she said "if".

Twitter deleted her account and Omar whined about it.

Note that all Stella did was say that if Omar had broken the law she should be punished as proscribed by the law.

Now it's true she should have probably left off the part about Omar being hanged but the reality is that Democrats have tweeted similar things about Trump being a criminal, a racist, a fascist, a white nationalist with Twitter not showing the slightest sign of concern.

But we've known for awhile that Twitter is doing all it can to make sure that Democrats win so that the left can rule over we the people.

An insane theory: Is Ilhan Omar behind the story that she's a Qatar stooge?

There's been a story percolating around for a while that Democrat, and anti-Semite, Ilhan Omar is a spy for Qatar and, indirectly, Iran.

In a trial in Florida about Sheikh Khalid bin Hamad al-Thani ordering his bodyguard to murder two Americans testimony was given that said:

“If it wasn't for our[Qatar] cash, Ilhan Omar would be just another black Somali refugee in America collecting welfare and serving tables on weekends."

Qatar “recruited Ilhan Omar from even way before she thought about becoming a government official… They groomed her and arranged the foundation, the grounds, for her to get into politics way before she even showed interest. They convinced her,”

The deposition shows he[the witness] further told the court that, during a 2017 meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Omar swore allegiance to him. At the time she was a junior state representative in Minnesota.

Omar was said to also have passed information to Qatar which was subsequently handed along to Iran, and was actively involved in recruiting other American politicians to likewise work for the west Asian Islamic country, Bender testified.

This sounds compelling until you hear what the experts who have been investigating Omar's strange actions, like marrying her brother presumably as part of some immigration fraud, have to say.

Jordan states it more forcefully than I did, but we’re virtually on the same page.

I’m as skeptical as can be of the Qatar/@IlhanMN story, based on my MN sources. @JordanSchachtel calls it 100% nonsense, presumably based on his excellent natsec sources. https://t.co/mTr0Fu1FSX

— David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) November 26, 2019

We know that Omar is dishonest and an anti-Semite and it's hardly unlikely that her real loyalty is to Islam not the US but it's out of character for her to spy and in any case what in the heck would she have known before entering Congress that anyone would care about.

It's therefore likely that this story is a big lie about her.

Here's my off the wall totally unsubstantiated theory; Ilham Omar or one of her allies is behind this story.  By framing Omar and then revealing the frame someone can engender sympathy for Omar as well as discrediting those who are pointing out her numerous well verified problems.

It's classic disinformation strategy.  Put out an outlandish claim about someone who is crooked and have their critics repeat it.Then show that the claim was bogus thereby discrediting everything, including the factually correct things, the critics are saying.  Given that Omar, or whomever is behind this if this a disinformation effort, can count on the #FakeNews media to blanket condemn anyone who is criticizing Omar based on what turns out to be a bogus charge it could help Omar escape from the increasingly tight jam she's in.

Even if that doesn't work though the story will tend to distract the conversation from the substantial issues related to violations of tax and immigration law that Omar is currently facing.  It may also distract Somali's who aren't keen about how Omar's treated the father of her children who she recently and unceremoniously dumped.

Also note that poorly educated Somalis in Minnesota tend to like radical Islam, witness the Minnesota men who tried to join ISIS, so if they believe the story they might think it enhanced Omar rather than hurt her and she needs their votes to stay in Congress.

To see if you think that this story is legit ask yourself this question why would anyone in the Muslim world make up a fake attack on Omar? She's clearly on their side.  But precisely because she's on their side there are probably agents in the Muslim world who would lie for her which is precisely what this story might be; a lie to help provide Omar cover for her real actions.

To be clear there is no evidence for this story being a disinformation operation and it could be accurate or it could have been hatched by someone who doesn't like Omar not someone who is trying to help her.  But we don't care who is responsible only how we should deal with this new accusation; go with it or ignore it.

Clearly it's highly risky to act as though this story about Omar is true even if it's not a disinformation effort simply because pushing low credibility theories tends to reduce how much the independent voters one is trying to convince will trust you.

While it's unlikely that Omar is sophisticated enough to come up with this sort of disinformation plan on her own the people supporting her are fully capable of doing so.

Clearly there is no proof of this theory so like all conspiracy theories it has to be taken with a few containers of salt but it does explain why a Muslim source would attack one of the most prominent defenders of Islam in the US and the timing is very opportune with all the real scandals that Omar is involved in.

Some people will say that it's more likely that in fact Omar is a Qatari agent but the simple reality is that in the US with the level of influence that the #FakeNews media has on independent voters even if she is the unverified testimony of one man won't convince voters. However repeating the story will tend to convince Americans who are lied to every day by the #FakeNews media that Omar is being persecuted and that none of the claims against her are true.

Hence from a purely operational perspective the most useful theory for conservatives is that the story is disinformation designed to help Omar and to avoid acting otherwise so as to preserve our credibility.

So instead of repeating the Qatari spy story tell your friends about how Omar filedtax returns declaring that the father of her children was her husband when in fact she was legally married to another man.
Feel free to follow me on Twitter

If you live in New Jersey your tax dollars are helping illegal immigrants afford college

With most middle class American families struggling with the exploding cost of college it's good to know that the leftists who run New Jersey have transferred $3.8 million dollars of your money to subsidize illegal immigrants who are going to college.

Actually the number is much higher than $3.8 million since that's how much made it into the hands of illegal immigrants.  We all know that there is a huge amount of overhead in any government action so to get $3.8 million in the pockets of illegal immigrants a lot more will have to be vacuumed out of the pockets of New Jersey residents.

Democrats know that you, actual American citizens who reside in New Jersey, have too much money and illegals who came here for the freebies don't have enough.  So they pretend to be charitable by taking your money, not their own, and giving it to people they hope will illegally vote for them.

