Cultural appropriation; one more Leftist tool to make us hate each other

Last year the entire left wing cultural appropriation mob attacked a white high school student for wearing a Chinese style dress to the prom.

What's interesting is that you never see the same mob attack say a Native American for wearing Levi's or Blacks for watching TV shows made by whites. That's because by definition only minorities can have their culture appropriated.  Hence a white girl wearing a Chinese styled dress is evil but a Chinese man owning a McDonalds franchise is great.

The reality is that the whole culture appropriation racket is nothing more than one more leftist attempt to generate hatred between Americans.

Honest and sane people realize that when a white woman wears a Chinese style dress she's complementing Chinese peoples fashion sense.  But how can complementing someone be evil?

The Left can't win if Americans are united and hence it does everything possible to cause us to split into little tribes that all hate each other.  The cultural appropriation lie is one of the Left's attempts to convince anyone who isn't white that white's hate them and are exploiting them.

The very fact that cultural appropriation is only bad if it's done by white people shows the bigotry and hatred of the Left.  What other sin do you know of that is only bad when done by one race?  Murder, rape, theft, hatred are all bad no matter what the race of the person committing the crime; Mao's mass murder is just as bad as Hitlers even though Hitler was white and Mao was Chinese.

But making sins dependent on race is a standard technique for the Left; that way they can condemn whites while excusing minorities for the exact same actions. For example the Left says that minorities can't be racist.  Hence if some Black men kill a white man because he's white that's not a racist event but if some white men kill a Black man because he's Black that is a racist event in the eyes of the Left.

The "rationale" that the Left uses is that since the minority doesn't have power they can't be racist. The problem is that by that criteria the Democrat founded KKK and neo-Nazi's can't be racist either because neither group has any power--neither group could get their candidate elected to dog catcher much less to any powerful political office.

The truth is that whites use elements of minority culture out of respect and admiration.  We listen to the blues because it's great music and we eat Chinese food because it tastes great.

Even the Left, by its actions, admits that cultural appropriation is complementary. When's the last time you heard the Left condemn whites for becoming Buddhist or wearing a man bun?

Man buns are clearly Chinese in origin since they've been an element of Chinese men's hair style for hundreds of years yet we don't hear the Left declaring that leftists with man buns are evil.

As with most leftist arguments the whole tirade by the Left about cultural appropriation is just an emotional scream of hatred with no rational content.  Using aspects of other cultures is obviously a complement to that culture; no racist Southerner for example would put their hair in corn rows for example.

Next time you're discussing cultural appropriation with some white Buddhist man bun wearing leftist call them out and demand that they become Christian and get a crew cut since they're white.

Trump gives Democrats a chance to stand for free speech

At his very long but very funny and interesting speech to CPAC Trump made a key promise; he will issue an executive order that colleges and universities that don't support free speech will not receive taxpayer dollars.

Historically this would have been both unnecessary and a no brainer; after all didn't the wild leftists at  Berkeley fight for free speech in the 1960s?

The reality however is that the left has never been for free speech for all; instead they've been for leftists.  To the left free speech is about pornography and being able to call for the destruction of America.  It's never been about being able to support Republicans without fear of physical assault or allowing people of faith to not have to participate in gay weddings.

The left's call for free speech has always been a sham. From the beginning their intent was to allow things they wanted to say to be protected and as soon as that was established they planned to silence speech they didn't like.

To the left it's free speech for me and silence for thee. That's why the left defines speech that they don't agree with as hate speech and violence.  While it's unlikely they truly believe this in their hearts their propaganda line is that someone on the right opposing the redefinition of marriage is just as violent as some Antifa member beating that person with a club.

In fact the left justifies the violence by leftists against people who they disagree with by saying that it's ok to use violence to silence speech that is itself violent.

Aside from the fact that this directly rejects the 1st Amendment the position of the left is also problematic since it's the same position that every dictator in history has held; including Hitler and Stalin.

Fascists say that we the people can say whatever we want so long as it's approved of by our ruling elites.  That's precisely the position of Democrat politicians and the left in general today.

Because Democrat politicians hate free speech they will probably argue that forcing schools to allow it is in fact endorsing violence against students--but of course only students who are leftists since students who are conservatives will continue to be silenced and physically attacked--and hence is evil.

What will be interesting is how public the Democrats are willing to be about their fascist nature.  We see Democrats going all out in support of infanticide yet simultaneously working hard through their stooges in the #FakeNews media to keep voters from finding out the truth.  On the other hand Democrats are willing for people to know that they want to kill all the cows and provide a good standard of living for people who are able to but who don't want to work.

I bet they will try and bury their opposition to free speech while doing everything they can to block Trump since they've seen that even though they've tried to keep their support for infanticide out of view there has been a massive swing, especially among young Democrat voters, against abortion for any reason at any time including shortly after birth.

