The real violent ones; Democrats

The #FakeNews media is working over time to blame Republicans for all the violence in America which is odd since the only example of Republican violence is some wacko Trump supporter sending dangerous but non-working bombs to Democrats while Breitbart has a list of over 600 examples of Democrats using violence against Republicans.

Between Antifa, which most Democrats are comfortable with, and Democrats like Maxine Waters calling out mobs to drive Republicans out of restaurants and gas stations the left has a monopoly on political violence in America.  For all the insane rhetoric about the danger of assault weapons--ie guns that Democrats think look scary-- in the hand of citizens there have been no attempted murder of Nancy Pelosi the way a Democrat tried to murder Steve Scalise.  That's a good thing of course because violence has no place in our democratic process.

But it's a Big Lie that the media's trying to spread to cover the Democrats in the election by making average Americans who aren't politically engaged think that the Democrats aren't endorsing violence but Republicans are.  Trump speaks truth to power by pointing out that the #FakeNews media are constantly lying and the #FakeNews media say that Trump is inciting violence.  Democrats call for mobs on the street to attack Republicans and we're told that's just them exercising their First Amendment rights.

Even the purely rhetorical front the left--ie the main stream #FakeNews media like NBC, WaPo, CNN,MSNBC, ABC, etc-- is leading with violent language which you can see in this Media Research compilation where Trump and conservatives are compared to Stalin and Hitler--and no for once the left isn't saying Stalin was a great guy who was misunderstood.

Of course that's when they're not fantasizing about killing Trump.  Just a few days ago the NYT ran a bit of fiction about the Secret Service assassinating Trump. Prior to that we had that D list comedian holding a fake but bloody Trump head, and the version of Julius Caesar where Caesar was played by a Trump look alike and his wife spoke with the same sort of accent that Melinia Trump has.

Can you imagine for just a second how the media would have reacted if anyone had done anything remotely similar about Obama?  Everyone would have condemned the sick people behind these things and rightly so.  But when Trump's targeted the Democrats are all for it.

Tell anyone and everyone you know the truth; the Democrats are the party of violence who constantly call for the use of force against their political opponents.

The Left; all censorship all the time

A professor at Sarah Lawrence College wrote an editorial in the New York Times calling for diversity of thought on college campuses.

He pointed out that administrators are even more biased towards the left than are professors, not surprising given that being a professor in real fields like engineering requires intelligence, and that the events that those administrators schedule are entirely left wing with no room for discussion.

In response some people defaced the professors door and the university president supported the students, while weakly calling for free expression, by informing the professor that calling for free speech created a hostile work environment.

This is just one more example of the rejection of the First Amendment by the left.  If any leftist is bothered by speech the left believes that that speech should be censored.

On the other hand if a conservative is bothered by leftist speech that shows, according to leftists, that the conservative is a racist Nazi.

If you vote for any Democrat on Tuesday you're voting for repealing the First Amendment.

If Democrats win everyone in the world will be a US citizen

The mass of illegals marching through Mexico headed to the US has sued the US in Federal court for, among other things, acting unconstitutionally towards them.

That's right. The left wing lawyers, echoing what leftists in America believe, are arguing that foreigners on foreign soil have the same rights as American citizens.

The natural extension of these leftist actions is that everyone in the entire world has the same rights as taxpaying American citizens.

To the left there are no countries since their loyalty is only to their own clique; namely the Democrat party.  What matters to the left is having power over the people, as shown by their eagerness to control how much soda we drink, and it's easier to control people if they are poor, uneducated, and don't speak English; i.e. if they're illegals.

Which means that to them extending the rights of citizens to the entire world isn't a real change since  the left views  everyone as serfs who toil to enrich the ruling elites not as citizens from whom political power flows.

To the left none of us really have rights. Rather we are to be treated as the elites say we are to be treated.

Of course the really amusing thing is that this lawsuit has nothing to do with the actual illegals; they're simply being used as a ploy to justify some dishonest Federal judge overruling the clearly written laws to impose leftist orthodoxy on the country.

It's not that the Democrats care about the illegals anymore than they care about the rest of us "deplorables".  In the mind of Democrats we all are such failures that we need to have our lives run by the enlightened elites of the Democrat party.  What matters to Democrats is power; the power to run our lives as they see fit whether that means telling us what our religions must teach or what type of bags we can use when we go shopping.

Just one more reason why voting for any Democrat on Tuesday is like voting to become a serf.

What is a free press and why aren't the #FakeNews part of it?

