It has been a good summer for the Democratic Socialists of America.
On June 20, members of the organization’s Metro D.C. chapter confronted Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen at a Mexican restaurant downtown, chasing her out and making national news.
That's right; according to the WaPo hate group chasing a government official out of a private dinner is a good thing.
The hypocrisy here is staggering. As I recall back when the Tea Party was protesting at politicians town hall meetings we were told by the left that it was bad yet here the WaPo says that harassing a government official at a private dinner is "good".
Nielsen is not some monster; unlike Obama she doesn't advocate for letting babies born alive after a failed abortion to be left to die.
And we all know that if conservatives did the same thing to say John Brennan the WaPo would not label it good.
It's clear that the WaPo hates anyone related to Trump, including those who voted for him. Which means that it's also clear that absolutely nothing the WaPo publishes can ever be trusted until it's cooperated from non-hating sources.
If the paper believes that it's ok to harass government employee's in their private lives then it's unlikely that the paper would be bothered about lying about Trump in order to overturn the 2016 election.
Vile haters like the WaPo are unlikely to conform to decent moral standards, like not lying, when the object of their hate is involved. After all what actions can't a leftist, someone who generally subscribes to relative rather than objective morality and who is comfortable with the end justifying the means, support if it leads to what they define as the greater good?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment