Would Democrats punish Iran if Iran assassinated Trump?

Historically Democrats and Republicans united when dealing with foreign threats. We saw that after 9/11 for example.

But today Democrat politicians hate Trump so much it's unclear if they'd be bothered if Trump was assassinated by Iran.

The way the Democrat base, the #FakeNew media, and Democrat politicians have reacted to Trump killing the head of ISIS and now archterrorist mastermind Suleimani it's unclear that they wouldn't blame Trump and excuse Iran if Iran killed Trump. Unlike their response to the execution of bin Laden Democrat fanatics are castigating Trump and declaring that his motives were bad, his actions were unsound, and that there will be horrible consequences.

After all the DNC is blaming Trump for creating tension in the Middle East for retaliating against the Iranian controlled militia who killed an American.  In Democrat fanatics minds killing an American isn't creating tensions but retaliating for that murder is.

We should not forget the assassination porn that the left has embraced including Kathy Griffin's holding a fake severed Trump head.  Or the fact that senior Democrat politicians have called for mobs to chase Republicans out of restaurants and gas stations.  Similarly the tacit acceptance of Antifa violence against people who don't agree with Democrats show us that modern Democrat fanatics, but not the majority of Democrat voters, are showing very disturbing signs of embracing violence to achieve their ends.

Hence while it's clear that the likes of Pelosi and Schumer would mouth words of regret they and the rest of the Democrat fanatics would do nothing in retaliation.

Whether from fear they'd be next, which is why atheists rarely condemn Islam by the way, or simple gratitude to Iran for doing what impeachment couldn't it's very unlikely that Democrat fanatics would do anything in retaliation.

First they'd preach to us that it was really Trump's fault for killing Suleimani; if he'd just let the guy continue to kill Americans Trump would be alive today.

Then they'd talk about how returning to Obama's policy of appeasement since that clearly worked better; in saying that they'd of course ignore the on-going terrorists attacks against Americans during the time Obama's policies were in place.

And in the end they'd create some fake new crisis to distract we the people and Iran would know that America is weak.

There's actually a precedent for this. Nixon ended the US's direct military involvement in the defense of South Vietnam. But that wasn't good enough for the Democrats. No the Democrats who ran Congress at the time cut off all funding for munitions for the South Vietnamese.

Remember South Vietnam was a democracy, an imperfect one but then so is Chicago, while the North was a Communist dictatorship.  Yet while China and Russia poured weapons into North Vietnam the Democrats in Congress deliberately denied South Vietnam the munitions they needed to defend themselves.

Clearly Democrats have a history of taking revenge on those they don't like.

The left endorses violence against free speech: University of British Columbia

Andy Ngo was scheduled to talk about freedom of speech on campus.

Antifa threatened violence if he was allowed to talk.

UBC canceled Ngo's talk.

Now that's the face of fascism; violence to shut down speech we don't like is great.

Did you know that Soleimani plotted to kill the Saudi Ambassador to the US with a bomb in a DC resteraunt

Way back in 2011 one of Suleimani's underlings met with an FBI informant who the Iranians thought was a Mexican gang member.

Suleimani wanted to kill the Saudi Ambassador to the US by blowing up a restaurant in DC full of Americans.

Keep that in mind when you hear Democrats saying that we shouldn't have killed Suleimani for his attack on our Embassy and for the "big attack" he was plotting when he was killed.

The DNC loves Iran and hates Trump: Suleimani is still dead edition

Ages ago when men were men and giants walked the earth Democrats loved America more than power and would never think of undercutting a Republican Presidents foreign policy.

But today the Democrats are clear that they're on the side of Iran and terrorism if it will help them attack Trump.  That is that Democrat's first loyalty is to their own power and they don't care if we the people are hurt as a result.

The most resent example is how the DNC responded to Trump's killing of the Iranian general responsible for hundreds of American deaths.

The DNC response starts out with this lie:

The attack came amid tensions that started by the US attack on PMF units that killed 28 Iraqi popular forces. 

That's a lie. The tensions started when the Iraqi terrorist militia that obeys Iran killed an American contractor.

But in the mind of Democrats American's dying doesn't mean anything.

What's truly amazing is that Trump has managed to get the Democrats to defend Iran killing Americans.

The left loves Kurds and hates Americans

I'm so old that I can remember a few weeks ago when the entire left and the Democrat party were calling Trump a monster for not wanting to start a war with our NATO ally Turkey to protect a few Kurds.

Yet now those same people are declaring that it's truly monstrous for Trump to have killed a terrorist leader who has the blood of hundreds of Americans on his hands.

Fighting the Turks to defend the Kurds would have inevitably resulted in a war whereas killing Suleimani might result in attacks on US interests.