The motto of Cal Tech, taken from the Bible, is that the truth shall set us free.  And if we can get the truth about what Democrat politicians really stand for to we the people it will set us free from the neo-fascist Democrat party for good.

For Democrats #MeToo is really #YouOnly

The state of California has used over $1 million of taxpayer money to settle sexual harassment claims made against Democrat Kamala Harris's subordinates when she was Attorney General of California.

But Harris says she knew nothing about it but she's now "taking responsibility" which means absolutely nothing since when she had the power to do something she never did.

Just as Democrats fully support sexual harassment when the harasser was Bill Clinton or Democrat Fairfax, the Democrat Lieutenant Governor of Virginia, Harris basically gave a pass to men who sexually harassed women so long as those men are important to Democrats getting more power.

But what about the case of Al Franken?  In that case the Democrats gladly condemned Franken because they knew he'd be replaced with an extremely left wing woman and that by pretending to be bothered by Franken's actions they could win Jeff Sessions Senate seat.

There are tons of pictures of Joe Biden being creepy with women but if he turns out to be the Democrats best hope to win in 2020 those will be ignored.

Just more proof that the only moral compass Democrats have always approves of whatever action gets Democrats more power.

The problem with ripping off the rich.

California shows us what Democrats want America to be like.  Things like massive income inequality, amazingly wealthy Google employee's vs average Californians, and rampant poverty show the bankruptcy of Democrat policies.

While California has only 12% of the US population it has 34% of all American welfare recipients.

Now we discover that California is supporting its entire budget on the backs of the top 1% of Californians. While that's great according to Democrats it means that if even a few thousand of those ultra rich people decide to leave California the entire state will become even more insolvent than it is; remember that the state is as much as $900 billion in debt for it's very lavish pension funds for government workers.

By making the state dependent on a tiny group the reality is that the Democrats have created a huge risk for we the people; if the rich move away the state's budget will collapse.

We've already seen this in another Democrat "heaven on earth", New York state. Democrat Governor Cuomo is blaming a $1 billion shortfall in revenues on people leaving the state to go to a state with lower taxes.

Democrats critique of tax cuts both wrong and stupid

Democrats were saying that since average tax refunds were down that the Trump tax cuts weren't helping people.

This demonstrates the either complete dishonesty or the complete ignorance of Democrats about how the tax system works.

When you get a refund it's because you gave the government an interest free loan of your money.  Each week the government takes money out of your paycheck to pay your taxes.  If the government overestimates how much it should take you end up getting the money back as much as a year after the government confiscated it.

That has nothing to do with how much tax you're paying.  The amount of taxes you pay is independent of how much you pay in taxes.

We know that the vast majority of Americans, not just the rich, paid less in taxes last year due to the Trump tax cuts and that's all that matters.

If Democrats didn't know that they shouldn't be allowed to have anything to do with taxes but if they did know it and lied about it they shouldn't be allowed to have anything to do with governing since if they're willing to lie to we the people they're certainly not going to be bothered about passing laws that are good for Democrat politicians but bad for we the people.

Now it turns out that refunds are actually a bit higher than they were before so not only was the Democrat's attack stupid it was also factually incorrect.

Some good news; Berkeley takes action against ideological violence

While the SPLC says that hating someone because you don't like their politics isn't hate the normally radical Berkeley college administration has taken a different stand in at least one case.

A little over a week ago a leftist physically assaulted a conservative student who was manning a Turning Point USA table. The good news is that from the very beginning the school condemned the attack and the attacker has now been arrested.

This is a step in the right direction.

Sadly most of the #FakeNews media failed to provide the coverage of this story that it deserved. Compared to the insane coverage over the fake hate crime that Jussie Smollett reported the media was essentially silent. Clearly if the attacker had been a MAGA hat wearing Trump supporter and the victim a socialist we'd have seen non-stop coverage but because the attacker was a leftists the media mostly stayed silent.

Democrat endorses starving Venezuelans

Famous anti-Semite Democrat Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has said that it's a good thing that Venezuelans be starved since providing food to them is actually a run up to an invasion.

Aside from the fact that Omar clearly liked the socialist dictator of Venezuela it's interesting that she thinks that the people don't want the aid.  She said:

"We’re sending humanitarian aid that is in the guise of, you know, eventually invading this country and the people of the country don’t want us there."

Of course we all know that there are massive shortages of food and medicine in Venezuela so the idea that the people don't want that aid is almost as absurd as the idea that American aid is part of an invasion. The US regularly provides aids to a huge number of countries that we have never invaded.

The fact that Maduro, the current Venezuelan dictator, is using the military to keep aid shipments out is proof that the people would like to not be starving.

Omar provides us with insights as to what the new wave of Socialist Democrats are willing to do to we the people in order to achieve their fascist dream.  If Omar thinks the goal of socialism justifies starvation and poor medical care for the people of Venezuela she probably thinks the same about the Americans; the suffering of the people is no reason not to give the government power over every aspect of citizens lives.