While Democrats say that illegal immigrants don't vote the idea that people who are willing to violate our immigration laws to get more money would never think of violating our voting laws to get more money is clearly insane.

This sort of "generosity" by Democrats isn't restricted to New Jersey.

In California the Democrats passed a new tax on American citizens for the sole purpose of paying for free health care for some illegal immigrants.

Never doubt that Democrats love power far more than they care about you and that if stealing from you to buy the votes of illegals gets them more power they won't hesitate to do so.

Despite Chinese threats Trump condemns Communist tyranny in Hong Kong

People have been hard on Trump for not being more vocal in support of the freedom protestors in Hong Kong.

There are several possible reasons for Trump having been quiet:

• He has secretly told China that he'll be silent so long as they don't use military force to crush the people of Hong Kong as they did at Tiananmen Square
• He feels that winning the economic war that China has been waging against the US for decades is more important in the long run
• He is just putting American interests first

But unlike Obama who was always cool with tyranny overseas unless it was in a country that was helping the US Trump has signed two bills that Congress passed condemning the Chinese policy in Hong Kong and calling for the rights of the people of Hong Kong that China agreed to being respected.

Trump's rhetoric about Xi, the tyrant who runs China, is the same as his rhetoric about Putin; a ploy to develop a friendship with him so that Trump can get him to do what's best for America.  As with Putin Trump's actions show that he's not in fact a big fan of Xi but if stroking the ego of the Chinese tyrant helps achieve America's objective's Trump's more than willing to do so.

NYT declares that spying on Trump's campaign by FBI isn't really spying

The #FakeNews media is going all out to convince us that the FBI sending spies to meetings with Trump campaign members is not only not spying but just business as usual.

While the NYT admits that the FBI did have an undercover agent meet with Papadopoulus in London they say that that's not actually investigating the Trump campaign.

Similarly the NYT says that the Papadopoulus wasn't set up by the FBI even as it admits that the FBI hid exculpatory evidence about Papadopoulus from the FISA court.

If the Trump administration did either of these things to any Democrat candidate's campaign the #FakeNews media would be exploding.

We know that because they're incensed that Trump dared ask Ukraine to investigate the Biden family's clearly corrupt behavior in Ukraine.

What's interesting is that this preemptive smoke screen of lies indicates that the Justice Department's Inspector General report won't be a complete white wash of the Obama conspiracy to overturn our democracy.

Judicial Tyranny: Immigration edition

Donald Trump takes the common sense stand that legal immigrants to the US who aren't fleeing death should be a benefit to America not a burden.

So back in October he issued a ruling that legal immigrants would have to show that they could pay for their own healthcare and not end up being subsidized by US taxpayers.

But now a Federal Judge in Oregon has said that that's no good since it's Congress not the President that can define the criteria for legal immigrants.

The only problem is that Congress has clearly given Trump that power in the Immigration and Nationality Act where it says:

"Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate,'"

That's pretty clear and it's obvious that the Judge is really declaring that Congress is in charge only if Congress issues laws he likes.

One more sign of how Democrats and the left hate democracy and want to rule over us rather than represent us.

Transgender Tyranny:Female athletes can dope up if they say they want to be boys edition

In Texas a girl won the state high school wrestling championship in the 110lb division.

That wouldn't normally be news but the winner is winning because she is doping up and it's perfectly legal.

The winner is taking testosterone shots for three years.  Given that there'a pretty strong societal consensus that that sort of thing is wrong and should disqualify athletes this girl is getting away with it.

Why?

Because she says she's transitioning to a boy.  Of course she's not since she's not changing her DNA but under Texas law if the performance enhancing drugs are administered by a doctor, presumably as part of some sort of health care, it's ok.

In fairness to her Texas law requires that people compete based on their birth certificate sex so her request to compete with boys was turned down.

But this is just one more example of how the left hates real women and has no problem with letting real or fake men compete with them in sports.

All you need to know about Democrat Candidates: Tom Cotton edition

Democrats picked Josh Mahony to run against Republican Tom Cotton for Senate in Arkansas.

Unfortunately the Democrats either didn't do their homework or didn't care that Mahony had lied on a  Federal form and couldn't remember the last time he had a job.

Two hours after that information was revealed Mahony dropped out of the race.

Of course the #FakeNews media didn't dig up that dirt; Tom Cotton's team had do do what a honest press is supposed to do.

How many Democrat candidates have similar problems which voters will never hear of because the #FakeNews media is protecting them?

For example will the #FakeNews media ever call out Ilhan Omar for tax fraud now that it's a proven fact that she filed tax returns for at least two years citing the father of her children as her husband even though she was legally married to someone else at the time?

How the left hates God: Joy to the World edition

A charter school in California originally said that a student couldn't play the song "Joy to the World" on the piano as an assignment presumably because it was too religious even though the 13 year old girl wasn't planning on singing the lyrics.

If this doesn't get Democrats to love charter schools nothing will.

While the school did back down when threatened with legal action it shows just how much the left hates God.  While Christians are supposed to tolerate atheist speech in schools by teachers Christians are being told that atheists are such easily triggered people that it's unreasonable to expect them to have to "endure" hearing an even remotely religious song.

That's the big lie behind the separation of church and state; atheism is a faith based tradition ie a religion.

Atheists say that the lack a belief in God while in fact saying repeatedly that there is no god.  But their belief that our world can exist without god is based on faith in things they can't prove to be true.

For example they can't prove that the Bible isn't historically accurate.

There are even purely secular arguments that show that god is more likely than not.

For example Prof Hawking wrote:

"It is hard to imagine how free will can operate if our behavior is determined by physical law, so it seems that we are no more than biological machines and that free will is just an illusion."

Hawking, Stephen. The Grand Design . Random House Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

His argument is simple:

• If we're purely material beings, ie we don't have souls, then all our thoughts are brain chemistry
• But brain chemistry is controlled by the laws of physics not us
• Hence we have no control over any of our thoughts or actions
• Hence we can't have free will

Yet when we all listen to what goes on in our heads we know that we do have free will.  Which means that atheists must believe based on blind faith that, as Hawking says, our free will is an illusion.

It's clear then that atheism is based on faith in things atheists can't show to be true.  Now the atheists faith may be correct, just as Christian's faith may be correct, but atheism is on weaker ground than Christianity--Christians have eyewitness testimony to Jesus for example.

So what the whole separation of Church and State movement is doing is nothing less than enshrining the atheist faith based belief system, ie religion, as the official religion of the US which is enforced by the full power of the government.

Teachers can freely preach the atheist gospel in public schools but Christian teachers can't even mention Jesus's name without fear of being fired.

That's precisely the sort of state backed religion that the 1st Amendment condemns.

Just as the left hates freedom of speech they hate freedom of religion and they hate the idea that God, not government, is the source of our rights because that puts limits on what the left can do to we the people.

Some Turkey pictures

Democrats double standards on political killings by Muslim countries

People were rightly indignant and angry when the Saudi Monarchy had a Saudi trouble maker and part time reporter executed.  Democrats demanded we end support for Saudi Arabia and ensure that the Saudis buy Russian and Chinese weapons.

But now Iran has killed an Iranian dissident, Masoud Molavi, in a foreign country and we're not hearing demands from Democrats that the US increase pressure on Iran.

The Iranian regime’s cruelty isn’t contained by borders. Last week, an Iranian dissident, Masoud Molavi, was assassinated in Istanbul after defecting to Turkey. His killing is yet another example in a long string of Iran-backed assassination plots outside of Iran. pic.twitter.com/vsATNzE8jT

— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) November 26, 2019

One more example of how Democrats don't put American interests first. Saudi Arabia is a paragon of virtue compared to Communist China but Democrats rarely castigate China but love to dump on countries that are less than perfect but which are helping the US.

Libya is a great example of that.  The Libyan dictator voluntarily gave up his WMD program and stopped supporting terrorism but Obama overthrew his government and left Libya as a failed nation state over run by terrorists.  Yeah that's the same Obama who refused any support to the Arab Spring movement in Iran.

The Big Late term abortion lie; none of them are elective

Today a baby has a reasonable chance of surviving if they're born at 20 to 21 weeks gestation.  But abortions are legal beyond week 32.

The virulently pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, a spin off of Planned Parenthood, says that every year roughly 12,000 viable babies are aborted each year.

Yet you'll often hear pro-abortion advocates saying that the only reason viable babies are aborted is that they're not going to live anyway.

That itself raises the obvious question that given that doctors aren't infallible and that we have many stories of doctors telling parents that their unborn baby wouldn't live and then the child living for years what sort of mother would kill her unborn child because the child might die naturally?

After all isn't giving your child a chance what being a mother is all about?

But we don't have to trust statistics to know that many late term abortions are of viable babies; we can listen to what late term abortionists say. Dr. Susan Robinson is happy to kill viable babies. Here's what she said in an interview:

"They think they just got pregnant. They have no idea they’re in their 24th week. So they make an appointment for an abortion, and it takes a few weeks, and they have their ultrasound and find out that they’re at 27 weeks, which is too far for an abortion anywhere. So then what happens? They either give up or have a baby, or they go on the Internet and they find us."

Clearly a significant fraction of the viable babies Dr. Robinson kills aren't doomed to die from natural causes.

Even the Guttmacher institute says:

“data suggest that most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.”

The article says that the main reasons for late term abortions are:

“they were raising children alone, were depressed or using illicit substances, were in conflict with a male partner or experiencing domestic violence, had trouble deciding and then had access problems, or were young and nulliparous.”

No matter whether you trust the statistics, the abortionists, or the Guttmacher institute the message is the same; late term abortions of viable babies are often elective and not required.

Democrat racism: Blacks can't be supporting Trump edition

Two major legitimate polls, Rasmussen and Emerson, show Black support for Trump at an unbelievably high level of 34%. At least one #FakeNews person is saying that can't be true:

Zero chance this is accurate. Zero. The poll must have only been conducted in the homes of Ben Carson, Kanye, that sheriff guy with the hat and those two Cubic Zirconia & Polyester-Spandex ladies. https://t.co/vsmXJBY1KB

— Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (@ananavarro) November 25, 2019

This is just one more example of how the left says that Blacks can't possibly dare to wander off the Democrats ideological plantation. It's interesting how she simply assumes that intelligent Blacks who notice that voting for Democrats for 70 years hasn't actually helped the Black community couldn't possibly think that Trump's driving down Black unemployment is a good thing.

It's another sign of how the left views Blacks as needing help to figure out what's "really" best for them; help that only leftists can provide.

Medicare for all failing bigly in Finland

Bernie Sanders cites Finland as a great example of how Medicare for All would work; only problem is that it's failing horribly.

Not only are patients forced to wait forever but there are shortages of doctors and the poor quality program is financially unsustainable.

For example if a child gets sick Finns can't call up and make an appointment with their doctor; they have to go into the office and wait. The wait isn't to see the doctor but to see a nurse who decides if they are eligible to see the doctor.

Read the whole Legal Insurrection article linked to above to get all the details.

Bernie Sanders is coming for your money with higher taxes

To pay for his big give away to people who don't work Medicare for All program  Bernie Sanders is going to impose a 4% tax on everyone who makes more than $29,000 a year.  Given the distribution of household incomes in the US that means that roughly 76% of Americans will see a tax increase.