The intent of the Constitution was to ensure that news sources can't be censored or controlled by the government.

The idea was that in order for citizens to vote intelligently they have to know what's going on.  That's impossible if the government can silence any voice that criticizes the government.

Due to the human condition preventing government censorship means evil people and stupid people will still be able to generate news that is bogus but the Founders considered that to be a price to be paid to ensure that the press could speak truth to power.

Our modern #FakeNews media outlets--WaPo, NYT, LA Times, ABC, CBS,NBC, MSNBC, CNN, etc--however are effectively trying to do an end run around the First Amendment.

By constantly either lying about stories or hiding information that disagrees with the objectives of the Democrat party they're effectively deluding many Americans just as much as if the government censored the news.

Does it really matter if people aren't aware of the truth because the Government censors it or because the #FakeNews media won't report it?

When Trump attacks the #FakeNews media he's attacking those outlets which prioritize their ideological agenda over the truth.  He's not saying that the government should censor even the odious CNN but that people shouldn't trust certain news sources.

That message is no different in nature than the one the Democrats have been saying for years about Fox and Rush. Of course the Democrat claims are false and Trump's are true but in both cases people are upset about what some news outlets are reporting. The big difference is what Trump and the Democrats do to "fix" the problem. Trump just tells folks to not listen to the liars but the Democrats have tried to silence the voices they don't like.

They've tried to get the "Fairness" doctrine into law. It would require radio stations to run an hour of a leftist talk show host for every hour of a conservative talk show host that they run; that would effectively put radio stations out of the political talk business which would be a  victory for the left since there are no left wing talk show hosts with much of a following.

The bottom line is this; Trump criticizing the #FakeNews media for lying to the people is not an assault on the free press anymore than Radio Free Europe was attacking the free press when it broadcast the truth into Eastern Europe when the Soviets controlled the area.

Trump isn't calling for censorship but Democrats are. They support the censoring of conservative voices on Twitter Facebook etc.

The real threat to the people knowing what they need to vote isn't Trump; it's the #FakeNews media.

The real anti-semites

If a Democrat politician or media flunky says that Democrats are good because of Y it's a near certainty that not only don't Democrats support Y they in fact do their best to do the opposite of Y.

For example Democrats are constantly telling everyone how they love Black people and that all Republicans are racists.

Yet every year, year after year, thousands of Black people are shot in cities run by Democrats and those Democrats do nothing to change things.  We all know though that if suddenly 4000 white people were shot in Chicago one year that those same Democrats would be doing something to end the horror.

Meanwhile Trump and other Republicans are calling for something to be done to end the horrible plight of inner city Blacks in places like Chicago.

Similarly Republicans were much more civil to Obama than Democrats were to Black people who dared to leave the Democrat intellectual plantation; people like Candice Owens, Kanye, Justice Thomas, and Ben Carson.

The reality then is that in direct opposition to their claim that they love Black people the actions of Democrats show that in fact they couldn't care less about Black people.

The same is true of Jews.  We're told by the Democrats and their #FakeNews media allies that Trump is responsible for the shooting of Jews at the Tree of Life synagogue. This despite the fact that we know that the shooter, the guy who is actually responsible, hated Trump because he thought that Trump was controlled by Jews.

It's unclear to reasonable people but apparently obvious to Democrats how a man the shooter hated could be responsible for the shooters actions but then that's Democrat logic for you.

Given that Trump is the guy who moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, sided with Israel rather than Iran, and who hasn't done a single anti-semitic thing that anyone can point to it's easy to understand how an virulent anti-semite like the shooter could hate him but near to impossible to understand how an honest Democrat could blame Trump for the shooting.

On the other hand Democrats ranging from members of the Congressional Black Caucus to Ben & Jerry, of the ice-cream empire, who have no problem associating with Louis Farrakhan who calls Jews "termites".

Twitter allowed the video of Farrakhan making that comparison to stay up for a long time so they apparently don't see any obvious problem with anti-semitism.

Now of course the anti-semitism of the Democrat party doesn't make them responsible for the shooting but given that Democrats never blame the killer, unless he's a Democrat, it's unclear how they can honestly blame Trump and not blame themselves.

But then honesty has never been an attribute of the left since if they were honest no one would vote for them outside of San Francisco and NYC.

This whole sorry episode proves that once again if Democrats claim to be for something good odds are they're really against it.

Every Democrat politicians first loyalty is to the Democrat party

In the recent Kavanaugh hearing Schumer, the head Democrat honcho in the Senate, knew that every single Democrat Senator would vote against whomever Trump nominated.