Yet we're told by the #FakeNews media that standing up to evil is wrong when it involves Iran.

Clearly if the left had been around in 1938 they would have been staunch endorsers of the Munich accords which set the stage for WWII by convincing Hitler that he could conquer countries and not face any consequences.

The reality is that one of two things are going to happen; either the Iranians will talk hard and do nothing or they will do something and they will pay an even higher price.

Either way we're better off with their lead general dead.

But what the left has once again demonstrated is that they love foreigners, like the Kurds, more than they do the Americans Suleimani killed

#FakeNews media loves Iranian terrorists who kill Americans

The New Yorker described Iranian terrorist leader Qasem Suleimani this way:

Suleimani, a flamboyant former construction worker and bodybuilder with snowy white hair, a dapper beard, and arching salt-and-pepper eyebrows...

Can you imagine the New Yorker describing Trump in such a positive way?

Further the article goes on to blame the US for killing Suleimani even though Suleimani has the blood of hundreds of Americans on his hands.

But the strike represented a stunning escalation between Washington and Tehran, and it may well have the reverse effect. Iran almost certainly will want to respond in some lethal form, whether directly or through its powerful network of proxies in the region.

Note that the killing of an American contractor, which was done by groups who Suleimani either controls or has a great influence over, wasn't a "stunning escalation".  Nor was the fact that Suleimani was behind the attack on the American Embassy in Iraq a "stunning escalation".

In the mind of the #FakeNews New Yorker the problem was that Trump held Suleimani responsible for his actions.

The article reflects the left's complete lack of understanding of how to deal with evil men.  You don't negotiate with them; you kill them.  Or to be more precise if they refuse to negotiate and behave in a civilized way you kill them.

Trump has offered Iran a way out of their predicament; Iran just has to behave like any other country and not pay for and plot terrorism around the world.

The New Yorker is all worried that now Iran will retaliate.  But the question the New Yorker doesn't ask is how much worse will Iranian attacks be now that the head of the snake has been cut off than they would have been if we'd let Suleimani continue his war on America, and innocent civilians?

The article also completely misrepresents the what Trump's action means to the Iraqi government:

The U.S. killing of Suleimani and the air strikes on Kata’ib Hezbollah over the weekend are an embarrassment to Iraqi leaders and a challenge to Iraqi sovereignty. They come at a time when Baghdad is gripped by the deepest political crisis since the U.S. invasion ousted Saddam Hussein, in 2003. The Prime Minister, Adel Abdul-Mahdi, a Shiite who spent years in exile in Iran, stepped down and is now playing only a caretaker role.

The reality is that Iraqi's have been attacking Iranian backed forces in Iraq precisely because Iraqi's don't want to be a puppet of Iran.  People in Iran and Iraq are very happy that the Iranians primary agent of oppression has been terminated with extreme prejudice.

The simple reality is that the #FakeNews media hate Trump more than they hate Iranian terrorists who murder Americans.  To them Trump standing up to Iranian imperialism and terrorism is not a defense of America but rather an opportunity to attack Trump.

We see this same attitude in the Democrats. The folks who didn't mind that Obama overthrew the government of Libya and turned Libya into a terrorist resort without consulting Congress and who also were mostly ok with Obama's drone strikes are now all upset that Trump didn't consult with them.

One final note; the title of the article is "The Killing of Qassem Suleimani Is Tantamount to an Act of War"

Apparently the Iranian sponsored attack on the US embassy in Iraq isn't "tantamount to an act of war" nor was the Iranian shooting down of a US drone in international air space nor was Iran's seizing US sailors.

In the mind of the New Yorker only Trump can do anything wrong and no matter what he does its wrong.

It's clear that to the Left the terrorist regime in Iran can do no wrong; which is probably why Obama did nothing to support the Arab Spring in Iran.

Leftist Washington Post labels armed militia members as "protestors"

The left was desperately rooting for Iran to win and kill Americans in our embassy in Baghdad so that they could condemn Trump.

How else can one explain the Washington Post labeling members of a violent militia controlled by Iran "protestors"?

In retaliation for the Trump ordering strikes on the militia after they killed an American Iran ordered the militia to assault our embassy.  That's a military operation not a protest.

It's interesting to remember that the media and team Obama used the same lie about Benghazi.  We now know that the attack on Benghazi wasn't some protest gone bad but a preplanned military operation where terrorists used the low security levels that Hillary created as an opportunity to kill Americans.

But unlike Obama who not only did nothing to help Americans but who lied about it Trump sent in the Marines and as a result there wasn't a repeat of Benghazi.

It's clear that to the left the enemy of my enemy is my friend which is why places like the WaPo will effectively provide cover for Iranian backed terrorists since they, like the terrorists, hate Trump.