Keep in mind that Medicare for All is just one of the many huge give away programs Bernie is running on. That means that this tax is just the beginning of a long list of taxes that Bernie will impose on you so he can buy the votes of people who don't work and won't be taxed but who will get all sorts of new freebies if he's elected.

Impeachment coverage shows #FakeNews media bias

It turns out that when Democrat Bill Clinton was impeached for actually lying under oath not a desire by Republicans to undo an election, the #FakeNews media televised a lot less of the hearings than they did when dishonest Democrats like Adam Schiff staged a coup under the guise of an impeachment.

Impeachment coverage %s Clinton vs Trump
Network	1998	2019	Ratio
ABC	36	75	208
CBS	42	84	200
NBC	26	92	354

It's clear that the #FakeNews media were eager to protect Bill Clinton and condemn Trump.  Despite low ratings and the lack of any real news since not one witness testified to first hand knowledge of a bribe/quid pro quo or anything even marginally illegal the networks wanted to put Adam Schiff on the air for hours.

In one sense the networks did us a favor.  By letting us see, unfiltered, what the witnesses were saying it was easy to see how the #FakeNews reporting on the hearings was all lies.

Thanks to the NewsBuster's team for digging this up.

Democrat Governor Tom Wolf says it's ok to kill "imperfect" unborn babies

Pennsylvania passed a common sense bill that said that women couldn't kill their unborn daughters just because they might not be perfect; ie they might have Downs syndrome.

But Democrat Governor Tom Wolf showed that Democrats are on the side of death not life and vetoed the bill.  Interestingly current law does say a woman can't kill her unborn child because her unborn child is a girl and she wants a boy or vis versa.

So by vetoing this new law Wolf is saying that it's wrong to kill based on sex but it's ok to kill based on the child being differently abled.  Now that's pretty monstrous.

That's the same sort of eugenics ideology that Hitler and Margret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, supported.  Hitler said that only the fittest should survive and that "inferior" people--Blacks, Jews, Eastern Europeans, etc--should be eliminated.

Clearly modern Democrats believe that the right to life guaranteed to all Americans in our Declaration of Independence is defunct and that politicians can decide, just as Hitler did, which human beings have rights.

If they believe that they don't support any real freedom for we the people.

Bloomberg News declares it will violate campaign finance laws

Bloomberg "News" declares it will not investigate Bloomberg or his fellow Democrats, but WILL investigate Trump. If that isn't a massively illegal in-kind campaign contribution, what is?

— Brent Bozell (@BrentBozell) November 25, 2019

I wrote about the fact that Bloomberg News is going to not investigate Democrats but continue to hound Trump earlier.

But Bozell makes a point I didn't think about. Essentially Bloomberg News is going to be one big continuous never ending negative campaign ad for Bloomberg's Presidential bid.  That's precisely the sort of in kind contribution that has to be counted under our election financing laws.

Of course we're sort of used to that since that's effectively what the entire #FakeNews media has been doing for years. But since they're smart enough to not actually put in writing their policy they can get away with being nothing more than constant ads for Democrats in violation of our campaign finance laws.

Whats even more amazing is that we have evidence of cases were #FakeNews media reporters cleared their stories with Hillary's campaign, ie they coordinated which is a big no no, and no one seems to care.

The poop explosion in San Francisco is going to get worse

You've probably heard that human feces are filling the streets in formerly beautiful San Francisco.

That's because Democrats are running the city and encouraging drug use--the city pays about 1/2 a million dollars a year for syringes for junkies which end up on the street endangering children-- and implementing racist homeless policies--Blacks are overrepresented in SF's homeless by a factor of 6.

Here's the number of complaints about feces on streets and sidewalks by year:

2017:  20,800
2018:  28,315
2019:  30,297 (estimated)

The problem is so bad there's a poop map on the internet that shows where to avoid walking in SF.

And it's going to get worse. The newly elected DA for SF, the son of convicted murders and terrorists,  Chesa Boudin has stated:

“We will not prosecute cases involving quality-of-life crimes,” he said. “Crimes such as public camping, offering or soliciting sex, public urination, blocking a sidewalk, etc., should not and will not be prosecuted. Many of these crimes are still being prosecuted; we have a long way to go to decriminalize poverty and homelessness.”
So not only will SF become one big open toilet it will now not be a crime for people to block sidewalks forcing parents to take their kids into the street in heavy traffic.  The exploitation of people through prostitution will increase as well.

There is one slender ray of hope.  Even the rich San Franciscans are beginning to be bothered so perhaps sanity might return but it's unlikely. After all SF just elected a DA whose campaign slogan was essentially to put cops in prison while keeping criminals out of prison.

Guess what? Bloomberg News admits it's a propaganda machine

In a email to the staff at Bloomberg News the editor-in-chief, John Micklethwait, has admitted that Bloomberg's news will be amazingly and intentionally biased.

He noted that there has always been a rule to not investigate their owner Michael Bloomberg which is amazingly revealing.  If Bloomberg has nothing to hide why would he have to instruct his own company to not investigate him?  After all they'd be unlikely to make up stuff about him.

But now that Bloomberg has entered the race for President the rules have become even more biased.  Not only will Bloomberg News not investigate any Democrat candidate they will continue to investigate Trump to their heart's content.

Hence we now have the editor-in-chief of Bloomberg News declaring that Bloomberg News is a propaganda engine for Democrats.

We knew that before but now you can tell your friends who listen to the #FakeNews media that Bloomberg is on record as being eager to hide from them any problems with Democrats.

LA Times demonstrates a lack of English proficiency: An inquisitor is the guy leading the inquisition edition

The LA Times referred to Republican Devine Nunes, a hispanic, as the "impeachment inquisitor".