The one Democrat Senator who ended up voting for Kavanaugh did so only when Schumer said it was ok because it wouldn't make a difference and the Democrat had to pretend to be moderate to get reelected.

Essentially due to the radical nature of what Democrats want to do to America--repeal the 1st and 2nd  Amendments for example--they always lie when they run for office. Well that's not quite true; there are some areas, like San Francisco and New York City, where Democrats can campaign on what they believe but Democrats running in the rest of the country have to lie.

In Arizona for example the Democrat candidate for the Senate, Kirsten Sinema, doesn't mention she's a Democrat and doesn't mention that she's for citizenship for all illegals.  In Missouri the Democrat Senate candidate is saying she's not one of those "crazy Democrats".

But undercover video by Project Veritas has revealed that Democrats will vote differently than one would think based on what they say when they're running for office.

One of the biggest lies that Democrats tell is that they plan to represent their constituents when in fact they will push for the Democrat party agenda no matter what.

That's why Democrats voted in lock step on Kavanaugh and Obamacare; the Democrat party is like an organized crime family not a political party.

Historically there was dissent in both parties; conservative Democrats siding with Republicans and liberal Republicans siding with Democrats.

But while the Republicans have stayed an honest political party-- witness the fact that there were three Republican Senators who weren't sure how they'd vote on Kavanaugh and John McCain voting against the repeal of Obamacare-- the Democrats have become a gang.

The logjam in Congress isn't due to a change in the American people but instead is due to the fact that the Democrats vote as a block which means that a super majority is needed to overcome the objection of Schumer or Pelosi to a bill.  Historically there was some bipartisanship but now the only bipartisan are Republicans.

This is a natural evolution of the Chicagoification of the Democrat party by Obama.  After all the Democrat machine in Chicago is famous for its ability to manufacture votes and ensure that everyone works together to maximize their power and profits.

A key element of the plan to revise the Democrat party has been the setting of strict standards about who can run for office as a Democrat.  For example the Democrat party has effectively said that no one who is pro-life can run for office while there are several pro-abort Republicans, including Susan Collins.

But since Pelosi's agenda is repugnant to most Americans the Democrats know that they have to lie about what they believe and how they will vote in order to get elected.

When you consider who to vote for remember that no matter what the Democrat candidate says they will vote with Schumer and Pelosi.  Which is not surprising given that almost all Democrat candidates are hard core leftists.  But even the few "moderates" will go along with the party because if they don't they'll be jettisoned for more compliant individuals.

If you doubt that note that in California the Democrat party rejected Diane Feinstein for Senate because she isn't as left wing as Democrat De Leon.

Any political tent too small to include Diane Feinstein is just a smidge to the right of Antia.

Voting for a Democrat, any Democrat, means...

No matter what they say they will do when they campaign every Democrat votes in lockstep with Pelosi and Schumer; their first loyalty is to their party.

So here's what a vote for any Democrat will lead to:

Higher taxes
Impeaching Trump--reason? we don't need no stinking reason
Open borders
Welfare for life for anyone who can sneak into the country
Taxpayers paying for abortion around the world
Weaker defense
Supporting Iran over Israel
Making nuns cooperate in providing abortions
Making Christians provide support for gay weddings
Reinstating the "fairness" doctrine to censor Rush
End to all investigations into government corruption
End to all investigations into the misuse of government authority against conservatives
Citizenship for anyone who doesn't live here who can make it here
Massive increase in government regulations
Drastic reduction in GDP growth--a person with a job is not beholden to the Democrats and that's bad
Support for violence by Antifa
Support for mobs attacking Republicans
Aiding the tech giants in censoring conservative speech
Continued mass shootings of Blacks in Democrat run cities
Cutting short the prison sentences of drug dealers
Cutting short the prison sentences of crooks even if they had a gun when they were breaking the law
Banning gun ownership through complex and impossible to follow regulations
Gun confiscation
Ending any attempt to stop voter fraud
Do everything possible to make voter fraud easier
Activist judges who believe they can make laws
Embracing the "living" Constitution which means whatever Democrats want it to mean


There are plenty more bad things that Democrats will work for but this is a good starting list.

No matter what a Democrat says when they're running for office they will vote with Schumer and Pelosi; we saw that in the Kavanaugh and Obamacare votes.

The above list is what Schumer and Pelosi stand for so that's what every Democrat will vote for.

If you want to stay free, if you want to have a great economy, if you want America to defend its borders vote for Republicans only next Tuesday.