The many horrible problems with Swetnick's claims against Kavanaugh

One thing we know for sure about the latest accusation against Kavanaugh is that the accuser, Julie Swetnick, is a monstrously evil person.

That sound harsh but it’s true.  If she’s lying then she’s destroying the credibility of woman who have really been raped but if she’s telling the truth she’s admitting to knowing about multiple gang rapes of other women and saying and doing nothing to stop them.

It’s one thing to say that a woman who has been raped might not come forward out of a totally unjustified feeling of shame but it’s quite another to say that it’s ok for a woman who knows that her friends are being gang raped to do nothing; she didn’t call the police, she didn’t tell her parents, she didn’t do anything to help those rape victims at any point in time until her claims became useful to attack a good man who won’t legislate from the bench. According to her claims she ignored the gang rapes of multiple women she knew at multiple parties.  If true that makes her a gender traitor of the first order.

Interestingly she claims no first-hand knowledge of Kavanaughs participation.  She says that he spiked the punch.  Last I heard underage teenagers drinking alchohol when they weren’t supposed to is not 100% correlated with rape. She says that they must have used Quaaludes or something but if that were the case everyone who drank the punch would have been out of it; something she doesn’t mention as being the case. For her story to be true all the girls, and the guys, at the party except the target would have had to know not to drink the punch which in turn would make them all accomplices in the gang rape. That’s hard to believe.

If Kavanaugh was buying large quantities of Quaaludes wouldn’t one of the six background checks that he’s gone through have found some indication of it? After all we had lots of evidence that Obama was using drugs in high school.

Further she’s just guessing that she was drugged since from what we hear about these things when women are drugged with powerful medications they don’t often remember what happened but Swetnick says her memory is fine. She says she must have been drugged because she didn’t fight back that could be the result of too much drinking or it could just be a lie.

Finally if she actually saw Kavanaugh putting drugs in the punch why did she drink it?  Either she saw him doing it at a party that occurred before she was raped in which case she wouldn’t have drunk it at the party she was raped at or she didn’t see him do it until after the party she was raped at which means that after being gang raped by a group of guys she went back to another party held by those same guys where she saw Kavanauh put Quaaludes in the punch.

She admits she wasn’t raped or even assaulted by him but she says she saw him in a line waiting to go into a room to rape a girl.  First note that that means that Swetnick knew a girl was being raped in a room and she did absolutely nothing to stop it.  But second in most houses there aren’t large waiting areas where lines to rape women can form.  If there were more than a few people at the party, which must be the case for gang rapes to be common, then for all Swetnick knew he was just talking to someone near the line because the house was crowded.  She doesn’t say that she saw him enter the room or that the alleged victim told her that Kavanaugh had assaulted her.

Further her claims that Kavanaugh knew about the rapes depends on everyone at all these parties knowing because she’s essentially claiming that his mere presence at these parties means he must have known. But everyone at these parties knew about the gang rapes raises huge problems with Swetnick’s claims.

First if all the girls at the parties knew there were gang rapes why did they keep going to the parties?  A moral degenerate like Avenatti might think that all women like being raped but the reality is few if any teenage girls look forward to being gang raped.  If not all the girls knew how come Swetnick knew?  If Swetnick knew that other girls didn’t know why didn’t she warn them?

Second why have none of the victims or the women who knew about the rapes, and there must have been tens of women with knowledge, come forth?  All we have is Swetnick who kept silent  until after the Kavanaugh hearings were over.

Third why did Swetnick keep going to parties where she knew gang rapes were occurring?  She had to attend at least two, the one where she was raped and the one where she allegedly saw Kavanaugh in line.  Is it more credible to think that Swetnick is lying or that she is such an insane person that after attending a party where one of her friends was gang raped she went to another party involving the same people?

For Swetnick’s claims to be true a lot of women must have known that Kavanaugh was a serial gang rapist. Those women would have talked to other women, “stay away from Kavanaugh”, but instead of seeing that we’ve seen sixty five women who knew him in high school say he was a gentleman. Given the sizes of the schools involved how likely is it that the large number of women who, according to Swetnick, must have know about Kavanaughs dark side wouldn’t have mentioned it to any of those sixty five women? 

Another problem with Swetnick's account is that based on her age she'd have been in college at the time these parties supposedly occurred. A college woman showing up at teen parties would have been something people would have remembered yet the people who would have been going to these parties deny knowing Swetnick.

There is a claim by someone who says they were in a relationship with Swetnick that she threatened him and his family, including his baby, after he broke up with her.  He apparently started the process to get a restraining order on her.  That doesn't mean that she must be lying about Kavanaugh but it's a good reason to question her veracity.

Avenatti is demanding an immediate FBI investigation. Why? The FBI has no jurisdiction and the statute of limitations has run out.  If Swetnick wanted justice she’s had decades to file a police complaint. At the very least we know that it’s not the gang rapes that really bother Swetnick, because if they did she’d have gone public long ago, but the idea that a Judge who won’t impose the leftist agenda on Americans could end judicial tyranny is what bothers her.

Avenatti tells us that because Swetnick has had security clearances we should trust her. The reason people with security clearances are usually trustworthy is that they’ve gone through background investigations. But Avenatti tells us that the six very detailed background investigations Kavanaugh has gone through say nothing about Kavanaugh being trustworthy so why would the far less intense scrutiny Swetnick has gone through prove that she’s not lying?

Further the two previous accusers were at least investigated by the press. True the second accuser’s story was so flawed that even the New York Times wouldn’t publish it but at least the New Yorker tried to talk to people who could corroborate her story.  Swetnick’s claim has been launched solely on the basis of Avenatti’s reliability and honesty.

We know that Avenatti is a liar, a tax cheat, and a lawyer. We also know he owes $10,000,000 to a fellow lawyer and that he’s failed to make the tax payments he promised to which indicates he is in desperate need of money.  On top of all that Avenatti has indicated he’s going to run for President in 2020 as a Democrat.
Combining the fact that if Swetnick is not making this all up she’s someone who was complicit in multiple gang rapes with the obvious dishonesty of Avenatti and toss in the bizarrely convenient timing, Avenatti came up with this “witness” just as the stories of the first two “victims” were falling apart, and it’s clear that this is just another left wing lie.