Obviously if any Republican had called a Democrat Hispanic that the LA Times would have been screaming racism.

But more importantly an inquisitor is the person who is running the trial whereas Nunes has been serving as an effective defense attorney--the exact opposite of an inquisitor.

Hence either the staff at the LA Times don't know what the word inquisitor means or they don't care and deliberately smeared a Hispanic for daring to leave the Democrats thought plantation.

Either way it's more reason to not trust anything the #FakeNews media says.

The people of Hong Kong vote for freedom

People want to be free. No one wants to have to follow the insane dictates of DMV employees much less be thrown in prison for the crime of not being an atheist.

So it's not surprising that the people of Hong Kong voted out the traitors who were siding with the Chinese dictators who've put over 1,000,000 Muslims in prison camps.

While I wish that Trump was saying more I think the fact that China hasn't used more force than it has--remember Tiananmen Square-- is a sign that Trump has said that if they do then the US will take economic steps that China can't endure.

Of course the real question is why aren't the #FakeNews media covering this story 24/7?  Probably because they side with China in general.  It's no accident that Obama said he wished he could rule America the way the Chinese Communist dictators rule China. The left believes that they are smarter and better than us and that they should rule over us just like the Chinese Communists rule in China.

Lots of stories you read about in the #FakeNews media are tilted for China including:

• Climate Change: Under the Paris Accords China is massively increasing its CO2 production while the US is decreasing ours yet the media is condemning the US and generally being silent about China
• Plastic in the Ocean: China puts 33 times more plastic in the ocean that the US does, the US actually puts less plastic in the ocean than North Korea, yet we're being forced to give up our straws even though they won't end up in the ocean and China's environmental "crimes" aren't mentioned.
• Imperialism: We're constantly told how evil the US is but you're unlikely to hear how China is claiming the entire South China sea

While some Democrats like AOC have spoken out against the crimes against humanity that the Chinese are committing--societal genocide, forced abortions, involuntary organ donations for example-- the reality is that the #FakeNews media are going easy on China.

Democrats go international; Iowa Caucuses may occur in New Zealand, Mexico, France, and Scotland

Because Democrats know that foreigners and US citizens living overseas are far more likely to vote Democrat than actual Americans who like living in America the Democrats in Iowa have decided to possibly allow caucus meetings to occur overseas.

While technically the participants are going to be restricted to Iowan's living overseas the reality is that it will be hard, if not impossible, for Iowa Democrats to verify that.

But it will probably increase the support for the more radical Democrat candidates so Democrats in Iowa view it as a good thing.

This is part of the general move by Democrats to let anyone who can show up at a polling place irrespective of their actual citizenship to vote.

Leftists hate you and love illegal immigrants: protecting men who rape children from deportation edition

There are several "sanctuary" counties in Maryland.  They're planning on releasing men who have been accused of raping children and other violent crimes back into the general public rather than turn them over to ICE where deportation proceedings can begin.

One illegal immigrant who is charge with rape of a child is among those who will be released along with another  who is charged with attempted 1st and 2nd degree murder.

While leftists can pretend that they care about those illegal immigrants who supposedly are contributing to America it's clear that their real feelings are far different. What sort of good American can want murderers and child rapists who are here illegally to stay here illegally?

This is one more example of how "sanctuary" cities/counties/states are only protecting predators.  What being a "sanctuary" place means is that the police in that jurisdiction don't tell ICE when illegal immigrants who have been arrested for a crime are going to be released thereby ensuring that the predator who happens to be here illegally gets to stay in the US.  "Honest" illegal immigrants whose only crime is breaking our immigration laws don't get arrested and hence don't benefit from "sanctuary" policies.

Just as the leftists in California have passed a tax on Americans to pay for free medical care for illegal immigrants shows where leftist's true allegiances lie sanctuary policies show that the left loves illegal immigrants far more than they love Americans.

Biggest Lesson of the impeachment witch-hunt; the #FakeNews media will shamelessly lie to us

If you bothered to actually listen to the testimony of the open hearings or read the transcripts from Schiff's secret star chamber inquisition you'd know that not a single witness provided first hand testimony about anything that even they said was illegal.

But if you listen to the #FakeNews media you'd "know" that witnesses said that Trump was a monster.

For example the #FakeNews media breathlessly reported on Ambassador Sondland's claim there was quid pro quo but not so much on the fact that when asked he admitted that not only had Trump told him directly there wasn't a quid pro quo but that he simply "presumed" there must be; ie he projected his own opinion on Trump.

Similarly the #FakeNews folk were eager to report that Fiona Hill said that Republicans had rejected the idea of Russia trying to interfere in 2016 even after Rep. Nunes provided Hill with her very own copy of the 240 page long report the Republicans had published last year where they all said that yes Fiona there was Russian interference.

Just as during the Mueller debacle every day the #FakeNews media gushed about this or that "damning" evidence which when examined turned out to be nothing more than wishful thinking.

It's not an accident that Democrat Adam Schiff had to pretend that words he was making up were in fact things Trump said or that Democrat Rep. Quigley had to declare that rumors are more reliable than first hand testimony; Schiff failed to produce a single witness who even claimed to have first hand evidence of anything other than Trump not doing what the bureaucrats wanted.

Of course if not doing what the "interagency" wants is an impeachable offense then Obama should  have been impeached since he flatly rejected the "interagency's" guidance that he should give military aid to Ukraine.

The bottom line is that anyone who still thought that the #FakeNews media were anything other than Democrat propagandists can no longer believe that in the face of the massive intentional misreporting that has gone on for the last few weeks.

Democrat Adam Schiff was first elected by campaigning against the impeachment of Bill Clinton

Back in 2000 when dishonest Adam Schiff was first elected to Congress a big theme of his was that his opponent had been part of the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

Schiff used impeachment, or rather his condemnation of it, as a fund raising tool.

Which is really interesting since Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath in order to avoid losing a #MeToo lawsuit for sexually harassing an Arkansas government employee when he was governor.

Contrary to the #FakeNews media spin Clinton wasn't  impeached for his cheating lifestyle. Rather because he lied under oath about his affair with a subordinate when he was in the White House.  He did so because if he'd told the truth it would have established a precedent for the #MeToo lawsuit against him; namely that he was in the habit of improperly hitting on women who worked for him.

But Adam Schiff said that was ok; that lying under oath and harassing women was great.

Now Schiff is saying that Trump daring to go against the interagency is a crime and that impeachment is necessary.

In all of the hearings, secret and open, not once has any witness identified a crime by Trump based on first hand knowledge. The closest it comes is Sondland saying there was a quid pro quo but then being forced to admit that in fact when he asked Trump about it Trump emphatically stated that he didn't want any quid pro quo. Sondland admitted that despite what the President told him he simply "presumed" that there was a quid pro quo.

That's pretty clear evidence that to Schiff this impeachment is just a way to undo the 2016 election since Hillary didn't win.

One more example of how Democrats are unenthused about democracy.

California Democrats are too radical for radical California Supreme Court: Trump tax returns edition

The Democrats apparently want a one party fascist state because they passed a law that said that Trump couldn't be on the ballot if the didn't make his tax returns public.  Clearly that was nothing less than a massive attempt to suppress Republican voting in California far worse than Republicans wanting to make every voter produce ID.

Of course if California could do that then Texas could say that any candidate whose son did business in Ukraine couldn't be on the ballot or that any candidate who had lied about being a native American when they weren't couldn't be on the ballot.

This blatant attempt by Democrats was so amazingly unconstitutional that even the uber radical California Supreme Court rejected it--as did Jerry Brown when the issue came up in 2017.

But the fact that the California Democrats were perfectly comfortable with passing what was nothing less than a law the sole purpose of which was to suppress votes and ensure that Democrats win elections shows that they're not really fans of democracy.

Impeachment wrap-up; Quick Summary there is no there there

After two weeks of the Democrats trying to convince us that a nothing burger is a steak we've learned the following things:

• Not one witness used the focus group selected word "bribery" about Trump
• Not one witness had first hand evidence of any crime or even anything problematic
• We learned, thanks to Democrat Mike Quigley, that Democrats believe that rumors are better evidence than first hand testimony
• Democrats believe that the fact that the one and only time Biden fired a prosecutor that prosecutor was the one and only prosecutor investigating a corrupt Ukraine company, Burisma, that gave his son $3.1 million is an obvious coincidence
• Sondland changed his story and said there was a quid pro quo but admitted under oath that Trump had told him that Trump didn't want any quid pro quo, bribe for Democrats, and that he, Sondland, simply presumed there was one
• Lt. Col. Vindman demonstrated he doesn't realize that Congressmen are his bosses and can call him anything they like
• Lt. Col. Vindman admitted to deliberately falsifying a transcript of a phone call between Trump and Ukraine president Zelensky
• Not one witness could identify a crime that Trump had supposedly committed
• Many witnesses apparently shared Lt. Col. Vindman's belief that it's the "interagency" that runs US foreign policy not Trump
• Fiona Hill testified that when Obama was president he defied the "interagency" and everyone was ok with that
• We learned that the "whistleblower's" source was Vindman something Schiff desperately wanted to hide because that showed that Vindman wasn't an independent corroboration of the "whistleblower".
• Lt. Col. Vindman testified that the Ukrainians loved and trusted him so much they asked him to be their Minister of Defense not once but 3 times; yet they never mentioned that they felt pressured by Trump
• No one testified that any Ukrainian official ever even suggested they felt that they were being pressured by Trump
• The Ukraine President and the Ukraine Foreign Minister both said they felt no pressure from Trump
• Fiona Hill demonstrated that she's officially ignorant by accusing Republicans of denying that the Russians tried to interfere in the 2016 election; Nunes gave her the 240 page report that the Republicans had released last year that said just that as an early Christmas present
• Williams and Vindman who both claim to be Ukraine experts testified that they had no knowledge at the time of the Trump Zelensky phone call that Joe Biden had conditioned US aid to Ukraine on Ukraine firing the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma; the company that paid Hunter Biden $3.1 million
• Lt. Col. Vindman self proclaimed Ukraine expert thought that Obama had provided military aid to Ukraine when in fact Obama refused to provide military aid to Ukraine in direct opposition to the "interagency"
• The #FakeNews media lied through it's teeth about every witness presenting their claims and not covering the Republican cross examinations that showed that the witnesses were testifying in an inaccurate and misleading way
• We learned that Democrats believe that asking Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden's corruption is a crime even though 3 Democrat Senators asked Ukraine to reopen investigations into people related to Trump or else in 2018
• We learned that Democrats believe that Trump firing an Ambassador was evil even though Obama demanded the resignations of every single Bush appointed Ambassador
• Former Ambassador Yovanovitch admitted to knowing of Ukraine interference in 2016 election for Hillary back in 2016 and doing nothing about it
• Democrats argued that because Joe Biden is running for president he can't be investigated for his crimes. By that reasoning Democrats can't be investigating Trump.
• We learned that unelected bureaucrats believe that they, not the President, should run foreign policy which means that at least vis a vis foreign policy elections don't matter
• Despite the fact that Ukraine got the military aid without having to do anything Democrats still believe there was a bribe
• We learned that Democrats thought it was great that Obama refused military aid to Ukraine because it might upset Putin but it is an impeachable offense for Trump to delay military aid to Ukraine for a few weeks
• Witnesses testified that Trump's concern wasn't about Biden but about corruption in general in the Ukraine. Trump thought that if they got rid of the corruption Ukraine could afford to pay for its own defense and US taxpayers wouldn't have to subsidize Ukraine
• In possible violation of US law the "whistleblower" is monetizing his fame by having a GoFundMe page
• We learned that in fact Schiff had deliberately distorted what happened during his secret Star Chamber hearings

What we didn't learn is anything remotely like evidence of any sort of criminal activity.

If a man exposes himself to a woman it's a crime unless he's in a women's bathroom.

I'm stealing this idea from a meme I saw on PowerLineBlog.

According to leftists if Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself at a drunken party when he was in college, which the alleged victim said he didn't, that's unimaginably evil.

According to leftists biological men who say, without a doctor verifying their claims, they are really women can use women's bathrooms where there is a chance little girls, real girls not pretend ones, will see their sex organ.

So on one hand a drunken act by adults is evil and on the other the exact same act when done while sober is fine.

That's the left for you; they hate women and they have two standards one for decent people and one for themselves.

Why blaming guns not people is stupid in one meme

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/the-week-in-pictures-natural-gas-edition.php

The full impeachment story in one meme

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/the-week-in-pictures-natural-gas-edition.php

Elizabeth Warren lies to us again: School choice edition

When a school choice advocate said that uber rich Elizabeth Warren sent her kids to private school Warren lied and said that they went to public school.

Not that it's relevant but the woman who asked Warren is Black.  Just one more example of how Democrats don't care about the abysmal education situation for Blacks in Democrat run cities and states.

The Washington Examiner found a year book from a pricey private school with Warren's son in it.

That forced her campaign to issue the following statement:

"Elizabeth's daughter went to public school. Her son went to public school until 5th grade," a Warren aide told Fox News. "Elizabeth wants every kid to get a great education regardless of where they live, which is why her plan makes a historic investment in our public schools. Every public school should be a great school. Her plan does not affect funding for existing non-profit charter schools, but she believes we should not put public dollars behind a further expansion of charters until they are subject to the same accountability requirements as public schools."

This is just one more example of how Democrats will lie to you and how they want for themselves what they want to deny you; a decent education for your kids.  We all know that a "historic investment" in public schools will go to higher teacher pay since the teacher's unions funnel untold millions into Democrat candidates.  In Chicago teachers keep getting raises even though they consistently fail to educate their students; and Democrats don't care.

#FakeNews media lies to you: Fake book on Kavanaugh lies about Justice Kennedy

A new book by a Washington Post editor is doing it's best to demonize the idea that evil Republicans are being monsters for wanting the Supreme Court to interpret laws not make them.

Democrats desperately need the Supreme Court to be our unelected rulers because none of the Democrats social agenda, from abortion for any reason at any time including shortly after birth to gay marriage, was passed by the democratic process. Every aspect of the Democrat's hedonistic morality were imposed by edicts from the Supreme Court.

That's why they will do and say anything in order to keep the Supreme Court in the business of making laws.

But even if we ignore the amazingly fascist message of the soon to be published book people in the know are pointing out serious factual problems with it.

First one of the books big bombshells is that supposedly Justice Kennedy told Trump that he was going to retire and to include Kavanaugh in the list of potential replacements.

While the WaPo says this is a worrying thing most sane Americans would disagree.  After all why shouldn't a retiring Supreme Court judge suggest to the President a person he considered would be a good replacement?  It's not like Kennedy was blackmailing Trump.

But that doesn't matter because  sources, including Kennedy, say that Kennedy never did that.  Of course the WaPo author simply says that we should accept his claim because he's who he is; which in the eyes of most honest Americans is more evidence that he's a liar than that he's trustworthy.

There are apparently other inaccuracies in the book but the basic point is that the whole premise that it's bad for Republicans to want a Supreme Court that doesn't make up laws in direct violation of the Constitution means that no matter the status of the "facts" in the book it's just another #FakeNews media hit piece; like the one the WaPo ran condemning Kavanaugh for buying tickets to Washington Nationals games on his credit card.

Fiona Hill inadvertently supports the claim that Russia interfered for Hillary in 2016

While Fiona Hill is clearly biased against Trump she has let out some information that is really damaging not to Trump but to the Democrats.

One such tidbit is that she believes that the infamous Steele dossier that was used to get FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign was a Russian disinformation project.

Essentially she's saying that Steele got played by the Russians.

Think about it a former British spy whose cover was blown manages to talk to dozens of high ranking people in Putin's government without Putin, whose iron grip on the country is infamous, finding out isn't too likely is it?

In addition if Putin's objective was to get Trump elected there is no way he'd allow compromising information about Trump to get in the hands of Hillary Clinton's agent.

A much more likely story, and the one that Fiona Hill believes in, was that Putin tailored what was fed to Steele. Now that could have been done to help Hillary or it could have been done to just taint the election results but that makes more sense than a spy whose identity was known to the Russians being able to contact sources in Russia, without ever going there, who had all this juicy information about Trump.

The fact that more of the dossier has been disproven than proven supports that theory.

Fiona Hill is an anti-Trump liar

In her opening statement Fiona Hill said:

"Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves."

This is lie as Rep. Nunes pointed out:

Nunes also says contrary to former NSC official Fiona Hill's accusation that some members of the Intelligence Committee don't believe Russians meddled in the election, Republican members published a 240-page report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election in March 2018. pic.twitter.com/L7uU255Upw

— Kristina Wongsgiving 🦃🇺🇸 (@kristina_wong) November 21, 2019

It's a lie designed to help the Democrats because we know that Ukraine did interfere in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton and no one has ever said the Russians didn't.

The Ukraine has convicted a number of people for deliberately interfering in the US 2016 election by releasing dirt about Trump's campaign manager, Manafort.  It's true that that attempt actually boomeranged and helped Trump because Manafort had to resign and his replacement, Kelly Ann Conway, was a key reason why Trump won.  But the intent of the Ukrainians who were in the Ukraine government was clearly to help Hillary and hurt Trump.

That's why Trump asked Zelensky to investigate Ukraine interference in the 2016 election long before Biden's name came up in their telephone call.

But Democrats only care about foreign election interference if it's in favor of Republicans so they want to ignore what the Ukrainians did just as they want to let illegal immigrants vote.

By supporting that talking point Fiona Hill showed that we can't trust anything negative that she says about Trump but we can be fairly sure that anything that she is forced to testify to that helps Trump is likely to be true.

An example of that is that she admitted that Obama refused to provide military aid to Ukraine even though the infamous "interagency"--all the policy wonks like Vindman who think they should run foreign policy not the President--said that the US should provide aid.  Hill said Obama did so for political reasons because he was worried that Putin wouldn't like it.

This is helpful to Trump because it shows that what he did, temporarily withhold aid against the wishes of the "interagency", was done by Obama. Of course Obama's case is even worse since Obama never provided the aid to Ukraine while Trump only held up the aid for a few weeks.

Lt. Col. Vindman admits to falsifying a Trump phone transcript

On April 21 Trump talked on the phone with Ukraine President Zelensky.

Prior to the meeting Vindman had told Trump to raise the issue of corruption.

For whatever reason Trump did not do so.

Yet Vindman put in the official transcript of the call that Trump had raised the issue of corruption.

Here's Vindman trying to defend his action:

HUGE#Vindman admits he falsified a call transcript btwn @realDonaldTrump & Zelensky

He added a reference fm talking points he made before the call to the final record

Even though Trump never said it on the call

Watch him squirm when he tries to explain this pic.twitter.com/GU1cqel8FK

— Jim Hanson (@JimHansonDC) November 21, 2019

Remember this is a man that the Democrats are saying is a honest unbiased trustworthy witness.

Clearly Vindman is a liar who won't hesitate to lie if it advances his agenda.

To date not one witness has said that they saw anything illegal occur in any of Trump's interactions with Ukraine.  Not even the liars like Vindman.

When the liars won't even tell the lie Democrats want them to it's clear there is no basis for any of the Democrat claims.

Yellow is the new white: How Democrats are acting as though Asians are whites

For years leftist colleges like Harvard have been discriminating against Asians. To get into a college Asians need higher scores than whites, whites need higher scores than blacks, and blacks need to mention their race.

Democrats discriminating against Asian Americans isn't new. After all it was FDR and the Democrat governor of California, Earl Warren--yes that Earl Warren--, who put Japanese Americans into prison camps during WWII for the crime of having Asian ancestors.

But now Democrats are being more open about it.  Essentially they're declaring that yellow privilege is the new white privilege so that it's not only good to discriminate against Asians it's a moral responsibility to do so to aid Blacks.

Most Blacks who get into college are smart enough to be in college just not necessarily the college that accepts them.  For example as Thomas Sowell, who's Black, has pointed out if a Black who would excel at say University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign where he'd be one of the smartest people instead goes to Harvard where he's one of the least smart people he's much more likely to fail.

Even those Blacks who do succeed are stigmatized because people always wonder did he get his degree because he's good or because he's Black? Given that the vast majority of Black colleges graduates get their degrees because they're good that means that a lot of intelligent Blacks have their competence questioned when it shouldn't be.

Clearly affirmative action doesn't help Blacks but since Democrats only care about symbolism not substance they don't care.

The reality is that "yellow privilege" is like "white privilege"; neither depends on race.  Asians do better in school because in general their parents prioritize education more. In Asian areas there are an uncountable number, a slight exaggeration, of tutoring companies that supplement kids education.  Whites and Blacks who have that same attitude also produce kids with higher test scores.

The reality is that "white privilege" has nothing to do with a person's race but with their behavior.  If people avoid out of wedlock babies, stay married for life, and live responsibly they get all the benefits of "white privilege" irrespective of their race.

To be fair the unsafe ghettos with poor schools and no jobs that Democrats have created for Blacks in our inner cities make it hard for some Blacks to succeed but that means the real issue is Democrat racism not "white privilege".  After all can anyone say with a straight face that Obama who was raised with all the benefits of "white privilege" was someone discriminated against?

The New York Times unconsciously admits the Democrat Debates are rigged and racist

45 minutes into tonight's #DemDebate, Elizabeth Warren has spoken the most of any candidate, followed by Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg.

Follow our real-time tracker to see more. https://t.co/H0HzW3yvz4 pic.twitter.com/S0hA4Q0925

— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 21, 2019

Given that the Democrat establishment is clearly keen on either Warren or Biden the skewing of time away from Blacks like Harris and Booker is clearly problematic.  Evaluated in light of the insanity that the Democrat base believes is good both Harris and Booker are at least as viable and credible as Bernie the fan of communism so in an unrigged world they'd be given as much time to lie as he was.

And of course we'd expect poor Andrew Yang to be discriminated against since Harvard, where leftists are born, has openly discriminated against Asians for years.  Effectively to leftists yellow is the new white.

Sadly the Russians don't seem to be interested in hacking the DNC this election cycle so given that we know the #FakeNews media is in the DNCs pocket we'll never have proof that the white Democrat elites aren't putting their thumb on the scale to make sure that their candidate wins.

Before you scream yes it's quite possible that it wasn't the Russians who hacked the DNC in 2016 but a disgruntled Bernie fan who wanted to end the DNCs siding with Hillary but who leaked doesn't really matter that much; in this context what matters is that we know in the past the DNC has broken their own rules and worked hard to get their candidate the nomination.